leytonorient Posted June 11 Posted June 11 I have been declined my retirement extension due to a strange issue. I rent from a private landlord. For the first time in many years being here the IO is requesting personal info about my landlord. First they asked for the landlord's title deed on the condo. I obtained that but they did not accept it because the deed was in the bank's name because the landlord has a mortgage. Now they want a copy of the landlord's mortgage contract with the bank to prove he is not a nominee. I already gave the TM 30 which the landlord obviously submitted. The landlord does not want to give out this personal financial info with the bank and I don't blame them. Has anyone else had this kind of issue where immigration is wanting all types of personal info from their landlord? 1 2
scubascuba3 Posted June 11 Posted June 11 The net is closing in on those with nominees, illegal thai proxy shareholders 1 1
Caldera Posted June 11 Posted June 11 Which immigration office is this? We've had similar reports from Chonburi Immigration's Jomtien office recently, it would be interesting to know if it happens elsewhere. 2
Popular Post leytonorient Posted June 11 Author Popular Post Posted June 11 On 6/11/2025 at 11:28 AM, Caldera said: Which immigration office is this? We've had similar reports from Chonburi Immigration's Jomtien office recently, it would be interesting to know if it happens elsewhere. Expand BKK It is unethical to ask someone for their personal financial info. The landlord is not obligated to pass out such documents to tenants. Especially as it is the same landlord that I had last year when I got the extension no problem. 1 1 1
Popular Post Caldera Posted June 11 Popular Post Posted June 11 On 6/11/2025 at 11:56 AM, leytonorient said: BKK It is unethical to ask someone for their personal financial info. The landlord is not obligated to pass out such documents to tenants. Especially as it is the same landlord that I had last year when I got the extension no problem. Expand I agree, that goes way beyond ensuring that you actually stay where you say you stay. The landlord should be obliged to provide their ID, the rental property's house book, the TM30 receipt - and nothing else. 2 4
Rob Browder Posted June 11 Posted June 11 On 6/11/2025 at 10:52 AM, leytonorient said: Has anyone else had this kind of issue where immigration is wanting all types of personal info from their landlord? Expand Yes - but for a marriage-based extension, which they hate doing. This is the first I have heard regarding a retirement-based case. It would seem the agent-money coffers are coming up short, so they are pushing more legit applicants to their agent-buddies. I would try to find an agent who will factor your actually meeting the financials in, and offer a cost short of the 15K (in Bangkok), which bypasses the financial requirements.
Popular Post renaissanc Posted June 13 Popular Post Posted June 13 If you are renting your accommodation, apologize to your landlord and say you'll have to move because of Immigration's requirements. This might make him change his mind. If he still won't help you and you can't talk to his wife (women are more sensible than men in financial matters generally), you will have to decide: shall I move accommodation or leave the country? The answer is obvious. 2 1
FritsSikkink Posted June 13 Posted June 13 On 6/13/2025 at 1:31 AM, renaissanc said: If you are renting your accommodation, apologize to your landlord and say you'll have to move because of Immigration's requirements. This might make him change his mind. If he still won't help you and you can't talk to his wife (women are more sensible than men in financial matters generally), you will have to decide: shall I move accommodation or leave the country? The answer is obvious. Expand The landlord is right, immigration shouldn't ask for this information. 1
timendres Posted June 13 Posted June 13 When I renewed two years ago, the IO insisted on the deed to the condo, as the owner was not in the blue book. (it was her daughter who was registered in the blue book and managing everything for her elderly mother). We produced the deed and all was okay. But it was a small battle over my unwillingness to provide an envelope. This was at CW. 1 1
DrJack54 Posted June 13 Posted June 13 On 6/13/2025 at 7:39 AM, timendres said: But it was a small battle over my unwillingness to provide an envelope. This was at CW. Expand Elaborate
Knight Rider Posted June 13 Posted June 13 Can't you book a hotel and get a TM30 from the hotel to comply with the immigration requirement. 1 1
chilly07 Posted June 15 Posted June 15 On 6/11/2025 at 10:52 AM, leytonorient said: I have been declined my retirement extension due to a strange issue. I rent from a private landlord. For the first time in many years being here the IO is requesting personal info about my landlord. First they asked for the landlord's title deed on the condo. I obtained that but they did not accept it because the deed was in the bank's name because the landlord has a mortgage. Now they want a copy of the landlord's mortgage contract with the bank to prove he is not a nominee. I already gave the TM 30 which the landlord obviously submitted. The landlord does not want to give out this personal financial info with the bank and I don't blame them. Has anyone else had this kind of issue where immigration is wanting all types of personal info from their landlord? Expand Yes Jomtien is asking for copy of landlords ID, copy of landlords land registry for rented property and copy of land registry for their own residence all for a student extension 1
sandyf Posted June 16 Posted June 16 On 6/13/2025 at 3:32 AM, FritsSikkink said: The landlord is right, immigration shouldn't ask for this information. Expand Are you saying immigration shouldn't have the right to ensure extension applicants are not aiding and abetting criminal activity. When I first came here there was a consensus that buying a house through a company with nominee shareholders was the only sensible method. Those that respected the law and did it with their wife were seen as stupid. 1
FritsSikkink Posted June 16 Posted June 16 On 6/16/2025 at 1:18 AM, sandyf said: Are you saying immigration shouldn't have the right to ensure extension applicants are not aiding and abetting criminal activity. When I first came here there was a consensus that buying a house through a company with nominee shareholders was the only sensible method. Those that respected the law and did it with their wife were seen as stupid. Expand No, that isn't what I am saying, read it again.
Caldera Posted June 16 Posted June 16 On 6/16/2025 at 1:18 AM, sandyf said: Are you saying immigration shouldn't have the right to ensure extension applicants are not aiding and abetting criminal activity. When I first came here there was a consensus that buying a house through a company with nominee shareholders was the only sensible method. Those that respected the law and did it with their wife were seen as stupid. Expand That the landlord is an individual (not a company) could be established with the usual documents requested. The additional ones that the OP is being asked for are way over the top.
timendres Posted June 16 Posted June 16 On 6/13/2025 at 9:36 AM, DrJack54 said: Elaborate Expand Not much to say. IO suggested a way to "expedite the process". I declined. The number was absurd. 1
sandyf Posted June 16 Posted June 16 On 6/16/2025 at 2:02 AM, FritsSikkink said: No, that isn't what I am saying, read it again. Expand Quite obvious what you said, and what you meant. Your words "The landlord is right, immigration shouldn't ask for this information."
FritsSikkink Posted June 16 Posted June 16 On 6/16/2025 at 8:47 AM, sandyf said: Quite obvious what you said, and what you meant. Your words "The landlord is right, immigration shouldn't ask for this information." Expand That doesn't make me support illegal ownership. The conditions of somebody's mortgage is none of their business. 1
sandyf Posted June 16 Posted June 16 On 6/16/2025 at 5:34 AM, Caldera said: That the landlord is an individual (not a company) could be established with the usual documents requested. The additional ones that the OP is being asked for are way over the top. Expand You are entitled to your opinion. Immigration is quite entitled to check the landlord is a private individual, and not a company. At the end of the day, the man with the stamp has the last word.
sandyf Posted June 16 Posted June 16 On 6/16/2025 at 8:59 AM, FritsSikkink said: That doesn't make me support illegal ownership. The conditions of somebody's mortgage is none of their business. Expand And what do you think advocating against immigration's right to verify supports.
FritsSikkink Posted June 16 Posted June 16 On 6/16/2025 at 9:12 AM, sandyf said: And what do you think advocating against immigration's right to verify supports. Expand They need to know where you live, how the owner support his finances has nothing to do with that. 1
sandyf Posted June 17 Posted June 17 On 6/16/2025 at 9:19 AM, FritsSikkink said: They need to know where you live, how the owner support his finances has nothing to do with that. Expand So you think they don't need to know if your accommodation is legal or not. You can think what you want, it was those that advocated nominee shareholders, and there was some on this forum, that have created the need for more extensive checking. You cannot blame immigration for the misdeeds of others, but why not take the easy option.
FritsSikkink Posted June 17 Posted June 17 On 6/17/2025 at 1:33 AM, sandyf said: So you think they don't need to know if your accommodation is legal or not. You can think what you want, it was those that advocated nominee shareholders, and there was some on this forum, that have created the need for more extensive checking. You cannot blame immigration for the misdeeds of others, but why not take the easy option. Expand The landlord has a copy of the chanote, a personal bank loan, what his mortgage looks like has NOTHING to do with nominee shareholders. You have shareholders in a company. You have no idea what you are talking about. 2
Rob Browder Posted June 19 Posted June 19 On 6/16/2025 at 1:18 AM, sandyf said: Are you saying immigration shouldn't have the right to ensure extension applicants are not aiding and abetting criminal activity. When I first came here there was a consensus that buying a house through a company with nominee shareholders was the only sensible method. Those that respected the law and did it with their wife were seen as stupid. Expand A lease and landlord's ID should be all that is required. You are applying for an extension of your permitted-stay from immigration - not working as an agent of the revenue dept, or whatever. They can (and sometimes do) come to see you "really live there." And, if they think they landlord is doing something wrong, they can take it up with them - has nothing to do with the applicant living where they say they are. 1
Rob Browder Posted June 19 Posted June 19 On 6/16/2025 at 7:00 AM, timendres said: Not much to say. IO suggested a way to "expedite the process". I declined. The number was absurd. Expand This is what "extra requirements" are always really about. Even some "real" requirements are skipped for agent-envelopes. 1
proton Posted June 19 Posted June 19 On 6/19/2025 at 4:02 AM, Rob Browder said: This is what "extra requirements" are always really about. Even some "real" requirements are skipped for agent-envelopes. Expand At CW as well, said to be squeaky clean and all above board 🤨 1
NanLaew Posted June 19 Posted June 19 On 6/17/2025 at 5:45 AM, FritsSikkink said: The landlord has a copy of the chanote, a personal bank loan, what his mortgage looks like has NOTHING to do with nominee shareholders. You have shareholders in a company. You have no idea what you are talking about. Expand Hypothetical: What if it is a farang landlord who doesn't have a registered company but owns several condominiums that he rents out for his 'living the dream' income here?
sandyf Posted June 19 Posted June 19 On 6/19/2025 at 4:00 AM, Rob Browder said: And, if they think they landlord is doing something wrong, they can take it up with them - has nothing to do with the applicant living where they say they are. Expand Indeed, but if they think there is something not quite right they are quite entitled to make sure the applicant is not involved. There are many on here that would say the applicant is at fault if living in an Airbnb, they would be wrong of course, but that is the reality.
timendres Posted June 21 Posted June 21 On 6/19/2025 at 4:11 AM, NanLaew said: Hypothetical: What if it is a farang landlord who doesn't have a registered company but owns several condominiums that he rents out for his 'living the dream' income here? Expand I am not an expert on this topic. Have only talked to a few "landlords". But I believe that, if the landlord has a valid extension, and they are hiring Thai nationals for any "work" involved, and they are reporting their income to the Thai government and paying taxes, I believe it is all fine. The difficult part is proving you are not "working" if, say, you are on a retirement extension. But one guy I spoke with indicated that he hired Thais for everything, including meeting potential renters and executing all paperwork. Another simply had a management company to handle everything - I believe as part of the development. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now