Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Do you side with Israel? 

 

A better question might have been "do you support further conflict in the Middle East" which I would have answered NO

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Only because you could not answer yes to supporting Irael, and you do not want to admit you support Hamas and Iran. 

 

 

 

You're right, I do not support Israel, or any other combatants anywhere on planet Earth.

Posted
34 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

It will not be carpet bombing, but pinpoint attacks with bunker busting bombs delivered by B2 stealth bombers.  While Iran has said they will build even deeper facilities next to Nantanz the construction can be interrupted on a regular basis.  

Thats the Grand Finale. Once everything else is a flaming ruin and the skies are clear, C-17 drops a Bunker Buster. Dont need a B52.

 

Natanz is already smoking and burning

Posted

I wonder when Israel makes these decisions if they ever even consider the concept of blowback and whether or not this will come back to haunt them in the long run. I'm not supportive of the Iranian government on any level, and I think they're up to no good but there are methods and then there is madness. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Thats the Grand Finale. Once everything else is a flaming ruin and the skies are clear, C-17 drops a Bunker Buster. Dont need a B52.

 

Natanz is already smoking and burning

The 

 

6 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Thats the Grand Finale. Once everything else is a flaming ruin and the skies are clear, C-17 drops a Bunker Buster. Dont need a B52.

 

Natanz is already smoking and burning

The 30,000 pound GPU-57A/B MOP can only be delivered by heavy bombers such as the B2 Spirit.  This weapon is larger than the 2 previous Bunker Busters.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Social Media said:

Statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense. President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.”


Rubio’s “unilateral” claim is already falling apart.

Israeli official to 'Jerusalem Post': 'There was full and complete coordination with the Americans'

'A senior U.S. intelligence official says the U.S. provided real-time reconnaissance support to Israel
before, during, and after the ongoing strikes—using secure channels to coordinate every step'.
@AvivaKlompas.

You help plan the heist, supply the getaway car, and provide the map—and you’re only a bystander?

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-857590

https://x.com/AvivaKlompas/status/1933343192633782764

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

I wonder when Israel makes these decisions if they ever even consider the concept of blowback and whether or not this will come back to haunt them in the long run. I'm not supportive of the Iranian government on any level, and I think they're up to no good but there are methods and then there is madness. 

 

Put Israel to the side and have a look at international air traffic. The current  air routes are packed.

Iran and Iraq have closed their airspace.

Overflights of Pakistan and parts of India are restricted because of the conflict between the two.

Airspace over Russia is restricted for many airlines

Much of Ukraine airspace is closed

Afghanistan airspace is avoided.

Armenia and Azerbaijan airspace is restricted  due to threat of  conflict.

Israel airspace is restricted

Jordan airspace is restricted.

 

As soon as Iran launches missiles, Gulf Arab airspace will close.

Cyprus airspace will close

Turkiye airspace will be restricted.

 

Good luck on flying to  Europe & UK via  many carriers

 

Guess who is not happy? Russia. Its drone and munitions supplier will be out of business for a while.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

Guess who is not happy? Russia. Its drone and munitions supplier will be out of business for a while.

 

Good, it's about time someone has put a stop to the rogue state supplying weapons to terrorists.

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

The 

 

The 30,000 pound GPU-57A/B MOP can only be delivered by heavy bombers such as the B2 Spirit.  This weapon is larger than the 2 previous Bunker Busters.

Better check.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

Guess who is not happy? Russia. Its drone and munitions supplier will be out of business for a while.

Bet you know who is happy? Ukraine.

 

Thats surely causes a conundrum for the pro Ukraine anti semite crowd.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, LosLobo said:


Rubio’s “unilateral” claim is already falling apart.

Israeli official to 'Jerusalem Post': 'There was full and complete coordination with the Americans'

'A senior U.S. intelligence official says the U.S. provided real-time reconnaissance support to Israel
before, during, and after the ongoing strikes—using secure channels to coordinate every step'.
@AvivaKlompas.

You help plan the heist, supply the getaway car, and provide the map—and you’re only a bystander?

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-857590

https://x.com/AvivaKlompas/status/1933343192633782764

 

 

Hearsay, and uncorroborated.  USA was advised by Israel that Israel was going to strike. That was the coordination. Some arab countries were aware of the pending attack as well. Israel has its own satellites. The USA  did not facilitate  this  pre-emptive strike.

The President warned Iran and the world that this would happen. Listen to his statement  from his presser at Les Miserables. He said that iran should not have a nuclear weapon. The IAEA report showed that Iran was hiding nuclear materials and lying about it.

The USA could only do so much to try and convince Iran to stop its pursuit of a nuclear arsenal. All the USA did was to get out of the way. Trump stopped Israel previously asking it to give negotiations time. Well, Iran acted in bad faith and this is the result.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Bet you know who is happy? Ukraine.

Thats surely causes a conundrum for the pro Ukraine anti semite crowd.

 

I don't think being supportive of the Ukraine  means one is an anti semite. Granted the Ukrainians didn't have a  stellar history in WWII, but  at least they are not slaughtering  them in the streets like they used to do 100 years ago.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Patong2021 said:

 

I don't think being supportive of the Ukraine  means one is an anti semite. Granted the Ukrainians didn't have a  stellar history in WWII, but  at least they are not slaughtering  them in the streets like they used to do 100 years ago.

I think he is referring to the hard leftists that support Ukraine and are anti-Israel. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

I believe Israel has weighed the possible repercussions and feels they are much better than facing nuclear annihilation.

 

If they're as smart as I hope they are, they already have a bunch of moderate Iranians onboard who will take over the reins of power when the zealots are gone.

 

Back in the late '70s and early '80s I studied and then worked with quite a few Iranians in Oil, and they were smart and very moderate.  I suspect that's true of many Iranians who will be glad when the zealots are gone.  But there's no way they could drive them out without the US or Israel backing them.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

If they're as smart as I hope they are, they already have a bunch of moderate Iranians onboard who will take over the reins of power when the zealots are gone.

 

Back in the late '70s and early '80s I studied and then worked with quite a few Iranians in Oil, and they were smart and very moderate.  I suspect that's true of many Iranians who will be glad when the zealots are gone.  But there's no way they could drive them out without the US or Israel backing them.

 

 

It's these moderate Iranians that have been collaborating with  Israeli intelligence.  I agree, once the regime falls they will step in to take over.  They will have the support of a population that welcomes change.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

If they're as smart as I hope they are, they already have a bunch of moderate Iranians onboard who will take over the reins of power when the zealots are gone.

 

Back in the late '70s and early '80s I studied and then worked with quite a few Iranians in Oil, and they were smart and very moderate.  I suspect that's true of many Iranians who will be glad when the zealots are gone.  But there's no way they could drive them out without the US or Israel backing them.

 

 

I completely agree, I think the vast majority of Iranians are very moderate, they despise the government and the Ayatollah, and they would like nothing more than to see them gone. Whether or not that makes Israel's decision to attack a wise one will be borne out over time. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

It is impossible to even conceive that Israel would make a choice like this without the blessing of the US, and it is also impossible to consider the possibility that Trump would be rational enough to say no. 

Off course.  This will get Trump off the hook for his failed negotiation.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...