Will there ever be a safe vaccine?

[simon43]

3 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

You say you are a scientist eh Simon. Yet you post absolute nonsense (above). I reckon you are just a chancer.

 

A virus is dead cell debris. It is inert. Does not, and cannot cause anything. If it has a role at all, it is probably to aid elimination of dead cells. It is only pathogenic in a computer.

 

As for you believing in the immune system, well I don't. I prefer to believe the body has a defence system. And part of that is a maintenance section, that is working 24/7/365, to keep us in good order. If we look after it, the body can self heal, eliminate undesirable entities and keep all aspects the body in good trim.

 

 

A virus is dead cell debris??!!  Go back to school!  A virus is not and never was a living organism.  It is a pathogen that 'hides' in living cells and replicates when the cell replicates.

[kwilco]

OP - what do you think you will achieve?

[newbee2022]

10 hours ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

 A large herd of pigs was feeding on the nearby hillside.  The demons begged Jesus, “Send us among the pigs; allow us to go into them.” He gave them permission, and the impure spirits came out and went into the pigs. The herd, about two thousand in number, rushed down the steep bank into the lake and were drowned.

 

"No, ma'am, your husband didn't die of dysentery........he was possessed, therefore we'll have to deny your claim.  Amen!"

Show me the herd of pigs here on AN 😁🐷🐷🐷

[xylophone]

https://www.who.int/news/item/24-04-2024-global-immunization-efforts-have-saved-at-least-154-million-lives-over-the-past-50-years

 

Of course, according to the sad nut jobs on AN all of this isn't true. 

 

 

[xylophone]

More reading for the intelligent folk on AN.....

 

Vaccines have saved 150 million children over the last 50 years. Every ten seconds, one child is saved by a vaccine against a fatal disease.

 

Open and read...............https://ourworldindata.org/vaccines-children-saved

By: Hannah Ritchie

May 06, 2024

[rattlesnake]

4 hours ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

If you don't think viruses make you sick here is a link to a site that explains it. It's from a company called Pfizer. No need for thanks. 

https://www.pfizer.com/news/articles/how_do_viruses_make_us_sick#:~:text=How the immune system reacts,works to destroy invasive microbes.

 

Is that the same Pfizer which was fined $2.3 billion for marketing a drug with the intent to deceive and mislead the public? Just checking as it is my understanding we are into "reliable sources" on this forum.

 

Pfizer Hit with Largest Criminal Fine in US History

https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/pfizer-hit-with-largest-criminal-fine-in-us-history/

[Magictoad]

Yes. There are dozens if not hundreds. The poster should grow up and stop using this forum for anti-vax conspiracy  theories. It's not just childish; it's actually dangerous.

[rattlesnake]

4 hours ago, kwilco said:

...and there you have it! "Ask yourself why this paper isn’t covered by the mainstream media…”
That line is a giant red flag. It’s a tired cliché often used by anti-vaxxers and conspiracy theorists to prop up dodgy science. If a paper has real merit, it stands up to peer review—not just YouTube comments. The phrase is just a classic deflection. It’s not censorship—it’s usually because the "study" is low-quality, unreviewed, or outright bunk. Real science gets traction through evidence, not echo chambers.

 

The paper is from NEJM, which a prominent pro-vaxxer of this forum has cited as a quality, reliable source in this very thread. If you guys actually put your money where your mouths are, you would read and assess it dispassionately, instead of coming up with increasingly convoluted (and quite frankly, amusing) reasons to preemptively dismiss it.

 

As for media coverage (or lack thereof), you should definitely be asking yourself these critical questions. I'll let the Secretary of Health and Human Services explain it to you. Oh but wait, he's 'insane', isn't he? Can't watch that then, can we? Let's stick to typing "Are vaccines safe?" on Grok!

 

"All the major institutions of our society have been captured by the (medical) industry.

[…]

They advertise because they wanna control the content. If you look at Anderson Cooper or Lester Holt or Jake Tapper, their paycheck is being paid by the network but their salaries are actually coming from pharmaceutical companies, and they know that.

And they know that they've got to toe the line and they've got the frighten us about infectious diseases. They've got to make us all comply with the pharmaceutical mandates, and they're not giving us real news. They're not asking the questions that they ought to be asking. There's no skepticism.

And if you look at these new shows, like twenty years ago, they were saying, yeah, there are problems with vaccines or these other drugs.

They will never do that today."

 

 

 

[Lacessit]

7 hours ago, simon43 said:

 

A virus is dead cell debris??!!  Go back to school!  A virus is not and never was a living organism.  It is a pathogen that 'hides' in living cells and replicates when the cell replicates.

Don't waste your time. The poster you are responding to is an idiot.

[Lacessit]

5 hours ago, Magictoad said:

Yes. There are dozens if not hundreds. The poster should grow up and stop using this forum for anti-vax conspiracy  theories. It's not just childish; it's actually dangerous.

I have lost count of the "Dr. Kevin Stillwagon says..." threads. Surely the mods could put a stop to the regurgitation.

 

I'm torn between a horsewhip and a lobotomy for people who deliberately spread misinformation.

[newbee2022]

17 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

Approx 1 in 10.000 of all vaccines administered worldwide are 'therapeutic', i.e. meant to treat the symptoms of a disease after it manifested already.  And those approved treatment vaccines are mainly for treating cancers, while experimental and clinical trials are ongoing for other diseases.  The success rate of the approved treatment vaccines is - unsurprisingly - quite low in spite of the billions of $ spend on research in that area.  On reading dr Stillwagon's article you will also understand why. 

 

Also, when people are sick and receive medicine/treatment that cures them they can speak from personal experience.  But it always strikes me that the majority of people that roll up their sleeve for a so-called 'preventive' vaccine (and that's 99,99 % of all vaccines administered) are totally convinced of their beneficial effect.  Big Pharma propaganda has done an amazing job in firmly installing that belief in people, even to such an extent that when the jabbees do get the disease that the vaccine claims to prevent that they then sing to the tune of 'it would have been worse, had I not gotten the shots'.  

Covid-19 being a case in point, with many multi-jabbed people getting Covid every time after their 'protective' booster-jab.  And they are still defending that harmful, ineffective and totally unnecessary practice against the stupid 'anti-vaxxers' that are not part of the jabbee cult.  

See a shrink. 😱

[gamb00ler]

15 hours ago, Dcheech said:

Dr. Kevin Stillwagon, a chiropractor for more than 40 years and a pilot for more than 3 decades who left his career as a pilot due to mask mandates ...

A chiropractor?!!       Why is it always Chiropractors? 

It's very common for personality traits to closely correlate to their chosen profession.  It may be that chiropractors tend to overestimate the breadth and applicability of their knowledge and consequently stray out of their lane.

 

Wikipedia's definition of chiropractic medicine describes it as based on pseudoscience.  That may be a bit harsh.

 

You'll find a lot of chiropractors on YTube making videos on subjects that are in areas of knowledge that are outside of what they normally study.