Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, darbie-foos said:

 

 

The Israel Atomic Energy Commission found the attacks to have been a success. Thanks for that astounding piece of news. You should be a journalist.

  • Agree 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

I cant help the name I was born with, you however deliberately chose your racist, America hating, sexually disturbed troll persona.

Yes, I'm sure that's your real name. Now the snake bit,  that I definitively believe.

Posted
15 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Yes, I'm sure that's your real name. Now the snake bit,  that I definitively believe.

Cool and we are sure you are a troll.

Posted
19 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

 

The Israel Atomic Energy Commission found the attacks to have been a success. Thanks for that astounding piece of news. You should be a journalist.

haters like you will always relish the taste of each and every turd sandwich Trumps MAGA WINNING stuffs down your pathetic pie hole. must suck being so envious of Trumps immense success compared to the mentally retarded Biden and his nonstop bone head failures. Get a life loser,or forever be a woke laughed at democrat failure.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

JD, where is it? The plot thickens.

 

JD Vance Confronted on Fox TV Over Mystery of Iran’s Uranium

 

"JD Vance ducked a Fox News host’s question on the whereabouts of Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpiles, after suggesting a day earlier they could have been moved.

 There is evidence, Israeli officials told The New York Times, that Iranians shifted 880 pounds of uranium enriched to 60 percent purity before the U.S. strikes."

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Cool and we are sure you are a troll.

I'm utterly devastated.

Now, a reminder of the topic:

 

Early assessment suggests US strikes didn’t destroy Iran’s nuclear sites

Posted
2 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

I'm utterly devastated.

Now, a reminder of the topic:

 

Early assessment suggests US strikes didn’t destroy Iran’s nuclear sites

Why, its just another troll.

Posted
7 minutes ago, darbie-foos said:

haters like you will always relish the taste of each and every turd sandwich Trumps MAGA WINNING stuffs down your pathetic pie hole. must suck being so envious of Trumps immense success compared to the mentally retarded Biden and his nonstop bone head failures. Get a life loser,or forever be a woke laughed at democrat failure.

illisdean, are you back after your holiday?

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Trump will just continue to lie that it was an enormous success.

It was a success because it showed US resolve and capability. It demonstrated that the USA can and will act if necessary. Iran's dictatorship got the message. Next time they will be turned to rubble.

 

Maybe the  mission did not destroy the capability, or maybe it did. I suggest that the people who are saying it did not, are advocating for more bombing.

Posted
33 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

 

The Israel Atomic Energy Commission found the attacks to have been a success. Thanks for that astounding piece of news. You should be a journalist.

No the journo bit is done by the media. 

 

The Israeli government's nuclear authority says US and Israeli strikes on Iran have rendered the Fordo underground enrichment site "inoperable".

In a statement the Israel Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) says the "devastating" strike "destroyed the site's critical infrastructure".

"We assess that the American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other elements of Iran's military nuclear program, has set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years," it says.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c20xel1e97gt?post=asset%3A36835929-e53c-4b06-8d4f-05df5794627e#post

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

It was a success because it showed US resolve and capability. It demonstrated that the USA can and will act if necessary. Iran's dictatorship got the message. Next time they will be turned to rubble.

 

Maybe the  mission did not destroy the capability, or maybe it did. I suggests that the people who are saying it did not, are advocating for more bombing.

"It was a success because it showed US resolve and capability"

Let's agree to disagree whether that is a metric that can measure success in such a specific mission. 

 

"It demonstrated that the USA can and will act if necessary. Iran's dictatorship got the message."

Iran's Mullah's have been given countless messages over the years. I doubt they'll ever get "the message".

 

"Maybe the  mission did not destroy the capability, or maybe it did. I suggests that the people who are saying it did not, are advocating for more bombing."

Haven's seen anyone categorically saying the attack was a complete failure. I've seen lots saying categorically it was a complete success, though.

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

No the journo bit is done by the media. 

 

The Israeli government's nuclear authority says US and Israeli strikes on Iran have rendered the Fordo underground enrichment site "inoperable".

In a statement the Israel Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) says the "devastating" strike "destroyed the site's critical infrastructure".

"We assess that the American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other elements of Iran's military nuclear program, has set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years," it says.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c20xel1e97gt?post=asset%3A36835929-e53c-4b06-8d4f-05df5794627e#post

Hopefully they're right, but serious doubt exists.

Posted
2 hours ago, BLMFem said:

Quoting Sane Stream Media sources is trolling?😄

 

CNN & MSNBC...yeah OK then, glad to see Trump called them 'scum' to their faces. Because they are.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Hypothetically Iran builds, buys or is given nuclear bombs/weapons, Israel allegedly has nuclear bombs/weapons, both sides hate one another with a passion, whoever fires first is guaranteed to get the same back at them, millions of people die and the whole area is turned into a wasteland.

 

Anyone know how much has been spent by all sides to get where we are today?

 

The lot of them are braindead, millions around the World starving, in poverty and dying, giving me the right hump, crazy bastards.

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

If you watched it then you know you know what was leaked was an early assessment with very low confidence. This leaked assessment is what you've based this thread on. All you can do is display your derangement for Trump and not address anything in the video. 

He is the biggest troll on AN, dont give it the time of day

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Patong2021 said:

It was a success because it showed US resolve and capability. It demonstrated that the USA can and will act if necessary. Iran's dictatorship got the message. Next time they will be turned to rubble.

 

Maybe the  mission did not destroy the capability, or maybe it did. I suggest that the people who are saying it did not, are advocating for more bombing.

It's not that simple.

 

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BLMFem said:

"It was a success because it showed US resolve and capability"

Let's agree to disagree whether that is a metric that can measure success in such a specific mission. 

 

"It demonstrated that the USA can and will act if necessary. Iran's dictatorship got the message."

Iran's Mullah's have been given countless messages over the years. I doubt they'll ever get "the message".

 

"Maybe the  mission did not destroy the capability, or maybe it did. I suggests that the people who are saying it did not, are advocating for more bombing."

Haven's seen anyone categorically saying the attack was a complete failure. I've seen lots saying categorically it was a complete success, though.

 

There are some very biased opinions offered as "fact". A failure because there is no  scorched earth evidence of total destruction, or a success because the  nuclear weapons source sites were hit with ease. I measure success on the basis of it showing that the USA was not isolationist and that finally, someone other than Israel said no to the deranged mullahs.It is a regime that hangs teenagers in public squares for the crime of being gay, that beats and blinds women for going without a hijab, thatcruelly kills companion dogs because dogs are considered harem, and where millions come out to chant death to those who oppose shiite  violence. The Iranians may have shocked the region's arabs into realizing that there  can be no accommodating Iran. It was wonderful seeing the Qataris panic at the sight of missiles overhead. Finally, they get an idea of what they have been financing for decades. On one hand we have people complaining that Trump bombed Iran, but  then those same people complain that the destruction was not  intense enough. Nothing trump does will satisfy them.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, darbie-foos said:

Be advised of the following,

 

Oh dear, the original "mango Mussolini pose".

 

Reality: he is a fat, spray tanned, amoral, narcissist in his late 70s who has lied and cheated for his entire personal, business and political life.

 

The world is laughing at you 'merica!

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Patong2021 said:

A failure because there is no  scorched earth evidence of total destruction, or a success because the  nuclear weapons source sites were hit with ease.

Ah but! Look at before and after images and scorched earth is exactly what you can seen. There were 12 massive bombs that exploded deep underground,

Images: Maxar Technologies. Fordow.

image.jpeg.87865ec44695cb096a1713d863da9202.jpeg

image.jpeg.89e0a4f9684eb9a0ebffa790ed5e98bc.jpeg

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Purdey said:

Looks like the Fat Man sang too soon. Obi Wan says: "The need to boast is strong in this one."

Mind you, Bush was no better with his Mission Accomplished announcement.

Exactly, who would expect "The Sophomore" as I like to call him to be any less bombastic and quick to coat his under achievements with Gold paint. Anybody who owns a house full of gold toilets should not be president. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...