22 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Incoming court case.

Lost, they are banned and as of now officially a proscribed Terrorist Group

 

Palestine Action to be banned as terrorist organisation at midnight – after losing late legal challenge
The protest group is set to be added to the list of proscribed terrorist groups from midnight.

https://news.sky.com/story/palestine-action-loses-bid-to-gain-temporary-block-on-government-ban-13392244

3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Lost, they are banned and as of now officially a proscribed Terrorist Group

 

Palestine Action to be banned as terrorist organisation at midnight – after losing late legal challenge
The protest group is set to be added to the list of proscribed terrorist groups from midnight.

https://news.sky.com/story/palestine-action-loses-bid-to-gain-temporary-block-on-government-ban-13392244

 

@RayC

 

A real time example, of where I previously tried to advise you that the UK Judiciary will never rule against the UK Government on matters of National Security or matters of Domestic Terrorism.

 

You, and google, apparently know better 😀😀

1 hour ago, The Cyclist said:

 

@RayC

 

A real time example, of where I previously tried to advise you that the UK Judiciary will never rule against the UK Government on matters of National Security or matters of Domestic Terrorism.

 

You, and google, apparently know better 😀😀

 

And thus the broad brush of "national security" has been applied, much to the detriment of national security.

2 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

And thus the broad brush of "national security" has been applied, much to the detriment of national security.

 

Not sure how you come to that conclusion.

 

In days of old, when men were bold and sheep were scared, trespassers on Military property could, and were shot.

 

People like the Palestine Action Group should go forth and multiply to Palestine, where, no doubt, they will be greeted with love and affection.

 

The same applies to any other group, who need to spark up outrage buses, for any other cause, that is outside the UK and outside the UK's jurisdiction.

 

Good on you, if you are happy with £ Billions of your tax money being spunked up a wall, clearing up the devastation that these clowns leave in their wake. I'm not, and I am pretty certain, that millions of other taxpayers feel exactly the same way.

 

Want to be part of the PAG, Palestine awaits you with open arms.

11 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Not sure how you come to that conclusion.

 

In days of old, when men were bold and sheep were scared, trespassers on Military property could, and were shot.

 

People like the Palestine Action Group should go forth and multiply to Palestine, where, no doubt, they will be greeted with love and affection.

 

The same applies to any other group, who need to spark up outrage buses, for any other cause, that is outside the UK and outside the UK's jurisdiction.

 

Good on you, if you are happy with £ Billions of your tax money being spunked up a wall, clearing up the devastation that these clowns leave in their wake. I'm not, and I am pretty certain, that millions of other taxpayers feel exactly the same way.

 

Want to be part of the PAG, Palestine awaits you with open arms.

If you’re not happy you do have the right to protest.

 

Well, at least for now you do.

37 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

If you’re not happy you do have the right to protest.

 

Well, at least for now you do.

 

Mentalists like you cannot see the difference between protest, and when it spills over into much more than protest.

 

And attacks on UK Forces Bases,  whether that be by criminal damage, shootings, bombings are acts of Terrorism.

 

Shove that in your Pally flag and smoke it.

2 hours ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Not sure how you come to that conclusion.

 

In days of old, when men were bold and sheep were scared, trespassers on Military property could, and were shot.

 

People like the Palestine Action Group should go forth and multiply to Palestine, where, no doubt, they will be greeted with love and affection.

 

The same applies to any other group, who need to spark up outrage buses, for any other cause, that is outside the UK and outside the UK's jurisdiction.

 

Good on you, if you are happy with £ Billions of your tax money being spunked up a wall, clearing up the devastation that these clowns leave in their wake. I'm not, and I am pretty certain, that millions of other taxpayers feel exactly the same way.

 

Want to be part of the PAG, Palestine awaits you with open arms.

 

You mean in days of old when my taxes were spent on ensuring the BASIC INTEGRITY of the armed forces bases?

 

Palestine Action, and other pathetic, keffiyeh-wearing oxygen wasters like them, have benefitted immeasurably from this OTT knee-jerk from an idiot of a Home Secretary. When you ban something, it's exclusivity is enhanced and when it comes to these wing nuts, draws in the more radicalised and extreme.

 

But it's good to see you're all for toeing the line back home. The thin end of the wedge should never hurt much.

15 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

You mean in days of old when my taxes were spent on ensuring the BASIC INTEGRITY of the armed forces bases?

 

Mine, yours and every other taxpayers money went to fund the Defence Budget.

 

The basic integrity of Armed Forces Bases, was maintained by Servicemen, Armed where neccessary according to the threat, and would shoot to kill, if it was warranted.

 

15 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Palestine Action, and other pathetic, keffiyeh-wearing oxygen wasters like them, have benefitted immeasurably from this OTT knee-jerk from an idiot of a Home Secretary. When you ban something, it's exclusivity is enhanced and when it comes to these wing nuts, draws in the more radicalised and extreme.

 

Makes it easier to identify them, revoke visa's and deport them, as and when they show themselves.

 

Alternatively, the utter mongs could start up their outrage buses and go to Palestine and show their support and solidarity in Palestine, which would be the sensible thing to do.

 

@Chomper Higgot could lead the convey, although I doubt he could lead a group of kids to McDonalds.

 

15 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

But it's good to see you're all for toeing the line back home. The thin end of the wedge should never hurt much.

 

Not sure where you are, but where I am, it is currently 1210 hrs, and I will be shortly having lunch. I am not toeing any line.

 

If mongs wish to wreck their lives in the UK by supporting a cause that is back all to do with either them, or the UK, who am I to try and discourage them.

 

Actions have consequences. Something that has increasing vanished in the Uk over the last 30 years or so. So yes, Even though it is a Labour government, I am happy that they are cracking down it.

 

 

On 7/4/2025 at 2:22 AM, mikeymike100 said:

Doesn't make sense that these people vote against proscribing 'Palestine Action' a terrorist organization?

So you can't disagree with Government anymore?

The right of protest is being eroded law by law

1 minute ago, Negita43 said:

So you can't disagree with Government anymore?

The right of protest is being eroded law by law

But they are not protesting about something in the country they are in.

 

To many foreign factions in the UK.........🤗

5 minutes ago, transam said:

But they are not protesting about something in the country they are in.

 

A fact that is wilfully ignored, or some people are too dense to understand.

5 minutes ago, Negita43 said:

So you can't disagree with Government anymore?

The right of protest is being eroded law by law

You can disagree with the Government and peacefully protest, unless you are are supporting terrorists!

Why don't they protest in their own country?

Just now, mikeymike100 said:

Why don't they protest in their own country?

Where are you from?

41 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Mine, yours and every other taxpayers money went to fund the Defence Budget.

 

The basic integrity of Armed Forces Bases, was maintained by Servicemen, Armed where neccessary according to the threat, and would shoot to kill, if it was warranted.

 

 

Makes it easier to identify them, revoke visa's and deport them, as and when they show themselves.

 

Alternatively, the utter mongs could start up their outrage buses and go to Palestine and show their support and solidarity in Palestine, which would be the sensible thing to do.

 

@Chomper Higgot could lead the convey, although I doubt he could lead a group of kids to McDonalds.

 

 

Not sure where you are, but where I am, it is currently 1210 hrs, and I will be shortly having lunch. I am not toeing any line.

 

If mongs wish to wreck their lives in the UK by supporting a cause that is back all to do with either them, or the UK, who am I to try and discourage them.

 

Actions have consequences. Something that has increasing vanished in the Uk over the last 30 years or so. So yes, Even though it is a Labour government, I am happy that they are cracking down it.

 

 

Please leave me out of your fetid fantasies.

 

 

On 7/4/2025 at 7:58 AM, JonnyF said:

No surprise from this clown.

 

What a disgrace this woman is. 

Somebody needs to start a grassroots campaign to enact legislation to ban

the keffiyeh scarf , its symbolizing  terrorism,

it has a Swastika  effect.

https://www.washingtonjewishweek.com/keffiyeh-as-neo-swastika-fashion-statement/

Cringeworthy Dianne Abbott..................🤥

 

 

12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Please leave me out of your fetid fantasies.

 

 

 

Take a hint and stop spouting kack then.

 

Then people will have no reason to play pokeamong.

We could always ask Donny to make room for her in his new Alligator hotel now he and Kier are besties.

15 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Take a hint and stop spouting kack then.

 

Then people will have no reason to play pokeamong.

 

If you don’t like reading views you disagree with feel free to ignore them.

Certainly don’t link my username in your posts, unless of course you are craving for attention.

 

On 7/4/2025 at 12:01 PM, proton said:

She said on TV that on balance Chairman Mao did more good than harm. He was responsible for about 60 million deaths!

I saw that interview, Michael Portillo was sat next to her, his reaction when she said this was epic!!

https://youtu.be/uB4o5n2EGyA?si=SIOPA9lCZ3ENJVNv

15 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

If you don’t like reading views you disagree with feel free to ignore them.

Certainly don’t link my username in your posts, unless of course you are craving for attention.

 

 

Was this you, quoting me, or did someone hack your account ?
 

3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

If you’re not happy you do have the right to protest.

 

Well, at least for now you do.

 

Face / mirror interface, with a larger dash of self awareness required. Again

8 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Was this you, quoting me, or did someone hack your account ?
 

 

Face / mirror interface, with a larger dash of self awareness required. Again

Responding to a post is not the same thing as linking a username in a post.

 

You do it often enough, you ought to have grasped the distinction.

 

 

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Responding to a post is not the same thing as linking a username in a post.

 

Don't respond to a post where you do not like the message or will not like the response.

 

QED

 

Anyway, howl away to your hearts content I believe the Palestine Action Group official become a proscribed terrorist organisation about 8 hours ago.

 

Bummer.

Just now, The Cyclist said:

 

Don't respond to a post where you do not like the message or will not like the response.

 

QED

 

Anyway, howl away to your hearts content I believe the Palestine Action Group official become a proscribed terrorist organisation about 8 hours ago.

 

Bummer.

But I haven’t claimed I don’t like the message, or referred to them as, what’s that term you used?, ‘kack’.

 

Consistent with the idea of a ‘discussion forum’ I offer my personal views.

 

If that’s alright with you?!

 

(Not that it needs to be).

 

 

 

 

She is a  f#t sl@g who used to sleep with Jeremy Corbyn who has just formed a new Independent Party I which expect her to join.

 

She is typical of those who have been elected to their position of authority due to DEI no talent or intelligence. Diversity 

Equity & Inclusion; my @rse.

She has now just arisen to give her support to those anti- smites who were chanting at Glastonbury using the stage as an anti Jewish platform along with the crowd joing in.

she referred to the IDF as " The Jewish Defence League".

Thus highlighting the the bands chants of " Death, death to the IDF was indeed an Jewish chant.

She is always making mistakes especially in the media. I'm not sure whether Jeremy and his new party will actually want her; I wouldn't!

1 hour ago, roo860 said:

I saw that interview, Michael Portillo was sat next to her, his reaction when she said this was epic!!

https://youtu.be/uB4o5n2EGyA?si=SIOPA9lCZ3ENJVNv

 

Yep. Choo Choo in fits.

7 hours ago, The Cyclist said:

 

@RayC

 

A real time example, of where I previously tried to advise you that the UK Judiciary will never rule against the UK Government on matters of National Security or matters of Domestic Terrorism.

 

You, and google, apparently know better 😀😀

 

A completely separate and different issue to the one which we were discussing.

 

In any event, here are two examples where the UK judiciary have ruled against GCHQ (I have assumed that GCHQ was acting on the UK government's behalf).

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/may/15/government-security-gchq-decisions-can-be-challenged-in-court-judges-rule

 

https://www.channel4.com/news/gchq-nsa-broke-law-surveillance-prism-snowdown

 

Nice to be able to agree on something: Apparently Google and me do know better😉

3 minutes ago, RayC said:

 

A completely separate and different issue to the one which we were discussing.

 

In any event, here are two examples where the UK judiciary have ruled against GCHQ (I have assumed that GCHQ was acting on the UK government's behalf).

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/may/15/government-security-gchq-decisions-can-be-challenged-in-court-judges-rule

 

https://www.channel4.com/news/gchq-nsa-broke-law-surveillance-prism-snowdown

 

Nice to be able to agree on something: Apparently Google and me do know better😉

 

No comparison - GCHQ is a government agency - it does not determine law.

9 minutes ago, RayC said:

A completely separate and different issue to the one which we were discussing.

 

To take your education a step further, and in direct reference to yesterdays Court ruling.

 

This was a legal challenge, which was thrown out

 

From your link

 

Quote

By a 4-3 majority, supreme court justices declared that the extent of GCHQ’s powers to hack into internet services should be subject to judicial review.

 

2 pertinent points that you should take on board

 

1. GCHQ is not Government

 

Single aspects of GCHQ's actions should be subject  to a Judicial review..

 

2. A Judical Review is not the same as a legal challenge.

 

Two very distinct and two very different processes.

 

13 minutes ago, RayC said:

Apparently Google and me do know better😉

 

No, you don't, and never have done.

1 minute ago, nauseus said:

 

No comparison - GCHQ is a government agency - it does not determine law.

 

Agreed. GCHQ does not determine law but, as you say, it is a government agency and therefore, by definition, is acting on the government's behalf.

 

For whatever reason, the judiciary determined that it broke the law.