Jump to content

Mohammed Fahir Amaaz & Muhammad Amaad on Trial over Manchester Airport Clash


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, HK MacPhooey said:

Wrong again - the trial many insisted should not have taken almost one year to come to trial   

The delay was due to Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) investigation into the allegations the defendants made against the police and that this case is being tried at a Crown Court.

 

I trust you agree, police offers have a right to due process when accused of crimes.

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/dec/20/two-men-charged-over-manchester-airport-disturbance-involving-police

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 6
  • Haha 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

I trust you agree, that everyone, including Police Officers, have the right to defend themselves.

 

And that when the gloves come off, no point in pussyfooting around, they really come off.

I do.

 

Next.

  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

So you also agree that the complaints against the Police Officers were vexatious, unwarranted and an attempt at trying to get the 2 scumbags off scot free ?
 

In which case, the lawyer should also be in the dock, with the 2 scumbags. Just as well I was not the Judge on Friday, that clown of a lawyer would have been straight to the cells for crimes against fashion.

I agree the allegations made were vexatious.

 

However, that’s an opinion and does not negate the necessity for the IOPC investigation.

 

Even scumbags are deserving of legal representation, so no, their lawyers should not face the dick for representing their clients.

 

 

  • Thumbs Down 3
  • Haha 3
Posted

The original Victim refused to make a statement or press charges. It is likely a visit was arranged with threats and violence to him and his family if he pressed charges.

This is the Muslim lawyer blaming everyone and blatelently lyeing to the Extent of saying one recieved a suspected brain Injury that needed surgery pack of lies.

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

No, the delay was because the government were hoping this would become yesterday's news and then bury it.

 

They were also expecting Lammy's recommended racist 2 tier sentencing guidelines would be in place before the trial.

 

Thankfully they failed on both counts. Although I'd still expect an unusually light sentence followed by a load of disingenuous waffle from the judge about "cultural differences" and "good previous character".  

And yet I provided a link to the actual facts that the Charges came following the IOPC investigation.

  • Thumbs Down 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
37 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

 

Scumbag lawyers making vexatious claims, are still scumbags and should be charged with making false allegations, struck off, and a minimum 5 year term rammed up their hoop.

The defendants made the allegations, they are e titled to legal representation.

 

Your vengeance fantasy doesn’t negate those rights.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...