Jump to content

Mohammed Fahir Amaaz & Muhammad Amaad on Trial over Manchester Airport Clash


Recommended Posts

Posted
29 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

The original Victim refused to make a statement or press charges. It is likely a visit was arranged with threats and violence to him and his family if he pressed charges.

This is the Muslim lawyer blaming everyone and blatelently lyeing to the Extent of saying one recieved a suspected brain Injury that needed surgery pack of lies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

This scrote "stepped aside" nearly a year ago. Maybe he had sudden cyst formation somewhere?

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jul/29/teenagers-lawyer-steps-aside-after-manchester-airport-assassination-remarks

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cnk4pp530eqo

 

 

Oh, and here's another bit of news:

https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/news/birmingham-based-solicitor-and-accountant-charged-in-money-laundering-investigation

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Did they ? Are you sure.

 

My money would be on the scumbag lawyer making the allegations.

 

From Al Beeb

 

 

 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c624468nrd1o

 

I think anyone who is not a mentalist, knows exactly where these vexatious claims came from.

 

And it wasn't from the 2 knuckledraggers.

Solicitors make statements on behalf of their clients.

 

Get over the problem you have with people having the right to legal representation.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 6
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, The Cyclist said:

 

I don't have a problem with people having legal representation.

 

I have a problem with the vast amounts of scumbag lawyers that are infesting the UK

 

like the female KC representing the Qatari goatherder sex pest. Who according to her, he didn't know what he was doing, as he had very limited time around females.

 

Easy error to make, mistaking a goat for a female.

 

Who would have been screaming like a banshee for the max possible sentence, castration, immediate deportation of the sex pest, if he had tried to rape her.

 

Legal representation does not equate to spouting steaming piles of BS, downright lies, malicious and vexatious claims, in order to try and get guilty scumbags lesser sentences or let off for made up BS.

But, I think that is what a lawyer/barristers job is, they are paid to get them off or try too.

Same with immigration, the public pays for the lawyer to plead the immigrant's case.......

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, transam said:

But, I think that is what a lawyer/barristers job is, they are paid to get them off or try too.

 

There job is to represent their clients in terms of legal stuff that the client might not understand.

 

Scumbag lawyers have somehow adopted this practice.

 

And it should be jumped on from a great height, and start striking them off the solicitors register.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

If these 2 thugs are sentanced demonstations and claims of Police Brutality will hit the streets and it will kick off.

 

The same may happen if justice has not been seen to have been done.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Watch this video where the younger thug in Blue goes for the Female Police Officer what did she do to deserve this ??

 

 

 

They are buried..........:clap2:

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Great you now agree that any assaults on police or associated service personal should be mandatory jail. Will be holding you to that.

And as "2 tier" seems to be all the rage lets put a 50% increase on all crimes committed by people like this 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, transam said:

Probably shows the 'inbuilt' dislike of females, which most definitely showed in the vid................:whistling:.

 

Wot you mean? They woz defendin' their mum, wozn't they? She was upset and they wanted to take care of her.

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

Wot you mean? They woz defendin' their mum, wozn't they? She was upset and they wanted to take care of her.

One Mohamad did give her an elbow for over reacting to an infidel...........🤭

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

We all saw this and remember it well. The victim is not testifying because he's been nobbled by this thug family.  I was in the UK when the incident happened.  Just like the judge says: everything is on video including the coffee shop video and the police constable's.

Hopefully, justice will be served BUT you never know in current Two Tier Britain where people get imprisoned for writing hurty words and walk free for beating a man to the ground.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

Wot you mean? They woz defendin' their mum, wozn't they? She was upset and they wanted to take care of her.

Would you punch a female in her face Nan ? 

Posted

Starmer was once the head of the public prosceutions but is carfeull not to whip up racial trouble and he is aware any muslim prosecutions could effect future votes for him in an upcoming bi or General Election. We have seen it before. So we will be looking at the sentances these thugs are given if they are found of guility of ABH.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member




×
×
  • Create New...