1 hour ago, DonniePeverley said:

 

Dude, some cases can take up to a year to get to court. You cannot just go into court the following month. There is a schedule to follow, and when it is your turn in court - as you know there will be thousands of other cases going on too. 

 

This has nothing to do with the race. No cases go to courts in weeks when there is a not guilty plea, and one that is high profile as this. 

 

However, if found guilty, these two plonkers will have an increased sentence for not pleading guilty, wasting the courts time. 

 

You have no clue on the judicary system and how courts work. Take it easy, get back to X and reading what Indian men in bot factories pretending to white guys are typing and continue your descent to radicalisation.

 

 

There you go banging on about the wrong thing again but you carry on avoiding the issue. It is the 5 months to bring charges that is highly suspicious.

Have I in any of my posts mentioned race. You are the one obsessed with race. I don't use X never have done never will. You really are obsessed with Indian men. Keep it up.

2 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

He did not have his head stamped on by a policeman which was the first video that came to light and caused complaints about police excessive force. Therefore his case did not get referred to the IOPC or require an investigation by GMP.

He immediately plead guilty and was therefore dealt with by a magistrates court who could quickly pass sentence, it did not go to a full criminal trial. So no involvement of the CPS to gather evidence over a period of weeks, no scheduling of a complex criminal case in to an overloaded criminal justice system.

If you punch someone in a pub you will generally be seen by a magistrate the next day, plead guilty, accept your punishment, job done.

Do you really not understand the differences in the two cases? Really?? I don't understand how you can refuse to see what is so clearly obvious - the cases could not be more different.

One case charges brought in less than a month. The other case charges brought in 5 months in what was a very simple, uncomplicated case. They are not different. Both were unprovoked extreme violence. Absolutely stinks of a conspiracy. 

 

5 hours ago, DonniePeverley said:

 

 

No system is perfect. 

The Post Office scandal was to do with a failed IT system, not a direct fault of the judicary itself - although i do counter that it is debatable. 

 

I am not saying the UK system is perfect. Sentancing for actual crimes is a joke. But in terms of procedure and the court system it's one of the best in the world. Wait till you experience systems in other countries. 

 

 

The Post Office themselves brought the prosecutions not the CPS however the, so called, legal profession were necessarily involved and it now appears perjury and perverting the course of justice was employed to get the accused found guilty.

@josephbloggs

What are your thoughts on the head-stamping incident?

 

 

4 minutes ago, faraday said:

@josephbloggs

What are your thoughts on the head-stamping incident?

 

 

 

Remedial training for the Officer involved. It was a feeble attempt and nowhere near the standards required.

 

Point to note for the faint hearted.

 

I am rather old skool and when the gloves need to come off, they really do come off. Even more so when female colleagues have been assaulted.

10 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

So you think the CPS just glance at a video clip and make a decision?

They did for Tommy Robinson

3 hours ago, sungod said:

They did for Tommy Robinson

He went to jail for Contempt of Court. And he plead guilty.

He isn't persecuted. 

This is two tier Policing in Action on the streets in London.

 

 

 

16 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

So you think the CPS just glance at a video clip and make a decision? Is that how flimsy you want their cases to be? Imagine how many people would get away with their crimes if the CPS just went "saw a ten second video clip on YouTube, prosecute. Next!"

Complete fantasy land stuff.

I have explained the due process in this case twice now, I am not going to do it a third time for you to ignore again. I have been doing it since the beginning too. Investigations done, evidence seemingly water-tight, complaints against the police dismissed, now in a criminal trial after which I fully expect to see a guilty verdict and jail time.  If the legal process went "watch video clip, ignore all inquiries and counter complaints, don't bother with witness interviews or cross checking of evidence,  send for immediate prosecution" they would be out already on a technicality or would have had their case dismissed by any decent lawyer. I thought you were all for law and order, no?

 

Due process my arm. They were all hoping it would just go away - like the rape gangs.

7 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

Due process my arm. They were all hoping it would just go away - like the rape gangs.

I agree, that's what was happening in your head.

 

5 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

I agree, that's what was happening in your head.

 

 

Whatever that was, you'll have to do much better.

13 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

This is two tier Policing in Action on the streets in London.

 

Of course if you attack the agenda of the elites, they will squash you like an insect. 

 

 

1 hour ago, nauseus said:

 

Whatever that was, you'll have to do much better.

He won't nauseus because its been prooved to be true along with the justice law thats bent too.

For sure, the 'English' will be watching the legal outcome with extreme interest...

Suppose all this is in joe bloggs head to. But hey there from war torn countrys even India.

 

 

 

14 hours ago, Geoff914 said:

16 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

He did not have his head stamped on by a policeman which was the first video that came to light and caused complaints about police excessive force. Therefore his case did not get referred to the IOPC or require an investigation by GMP.

He immediately plead guilty and was therefore dealt with by a magistrates court who could quickly pass sentence, it did not go to a full criminal trial. So no involvement of the CPS to gather evidence over a period of weeks, no scheduling of a complex criminal case in to an overloaded criminal justice system.

If you punch someone in a pub you will generally be seen by a magistrate the next day, plead guilty, accept your punishment, job done.

Do you really not understand the differences in the two cases? Really?? I don't understand how you can refuse to see what is so clearly obvious - the cases could not be more different.

 

One case charges brought in less than a month. The other case charges brought in 5 months in what was a very simple, uncomplicated case. They are not different. Both were unprovoked extreme violence. Absolutely stinks of a conspiracy.

 

I one pleads guilty BEFORE going to trial, the route to justice, as already explained, is COMPLETELY different to the route to justice if one pleads not guilty, thus resulting in a trial.

 

There is absolutely NOTHING with regard to the airport assaults that is "uncomplicated", primarily due to the hotheads on BOTH sides of the camp stirring the pot, mostly via social media.

 

Saying otherwise stinks of ignorance.

5 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

This is two tier Policing in Action on the streets in London.

 

 

 

 

And that's Douglas Murray, the less which is said about him, the better.

 

Whatever next? Stephen Yaxley-Lennon?

1 hour ago, transam said:

For sure, the 'English' will be watching the legal outcome with extreme interest...

 

Just the white ones.

3 hours ago, save the frogs said:

 

Of course if you attack the agenda of the elites, they will squash you like an insect. 

 

 

 

And deservedly so.

 

Now, where did I leave my bloody keffiyeh?

1 hour ago, NanLaew said:

 

I one pleads guilty BEFORE going to trial, the route to justice, as already explained, is COMPLETELY different to the route to justice if one pleads not guilty, thus resulting in a trial.

 

There is absolutely NOTHING with regard to the airport assaults that is "uncomplicated", primarily due to the hotheads on BOTH sides of the camp stirring the pot, mostly via social media.

 

Saying otherwise stinks of ignorance.

Oh my God, hallelujah, I thought I was the only reasonable, non conspiracy nutcase person on here. 

12 hours ago, The Cyclist said:

 

 

 

I am rather old skool and when the gloves need to come off, they really do come off. Even more so when female colleagues have been assaulted.

Two females wasn't it? Plus having a huge kick by the assailant on himself.

7 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

He went to jail for Contempt of Court. And he plead guilty.

He isn't persecuted. 

 

Of course he's not.....

29 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Oh my God, hallelujah, I thought I was the only reasonable, non conspiracy nutcase person on here. 

 

You are nut alone then?

Doesn't matter on this thread whatever videos we show it will be classed as a riggt wing or someone that is going against the police. This is what the UK police and senior MPs want hidden from the UK. like him or not listen to what he says.

1 hour ago, BarraMarra said:

Doesn't matter on this thread whatever videos we show it will be classed as a riggt wing or someone that is going against the police. This is what the UK police and senior MPs want hidden from the UK. like him or not listen to what he says.

What?

for some reason my Vid didn't upload. Some won't accept this has happened and is happening today. Watch the full Video. You cannot admit this is not true or a conspiracy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

for some reason my Vid didn't upload. Some won't accept this has happened and is happening today. Watch the full Video. You cannot admit this is not true or a conspiracy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mate, you really need to look at where you are getting your "news" from.

"A British Muslim is 170 times more likely likely than a non Muslim to be part of a grooming gang". Seriously, what kind of "news" reporting is that?? "6 out of 7 British Muslim males knew about or were part of a grooming gang". What???

Horrendous. Is this where you get your information and indignation from? Have you ever checked what CBN news is? I feel dirty for even clicking on it - it is now in my browser history. A conservative evangelical Christian media organisation, anti abortion, pro-Israel, anti Muslim extreme fundamentalist Christian group.

It is not "news". It is propaganda. Seriously, try harder.

Wow, just wow.

Barramarra, you need to expand your horizons, you have been sucked in by Christian extremists.


 

If i post from GB news you write it off all UK media MPS have admitted its happenig ITV, BBC, SKY News have all reported the Rape gangs are mostly Pakistani yet you ignore them all. Do you want to continue this game or are you just a wind up merchant. Post a video from one of your reputible news outlets where rape gangs are innocent of all chages labeled against them. Post evidence to back up your claim this is not happening, if you can't or deflect i suggest you leave this thread. Give us evidence.

28 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

If i post from GB news you write it off all UK media MPS have admitted its happenig ITV, BBC, SKY News have all reported the Rape gangs are mostly Pakistani yet you ignore them all. Do you want to continue this game or are you just a wind up merchant. Post a video from one of your reputible news outlets where rape gangs are innocent of all chages labeled against them. Post evidence to back up your claim this is not happening, if you can't or deflect i suggest you leave this thread. Give us evidence.

No, I write off your sources when they are obviously nonsense. Not the channel, the content. Seriously, listen to it, read what I said, and make a judgement. What they say is preposterous nonsense, 6 out of 7 Muslims in Britain knew about or were part of a rape gang. Just read that again and think about it. "A British Muslim is 170 times more likely likely than a non Muslim to be part of a grooming gang". Really? Think about it again. Yaxley-Lennon has more than a few grooming friends by the way, and he publicly defended them even after they were convicted

And then look at the fundamentalist, anti abortion, far right evangelical Christian source. That's all I am asking, look at it, look at what they say, look at their history and think if it makes sense.

And this is about the Manchester airport incident. Why are you asking me to post videos saying all rape gangs are innocent??Seriously, are you ok? Seems like you might be choking on your gammon. Just breathe, and relax, and discuss the Manchester trial. Who is saying all rape gangs are innocent? Not me, not anyone in this thread.

its no good typing, anyone can talk a good argument. Evidence Evidence back up your claims don't try and be clever when we all know who Tommy Robinson is you dont need to use his correct name we know who he is. You made a claim he has grooming gang friends ? where is a link to this ? The Manchester Airport attackers commited ABH true or not, the police officers are not on trial for ABH the three muslims are. Fact. Do most people believe there is a two tier police state yes. I provided links to this claim. And finally Lucy Connoly got locked up for over 30 Months for a tweet she removed. KNEECAP the Irish Rap band called for MPs to be killed, and bob Vinyl incited the british public to kill the IDF he was not arrested or charged. So yes two tier policing infront of our eyes. I don't have to provide a link it was even questioned in the Commons by all members of Parliment.