Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Maybe there are 1,000 victims.  Besides crazies on this forum, nobody wants those names.  

 

Last month, a judge listed in a 50-page document about 180 people – under pseudonyms – ordering that their identities be made public within 14 days of the order.

 

OK, at least 180 powerful people.   Probably 300.  Who knows?  90% won't be the headline story.  It's the 10% that scares everyone.

 

I'm 100% sure a few of those names could make you disappear if they knew you had the list.

 

Well, let's say you have the list.

 

Even if you sold the list for 1 zillion dollars, they will find you.   You will be arrested.  The media will show you shooting JFK if they thought the public would buy it.    That's why this list stays hidden.   We believe the pictures and videos of all the bad farangs in Pattaya.  We never wonder if it's AI.  We never try to find the truth.  We don't care.  No time.  We don't have a horse in the race.  Skin in the game.  Whatever.  Anyhow, to discredit the list, these people would spend billions to get us to believe whatever they wanted.   

 

Anonymous hackers or Anonymous Group (famous group of hackers) will have to get the list and release it.   

 

Are you really going to risk your family tree over a list?   

 

It is crazy that the January 6th crazies went to jail, which makes 100% sense.  Well, these rapists 100% need to go to jail.  

 

Will you release the list?   Your Thailand experience would end within 60 seconds.   The greatest manhunt the world has ever seen.   lol.  

  • Agree 3
  • Thumbs Down 9
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

 

The pilot has already testified that Donald flew on the plane.

And well known, Donald evicted him from his golf course.  

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/trump-banned-jeffrey-epstein-from-mar-a-lago-for-hitting-on-girl.html

 

Having a photo taken with him at an event, with Melania in attendance, vs visiting his island for services is a bit different.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Will B Good said:

Bannon, repulsive as he is, was correct in declaring "Trump is now part of the Deep State" on this matter.

 

Patel, Bondi et al are all in on it and toeing the line.......the list will never be revealed.

 

I see Bongino might display some honour......the rumour is he is about to walk after a stand up row with Bondi.

Truly funny 

 

how are you privileged to such rumors?

  • Thumbs Down 6
Posted
1 hour ago, KhunLA said:

And well known, Donald evicted him from his golf course.  

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/trump-banned-jeffrey-epstein-from-mar-a-lago-for-hitting-on-girl.html

 

Having a photo taken with him at an event, with Melania in attendance, vs visiting his island for services is a bit different.

 

Banning someone, after more than 20 years of close relationship, was because it got too hot.

 

From your own link.

 

Trump has repeatedly offered well wishes to Ghislaine Maxwell, who is charged with enabling Epstein’s serial sexual abuse of underage girls.

 

Admitting, He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side, is a bit different from having his picture taken.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
2 hours ago, impulse said:

 

Team Biden would have leaked that part long ago if implicated Trump.

 

 

I'm sorry, I didn't have any contact with "Team Biden". So I can't answer 

  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted

I lived within that industry for a while. 'Big money' people involved.  I mean billionaire class.

Not unlike the Red Bull situation, people have made their payments and agreements. So nothing to see there.

That's our world. Truth is a rare commodity. 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

I'm sorry, I didn't have any contact with "Team Biden". So I can't answer 

 

Yet you felt compelled to reply...

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

It's not the list per se that is important.

It's just names.

 

What we need is video or stills out of video's , clearly showing

who the perp is but pixellating the victimes.

 

These are bankers/politicians/royals/billionairs, ....

Hackers should go after it and expose them world wide.

State hackers or organised/private , of course not keeping it

to themselves so they can blackmail.

 

And all the people handling Epstein/Maxwell.

Those two were not alone.

People at the zorro ranch, ...

All the people who suppressed evidence too.

The blackmailers , intelligence people too.

 

If I had irrefutable evidence , I would surely expose it. 

 

  • Love It 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, FlorC said:

It's not the list per se that is important.

It's just names.

 

What we need is video or stills out of video's , clearly showing

who the perp is but pixellating the victimes.

 

These are bankers/politicians/royals/billionairs, ....

Hackers should go after it and expose them world wide.

State hackers or organised/private , of course not keeping it

to themselves so they can blackmail.

 

And all the people handling Epstein/Maxwell.

Those two were not alone.

People at the zorro ranch, ...

All the people who suppressed evidence too.

The blackmailers , intelligence people too.

 

If I had irrefutable evidence , I would surely expose it. 

 

Governments involved in criminality protect themselves by claiming "National Security" and then burying the evidence, and then calling it a "conspiracy theory."

  • Agree 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Will B Good said:

I see Bongino might display some honour

I'll believe it if Bongino quits the FBI and returns to civilian life, and then spills the beans on his podcast. Until then?  "Pfft!" 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
2 hours ago, impulse said:

Team Biden would have leaked that part long ago if implicated Trump.

 

Not if members of "Team Biden" were themselves implicated. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, connda said:

Governments involved in criminality protect themselves by claiming "National Security" and then burying the evidence, and then calling it a "conspiracy theory."

True , but if you had the evidence , you send it to all the US' enemies,

for exposure , not so that they can blackmail.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, FlorC said:

True , but if you had the evidence , you send it to all the US' enemies,

for exposure , not so that they can blackmail.

"True , but if you had the evidence , you send it to all the US' enemies,

for exposure..." where it most likely would be used for blackmail.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...