1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

Does the missus hit you in the night?

 

Mine lays into me on a regular basis........my traumatic nightmares drive her mad.

You know who will come back with something like that, or that my mum played the piano..........😂

3 minutes ago, transam said:

Tell me why I had a detached retina appear overnight, what cased it........?

Difficult for me to say Trans, without some history. Your story of the 10, even 20, years before the unfortunate detachment.

 

If you were a disciple of nature like me, you would understand that your body does things for reasons. It don't make mistakes and it does its best to keep one in good health.

 

What causedit? Look at you lifestyle, environment, work and medical history. Can't say any more than that. Sorry. But trust you are now OK.

 

Just now, Stiddle Mump said:

Difficult for me to say Trans, without some history. Your story of the 10, even 20, years before the unfortunate detachment.

 

If you were a disciple of nature like me, you would understand that your body does things for reasons. It don't make mistakes and it does its best to keep one in good health.

 

What causedit? Look at you lifestyle, environment, work and medical history. Can't say any more than that. Sorry. But trust you are now OK.

 

 I was born very short sighted, caused by my eyes not being round, slightly elongated, which is the main reason folk get detachments.

Both sides of my family had blindness, it was only modern tech that saved my sight.

 

Tell me how to not get cataract...........?  🤔

2 minutes ago, transam said:

 I was born very short sighted, caused by my eyes not being round, slightly elongated, which is the main reason folk get detachments.

Both sides of my family had blindness, it was only modern tech that saved my sight.

 

Tell me how to not get cataract...........?  🤔

 

UV sunglasses from birth

20 minutes ago, transam said:

 I was born very short sighted, caused by my eyes not being round, slightly elongated, which is the main reason folk get detachments.

Both sides of my family had blindness, it was only modern tech that saved my sight.

 

Tell me how to not get cataract...........?  🤔

 

He'll dig up some dusty anti-vax blog where a self-certified "holistic wellness guru" in Illinois swears that a single patient developed cataracts after a polio shot - and voilà!..... That’s all the scientific proof he needs. Forget decades of peer-reviewed research and global medical consensus - Debbie from the crystal healing spa said so, and that’s case closed....

 

Though...  there was a strong rumour when growing up that whaking-off too much leads to blindness... So Debbie from the crystal healing spa may running a sideline !!!

 

---------

 

Ridicule aside: vaccines are not 100% risk-free (no one is suggesting they are), but when viewed in aggregate, they remain vastly superior to the alternative of no vaccination at all. Intelligent people grasp this broader, population-level benefit.  The anti-vaxx arguments is similar to arguing that grapes are dangerous because people have choked on them.

 

As with any medical intervention, there will always be an extremely small minority who experience adverse effects. The problem is that anti-vaxxers take these isolated cases, blow them wildly out of proportion, and portray them as if they represent the typical outcome. They’re not wrong that adverse events can occur - but their narrative is exaggerated, profoundly disingenuous and misleading.

 

Take cataracts, for example. Yes, there are a couple of rare reports where vaccines have been ‘suggested’ as a potential cause. But that hardly equates to “vaccines cause cataracts”. Those cases are an infinitesimal fraction of the millions vaccinated. To put it in perspective, more people would be harmed simply walking across the street to get their shot than those who suffer such adverse effects.

 

 

 

 

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (BNT162b2 – Pfizer-BioNTech)

Study: A previously healthy 20-year-old male developed bilateral cataracts leading to significant visual decline (from 20/20 to 20/300–400) following the first dose of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine. The cataracts were likely a result of systemic inflammation after vaccination.

Source: Kim DH, Hsu D, Li Y, Sulewski ME. Cataracts in setting of multisystem inflammation after COVID-19 vaccination. American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451993622004005

 

 

Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) Vaccine

Study: A 12-month-old girl developed unilateral anterior uveitis with rubeosis and cataract three months after receiving the MMR vaccine at 9 months of age. Aqueous humor analysis revealed the presence of rubella-specific immunoglobulin G in the affected eye, supporting the association between the MMR vaccine and the development of cataract.

Source: Ferrini W, Aubert V, Balmer A, Munier FL, Abouzeid H. Anterior uveitis and cataract after rubella vaccination: a case report of a 12-month-old girl. Pediatrics. 2013.

https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/132/4/e1035/64878/Anterior-Uveitis-and-Cataract-After-Rubella?

 

 

 

5 minutes ago, transam said:

 I was born very short sighted, caused by my eyes not being round, slightly elongated, which is the main reason folk get detachments.

Both sides of my family had blindness, it was only modern tech that saved my sight.

 

Tell me how to not get cataract...........?  🤔

 

3 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

If I fall off me ladder and broke a leg. Or, was seriously injured in a car accident, I would seek help. A dagger in me back. Where is the doctor?

 

But putting accidents aside, I wouldn't trust a white-coat as far as I could throw one. And I'll tell you why.

Firstly; there are none so blind as will not see. And these white-coats are right up there with the biggest idiots of our era.

Secondly; they are bound by protocols that stop them prescribing, even if they felt the need to, any remedy that could see them unsupported by their governing body or insurance. 

Thirdly they are controlled by Big Pharma (BP), and can only use the BP drugs.

Four; they cannot see past symptoms, and issue drugs to lessen, or eradicate them. Even though they are the body at work.

Five; they do not seem interested, in getting to the root causes of an illness.

Six; A lot of western doctors start out their careers with huge debts.

Seven; Being a white-coat should be a calling not a way to enrich oneself.

Eight; They seem to be unaware of diet, environments or nature.

 

These white-coats that relentlessly pump vaccine filth into kids and preggers women should be struck off, and denied the privilege to ever don a white coat again. They have conveniently forgotten that their first port of call is to help their patient, not enrich themselves or BP.

You are preaching to the converted. I did work in a hospital at one time for an expansion they was having. Most of the doctors there really did have the patients health as priority but having said that hospitals and doctors in general do it for the money like the rest of us. As such if they can give you a few tablets or injection that you don't really need the possible with try to get you to accept it. At the end of the day medicine is a business and business is based on profit.

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

The profit margin on vaccines is considerably less than other pharmaceuticals.

 

Vaccines are usually one-off, with maybe a booster.

 

OTOH, medications for chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension and cholesterol are ongoing.

 

A successful vaccine by definition is self-limiting in sales.

 

As a public health measure, the cost of vaccines is usually kept down by government procurement.

 

For example, flu vaccinations in Australia are free for a considerable proportion of the population.

Still paid for by the citizens of the country no matter who buys it.

1 minute ago, Photoguy21 said:

You are preaching to the converted. I did work in a hospital at one time for an expansion they was having. Most of the doctors there really did have the patients health as priority but having said that hospitals and doctors in general do it for the money like the rest of us. As such if they can give you a few tablets or injection that you don't really need the possible with try to get you to accept it. At the end of the day medicine is a business and business is based on profit.

An expert has arrived................🤥............😂

 

There's me thinking all trades did it for the money, a job, an income.......🤭

35 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Good you are well Sir.

 

There are no such things as 'childhood diseases'.

Thanks for making this statement, Sir, but I regret to inform you may have to search for "childhood diseases" to discover it is a commonly held understanding of what they entail.

Many diseases hit children first but can also affect adults later in life. In developed countries, vaccinations for certain diseases start following birth and into school.

 

diphtheria
measles
poliomyelitis
tetanus
Chickenpox
Mumps
Rubella

 

Maybe it would be better to say, "diseases that frequently occur most often in childhood".  Measles is a hot topic today and most who catch and spread it are children (I guess because of close proximity in school).

 

http://www.bccdc.ca/schools/Documents/EN_Guide_Childhood_Diseases.pdf

https://www.cdc.gov/parents/children/diseases-and-conditions.html

https://www.britannica.com/science/childhood-diseases-and-disorders

 

Have a good day.

1 minute ago, Photoguy21 said:

Still paid for by the citizens of the country no matter who buys it.

 

In a sense, but the cost/benefit analysis' always favour vaccination programs as being more cost effective than multiple deaths, disfigurements and the debilitating effects of avoidable infections.

1 minute ago, transam said:

An expert has arrived................🤥............😂

 

There's me thinking all trades did it for the money, a job, an income.......🤭

Some actually do it because they want to help others. Ever hear of Orbis? If not look it up

22 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

Medical Record Review Of the Twins Who Died After Vaccination And

A Review Of The Literature Proving SIDS Is Caused By Vaccines

 

Pierre KORY, MD, MPA was asked by Children's Health Defense and the parents to review the medical records of twins found dead in their bed eight days after multiple vaccinations. Related? Yes, says the hidden science.

 

Source: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/medical-record-review-of-the-twins

 

= = = 

 

Tyson and Dallas Shaw were found dead in their crib at 18 months of age

Last month, Children's Health Defense asked me to review the hospital records of two young Mennonite girls in Texas who died from what the hospital and our Pharma-controlled media claimed was the measles.

In that post, < https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/my-expert-review-of-the-medical-records > I provided the evidence from the medical records that, contrary to the fear-mongering Pharma-media hype, their deaths were not from measles but stemmed from a staggering, near criminal cascade of medical incompetence, repeatedly botching the treatment of routine bacterial pneumonias—one of the most basic conditions hospitals face daily.

Instead, those so-called “measles deaths” fueled a colossal media disinformation blitz, falsely branding measles as a deadly scourge to terrorize parents into vaccinating their children. As a physician who has devoted five years of my life and career (at significant personal and professional costs) to combating scientific Disinformation campaigns (ivermectin, Covid vaccines, chlorine dioxide, IV vitamin C, among others), attacking the immense, decades-long Disinformation campaign supporting childhood vaccines is my latest endeavor.

The immense anger that this one triggers in me sets itself apart from the others, mainly because the children are defenseless, have no voice or agency, and innumerable of their lives are either ended like the Shaw twins or destroyed with life-long chronic illnesses, the saddest of which is severe autism (known by the CDC), relegating them to lives of dependence upon their parents for care without the ability to have hobbies, careers, marriages, friends etc.

So, moving from the lie that measles is dangerous or deadly (it is not), let’s now examine the lie that childhood vaccines do not cause SIDS. What you will learn about the lethality of vaccines to infants (those under one year old) will shock you, as it shocked me.

The tragic cases of the Idaho twins rip apart the insidious myth that vaccines are “safe and effective.” Nothing could be further from the truth. It’s utterly maddening that countless parents remain oblivious to the damning evidence, blindly marching their precious infants to pediatricians for so-called “well-baby visits”—a ritual that, for some, is tantamount to delivering them to an executioner. Too extreme? Read the rest of this post, and then you can make an informed judgment as to the soundness of that statement.

 

You can read the full article here > https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/medical-record-review-of-the-twins

 

Pierre Kory is an American critical care physician who gained attention during the COVID-19 pandemic for advocating widespread off-label use of ineffective drug treatments for COVID-19, as president and co-founder of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC).^[1][2] Kory testified twice to the U.S. Senate regarding COVID-19. During his testimony in December 2020, Kory erroneously claimed that the antiparasitic medication ivermectin was a "wonder drug" with "miraculous effectiveness" against COVID-

11 minutes ago, Purdey said:

Thanks for making this statement, Sir, but I regret to inform you may have to search for "childhood diseases" to discover it is a commonly held understanding of what they entail.

Many diseases hit children first but can also affect adults later in life. In developed countries, vaccinations for certain diseases start following birth and into school.

 

diphtheria
measles
poliomyelitis
tetanus
Chickenpox
Mumps
Rubella

 

Maybe it would be better to say, "diseases that frequently occur most often in childhood".  Measles is a hot topic today and most who catch and spread it are children (I guess because of close proximity in school).

 

http://www.bccdc.ca/schools/Documents/EN_Guide_Childhood_Diseases.pdf

https://www.cdc.gov/parents/children/diseases-and-conditions.html

https://www.britannica.com/science/childhood-diseases-and-disorders

 

Have a good day.

 

He will provide a typical response that these are not diseases... or they can be avoided -and then follow up with is dim quote "nature has the answers" !!!!

 

Fools can't be reasoned with - we're just being dragged down to that level when replying to such moronic claims....

3 minutes ago, Purdey said:

Thanks for making this statement, Sir, but I regret to inform you may have to search for "childhood diseases" to discover it is a commonly held understanding of what they entail.

Many diseases hit children first but can also affect adults later in life. In developed countries, vaccinations for certain diseases start following birth and into school.

 

diphtheria
measles
poliomyelitis
tetanus
Chickenpox
Mumps
Rubella

 

Maybe it would be better to say, "diseases that frequently occur most often in childhood".  Measles is a hot topic today and most who catch and spread it are children (I guess because of close proximity in school).

 

http://www.bccdc.ca/schools/Documents/EN_Guide_Childhood_Diseases.pdf

https://www.cdc.gov/parents/children/diseases-and-conditions.html

https://www.britannica.com/science/childhood-diseases-and-disorders

 

Have a good day.

There are symptoms that are associated with illness/sickness. They are not diseases.

 

Measles is indeed a hot topic at the present time. The symptoms of measles are very broad. They can, and are, clumped together in what ever basket the authorities feel is best suited to their agenda.

 

I'll leave you to work out what and why.

 

2 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Good that you want to debate Sir.

 

Cancer!? Let's get to it. My take is that cancer is the accumulatio of cells that are abnormal. The body, if healthy enough, can disperse these broken, and sometimes toxic-laden cells. However, if the body is lacking, or there is too much toxicity; either too much in one go, or over too long a time period, sothere is a build up, the body has to act to protect itself.

 

How does it do this? By coating the renegade cells and storing them away. This is the start of a tumor. What happens next depends upon various things**.

 

Nature has all the answers.

 

** Beyond the scope of this thread. But on another, I'd be only too willing to investigate 'cancer' in more depth.

Your take, are you medical schooled?

Just now, FritsSikkink said:

Your take, are you medical schooled?

 

YouTube actually......in your face.

9 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said:

Some actually do it because they want to help others. Ever hear of Orbis? If not look it up

Some see it as a calling. Others like Dr Koch were persecuted for decades because he took a different track. The Baileys (Drs Sam & Mark) in NZ are the modern day mavericks. And there are many others.

 

However, in saying that, many white-coats, although starting out with pore intentions, begin to enjoy the good life, and slip into a crowd/team/gang/group, where all their friends are the same, and think the same, as them. Although they might know that things are not as they should be - as with the pandemic for instance - they don't rock the boat because they don't want to lose their place in the group; and the status that goes with it.

 

My daughter works as a district nurse, and she tells me that many white-coats pocket the dosh, although they don't give vaxxes themselves. These, for me, are the pits. They know the vaxxes are not safe, so get others to administer them, and put the dosh in their pocket.

 

I do what I do to make people aware. To get them to research and perhaps make them think twice when some white-coat on TV says you have to do for the good of the whole. If he was wearing a clown outfit, instead of a white-coat, he would be laughed at for the same words.

 

Don't know who said the following, but it's pretty near the mark:

 

''Insisting that it's for the public's good, are the first words of tyranny.''

 

Nature has all the answers.

7 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

Your take, are you medical schooled?

I'm not a doctor, but was white-coat for a  couple of years.

21 hours ago, Purdey said:

Kory erroneously claimed that the antiparasitic medication ivermectin was a "wonder drug" with "miraculous effectiveness" against COVID-19.

I recall red phoenix recommending this as an alternative to Covid vaccines.

However, I must have had an allergic reaction to Ivermectin, as it just made me hoarse and gave me the trots.

1 minute ago, Liquorice said:

I recall red phoenix recommending this as an alternative to Covid vaccines.

However, I must have had an allergic reaction to Ivermectin, as it just made me hoarse and gave me the trots.

Off to the joke section with you Sir.

18 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Nature has all the answers.

That's exactly what Erin Patterson said about the death cap mushrooms in her beef wellington.

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Off to the joke section with you Sir.

 

You've never left... 

17 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

25 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

Your take, are you medical schooled?

I'm not a doctor, but was white-coat for a  couple of years.

 

An intern with 1 month experience repeated 24 times... 

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Off to the joke section with you Sir.

Neigh!

Apologies, side effects of the Ivermectin still haven't worn off.

22 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Don't know who said the following, but it's pretty near the mark:

 

''Insisting that it's for the public's good, are the first words of tyranny.''

 

 

That quote - “Insisting that it's for the public's good, are the first words of tyranny” - is a seductive soundbite, but it's intellectually hollow when unpacked.

 

If “the public good” is automatically suspect, then we might as well dismantle clean water systems, abolish fire departments, and cancel traffic laws. After all, each was introduced “for the public good”...  Does that make stop signs the seeds of dictatorship?

 

Tyranny doesn't begin with concern for others - it begins when no one is allowed to question authority, not when public health measures are debated transparently. Democracies thrive precisely because we weigh collective benefit with individual rights, not against them.

 

Rejecting every action taken for the public good isn’t liberty - it’s nihilism dressed up as freedom, just as disingenuous as every claim you’ve made in these anti-vax threads.

21 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I'm not a doctor, but was white-coat for a  couple of years.

Found you.

 

 

 

 

7 hours ago, MadAtMatrix said:

Wikipedia. The bastion of truth. Run by left wing basement dwellers that wear masks alone in their positive pressure rooms that don’t see the light of day. 

 

while they aren’t “creating” articles, they are faeces finger painting their shower walls. 
 

 

 

Here is a quote from the Wikipedia article - it's as plain as day that you have no read it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Kory

 

Kory in August 2022 falsely claimed that vaccines can disrupt pregnancy and fertility, based on his reading of Pfizer data submitted to the FDA, an interpretation which is not supported by peer-reviewed evidence. He represented the rates of miscarriage after COVID vaccination as alarming,^[30] when the rates are in fact consistent with background miscarriage rates of 11-16 percent in the general population.^[31] Multiple studies have shown that COVID infection, not vaccination against COVID-19, is risky for pregnant women. One study found that the risk of fetal or newborn mortality is higher in unvaccinated pregnant women who contract COVID, than it is for vaccinated women infected with COVID at the same stage of pregnancy.^[32] Further, according to studies cited by the CDC, there is no evidence of decreased fertility due to COVID vaccination now or in the future, and changes in menstrual cycles are small and temporary.^[33]

 

Kory repeatedly questions peer-reviewed science on COVID, the COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorization process overseen by federal agencies, and the profit motives of pharmaceutical companies, while he also profits from marketing off-label and "alternative" COVID treatments that are lacking in quality evidence.^[34] His rhetoric carries many of the markings of conspiracy theory, which make emotional arguments that presume malfeasance and coordinated efforts and deliberate obfuscation of information. Such theories become ingrained in in-groups as a form of secret knowledge, which reinforces the fervor with which the ideas are believed. Kory's detractors such as David Gorski^[35][36] have noted his efforts to promote and profit from alternative COVID treatments are similar to medical quackery going back centuries.^[26][37]

 

In June 2022, Kory tweeted that the American Board of Internal Medicine had warned him that his board certifications were in danger of being revoked for misinformation.^[34] Effectively unable to practice within mainstream medicine, Kory launched his own “advanced COVID-19 care center", charging US$1,250 to 1,650 for a series of three appointments.^[34]

 

As you see, Kory is a conman and a liar. You can follow the links, you can check the assertions, you can evaluate the evidence provided. But you won't do that - a characteristic of the idiot right is, an overwhelming desire to see, hear and read only what they want to. Facts, studies, peer-reviewed papers, decades of expert knowledge... these have to be written-off with childish abuse. 

 

You never provided any facts to support your position. You never said where Wikipedia is wrong. That's because you can't. You are just another right-wing fact-free gasbag.

 

 

13 hours ago, novanova said:

 

Here is a quote from the Wikipedia article - it's as plain as day that you have no read it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Kory

 

Kory in August 2022 falsely claimed that vaccines can disrupt pregnancy and fertility, based on his reading of Pfizer data submitted to the FDA, an interpretation which is not supported by peer-reviewed evidence. He represented the rates of miscarriage after COVID vaccination as alarming,^[30] when the rates are in fact consistent with background miscarriage rates of 11-16 percent in the general population.^[31] Multiple studies have shown that COVID infection, not vaccination against COVID-19, is risky for pregnant women. One study found that the risk of fetal or newborn mortality is higher in unvaccinated pregnant women who contract COVID, than it is for vaccinated women infected with COVID at the same stage of pregnancy.^[32] Further, according to studies cited by the CDC, there is no evidence of decreased fertility due to COVID vaccination now or in the future, and changes in menstrual cycles are small and temporary.^[33]

 

Kory repeatedly questions peer-reviewed science on COVID, the COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorization process overseen by federal agencies, and the profit motives of pharmaceutical companies, while he also profits from marketing off-label and "alternative" COVID treatments that are lacking in quality evidence.^[34] His rhetoric carries many of the markings of conspiracy theory, which make emotional arguments that presume malfeasance and coordinated efforts and deliberate obfuscation of information. Such theories become ingrained in in-groups as a form of secret knowledge, which reinforces the fervor with which the ideas are believed. Kory's detractors such as David Gorski^[35][36] have noted his efforts to promote and profit from alternative COVID treatments are similar to medical quackery going back centuries.^[26][37]

 

In June 2022, Kory tweeted that the American Board of Internal Medicine had warned him that his board certifications were in danger of being revoked for misinformation.^[34] Effectively unable to practice within mainstream medicine, Kory launched his own “advanced COVID-19 care center", charging US$1,250 to 1,650 for a series of three appointments.^[34]

 

As you see, Kory is a conman and a liar. You can follow the links, you can check the assertions, you can evaluate the evidence provided. But you won't do that - a characteristic of the idiot right is, an overwhelming desire to see, hear and read only what they want to. Facts, studies, peer-reviewed papers, decades of expert knowledge... these have to be written-off with childish abuse. 

 

You never provided any facts to support your position. You never said where Wikipedia is wrong. That's because you can't. You are just another right-wing fact-free gasbag.

 

 

Here you go, Richard Cranium. With sources. Now get back to your finger painting 

 

Wikipedia exhibits a **mild to moderate left-wing bias** in its English-language content, according to recent studies. A 2024 Manhattan Institute analysis found that Wikipedia articles tend to associate right-of-center public figures with more negative sentiment and left-of-center figures with more positive emotions like joy[1][2][3]. This bias appears in articles on recent U.S. presidents, senators, Supreme Court justices, and Western prime ministers, among others[1][3].

Earlier research also showed Wikipedia articles on U.S. politics leaned pro-Democratic by favoring terms associated with Democrats over Republicans[1][2]. Wikipedia’s arbitration and enforcement processes have demonstrated institutional favoritism toward left-of-center views as well[1][2].

However, some research and reports suggest that this political bias is not uniform, with certain topics or groups showing no bias or even slight bias against the left[1][2]. Wikipedia’s content overall, however, is often found comparable in neutrality and accuracy to traditional encyclopedias like Britannica[1][4].

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has publicly stated he believes Wikipedia has a significant left-leaning ideological bias, especially as it has moved away from strict neutrality[1][3]. Media and commentators have noted that this leftward bias in Wikipedia can influence large AI models trained on its content, spreading the bias further[3].

In summary, expert analyses and researcher consensus indicate that Wikipedia’s content shows a **left-wing bias**, especially in political topics related to U.S. and Western politics, although it is described as moderate rather than extreme[1][3][4].

Sources
[1] Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? - Manhattan Institute https://manhattan.institute/article/is-wikipedia-politically-biased
[2] [PDF] Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? | Manhattan Institute https://media4.manhattan-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/is-wikipedia-politically-biased.pdf
[3] The Myth of Wikipedia's Neutrality: Unmasking its Leftist Bias https://stophindudvesha.org/the-myth-of-wikipedias-neutrality-unmasking-its-leftist-bias/
[4] Ideological bias on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideological_bias_on_Wikipedia
[5] Do you think Wikipedia is biased? : r/AskALiberal - Reddit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8Px93Q6-XY
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskALiberal/comments/r9gafi/do_you_think_wikipedia_is_biased/

 

 

On 7/17/2025 at 4:56 PM, TheTightArseTraveller said:

So you mean a teddy in the cot ISN'T the problem, but the untested, untrialled, crazy chemicals I jammed in my kid because I am a weak as faaaaark father that gave in to the pharma sales machine with no actual care for my child are???? nooooooooo

Heard all sorts of nonsense in past years to deflect away from the filth being injected into little kids.

 

Don't lay baby on its back; or its belly. Baby should not be swaddled. Clothes must not be too loose. Pee reacts with chemicals in the cot mattress, and gives off fumes. Just back luck. These thing happen occasionally. Only sterile toys should be with a baby.

 

As I often say, ignorance and apathy are human's greatest enemy. If we are to fulfill our true destiny, this nonsense is something we must stop.