Thai - Cambodia Conflict Thai Troops Retaliate, 100 Cambodian Soldiers Dead in Fierce Clash

[riverhigh]

Where are all the so-called brave narcissistic, self-absorbed ticktokers?  Filming the skirmishes?? Not a chance, prefer to live rent free in mummy's house and  call themselves influencers.

[lordgrinz]

Just now, renaissanc said:

How do you fight a war when you are squabbling over only 4.6 sq. kilometres of land? It sounds so WW1-ish.

 

Which explains the trench warfare Cambodia initiated, that sparked this war.

[findlay13]

48 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

I'm expecting a spokesman from the Thai military to be trotted out inflating more silly figures.

We don't need it. Just listen to all the armchair generals on Asian now ! they have it all sussed out🤣

[lordgrinz]

8 minutes ago, findlay13 said:

We don't need it. Just listen to all the armchair generals on Asian now ! they have it all sussed out🤣

 

There are no armchairs here, more like barstools 😜

[Presnock]

11 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Has fighting between Cambodia and Thailand ever been this bad?

in different lifetimes yes!

 

[daejung]

1 hour ago, Burma Bill said:

 

Thanks. You beat me to it. Similar publication in todays  KHMER TIMES.

  Yet again, the aggressive Siamese military  inflating casualties to save face over losing the UNESCO Preah Vihear temple complex to Cambodia when the ICJ confirmed it was on Cambodian soil.

🛕 1. Origin of the Conflict: The Preah Vihear Temple

The Preah Vihear Temple was built in the 11th century by the Khmer people, ancestors of modern Cambodians.

It is located on top of a cliff in the Dângrêk mountain range, which forms the natural border between Cambodia and Thailand.

The conflict is not mainly about the temple itself, but about a 4.6 km² area surrounding it.



---

🇰🇭 Cambodia’s Position:

In 1962, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that the Preah Vihear Temple belongs to Cambodia, based on a French colonial-era map (1907).

Cambodia argues that Thailand tacitly accepted that map for decades.

Cambodia also contends that the 1962 ruling implies sovereignty over the adjacent area as well.



---

🇹🇭 Thailand’s Position:

Thailand accepts that the temple itself belongs to Cambodia (in accordance with the ICJ ruling).

However, it disputes Cambodia’s claim over the surrounding area, arguing that the map used by the ICJ is not legally binding for defining the border.

Thailand maintains that the border should follow the watershed line, which would place part of the disputed land on the Thai side.



---

🔥 Military and Political Tensions

Armed clashes occurred in 2008, 2009, and 2011, resulting in casualties on both sides.

These tensions are often fueled by domestic nationalist sentiments, especially during times of political crisis in either country.

In 2013, the ICJ issued a clarification of its 1962 judgment, confirming that Cambodia has sovereignty over the promontory where the temple stands.



---

📌 In Summary

Cambodia bases its claim on the ICJ ruling and the historical French map.

Thailand accepts the loss of the temple but disputes the adjacent territory, referring to geographical principles.

The dispute is a complex mix of international law, colonial history, regional geopolitics, and national pride.
 

[liddelljohn]

Thais should bomb Sianoukville   thats where all the Chinese are ,, who control Cambodia 

[portisaacozzy]

11 hours ago, webfact said:

File photo for reference only. Courtesy of Amarin TV

 

SI SA KET - In a recent skirmish along the Thai-Cambodian border, the Thai military has reportedly engaged in intense combat, resulting in the deaths of approximately 100 Cambodian soldiers.

 

According to a statement from the Second Army Region Operations Centre, the clashes occurred at approximately 4 p.m. on July 25th. The Thai forces have maintained control across all confrontation points by deploying tanks and artillery to retaliate effectively.

 

The conflict intensified as Cambodian troops attempted to breach key areas, including Chong Bok, Sam Tae, Phu Ma Khua, and other strategic locations. The Thai military has responded with continuous artillery fire, thwarting the opposition’s advances in these regions.

 

In Sam Tae, the situation involved tank and artillery assaults, causing significant damage to the opposition, especially in the Sattasom area.

 

Meanwhile, at Phra Viharn, ongoing skirmishes were reported near Wat Phra Kaew, with strategic movements aimed at securing an advantage on Phu Ma Khua.

 

Thai forces destroyed enemy positions at Hill 350 and successfully defended Prasat Ta Kwai in the Phanom Dong Rak district of Surin, reported Amarin TV.

 

Efforts to evacuate civilians from high-risk areas are currently underway and are being coordinated with provincial government agencies. So far, 63,446 people have been moved to safer zones within four provinces.

 

Currently, no additional damage to areas outside the immediate conflict zones has been reported. However, artillery shells have impacted various locales, including Ta Mieng and Bak Dai in Surin province and Si Wichean in Ubon Ratchathani, where BM-21 rockets damaged four homes. In Kantharalak district, Sisaket, artillery strikes have also been noted.

 

To assist affected civilians, royal charitable volunteers are providing aid in the four provinces, setting up seven royal kitchens and eight field kitchens, and preparing 52,000 meals a day for displaced individuals.

 

The public is urged to refrain from photographing or sharing information regarding military movements to prevent misinformation and reduce panic. People are also cautioned against falling for fake news, advising them to verify information from official sources.

 

As skirmishes continue along the borders of Buriram, Surin, Sisaket, and Ubon Ratchathani, residents are advised to avoid these frontier zones to ensure their safety.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Amarin TV 2025-07-26

 

 

 

the first casuality  of war is truth.

[bannork]

9 minutes ago, daejung said:

🛕 1. Origin of the Conflict: The Preah Vihear Temple

The Preah Vihear Temple was built in the 11th century by the Khmer people, ancestors of modern Cambodians.

It is located on top of a cliff in the Dângrêk mountain range, which forms the natural border between Cambodia and Thailand.

The conflict is not mainly about the temple itself, but about a 4.6 km² area surrounding it.



---

🇰🇭 Cambodia’s Position:

In 1962, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that the Preah Vihear Temple belongs to Cambodia, based on a French colonial-era map (1907).

Cambodia argues that Thailand tacitly accepted that map for decades.

Cambodia also contends that the 1962 ruling implies sovereignty over the adjacent area as well.



---

🇹🇭 Thailand’s Position:

Thailand accepts that the temple itself belongs to Cambodia (in accordance with the ICJ ruling).

However, it disputes Cambodia’s claim over the surrounding area, arguing that the map used by the ICJ is not legally binding for defining the border.

Thailand maintains that the border should follow the watershed line, which would place part of the disputed land on the Thai side.



---

🔥 Military and Political Tensions

Armed clashes occurred in 2008, 2009, and 2011, resulting in casualties on both sides.

These tensions are often fueled by domestic nationalist sentiments, especially during times of political crisis in either country.

In 2013, the ICJ issued a clarification of its 1962 judgment, confirming that Cambodia has sovereignty over the promontory where the temple stands.



---

📌 In Summary

Cambodia bases its claim on the ICJ ruling and the historical French map.

Thailand accepts the loss of the temple but disputes the adjacent territory, referring to geographical principles.

The dispute is a complex mix of international law, colonial history, regional geopolitics, and national pride.
 

An excellent summary of the temple dispute. For the current outbreak of violence, other factors may have to be considered: 

 https://www.khaosodenglish.com/politics/2025/06/26/thailand-crackdown-intensifies-after-amnesty-cambodia-scam-center-report/

[JAG]

1 hour ago, captain_shane said:

As they should be. Thailand needs to hit cambodia until they unequivocally surrender. Bombing 7/11's and civilian locations should be met with absolute brutal force. No cease fire should happen until cambodia admits that they lost and they have no chance in fighting. Until then, they need to get their teeth kicked in. Cease fire's only help with weaker party have a chance to regain composure and restock weaponry, thailand should not fall for this.

Posted from a safe distance eh?

 

If we are to believe the Thai claims (if) 100 + boys have died in a pointless squabble over a pile of old stones. Both countries claim to be Budhist, but these ruins are not even of a Budhist Temple.

 

You are revelling in it aren't you - sick bastard!

[TroubleandGrumpy]

2 hours ago, Gaccha said:

It's remarkable looking at the work of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.

 

They have gone back in time looking at the satellite maps and they can identify the exact moments of explosions and troop movements. 

 

Never has a conflict being so clearly the fault of one side: Cambodia.

 

You can clearly see troop movements in mid-February, to fortify strategic hill stations, as well as strengthening military road networks within Cambodia. 

 

You can then see that the first shots were fired into Thailand. 

 

But it is equally shocking how bad Thailand has done on the communication front. The whole international media is alight with Cambodian representatives pleading their innocence. Whilst Thai diplomats sound aggressive and obstinant. 

Thai Military is unaware of how to deal with the media. In Cambodia the 'politicians' are running things and they know how to deal with the media. Thailand's politicians in the Govt are hanging on to power, and the Military is offside with them - so they are not talking enough to each other. There are people who could handle the media is such a situation (Prayat and other in the 'military parties) - but they are not interested in helping the Government. 

 

Thailand is run by a squabbling bunch of greedy wealthy Thainese with nil care about the average Thai person.  That has never been more evident than in this matter - the Military organised the evacuations and managed their responses themselves. This and many other episodes show clearly that the Thai politicians could not organise a beer in a brewery , whilst the Thai Military know what they are doing and how to do it - except for managing the media.  

[captain_shane]

Just now, JAG said:

Posted from a safe distance eh?

 

If we are to believe the Thai claims (if) 100 + boys have died in a pointless squabble over a pile of old stones. Both countries claim to be Budhist, but these ruins are not even of a Budhist Temple.

 

You are revelling in it aren't you - sick bastard!

Screw you pal. I'm in koh chang, 43km away. Where are you? In the bar in pattaya or what?

[Harrisfan]

9 minutes ago, JAG said:

Posted from a safe distance eh?

 

If we are to believe the Thai claims (if) 100 + boys have died in a pointless squabble over a pile of old stones. Both countries claim to be Budhist, but these ruins are not even of a Budhist Temple.

 

You are revelling in it aren't you - sick bastard!

Learn the origins of Buddhism

[TroubleandGrumpy]

29 minutes ago, daejung said:

🛕 1. Origin of the Conflict: The Preah Vihear Temple

The Preah Vihear Temple was built in the 11th century by the Khmer people, ancestors of modern Cambodians.
It is located on top of a cliff in the Dângrêk mountain range, which forms the natural border between Cambodia and Thailand.
The conflict is not mainly about the temple itself, but about a 4.6 km² area surrounding it.
Cambodia’s Position:
In 1962, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that the Preah Vihear Temple belongs to Cambodia, based on a French colonial-era map (1907).
Cambodia argues that Thailand tacitly accepted that map for decades.
Cambodia also contends that the 1962 ruling implies sovereignty over the adjacent area as well.

Thailand’s Position:
Thailand accepts that the temple itself belongs to Cambodia (in accordance with the ICJ ruling).
However, it disputes Cambodia’s claim over the surrounding area, arguing that the map used by the ICJ is not legally binding for defining the border.
Thailand maintains that the border should follow the watershed line, which would place part of the disputed land on the Thai side.

 

Military and Political Tensions
Armed clashes occurred in 2008, 2009, and 2011, resulting in casualties on both sides.
These tensions are often fueled by domestic nationalist sentiments, especially during times of political crisis in either country.
In 2013, the ICJ issued a clarification of its 1962 judgment, confirming that Cambodia has sovereignty over the promontory where the temple stands.

In Summary
Cambodia bases its claim on the ICJ ruling and the historical French map.
Thailand accepts the loss of the temple but disputes the adjacent territory, referring to geographical principles.
The dispute is a complex mix of international law, colonial history, regional geopolitics, and national pride.
 

A very biased and simplex revision of history - you missed quite a few things.

 

In 1904 there was a Treaty made between French Indochina and Thailand that specified the borders. On that basis the temples (there are several) were all inside Thailand. That map drawn up by French mapmakers in 1907 was wrong and it was never part of the Treaty. In fact I doubt the Thais saw it for a very long time - probably decades later - and they just ignored it - they had their own maps. The 1907 map was dragged out by Cambodia in 1960s in a Court case that Thailand did not accept - Thailand are not a signatory to the ICJ. 

 

The People's of Isaan and Cambodia and Loas are all related back in the past and are a 'common people' - they all go back to the Khmer period. Under the Treaty with French Indochina Thailand ceded Siem Riep to them - before that Thailand 'owned' it going back to when they conquered the Khmer Empire in 1400s. 

 

I dislike it when people state such obvious mistruths and distortions that only take a little research of history to show not true. I am not saying you lied - but your conclusions are wrong because they are not based on all the information - in fact that is what Cambodia did in the past and are doing again. Hun Sen is linked to people who were part of the Pol Pot regime - he was in 20s at that time.

 

You are very correct when you said this - The dispute is a complex mix of international law, colonial history, regional geopolitics, and national pride.

 

Thailand believes that the ICJ Court was very biased and in error - they never gave up control over the areas surrounding those temples to . But Thailand has acknowledged their decision about the temples. But the decision was not about the borders - and Thailand maintains that the temples are inside Thailand and will never change the border line without serious reasons. 

 

Between 1904 and 1953 when Cambodia became independent from France the borders were what Thailand believed them to be - almost 50 years.  Later claims by Cambodia in 1960s that the 1907 unofficial map was the boundary are patently false. But with Thailand refusing to be a member of the ICJ - it is clear the ICJ decision was biased.  

[AustinRacing]

The leaders are taking leaves out or Trump/netanyahoooo books. Start some military conflict to deflect from internal issues. 

[gravia]

  reply to Renaissance.       world war 1 is the era most Thai and Cambodian  goverments live in 

[Liverpool Lou]

3 hours ago, proton said:

Looks like Thailand is a war criminal then

How so?

[Cuchulainn]

Lot's of interesting post's  opinion's and view's from poster's about Thai's and Khmer's on the subject.

Well done, boys.

 

Sorry, edit........ boy's

[MarkBR]

39 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

A very biased and simplex revision of history - you missed quite a few things.

 

In 1904 there was a Treaty made between French Indochina and Thailand that specified the borders. On that basis the temples (there are several) were all inside Thailand. That map drawn up by French mapmakers in 1907 was wrong and it was never part of the Treaty. In fact I doubt the Thais saw it for a very long time - probably decades later - and they just ignored it - they had their own maps. The 1907 map was dragged out by Cambodia in 1960s in a Court case that Thailand did not accept - Thailand are not a signatory to the ICJ. 

 

The People's of Isaan and Cambodia and Loas are all related back in the past and are a 'common people' - they all go back to the Khmer period. Under the Treaty with French Indochina Thailand ceded Siem Riep to them - before that Thailand 'owned' it going back to when they conquered the Khmer Empire in 1400s. 

 

I dislike it when people state such obvious mistruths and distortions that only take a little research of history to show not true. I am not saying you lied - but your conclusions are wrong because they are not based on all the information - in fact that is what Cambodia did in the past and are doing again. Hun Sen is linked to people who were part of the Pol Pot regime - he was in 20s at that time.

 

You are very correct when you said this - The dispute is a complex mix of international law, colonial history, regional geopolitics, and national pride.

 

Thailand believes that the ICJ Court was very biased and in error - they never gave up control over the areas surrounding those temples to . But Thailand has acknowledged their decision about the temples. But the decision was not about the borders - and Thailand maintains that the temples are inside Thailand and will never change the border line without serious reasons. 

 

Between 1904 and 1953 when Cambodia became independent from France the borders were what Thailand believed them to be - almost 50 years.  Later claims by Cambodia in 1960s that the 1907 unofficial map was the boundary are patently false. But with Thailand refusing to be a member of the ICJ - it is clear the ICJ decision was biased.  

Interesting

[Grumpy one]

8 hours ago, JimHuaHin said:

" ... resulting in the deaths of approximately 100 Cambodian soldiers."  Source of estimated fatalities - Thai drones, Thai supporters in the Khmer military, satellite images, Thai spies or a version of the TAT tourist calculator?

My money is on a used TAT calculator 🤫

[Rinato]

I just read that Cambodia asked for immediate and unconditionef casefire 

[transam]

1 minute ago, Rinato said:

I just read that Cambodia asked for immediate and unconditionef casefire 

Unconditional ceasefire........😉

[Rinato]

2 minutes ago, transam said:

Unconditional ceasefire........😉

Thanks 

[DezLez]

1 hour ago, Harrisfan said:

Learn the origins of Buddhism

Why?

[CallumWK]

18 minutes ago, Rinato said:

I just read that Cambodia asked for immediate and unconditionef casefire 

 

So they start the shooting, and when they find out that was a bad decision because they are losing, they want the Thais to stop. Hahahahaha

[thesetat]

2 hours ago, findlay13 said:

We don't need it. Just listen to all the armchair generals on Asian now ! they have it all sussed out🤣

Yeah... there are so many... What gets me the most is they are believing everything the Thai news is telling them. Yet, most every other topic discussed they are doubtful or skeptical about what is put in the news. 

[BarraMarra]

2 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

Learn the origins of Buddhism

Thought it wouldnt be long before you chipped in Harris suppose you were in a Temple for a year.

[BarraMarra]

18 minutes ago, thesetat said:

Yeah... there are so many... What gets me the most is they are believing everything the Thai news is telling them. Yet, most every other topic discussed they are doubtful or skeptical about what is put in the news. 

You only have to look at how the Thais look down on the lower class in Thailand. Give them B/S and make it like they know what they mean and believe it.

[Captain Flack]

Troll post removed @cardinalblue

[Yagoda]

1 hour ago, CallumWK said:

 

So they start the shooting, and when they find out that was a bad decision because they are losing, they want the Thais to stop. Hahahahaha

Glad you think that 100,000 jungle grubbing poor INNOCENT people being dispossessed from their homes over BULLSHlT is funny.

 

The HiSos and the Okhnas play their games and poor people get screwed.

 

I for one may move to a more peaceful place in the spring. Im tired of the governments in both Thailand and Cambodia