8 hours ago, rice555 said:

The Azof battalions refused to

go and try to get them out, the brave goose steppers.   

As far as I'm aware, the prisoners of war do not include any Azov members or foreign mercenaries. Those captured are solely normal Ukrainian soldiers, often forced into the war; the others simply do not reach captivity.

The Ukrainians have 10K to 20K Ruskies surrounded in Pokrovsk & Kupiansk and have told them to surrender or die.  Looks like Zelenskyy will win the war! 

 

13 hours ago, VBer said:

As far as I'm aware, the prisoners of war do not include any Azov members or foreign mercenaries. Those captured are solely normal Ukrainian soldiers, often forced into the war; the others simply do not reach captivity.

In my post before the one you replied to here, Azov AFU were ordered

to go and try to help the 5K and 5K+(10,000+ in my post) to break out of

the encirclement in Pokrovsk and Kupiansk.

December1991 on Bitchute has a collection of VDO's of press gangs

pulling people off the street for the front lines.

 

-

 

More and more Russians are feeling pain from their war now and even some young people are showing some spine!

 

Approx 12k Ukrainian troops are surrounded. They have to surrender or die.

 

Conflict should be over this year.

4 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Approx 12k Ukrainian troops are surrounded. They have to surrender or die.

 

Conflict should be over this year.

Fake news.

Large Russian city flooded with feces.

Emblematic of wartime Russia under genocidal war criminal dictator Putin.

 

 

13 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Large Russian city flooded with feces.

Emblematic of wartime Russia under genocidal war criminal dictator Putin.

 

 

Not according to George Galloway and Scott Ritter.

10 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Not according to George Galloway and Scott Ritter.

Who cares what Putin propagandists say?

17 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Who cares what Putin propagandists say?

Well Sir! If they are right; the west should be interested.

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkrainianConflict/comments/1ol31a3/exclusive_russia_plans_to_issue_debut_sovereign/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

 

So the rubble is worthless as a international currency

 

 

On 10/31/2025 at 7:57 AM, Stiddle Mump said:

Well Sir! If they are right; the west should be interested.

 

Ritter is a nonce. Who cares about the opinions of a convicted paedophile. Galloway, in the past, has expressed curious opinions on his views about rape, in relation to allegations made about Julian Assange.

 

There is not a chance this pair are correct.

 

 

 

 

 

What a misleading title ! with comments reeking of credulity and propaganda.

 

IMO, the Russians can't lose. They are infinitely more numerous, better armed, fresher, better equipped, and largely supported by their people.

 

Putin is proceeding cautiously, for now refraining from using tactical nuclear weapons to maintain the Chinese alliance and the West's fearful neutrality. But if he were seriously attacked on Russian soil, with any doubt about the ultimate victory, there's no doubt he would launch a massive offensive and destroy Ukraine in a matter of days.

 

In short, this thread is just another way of talking nonsense.

2 hours ago, Toc-Toc said:

What a misleading title ! with comments reeking of credulity and propaganda.

 

IMO, the Russians can't lose. They are infinitely more numerous, better armed, fresher, better equipped, and largely supported by their people.

 

Putin is proceeding cautiously, for now refraining from using tactical nuclear weapons to maintain the Chinese alliance and the West's fearful neutrality. But if he were seriously attacked on Russian soil, with any doubt about the ultimate victory, there's no doubt he would launch a massive offensive and destroy Ukraine in a matter of days.

 

In short, this thread is just another way of talking nonsense.

 

There's another thread for your sort, a safe place if you will. You've expressed an opinion, but your opinion is obvious nonsense, with your pining for "ultimate victory". 

2 hours ago, Toc-Toc said:

What a misleading title ! with comments reeking of credulity and propaganda.

 

IMO, the Russians can't lose. They are infinitely more numerous, better armed, fresher, better equipped, and largely supported by their people.

 

Putin is proceeding cautiously, for now refraining from using tactical nuclear weapons to maintain the Chinese alliance and the West's fearful neutrality. But if he were seriously attacked on Russian soil, with any doubt about the ultimate victory, there's no doubt he would launch a massive offensive and destroy Ukraine in a matter of days.

 

In short, this thread is just another way of talking nonsense.

I wish people  who make such obviously clueless Putin puffery posts would inform us if they are directly allied with Russia or are just another western useful idiot for Putin type who has been infected with Kremlin propaganda like Tucker Carlson. Putin's Russia has it's strengths and weaknesses, but you have to give them credit for the most effective propaganda machine in the world. 

5 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

 

Ritter is a nonce. Who cares about the opinions of a convicted paedophile. Galloway, in the past, has expressed curious opinions on his views about rape, in relation to allegations made about Julian Assange.

 

There is not a chance this pair are correct.

That sounds a tad biased buddy.

 

The question remains; are they correct?

The Pentagon has cleared a plan to supply Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles, but the final political decision now rests with President Donald Trump.

 

According to three US and European officials quoted by CNN, the Pentagon’s Joint Staff informed the White House that delivering Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine would not weaken America’s own reserves.

The assessment was completed earlier this month before Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington.

 

The long-range Tomahawk, which can strike targets up to 1,000 miles away, would allow Ukraine to hit oil and energy facilities deep inside Russian territory.

 

Trump has final say: Pentagon clears Ukraine for Tomahawk missiles

 

19 minutes ago, bannork said:

The Pentagon has cleared a plan to supply Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles, but the final political decision now rests with President Donald Trump.

 

According to three US and European officials quoted by CNN, the Pentagon’s Joint Staff informed the White House that delivering Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine would not weaken America’s own reserves.

The assessment was completed earlier this month before Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington.

 

The long-range Tomahawk, which can strike targets up to 1,000 miles away, would allow Ukraine to hit oil and energy facilities deep inside Russian territory.

 

Trump has final say: Pentagon clears Ukraine for Tomahawk missiles

 

Trump doesn't want Ukraine to win.

He just wants any kind of "peace" deal where he can do a big press event and proclaim himself the hero/savior. 

He'll only use the tomahawks as bargaining chips rather than sending them without conditions.

All transactional, all the time.

 

21 hours ago, Toc-Toc said:

In short, this thread is just another way of talking nonsense.

Bro, this thread is the same thing as the main mass media news. Just a massive pro ukrainian, warmongering psyop and rusophobic propaganda. Financed by the groups that only want to escalate this "war". I just came back from 8day trip to Lviv, Kyiv and surrondings and what I see (again) and hear from local ukrainian people totally doesn't correspond with narration pushed by politicians and mass media. All of them don't care about ordinary people, they only care about their own profits. Significant thing about this forum - they sit in comfy, safe, distant places and spreading lies about the situation in Ukraine. If they believe in this cause and they are so commited to it, why da hell they don't go to Ukraine to help their homies there ?