13 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Why did the Biden DOJ not release the dirt on Trump again? 

The Epstein files were not part of the Dem playbook at that time, they were part of the MAGA playbook.

 

Why is it that MAGAs, after asking for their release for years, suddenly want to hide them? 🤣

9 minutes ago, candide said:

The Epstein files were not part of the Dem playbook at that time, they were part of the MAGA playbook.

 

Why is it that MAGAs, after asking for their release for years, suddenly want to hide them? 🤣

I do not know anyone that wants to hide them.

 

Why did the Biden DOJ not release the dirt on Trump again? 

1 hour ago, Thingamabob said:

As pointed out elsewhere the age of consent at 14 is normal in many countries.

How low can you go? —there's, also reports of victims as young as 11 and 13.

Litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia

10 minutes ago, mogandave said:

I do not know that wants to hide them.

 

Why did the Biden DOJ not release the dirt on Trump again? 

I already replied. It was not part of their playbook.

 

Then why don't they want to release the Epstein files now?

 

MAGAs campaigned on it and now they don't want to release them any more! Why that?

2 minutes ago, candide said:

I already replied. It was not part of their playbook.

So the was part of Trump’s playbook, but Biden chose not to shut it down by leaking dirt on Trump. 

 

Why?

2 minutes ago, candide said:

Then why don't they want to release the Epstein files now?

I’m sure I don’t know. But I do know that had there been dirt on Trump, it would have been leaked. 

2 minutes ago, candide said:

MAGAs campaigned on it and now they don't want to release them any more! Why that?

Campaigned on what? I want them released. and I do not know anyone that does not want them released, do you? 

1 hour ago, Will B Good said:

 

Source ?

1 hour ago, Will B Good said:

 

Source ?

5 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Source ?

 

Lee & Perrins

 

https://www.epsteinarchive.org/?

12 hours ago, bendejo said:

Bad news for the MAGA drive to normalize pedophilia. 

Your evidence for that inane claim is what?

3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Lee&Perrins

 

https://www.epsteinarchive.org/?

The Worcester wonder. Never without it.

3 minutes ago, mogandave said:

It does make one wonder why with all the evidence, the Biden DOJ was too busy spinning a few misdemeanor  bookkeeping discrepancies into 34 felonies. 

 

Because there is no end of Dems, Dem donors, personal friends all in there somewhere??????

4 minutes ago, mogandave said:

It does make one wonder why with all the evidence, the Biden DOJ was too busy spinning a few misdemeanor  bookkeeping discrepancies into 34 felonies. 

Because there was/is nothing else if much interest.

18 minutes ago, mogandave said:

So the was part of Trump’s playbook, but Biden chose not to shut it down by leaking dirt on Trump. 

 

Why?

I’m sure I don’t know. But I do know that had there been dirt on Trump, it would have been leaked. 

Campaigned on what? I want them released. and I do not know anyone that does not want them released, do you? 

I replied already. It was not part of their playbook and they did not care about it. I guess they weren't motivated to go through several 1000s of archived files, for what was perceived as another MAGA hoax. Your question is also irrelevant, as the issue is now that the current administration doesn't want to release them.

 

It was a MAGA propaganda issue. And now, the MAGA administration doesn't want to release them after bragging about it.

 

I don't know what's in them, and I think there's likely no direct proof, beyond what we already know (Andrew, etc...). However, there is obviously something Trump don't want to release. 😆

7 hours ago, Tug said:

And Donald is allready considering a pardon or so he says on camera on CNN….unbelievable but then again most likely trying to buy her silence 🤫 

Unbelievable that you would not watch your own link before posting, he specifically said that he is not considering a pardon.

7 hours ago, Tug said:

Donald is allready considering a pardon or so he says on camera on CNN

Fatuous nonsense.

7 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Any guesses where she’ll run to when Trump does release her?

He is not releasing her, why do you suggest that he is?

5 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Unbelievable that you would not watch your own link before posting, he specifically said that he is not considering a pardon.

 

 

When does he say he is not considering a pardon?

Wonder how she got her case to the Supreme Court so quickly…

11 minutes ago, candide said:

I replied already. It was not part of their playbook and they did not care about it. I guess they weren't motivated to go through several 1000s of archived files, for what was perceived as another MAGA hoax. Your question is also irrelevant, as the issue is now that the current administration doesn't want to release them.

 

It was a MAGA propaganda issue. And now, the MAGA administration doesn't want to release them after bragging about it.

 

I don't know what's in them, and I think there's likely no direct proof, beyond what we already know (Andrew, etc...). However, there is obviously something Trump don't want to release. 😆

I say they get released in early September for the midterms. 

 

I am sure they went through them with a fine tooth comb, and found nothing of any significance on Trump. No way they had it, and did not use it.

4 minutes ago, Suetape said:

Wonder how she got her case to the Supreme Court so quickly…

Five years?

I just do not understand how a pardon helps Trump. 

 

 

2 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Five years?

 

 

Ghislaine Maxwell first lodged her appeal based on Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 non-prosecution agreement in early 2025, culminating in a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court that was rejected on October 6, 2025.

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Ghislaine Maxwell first lodged her appeal based on Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 non-prosecution agreement in early 2025, culminating in a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court that was rejected on October 6, 2025.

She was convicted five years ago, yes?

13 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

When does he say he is not considering a pardon?

In the linked video in the comment to which I responded!

3 minutes ago, mogandave said:

She was convicted five years ago, yes?

 

2 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

In the linked video in the comment to which I responded!

 

 

Well now he's changed his mind!!

17 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

When does he say he is not considering a pardon?

In that video that you posted also, 0:33!  

1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said:

In that video that you posted also, 0:33!  

 

Give it up......he repeatedly says he'll talk to the DoJ about it.

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

4 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

In the linked video in the comment to which I responded!

 

 

Well now he's changed his mind!!

Watch your own link!  0:33, he does not say that he has changed his mind.

3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

So she finally got her case to the supreme court five years after conviction. 

 

It does not take long for a case to be heard once it’s accepted.