OUTRAGE: UK Court FORCES Vaccination on Baby Against Mother’s Wishes

When “child protection” becomes state control — a North London mother loses her right to decide what goes into her baby’s body.

Source: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/outrage-uk-court-forces-vaccination

 

= = = 

In a chilling High Court decision, an Islington mother has been overruled by the state, her 8-month-old daughter will be vaccinated without her consent.

The ruling, justified under “child welfare,” has ignited debate over parental rights, medical freedom, and the expanding power of local authorities over family life in Britain.

 

The UK's Children Act 1989 gives local authorities the power to arrange for children in care to be vaccinated even if their parents object.

While there is no law that says children must be vaccinated, the NHS strongly urges parents to follow its routine schedule of vaccinations for babies under one year of age, starting at eight weeks, to protect against diseases like measles, tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough.

 

 

The baby is in the care of the local authority....why? ......because the mother couldn't be trusted to look after her.

 

Even though the baby is in their care they still have to follow a legal process.

 

Under UK law, when a child is under local authority care, the council can apply to the court to make decisions in the child’s best interest.

•  The ruling did not override parental rights arbitrarily—it followed legal due process and was based on medical consensus and child welfare standards.

•  The mother’s objections were considered but ultimately rejected due to lack of scientific basis and the risk posed by non-vaccination.

6 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

OUTRAGE: UK Court FORCES Vaccination on Baby Against Mother’s Wishes

When “child protection” becomes state control — a North London mother loses her right to decide what goes into her baby’s body.

Source: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/outrage-uk-court-forces-vaccination

 

= = = 

In a chilling High Court decision, an Islington mother has been overruled by the state, her 8-month-old daughter will be vaccinated without her consent.

The ruling, justified under “child welfare,” has ignited debate over parental rights, medical freedom, and the expanding power of local authorities over family life in Britain.

 

The UK's Children Act 1989 gives local authorities the power to arrange for children in care to be vaccinated even if their parents object.

While there is no law that says children must be vaccinated, the NHS strongly urges parents to follow its routine schedule of vaccinations for babies under one year of age, starting at eight weeks, to protect against diseases like measles, tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough.

 

When it is best for a child, then sometimes the Law must intervene, it happens to put the child's interests first, as in the cases involving Jehovah Witness parents, junky parents and fruitcake parents...🤫

Very sad this.

 

Poor little soul. Gonna have toxic filth put into her precious body.

 

The NHS! The National Homicide Service.