Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trump to void all docs allegedly signed by Biden with autopen

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post

Trump to void all documents allegedly signed by Biden via autopen, threatens perjury charge

President Donald Trump announced on Friday he is terminating all documents allegedly signed by former President Joe Biden with the autopen.

In a Truth Social post, Trump claimed 92% of documents signed during Biden's presidency were done so with the device.

"The Autopen is not allowed to be used if approval is not specifically given by the President of the United States," Trump wrote. "The Radical Left Lunatics circling Biden around the beautiful Resolute Desk in the Oval Office took the Presidency away from him."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-void-documents-allegedly-signed-biden-via-autopen-threatens-perjury-charge

 

"Lots of ignoramuses will be rejoicing. But it's extremely unlikely that the courts will support Trump.

 

"Despite Attorney General Pamela Bondi’s grandstanding, there’s nothing the Justice Department can do about this. Biden was president, the pardons were issued on his authority, he has said publicly he approved them (in some vague way), and they were official acts at the core of executive power. As the Supreme Court held in the immunity case (Trump v. United States, also known in the Trump administration as The Highest Law), courts are not going to second-guess official executive acts by inquiring into the president’s state of mind (whether that involves corrupt motivation or mindlessness that hasn’t been certified as such by the 25th Amendment)"

https://archive.ph/GvqXR#selection-769.0-777.287

 

The author of this denounced the pardons as instances of corruption. He also said the same about Trump's recent pardons. But nothing can be done about it. He does recommend amending the Constitution to eliminate the power of the pardon. I think he's right. Especially now that the Supreme Court has mostly exempted Presidents from criminal prosecution.

  • Replies 118
  • Views 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Trump is now much more far gone mentally than Joe Biden ever was. Getting to the point where there need to be calls for him to step aside. 

  • Enough, we love our country and do not want to see this grifter tear it apart. This term he is doing a great job of that, as shown by his poll numbers. The worst polls for a second term president in t

  • Trump's downard spiral ( or is it plummet?) is accelerating.

Posted Images

  • Author
  • Popular Post

Trump's downard spiral ( or is it plummet?) is accelerating.

  • Popular Post

 

 

image.png.17a275429d4d08b902577dc6c471ed94.png

 

And I'm waiting for (maybe): The Afghan shooter had lunch with Sleepy Biden on the Rehoboth Beach before heading to WashDC.

  • Popular Post

Trump is now much more far gone mentally than Joe Biden ever was. Getting to the point where there need to be calls for him to step aside. 

  • Author
5 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

 

 

image.png.17a275429d4d08b902577dc6c471ed94.png

 

And I'm waiting for (maybe): The Afghan shooter had lunch with Sleepy Biden on the Rehoboth Beach before heading to WashDC.

And it will be reported that the meal was Halal and Biden will be brought up on charges for refusing to eat pork.

1 hour ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Trump to void all documents allegedly signed by Biden via autopen

Allegedly: being the operative word here.

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, marin said:

Trump is now much more far gone mentally than Joe Biden ever was. Getting to the point where there need to be calls for him to step aside. 

Well, yes, I suspect even his voters can now see what they voted for was a mistake, mind you a couple on here will still support him, eh Dinsy...............😒

  • Author
  • Popular Post
8 minutes ago, novacova said:

Allegedly: being the operative word here.

"Allegedly" is not Trump's word. "Allegedly" is the Fox News characterization of Trump's claims. Fox News is not reporting Trump's claims as facts.

1 hour ago, Alan Zweibel said:

President Donald Trump announced on Friday he is terminating all documents allegedly signed by former President Joe Biden with the autopen.

And rightfully so.

 

Before you America haters and folks blinded by your obsessive Trump derangement start your usual lies and innuendoes, here is the report. 

 

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/The-Biden-Autopen-Presidency-Decline-Delusion-and-Deception-in-the-White-House-2025.10.24.pdf-UPDATED-Oct.-28.pdf

 

I defy any of you  to dispute anything in the report.

  • Popular Post
Just now, Yagoda said:

Before you America haters and folks blinded by your obsessive Trump

Enough, we love our country and do not want to see this grifter tear it apart. This term he is doing a great job of that, as shown by his poll numbers. The worst polls for a second term president in the history of our nation. This anti Trump American supports democracy not fascism which is what you and your ilk promote.

 

FO with your America hater rhetoric. 

  • Author
2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

And rightfully so.

 

Before you America haters and folks blinded by your obsessive Trump derangement start your usual lies and innuendoes, here is the report. 

 

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/The-Biden-Autopen-Presidency-Decline-Delusion-and-Deception-in-the-White-House-2025.10.24.pdf-UPDATED-Oct.-28.pdf

 

I defy any of you  to dispute anything in the report.

Whatever the virtue of the House Republicans' report, I defy you to find support in the courts for Trump's attempt to nullify those pardons. It's bonkers.

And it will never get past the courts.

Pardons cannot be voided by a successor president, autopen or otherwise. The Constitution (Article II) grants absolute pardon power without mandating a specific signing method—oral pardons have even been upheld historically (e.g., Nixon's preemptive pardon by Ford). Trump's claims here are legally baseless and would face immediate court blocks if pursued; no precedent exists for revoking them on signature grounds. (Note: Trump himself used autopen for some pardons during his first term.)

11 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Whatever the virtue of the House Republicans' report, I defy you to find support in the courts for Trump's attempt to nullify those pardons. It's bonkers.

Translation: I havent read the report and have no idea of the law involved. I prefer to spew ignorant nonsense.

  • Popular Post

March 17, 2025 -- The Justice Department in 2005, during the second Bush administration, looked at the legality of the president’s use of the autopen, endorsing it.

 

A president doesn’t have to physically sign his signature to a bill for it to have the power of law–and this “well-settled legal understanding,” the Justice Department said, dates back to the founding of the country. As long as the president personally makes the decision to approve and sign a bill, he’s using his authority appropriately, the Office of Legal Counsel opinion says.

 

Trump is “just having fun at Biden’s expense,” John Yoo, the conservative law professor and Bush-era Office of Legal Counsel attorney, told CNN on Monday. The Bush Justice Department’s conclusion was thorough, Yoo added. “I cannot see the courts rejecting this — it builds on centuries of practice and a long legal tradition of allowing agents to sign on behalf of their principals.”

 

https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-administration-presidency-03-17-25#cm8dddqv600063b6mn0twi2t1

  • Popular Post
4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Translation: I havent read the report and have no idea of the law involved. I prefer to spew ignorant nonsense.

 

There was no need for you to explain this, everyone on this forum know already that the majority of your posts are ignorant nonsense.

1 minute ago, CallumWK said:

There was no need for you to explain this, everyone on this forum know already that the majority of your posts are ignorant nonsense.

Defending the undefendable is about as ignorant as you can get. Seeing a lot of it lately. 

32 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

"Allegedly" is not Trump's word. "Allegedly" is the Fox News characterization of Trump's claims. Fox News is not reporting Trump's claims as facts.

“Allegedly” is in the title of the op and a core characterization of what you posted as in “allegedly” is the absolute operative word here. Perhaps next time post something that conforms more inline with what you would like to believe.

3 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

There was no need for you to explain this, everyone on this forum know already that the majority of your posts are ignorant nonsense.

I disagree. Not ignorant, just faithful:

 

04MAY2025

 

When does it become the Trump economy?                               

PRES. DONALD TRUMP:

It partially is right now. And I really mean this. I think the good parts are the Trump economy and the bad parts are the Biden economy because he’s done a terrible job.

 

He did a terrible job on everything, from his autopen — which I’m sure he knew nothing about, some of the things he was supposedly signing — to immigration. 

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/read-full-transcript-president-donald-trump-interviewed-meet-press-mod-rcna203514

25 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Whatever the virtue of the House Republicans' report, I defy you to find support in the courts for Trump's attempt to nullify those pardons. It's bonkers.

Translation: I never read the report, I dont know anyhting about the law involved but Ill just keep arguing like an idiot because even though I changed my username, I still have nothing.

13 minutes ago, marin said:

Enough, we love our country and do not want to see this grifter tear it apart. This term he is doing a great job of that, as shown by his poll numbers. The worst polls for a second term president in the history of our nation. This anti Trump American supports democracy not fascism which is what you and your ilk promote.

 

FO with your America hater rhetoric. 

FO? Not enough balls to type it out, traitor?

 

3 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Pardons cannot be voided by a successor president, autopen or otherwise. The Constitution (Article II) grants absolute pardon power without mandating a specific signing method—oral pardons have even been upheld historically (e.g., Nixon's preemptive pardon by Ford). Trump's claims here are legally baseless and would face immediate court blocks if pursued; no precedent exists for revoking them on signature grounds. (Note: Trump himself used autopen for some pardons during his first term.)

Possibly the stupidest spin I have ever seen.  Give us the name of the Court case where an oral pardon has been upheld. Tell us, does a forged signature on a pardon render it void? Do you know what forgery is? There is no precedent as to the effects of a forgery on a document?Tell us who Trump pardoned using an autopen?

 

Tell us, have you read the report? No, you havent.

 

Im seeing criminal charges coming LOL

12 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

As long as the president personally makes the decision to approve and sign a bill, he’s using his authority appropriately, the Office of Legal Counsel opinion says.

Emphasis added. Merely a restatement of the common law rules.

 

Hey precedent ssearchers: Research the legal cases surrounding use of signature stamps

11 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

There was no need for you to explain this, everyone on this forum know already that the majority of your posts are ignorant nonsense.

Bet you havent read the report either, flamer.

 

Now notice, he says I post ignorant nonsense. Watch this, I can just see him squirming:

 

If you take my signature stamp and stamp a promissory note from me to you without me knowing, do I owe you the money?

  • Popular Post

As per usual he is accusing others of what he is doing himself.

4 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

As per usual he is accusing others of what he is doing himself.

What is he doing? Is he using the autopen?

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

What is he doing? Is he using the autopen?

You still asleep?

7 minutes ago, Yagoda said:
25 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

As long as the president personally makes the decision to approve and sign a bill, he’s using his authority appropriately, the Office of Legal Counsel opinion says.

Emphasis added. Merely a restatement of the common law rules.

It was a published opinion by the Office of Legal Counsel in 2005 the summary being:

 

The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he
approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law. Rather, the President may sign a
bill within the meaning of Article I, Section 7 by directing a subordinate to affix the President’s
signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.


(signed by) Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Office of Legal Counsel

 

 

  • Popular Post
51 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

I defy any of you  to dispute anything in the report.

The Biden Autopen Presidency ranks among the greatest scandals in U.S. history.

 

 

8 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

It was a published opinion by the Office of Legal Counsel in 2005 the summary being:

 

The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he
approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law. Rather, the President may sign a
bill within the meaning of Article I, Section 7 by directing a subordinate to affix the President’s
signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.


(signed by) Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Office of Legal Counsel

 

 

Yep. Common law rules of agency. Emphasis added.

 

I know that unlike  the yahoos here,  you will read the report sooner or later. If you havent already.

1 minute ago, jerrymahoney said:

The Biden Autopen Presidency ranks among the greatest scandals in U.S. history.

 

 

You dont consider forging the Presidents signature a scandal? Sure beats a BJ in the Oval Office. Emphasis added.

  • Author
36 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Translation: I havent read the report and have no idea of the law involved. I prefer to spew ignorant nonsense.

If Andrew McCarthy,  a former federal prosecutor who writes on legal matters for the National Review, is an ignoramus you have a point.  Otherwise, not so much. What's more, I have no way of knowing whether you have actually read the report.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.