The Billion-Dollar Diagnosis: How PCR Tests Created Pandemics Out of Thin Air

An essay

Source:  https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-billion-dollar-diagnosis-how

= = = 

The Test That Broke the World

Twenty-seven user manuals. All from different PCR test manufacturers. All containing the identical disclaimer: “Research Use Only (RUO), not for diagnostic purposes.”

This fact emerged in a Dutch courtroom in November 2020, presented by entrepreneur Jeroen Pols to the German Corona Committee. The tests that shut down the global economy, that separated families, that justified trillions in pharmaceutical expenditures—every single manufacturer explicitly stated these tests were not intended for diagnosis.

The American CDC and FDA admitted the same thing. The instructions for use of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests explicitly state they are not suitable for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Yet diagnosis is precisely what happened, on a scale never before seen in human history. By early 2021, billions of these tests had been administered worldwide, each one generating data that determined whether someone was “infected” with a virus, whether they could work, travel, see family, or attend school.

The polymerase chain reaction cannot distinguish between viral particles and cellular debris. Kary Mullis, who won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for inventing PCR, stated repeatedly that it cannot detect infection. In a 1993 interview, Mullis was direct: “PCR doesn’t tell you that you are sick. These tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all.”

This is not a technical quibble about testing methodology. This is the foundation upon which modern pandemic response has been built—and that foundation is absent.

What PCR Actually Does (and Doesn’t Do)

To understand how billions of people came to be diagnosed with infections that may not exist, you need to understand what PCR actually measures.

... 

> You can read the full article here: https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-billion-dollar-diagnosis-how

24 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

Kary Mullis, who won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for inventing PCR, stated repeatedly that it cannot detect infection. In a 1993 interview, Mullis was direct: “PCR doesn’t tell you that you are sick. These tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all.”

Unfortunately he died shortly before the Covidiocy plandemic

and anyone citing his comments above were daubed conspiracy theorists,ridiculed and removed form 'polite society'. 

Dr Samantha Annabel Hope Bailey

https://www.hpdt.org.nz/Charge-Details?file=Med22/574P

 

Claus Köhnlein 

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/germanys-covid-sceptics-fuelled-by-russian-media-and-far-right-conspiracies/

 

 

39 minutes ago, johng said:

Unfortunately he died shortly before the Covidiocy plandemic

and anyone citing his comments above were daubed conspiracy theorists,ridiculed and removed form 'polite society'. 

Almost certainly, you have no idea of all the steps involved in using a RT-PCR test to show the presence of the COVID virus.  Accordingly, your opinion is an uniformed one and I will note it as such and spend no more time on it.

5 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

Accordingly, your opinion is an uniformed one and I will note it as such and spend no more time on it.

Not my opinion it was the opinion of the inventor of the PCR tests

you can ignore it all you want but it wont change the facts.

22 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

Dr Samantha Annabel Hope Bailey

https://www.hpdt.org.nz/Charge-Details?file=Med22/574P

Sam was absolutely right.

 

These nonsense charlatans should all resign immediately. Just about as anti-science and anti-nature as they could get.

 

Here Dr Sam talks about the reason she would not take down a vid. Just 5 minutes long. Well worth a look. Integrity or what?!

 

https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/should-i-take-my-video-down:f

 

18 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

Almost certainly, you have no idea of all the steps involved in using a RT-PCR test to show the presence of the COVID virus.  Accordingly, your opinion is an uniformed one and I will note it as such and spend no more time on it.

You are wrong there Sir.

 

The PCR is a lab magnifying tool. As there is no such thing as a COVID virus, it can't show the presence of it. Can it?

2 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

You are wrong there Sir.

 

The PCR is a lab magnifying tool. As there is no such thing as a COVID virus, it can't show the presence of it. Can it?

You believe as you wish.  And I'll assume that since your posts are nothing but denials and grade school level simplifications, I'll believe you're incapable of actual analysis of carefully documented and reviewed science experiments.

3 hours ago, johng said:

Not my opinion it was the opinion of the inventor of the PCR tests

you can ignore it all you want but it wont change the facts.

The actual facts are that the oft quoted statement by Mullis has never been found in any of his content.  It is a fabricated statement conjured up by those unhappy with the government's handling of COVID.

 

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=508560233861500

 

11 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

The actual facts are that the oft quoted statement by Mullis has never been found in any of his content.  It is a fabricated statement conjured up by those unhappy with the government's handling of COVID.

 

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=508560233861500

 

It's on the WWW for all to see.

 

Covid was a military operation. Started on 2017.

Waited for Dr Mullis to pass in august 2019.

Event 201.

All the western deep states were in on it from September 2019.

Companies were instructed to prepare the mRNA jabs. 

Israel told their people that a pandemic was on its way in November 2019.

All the western governments were in lockstep on the lockdown.

PCR rolled out.

Bats & pangolins the guilty ones.

Lab leak first mentioned.

 

There was no pandemic. No virus. No deaths.

11 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

I'll believe you're incapable of actual analysis of carefully documented and reviewed science experiments.

I don't believe in junk science and fraudulent data. That's for sure. I also don't roll up my sleeve because someone wearing a white coat says the stuff in the syringe is 'safe n effective'. You got that right Sir.

 

Where are these; 'carefully documented and reviewed science experiments.'?

 

There ain't none regarding viruses and covid. Any virus for that matter. Don't have to search 100s of science papers; just ask an AI where a virus has been isolated and shown to cause illness.

 

You have backed a loser on this Gamby. Best to cash in yer chips and retire. Move onto other stuff.

 

 

7 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

You have backed a loser on this Gamby. Best to cash in yer chips and retire. Move onto other stuff.

I thought I was wrong once... as it turned out, I was mistaken.

 

I think you need a wheelchair... you don't have a leg to stand on.