video screenshot

 

Explosive images from Jeffrey Epstein's estate have rocked the political sphere, displaying influential figures such as US President Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton, and others in his unsettling orbit. The Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released 19 photos, revealing connections between Epstein and a multitude of powerful men, intensifying scrutiny of these ties. Among the images are Trump surrounded by women with redacted faces and novelty condoms featuring his caricature.

 

Photos also include Steve Bannon and Epstein, Clinton with Maxwell, and Bill Gates with the former Prince Andrew. None of the images show sexual misconduct, and the timing or origin of the images remains unclear. The release has sparked a strong response, with the White House accusing Democrats of crafting a false narrative and omitting context.

 

The Republicans gathered these images as part of a probe into Epstein's dealings, having secured tens of thousands of documents shedding light on new investigative paths. Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia underscored the importance of transparency, noting that only a small portion of the 95,000 images have undergone examination. He called for the Department of Justice to disclose all relevant files immediately.

 

Some individuals pictured have publicly dissociated from Epstein. Bill Gates and Clinton have consistently refuted any wrongdoing, with Gates apologising for past associations and Clinton severing ties before Epstein's arrest in 2019. Trump’s past connections with Epstein were acknowledged, though his team has previously dismissed any criminal acts, labelling Epstein as a "creep."

 

With an impending legal mandate requiring the DOJ to release all Epstein files by December 19, the investigation continues. Republican Rep. Thomas Massie warns of legal consequences if the files are not released, while Garcia pushes for immediate disclosure, hinting at further unnerving material, reported CNN.

 

 

Key Takeaways:

 

• Photos from Epstein's estate implicate various high-profile figures.
• Democrats and Republicans clash over the release and interpretation of these images.
• Pressure mounts on the DOJ to release Epstein files by December 19.

 

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from CNN 2025-12-13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All photos are at 

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/fq3vn18ltfd83re8ggtle/AHYB3CbERvyT38o_vHllVx4?rlkey=tz5pq4zr9i6nofkpi2g7l5vne&e=2&st=rxoz19hb&dl=0

 

(there are more)

This with trump on video saying he used to barge into the teen models dressing rooms when he had that franchise……..hummm…….

Yawn.  Nothing new. Politics as usual.

28 minutes ago, kimothai said:

Yawn.  Nothing new. Politics as usual.

Yawn indeed. Nothing remotely 'explosive' about these images.

And if you believe Epstein killed himself you likely believe all that Aljazeera says.  All those men in those photos bopped little girls.

Just now, koolkarl said:

And if you believe Epstein killed himself you likely believe all that Aljazeera says.  All those men in those photos bopped little girls.

"Little"......🤫

1 hour ago, koolkarl said:

And if you believe Epstein killed himself you likely believe all that Aljazeera says.  All those men in those photos bopped little girls.

Including Donny........

 

16 hours ago, xylophone said:

Including Donny........

 

TOTAL BS..

The photo in the post (two side-by-side images of a man and woman at a beach/pool, one in swimwear, one in white outfits) is not real and not from any Epstein archive.

No such photo exists in the actual 2025 Epstein estate releases (thousands of images from House Oversight Committee include Trump, Clinton, Gates, Bannon, Maxwell – but nothing matching this beach scene with a young blonde woman).

It's a common AI hoax circulating on social media (variations date back to 2024–2025, often labeled "from Epstein files" to go viral).

Visual tells: Unnatural lighting, inconsistent skin tones, odd proportions (e.g., woman's face/pose), and the "special place in HELL" caption is pure meme bait – no archive photo has that.

18 hours ago, koolkarl said:

And if you believe Epstein killed himself you likely believe all that Aljazeera says.  All those men in those photos bopped little girls.

Not little, well developed, and more than happy, at the time, to be well rewarded for their services.

40 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

TOTAL BS..

The photo in the post (two side-by-side images of a man and woman at a beach/pool, one in swimwear, one in white outfits) is not real and not from any Epstein archive.

No such photo exists in the actual 2025 Epstein estate releases (thousands of images from House Oversight Committee include Trump, Clinton, Gates, Bannon, Maxwell – but nothing matching this beach scene with a young blonde woman).

It's a common AI hoax circulating on social media (variations date back to 2024–2025, often labeled "from Epstein files" to go viral).

Visual tells: Unnatural lighting, inconsistent skin tones, odd proportions (e.g., woman's face/pose), and the "special place in HELL" caption is pure meme bait – no archive photo has that.

Well you would say that being one of his fanboys........but it is known that trump liked young girls and the court filings by the lawyers of a young girl whom he was accused of raping, are still available!

17 hours ago, xylophone said:

Including Donny........

 

Interesting photo if it is not doctored.

29 minutes ago, koolkarl said:

Interesting photo if it is not doctored.

It's doctored, see my post immediately after the fake photo!

36 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Well you would say that being one of his fanboys........but it is known that trump liked young girls and the court filings by the lawyers of a young girl whom he was accused of raping, are still available!

I am just stating facts, I am not the one posting fake pictures!

 

President Trump has been accused of raping young girls, but the accusations are unsubstantiated, withdrawn, and widely debunked as hoaxes or smears.

The primary allegation came from a 2016 lawsuit filed under the pseudonym "Katie Johnson," claiming Trump raped her at age 13 in 1994 at an Epstein party.

It was dropped twice (once for threats, per the filer), with no evidence, no witnesses, and the lawyer (Lisa Bloom initially involved but distanced) admitting it was likely fabricated.

Fact-checkers like Snopes label it "false" based on inconsistencies and lack of proof.

No criminal charges, no credible corroboration, and Trump denied it vehemently.

Other claims (e.g., viral Epstein "list" memes or anonymous stories) are baseless or AI-generated fakes, often resurfacing in 2025 political attacks but dismissed by outlets like Reuters as misinformation. Trump's Epstein association exists (1990s–2004 social ties, ended with ban from Mar-a-Lago), but no proven involvement in crimes against minors

These accusations are often weaponized in politics, but lack evidence to hold up legally or factually.

35 minutes ago, koolkarl said:

Interesting photo if it is not doctored.

Well a trump fan boy would deny the pic is real, however he does like young girls and liked to walk into the girls changing rooms unannounced and uninvited, then there's the other pics of him with scantily clad young girls, plus the court case filed against him for raping a 13 year old girl.......but that went nowhere and the reasons:- Power, influence, money and friends.

4 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

President Trump has been accused of raping young girls, but the accusations are unsubstantiated, withdrawn, and widely debunked as hoaxes or smears.

"Donald Trump 'spent hours at my house' and 'knew about the girls,' Jeffrey Epstein wrote in emails "

Nov. 12, 2025 Updated

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-11-12/la-na-epstein-trump

 

4 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

widely debunked as hoaxes or smears.

Widely debunked by whom?

7 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Widely debunked by whom?

 

Well quite a few....

 

Snopes: Rated "False" – no evidence, case withdrawn twice (once for threats, but no proof), plaintiff vanished, and filings full of inconsistencies.

 

PolitiFact: "Mostly False" – anonymous claims, no corroboration, lawsuit dismissed without trial.

 

FactCheck.org: Debunked as baseless – no documents, witnesses, or forensic evidence; tied to political operative Norm Eisen's circle for timing.

 

Reuters: "Unfounded" – reported but emphasized lack of verification, case dropped before discovery.

 

CNN and NYT: Covered but noted "unsubstantiated allegations," with CNN calling it a "last-minute election smear" in 2016 retrospectives.

 

Courts: The suit was filed/dropped in California (June 2016), refiled in NY (Sept 2016), dropped again (Nov 2016) – no judge found merit; plaintiff never surfaced.

 

No victims, no proof – just a hoax timed for 2016 election chaos. "Widely debunked" isn't spin; it's fact from non-partisan checkers.

 

Now of course if  you have evidence to the contrary?? Share it!

34 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

 

Well quite a few....

 

Snopes: Rated "False" – no evidence, case withdrawn twice (once for threats, but no proof), plaintiff vanished, and filings full of inconsistencies.

 

PolitiFact: "Mostly False" – anonymous claims, no corroboration, lawsuit dismissed without trial.

 

FactCheck.org: Debunked as baseless – no documents, witnesses, or forensic evidence; tied to political operative Norm Eisen's circle for timing.

 

Reuters: "Unfounded" – reported but emphasized lack of verification, case dropped before discovery.

 

CNN and NYT: Covered but noted "unsubstantiated allegations," with CNN calling it a "last-minute election smear" in 2016 retrospectives.

 

Courts: The suit was filed/dropped in California (June 2016), refiled in NY (Sept 2016), dropped again (Nov 2016) – no judge found merit; plaintiff never surfaced.

 

No victims, no proof – just a hoax timed for 2016 election chaos. "Widely debunked" isn't spin; it's fact from non-partisan checkers.

 

Now of course if  you have evidence to the contrary?? Share it!

No proof doesn't mean debunked.

 

Why do you presume i think him guilty? I object to unsubstantiated statements like yours.

10 minutes ago, stevenl said:

No proof doesn't mean debunked.

You are absolutely correct. If it doesn’t exist then there’s nothing to debunk. Without validation, there’s nothing to prove.

8 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

It's a common AI hoax circulating on social media (variations date back to 2024–2025, often labeled "from Epstein files" to go viral).

 

Great then that Donald just signed a law forbidding all and any control of generative AI.

 

"You live by the sword, you die by the sword."

The media is generally reporting these photos to be all innocuous. But to give him his due, Roger Stone is on the ball (though maybe he's stealing someone elses thunder).

 

https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-560w,f_avif,q_auto:eco,dpr_2/rockcms/2025-12/251212-steve-bannon-jeffrey-epstein-cs-f5c7a5.jpg

 

 

On Epstein's desk are two photos, both redacted (they were looking hard at these photos). One appears to show a woman slumped on a sofa, placed very close to the edge of the desk, near Bannon. Bannon is in conversation with Epstein, after Epstein's initial arrest. Some say this is an Ipad showing a livestream. Others think its faked.

 

Bannon planned a documentary on Epstein, and there is apparently 15 hours of unaired footage from interviews in Epstein's office, held by Bannon. This I suppose is why there are these photos appearing. There were people going around the office, the house, snapping off the cuff moments with Bannon, Allen and others.

3 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

No victims, no proof – just a hoax timed for 2016 election chaos. "Widely debunked" isn't spin; it's fact from non-partisan checkers.

Of course trump isn't guilty of sex with girls because he has a blemish free record.....

 

Why would anyone believe a POS like this and he was accused of rape by his first wife as well, but that was changed........amazing what money and power can do. 

 

And here Stacey Williams speaks about trump sexually assaulting her..... https://youtu.be/Iv0zDRycJlg?si=caqFfzv3_FVXFoKw

It's completely ridiculous for the White House to be playing this game, most reasonable people are willing to acknowledge that Trump is not only a degenerate, but that his behavior in his younger years was that of a completely depraved soul. 

 

He is as guilty as they come he was very close to Epstein for two decades and you can't tell me that a guy with Trump's nature would have had the discipline to refrain from having underaged sex. 

 

 

14 hours ago, stevenl said:

No proof doesn't mean debunked.

 

Why do you presume i think him guilty? I object to unsubstantiated statements like yours.

i object to your objection! 

"All these accusations – rape, young girls, 'knowing what Epstein was up to' – and not one shred of evidence has ever surfaced. No victims, no witnesses, no logs, no tapes.
If you've got actual proof, show it. Until then, it's just recycled gossip from a dead pedophile and political hacks. Put up or shut up.

12 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Of course trump isn't guilty of sex with girls because he has a blemish free record.....

 

Why would anyone believe a POS like this and he was accused of rape by his first wife as well, but that was changed........amazing what money and power can do. 

 

AND....https://youtu.be/Iv0zDRycJlg?si=caqFfzv3_FVXFoKw 

 

Who said he has a blemish free record??? Your making stuff up and posting fake images!

 

Let's look at facts, instead of delusions!

 

Ivana Trump "Rape" Accusation: From her 1990 divorce deposition (post-hair surgery fight), but she retracted in 1993 book and 2015 statement:

"Not literal rape – I felt violated emotionally." No charges, no trial – she called it "without merit" and supported his 2016 run.

"Changed because money/power"? Baseless – Ivana got $14M settlement and stayed amicable co-parents. Retracted voluntarily, not coerced.

 

The Video Link: Ghislaine Maxwell's 2016 deposition clip – she describes a 1997 dinner with Trump, a journalist, and no Epstein. "Friendly interaction"? Yeah, that's it – no allegations, no "girls," no crimes. It's irrelevant fluff, not the "smoking gun" you imply. Nice try linking, but it proves zilch.

 

Your "guilty of sex with girls" insinuation? Zero proof – no victims, no charges, no island visits .

"Power and money" as cover-up? Cope for lack of evidence. Voters see through the smears – twice. 

37 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

i object to your objection! 

"All these accusations – rape, young girls, 'knowing what Epstein was up to' – and not one shred of evidence has ever surfaced. No victims, no witnesses, no logs, no tapes.
If you've got actual proof, show it. Until then, it's just recycled gossip from a dead pedophile and political hacks. Put up or shut up.

Again, why do you presume i think him guilty? 

22 hours ago, xylophone said:

Well you would say that being one of his fanboys........but it is known that trump liked young girls and the court filings by the lawyers of a young girl whom he was accused of raping, are still available!

Nonsense. There is absolutely nothing to link Trump with young/underage girls, rather the opposite in fact. Get over it and find something else to whine about.

15 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Nonsense. There is absolutely nothing to link Trump with young/underage girls, rather the opposite in fact. Get over it and find something else to whine about.

How about trump walking in on the dressing room for a teen pageant? 

On 12/13/2025 at 1:46 PM, Thingamabob said:

Yawn indeed. Nothing remotely 'explosive' about these images.

And "grabbing them by the pussy" is normal for you too?