39 minutes ago, stevenl said:

As already requested by another poster, link please.

 

I already gave you one, but I doubt anyone even looked at it.  Because you only follow the science that agrees with you.  How'za bout you comment on what I've already provided, because it'll be a few days before I'm in a location where most of the right wing sources aren't blocked on one side or the other. 

 

I'll be in Thailand midweek and have access to my bookmarks in my "Election Fraud" bookmark folder.  If I posted those links from China here, I'd be doing it mostly blind because I can't open them from here.

27 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

I already gave you one, but I doubt anyone even looked at it.  Because you only follow the science that agrees with you.  How'za bout you comment on what I've already provided, because it'll be a few days before I'm in a location where most of the right wing sources aren't blocked on one side or the other. 

 

I'll be in Thailand midweek and have access to my bookmarks in my "Election Fraud" bookmark folder.  If I posted those links from China here, I'd be doing it mostly blind because I can't open them from here.

If you're referring to the links from Justfacts.com,  I hope you're not aware that justfacts.com is basically the work of someone named James Agresti. What he publishes on his website isn't peer reviewed. So it's just some guy, who's not even a statistician, making dubious claims.

How can an illegal vote? Where I live, you have to be enrolled to vote, and when you vote, you have to prove who you are.

42 minutes ago, still kicking said:

How can an illegal vote? Where I live, you have to be enrolled to vote, and when you vote, you have to prove who you are.

Only in MAGA bizarro land.

56 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

If you're referring to the links from Justfacts.com,  I hope you're not aware that justfacts.com is basically the work of someone named James Agresti. What he publishes on his website isn't peer reviewed. So it's just some guy, who's not even a statistician, making dubious claims.

And it's been already debunked! 

(as each and every MAGA claim about massive voter fraud)

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/noncitizens-registered-to-vote/

1 hour ago, Alan Zweibel said:

If you're referring to the links from Justfacts.com,  I hope you're not aware that justfacts.com is basically the work of someone named James Agresti. What he publishes on his website isn't peer reviewed. So it's just some guy, who's not even a statistician, making dubious claims.

Claims that the researcher himself said to be not supported by the data.

13 hours ago, stevenl said:

Claims that the researcher himself said to be not supported by the data.

Actually, just a quibble, but there were 3 researchers. But you have correctly cited their expert opinions. Among other things, the sample they used was way too small to be statistically significant enough to justify the conclusions  drawn by Agresti.

More election fraud B.S. from Trump, this time about the 2024 election! 🤣🤣🤣

 

"It’s a rigged election in California because we would win California by a lot."

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/gov-newsom-mocks-trump-making-224452665.html

 

 

AI via Gemini:

 

 (52 U.S.C. § 20701) specifies the 22-month period is the minimum time for which they are required to retain and preserve the records. 52 U.S.C. § 20703 gives the U.S. Attorney General the authority to demand access to these records during that 22-month period for the purpose of ensuring the integrity of federal elections and protecting voting rights. 

 

52 U.S.C. § 20703 gives the U.S. Attorney General the authority to demand access to these records during that 22-month period for the purpose of ensuring the integrity of federal elections and protecting voting rights. 

 

While the statute itself doesn't mention a 22-month period, related federal election laws (like the NVRA) require states to maintain voter records for a minimum of 24 months (2 years), making these records accessible for AG investigations during that retention period. 

 

The "22-Month Period" Connection:

Federal law (like NVRA) mandates states keep voter registration records for at least 24 months.

 

The AG uses § 20703 to access these state-held records to check compliance with federal election laws, meaning records are generally available during much of this ~2-year retention window for investigation.(per 52 U.S.C. § 20701)