Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Label Controversy at National Museum: "Khmer Art" Dispute

Featured Replies

611733260_1281798770650302_1838607322442958456_n-2-1024x576.jpg

Photo courtesy of Khaosod

The opening of a public exhibition at the National Museum Bangkok featuring recently returned bronze sculptures has sparked a debate about their classification and national identity. The artifacts, returned from the Asian Art Museum in San Francisco, are on display at the Isara Winitchai Throne Hall. A Thai artifact restitution group has urged the Fine Arts Department to revise labels that currently describe the sculptures as "Lopburi Art" or "Khmer Art in Thailand," arguing for a classification that better reflects their origins.

Chotiwat Runjaroen, co-founder of the “Samnuek 300 Ong” group, challenged the current labels, advocating for terms like "Dvaravati-Isan" or "Prakon Chai" to recognize a unique Southeast Asian style distinct from Khmer influences. This issue traces back to 1923 when the term “Lopburi Art” was coined to avoid French territorial claims by then-Prince Damrong Rajanubhab, as explained by Rungroj Phirom-anukul, an associate history professor at Ramkhamhaeng University.

Rungroj noted that the term "Khmer Art in Thailand" emerged as a means to address nationalist tensions but argued that using such ethnic labels is misleading, given the lack of knowledge about the creators' identities. He proposed that these sculptures, discovered in Buriram province, be recognized as "Mun River Basin Art," with possible connections to the ancient Sri Canasa culture in Nakhon Ratchasima.

As the exhibition continues, the debate highlights the complexity of art classification amid evolving understandings of national identity and history. The Fine Arts Department is under pressure to reconsider its labels, reflecting broader discussions on how historical artifacts should be contextualized, reported Khaosod.

Key Takeaways

  • Debate over artifact labels highlights complex national identity issues.

  • Terms like “Lopburi Art” were historically used to navigate territorial tensions.

  • Experts suggest reclassification to “Mun River Basin Art” due to origin and style.

Related Stories

Thailand Updates National Museum and Heritage Site Entry Fees

Chalawan Thailandicus Fossils Declared National Treasure

image.png  

Adapted by ASEAN Now from Khaosod 2026-01-08

 

image.png

 

image.png

  • Popular Post

On 1/8/2026 at 3:06 AM, snoop1130 said:

Chotiwat Runjaroen, co-founder of the “Samnuek 300 Ong” group, challenged the current labels, advocating for terms like "Dvaravati-Isan" or "Prakon Chai" to recognize a unique Southeast Asian style distinct from Khmer influences

LOL!!! The insecurities and jealously is so strong with these bozos! Hey Thailand, call it what you want. bottom line, any ancient art, sculptures, and structures in the area were built by Khmer, Mon (Dvaravati) or anyone else long before there was a unified Thai state. History isn't that hard and perhaps you can do your people justice by telling them the truth rather than hide it. That's why so many poor Thai are ignorant, confused and have misplace information on their own past.

6 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Reeks of cultural appropriation to me.

It typical Thai disdain and envy of anything that they didn't create or invent esp. if it has Khmer origin.

7 hours ago, BayArea said:

LOL!!! The insecurities and jealously is so strong with these bozos! Hey Thailand, call it what you want. bottom line, any ancient art, sculptures, and structures in the area were built by Khmer, Mon (Dvaravati) or anyone else long before there was a unified Thai state. History isn't that hard and perhaps you can do your people justice by telling them the truth rather than hide it. That's why so many poor Thai are ignorant, confused and have misplace information on their own past.

Your last sentence says it all - there is the "official" Thai version of history; and then there is the rest of the world version of Thai history. The "official" version of Thai history is a "selected" version, rejecting numerous historical facts and scientifically verified evidence which conflicts with the "official" version.

3 hours ago, JimHuaHin said:

Your last sentence says it all - there is the "official" Thai version of history; and then there is the rest of the world version of Thai history. The "official" version of Thai history is a "selected" version, rejecting numerous historical facts and scientifically verified evidence which conflicts with the "official" version.

Perfectly stated

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.