My personal belief is either or the combination of emf proliferation and food additives are suspect.

From birth this generation is the first to have been bathed their entire life in the impact of these influences.

But as the first they are just the vanguard of generations that potentially could present with even worse cancer outcomes.

I would add that the same causations to be involved in the Autism spectrum that is so in vogue now.

7 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

My personal belief is either or the combination of emf proliferation and food additives are suspect.

Could well be .... but what it certainly aint is the 'safe and effectives'

well should say the other safe and effectives as they also say the electromagnetic radiation

and the foods additives are safe too.

1 minute ago, johng said:

Could well be .... but what it certainly aint is the 'safe and effectives'

well should say the other safe and effectives as they also say the electromagnetic radiation

and the foods additives are safe too.

EMF's in particular have caused schools and other sensitive institutions to be relocated from under "high tension carrier lines" due to recognition that the radiation levels exceed a certain measure.

How was that measure established? And what was the official recognized need?

Many Doctors will not carry a cellphone that is live and at most will carry a beeper to refer to admin notifications to respond to calls.

The problem is that modern systems for almost all interactive communication or electronic participation necessitates devices that emit ever increasing emf radiation that is a byproduct of function.

I can remember warnings against sleeping on an active electric blanket due to being recumbent in an emf field for many hours due to risks of disruption to normal neurological responses etc. That was well prior to wifi. Stay back from the TV screen etc.

Since those times the atmospheric saturation is well beyond "normal " background radiation that life forms developed within prior levels.

I wonder how many of those born in the 50/60's or earlier can recall with certainty that in the silence of the night there was no low level sort of buzz in their head....not tinnitus type "noise" but something more subtle that does not actually inhibit hearing at all ?

So when "they "say things are safe it really only means no proof of problems associated with a product of any description has yet been established or will be as long as suppression can be enforced in the primary interests of commercial profit !

24 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

EMF's in particular have caused schools and other sensitive institutions to be relocated from under "high tension carrier lines" due to recognition that the radiation levels exceed a certain measure.

How was that measure established? And what was the official recognized need?

Many Doctors will not carry a cellphone that is live and at most will carry a beeper to refer to admin notifications to respond to calls.

The problem is that modern systems for almost all interactive communication or electronic participation necessitates devices that emit ever increasing emf radiation that is a byproduct of function.

I can remember warnings against sleeping on an active electric blanket due to being recumbent in an emf field for many hours due to risks of disruption to normal neurological responses etc. That was well prior to wifi. Stay back from the TV screen etc.

Since those times the atmospheric saturation is well beyond "normal " background radiation that life forms developed within prior levels.

I wonder how many of those born in the 50/60's or earlier can recall with certainty that in the silence of the night there was no low level sort of buzz in their head....not tinnitus type "noise" but something more subtle that does not actually inhibit hearing at all ?

So when "they "say things are safe it really only means no proof of problems associated with a product of any description has yet been established or will be as long as suppression can be enforced in the primary interests of commercial profit !

EMFs are nefarious. Additives are bad too… but they should not be used to hide the massive elephant in the room, the Thing We Can't Mention.

On 2/20/2026 at 6:04 PM, rattlesnake said:

Ask them to list a vaccine's ingredients and they will be incapable of it. They will, however, be visibly irritated to see their Authority and Knowledge challenged by a mere commoner.

Can you recite the list of nine essential amino acids off the top of your head? How about the best plant and animal sources of each? You do know that without them you'll die, right?

23 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

Can you recite the list of nine essential amino acids off the top of your head? How about the best plant and animal sources of each? You do know that without them you'll die, right?

I could sir. Well some of them.

Now repeat after me; 'safe and effective'. And again to show why I'm wearing the white-coat and you are not; 'safe and effective'.

All you need to know. Now roll up yer sleeve. Safe and effective. There yer go. Sit quiet in the rest room for 20 minutes Sir. And no driving for 24 hours. Wouldn't want to do a Tiffany Dover and fall over now would we. Safe and effective.

On 2/28/2026 at 11:18 AM, Stiddle Mump said:

I could sir. Well some of them.

Now repeat after me; 'safe and effective'. And again to show why I'm wearing the white-coat and you are not; 'safe and effective'.

All you need to know. Now roll up yer sleeve. Safe and effective. There yer go. Sit quiet in the rest room for 20 minutes Sir. And no driving for 24 hours. Wouldn't want to do a Tiffany Dover and fall over now would we. Safe and effective.

Now, repeat after me; 'arrogant and lazy'.

The anti-germ theory and anti-vaccine crew arrogantly believe that the smattering of science knowledge that they can muster gives their opinion some heft. The matching shoe... is the too lazy trait that prevents them from learning any real science despite it being clearly documented and readily available to anyone that can read.

Time to leave the 1890's and the attendant fallacious theories behind, don't 'ya think?

On 2/20/2026 at 4:56 PM, BritManToo said:

Oddly enough when you refuse vaccination for your kids, the nurse just grabs them and injects them anyway. In actual face the first injection is given within minutes of them entering the world.

Best to keep them away from know nothing nurses then.

On 3/3/2026 at 5:17 PM, gamb00ler said:

Now, repeat after me; 'arrogant and lazy'.

The anti-germ theory and anti-vaccine crew arrogantly believe that the smattering of science knowledge that they can muster gives their opinion some heft. The matching shoe... is the too lazy trait that prevents them from learning any real science despite it being clearly documented and readily available to anyone that can read.

Time to leave the 1890's and the attendant fallacious theories behind, don't 'ya think?

I'm essentially in the 'pro-nature' camp. Truth is everything.

The body - that's your body, and mine - does not make mistakes. It is at all times making us strong to face the big world. The body will heal itself if given support. However, many have been injected, vaccinated and are under orders not to miss any of their medication. Or else!! We may have to give you more, and more. Safe n effective.

As for 'the smattering of science knowledge' you speak of. It's all around you Sir. Just have to look. Nature is truth. truth is nature. We are nature.

The Germ Theory is made up nonsense. Anti-science and anti-nature.

On 1/12/2026 at 12:21 PM, johng said:

Again the 'scientist /eggsperts' are baffled as to the cause but what they know for sure is that it is in no way whatsoever connected to the 'safe and effectives' !!!!!

they also just know that climate change got something to do with whatever seem to be a problem