Israeli terrorists have killed 100 killed since ceasefire.

9 hours ago, Tidal wave said:

Get yourself along to a doctor fast the smog has got ya.

The term “terrorist” can be justified when a military engages in actions that deliberately or systematically inflict violence on civilians in order to intimidate or control a population, regardless of whether the actor is a state or a non-state group. During the Great March of Return, credible human rights reports documented the shooting of unarmed demonstrators, including instances where snipers targeted protesters’ kneecaps, as well as journalists and medics. The use of live ammunition against largely civilian protests, resulting in deaths and life-altering injuries, can reasonably be interpreted as an attempt to deter and terrorise a civilian population through fear and physical harm. More broadly, military operations have allegedly caused large-scale civilian casualties, there are persistent claims of disproportionate force, and repeated allegations of violations of international humanitarian law. Actions such as strikes during ceasefires or the targeting of civilian infrastructure, if proven, could constitute war crimes. If terrorism is understood as the intentional use of violence against civilians for political ends, then conduct that consistently results in the killing, maiming, or intimidation of non-combatants fits that functional definition, and state status alone does not place an actor beyond that label.