Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Court Upholds 50-Year Jail Terms in Massage Parlour Case

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post

image.jpeg

Picture courtesy of Daily News

The Supreme Court has brought the long-running Victoria’s Secret massage parlour case to a close, upholding heavy prison sentences of up to 50 years for key defendants and increasing compensation interest for victims. The ruling confirms convictions against “Pa Tik” and several associates for offences linked to human trafficking and prostitution involving underage victims. The decision marks the final judicial outcome after years of investigation and appeals.

The case stems from events between December 2017 and 12 January 2018 at the Victoria’s Secret bathhouse in Bangkok. Prosecutors alleged that the defendants conspired to procure Thai and Myanmar girls aged over 15 but under 18 to provide sexual services. The lawsuit was filed on 11 April 2018 by anti-trafficking prosecutors together with three victims.

Defendants included Sratthatham Jaengchai, known as Pa Tik, the venue’s manager, along with Boonsap Amornratsiri (Pa Kob), Chainarong Ansuk (Pa Sanga), Ekkanapat Jaruwattanapathomkun (Pop), a partnership operating the premises, its managing partner Sasithorn Wirathepsuporn and Davis Silver Star Co Ltd. All denied the charges throughout the proceedings.

The Criminal Court initially sentenced Pa Tik and three associates to 15 years and 12 months each for arranging prostitution, while Sasithorn received seven years and six months. Corporate defendants were acquitted at first instance and the trafficking charge was dismissed, prompting appeals by prosecutors.

The Court of Appeal later increased penalties significantly, sentencing Pa Tik and Boonsap to 68 years each, Chainarong and Ekkanapat to 62 years and eight months and Sasithorn to 68 years. Under Thai law, prison terms were capped at 50 years each and fines were imposed on the corporate entities totalling nearly four million baht each.

On 29 January, the Supreme Court upheld the appeal court’s findings, rejecting defence arguments that the victims acted voluntarily. The court accepted evidence that the girls applied for work without intent to sell sex but were coerced and threatened, and cited physical evidence including condoms and lubricant seized during an undercover operation. The court also raised the interest rate on compensation to victims from 7% to 7.5% per year from the date of filing, in line with updated Finance Ministry regulations.

Daily News reported that one suspect, Kamphon Wirathepsuporn, remains a fugitive and was not tried, while his wife and son were not prosecuted. Five defendants were brought from prison to hear the final verdict, bringing an end to one of Thailand’s most prominent trafficking cases.

[Insert video here if available]

Key Takeaways

• The Supreme Court has upheld prison sentences of up to 50 years in the Victoria case.

• The court increased interest on victim compensation to 7.5% per year from the filing date.

• One key suspect remains at large, with related cases already dropped against family members.

image.png  

Adapted by ASEAN Now from Dailynews 2026-01-30

 

image.png

 

image.png

  • Popular Post

And rightly so...

Who on the top of the food chain, in a brown uniform with some goody golden wings, was getting the fat enveloppes...and suddenly the enveloppes went on a diet ?

  • Popular Post

Not a happy ending for the perps.

How many years will they actually serve? I suppose it depends on how many millions they spend.

  • Popular Post
13 minutes ago, Purdey said:

How many years will they actually serve? I suppose it depends on how many millions they spend.

Yeah you have to read it a couple of times to understand. Case was originally from 2018 doesn't say when original case and ruling was so probably 2020 is a fair guess. So I would assume they have been in Jail at least since the sentencing ruling.

If you noticed the original jail terms 15 years 12 month? and 7 years 6 months were increased to maximum cap of 50 years at the appeal sentencing.

Think this was to send a clear message to the World that this is not acceptable and will not be tolerated. Just read China executed 11 people involved in trafficking, torture, etc in Scam Call centers.

  • Popular Post

Unfortunately this is very bad press for Thailand, and plays right into the hands and minds of people's media fueled prejudices. I'm constantly hearing from people back in the US who think Thailand is the world's worst offender for perversion, when the US has Jeffrey Epstein and hundreds more like him who have never been caught. Even the US president was a pal of Epstein and a pervert dabbling in underage prostitution. Then there's Prince Andrew.

4 hours ago, Jonathan Swift said:

Unfortunately this is very bad press for Thailand, and plays right into the hands and minds of people's media fueled prejudices. I'm constantly hearing from people back in the US who think Thailand is the world's worst offender for perversion, when the US has Jeffrey Epstein and hundreds more like him who have never been caught. Even the US president was a pal of Epstein and a pervert dabbling in underage prostitution. Then there's Prince Andrew.

I agree totally

And feel deeply for the young girls who were bullied and abused by these scum

I would suggest that the outcome on appeal actually provides a positive perspective in the context of the Epstein debacle.

The pervasive concept of Thailand and SEA in general as a lawless pit of sexual exploitation comparative to Western claims of morality and social protections is false.

In the Western sphere it is more hideously vicious because it involves criminally dismissive existence in defiance of law, social denial perceptions and visibility.

In Thailand as an example there is a perception that does not deny but falls short of acceptance beyond practical social recognition of

existence. Prostitution, ladyboys , tomboys are mostly considered a part of the fabric of society.

Unfortunately there is a coupling in this social perception that includes the wider application of manipulation of laws in general .

The saddest aspect of that has similarities to the failings of Western application of legal perception that identifies those considered to be at the peak of society as opposed to those generally at the lower end of the social spectrum.

This case is an attempt to distinguish choice from infliction.

Anyone paid to see "Melania the documentary " yet

Now anyone accepting loans from this institution will have to be investigated - i imagine- because they have accepted money from illegal sources..?

6 hours ago, Jonathan Swift said:

Unfortunately this is very bad press for Thailand, and plays right into the hands and minds of people's media fueled prejudices. I'm constantly hearing from people back in the US who think Thailand is the world's worst offender for perversion, when the US has Jeffrey Epstein and hundreds more like him who have never been caught. Even the US president was a pal of Epstein and a pervert dabbling in underage prostitution. Then there's Prince Andrew.

Thailand has always been known as, "The World's Brothel."

Wake up.

59 minutes ago, KhunHeineken said:

Thailand has always been known as, "The World's Brothel."

Wake up.

True, prostitution is part of Thai culture. But this case involves trafficking and underage girls.

1 hour ago, brewsterbudgen said:

True, prostitution is part of Thai culture. But this case involves trafficking and underage girls.

So do all the other establishments that operate in the same way.

Selective enforcement, that's all.

14 hours ago, Purdey said:

How many years will they actually serve? I suppose it depends on how many millions they spend.

Thaksin went through an investigation / judicial roller coaster for years, got chared with several serius offences and he fled. Some cases herad an sentences given in hs absence, some not. In reality a big complicated multi faceted puzzle.

Then he returned to be allowed freedom, then jail, but in less than a few hours transferred to the police hospital, staying in a luxury suite for several months, in luxury.

Then several investigations whether he was reallly ill. Then a more recent case and the judges handed down a verdict that he was never ill and should have been in Klong Prem, and he was then jailed in klong prem prison.

Then a few days ago an announcement that he might get early release.

What a circus / what a sham.

Back to the comment "how many years will they (or thaksin) really serve?

While low levels criminals serve their full time. Just a joke.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.