6 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

The video shows no such thing.
The Epstein files actually do contain those allegations against Trump.

Calling the 2016 Jane Doe case ‘debunked’ is false.
It was withdrawn after the plaintiff’s attorney said she received death threats, not adjudicated. No judge or jury ever ruled the allegations untrue.

‘Unproven’ does not mean ‘invented’.
It means never tested in court — which happens a lot in sexual-assault cases involving powerful people.
And it was not ‘dropped without evidence’. The complaint itself named two corroborating witnesses.

Brandolini’s Bulls*** Asymmetry Principle ensures I live a very fulfilling life.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660679.pdf

Time to get Bob Mueller on the job!

22 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Something that seems to pass people by is that this man has absolutely no class. He is an ignorant (comparing himself to Nelson Mandela is a recent act that reveals his lack of self awareness) loud-mouthed tasteless American, who is interested only in himself and no-one and nothing.

This sums him up perfectly:

Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?" Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent response:

"A few things spring to mind.

Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem. For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed. So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever. I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman. But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness. There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface. Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront. Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul. And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist. Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat. He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege. And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.

That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down. So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:*

Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man. This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss. After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of bull<deleted>. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum. God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

22 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Something that seems to pass people by is that this man has absolutely no class. He is an ignorant (comparing himself to Nelson Mandela is a recent act that reveals his lack of self awareness) loud-mouthed tasteless American, who is interested only in himself and no-one and nothing.

This sums him up perfectly:

Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?" Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent response:

"A few things spring to mind.

Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem. For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed. So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever. I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman. But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness. There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface. Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront. Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul. And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist. Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat. He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege. And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.

That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down. So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:*

Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man. This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss. After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of bull<deleted>. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum. God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

22 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Something that seems to pass people by is that this man has absolutely no class. He is an ignorant (comparing himself to Nelson Mandela is a recent act that reveals his lack of self awareness) loud-mouthed tasteless American, who is interested only in himself and no-one and nothing.

This sums him up perfectly:

Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?" Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent response:

"A few things spring to mind.

Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem. For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed. So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever. I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman. But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness. There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface. Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront. Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul. And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist. Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat. He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege. And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.

That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down. So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:*

Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man. This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss. After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of bull<deleted>. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum. God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

Your incessant whining and criticism of President Trump is tedious and boring.

You and your liberal friends just can't accept the fact that the American voters elected Mr. Trump to end Socialism and bring Democrasy back to America and he is doing an excellent job!

23 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Something that seems to pass people by is that this man has absolutely no class. He is an ignorant (comparing himself to Nelson Mandela is a recent act that reveals his lack of self awareness) loud-mouthed tasteless American, who is interested only in himself and no-one and nothing.

This sums him up perfectly:

Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?" Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent response:

"A few things spring to mind.

Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem. For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed. So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever. I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman. But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness. There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface. Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront. Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul. And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist. Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat. He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege. And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.

That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down. So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:*

Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man. This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss. After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of bull<deleted>. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum. God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

Your constant whining and criticism of President Trump is tedious and boring.

You and your liberal friends can't get over the fact that the Amercan voters elected Mr. Trump to make America great again and he is doing an excellent job of accomplishing that objective!

https://youtu.be/8plLXbgskm0?si=ukBJqHYxUwSkREFV

22 minutes ago, MrRWB said:

Your incessant whining and criticism of President Trump is tedious and boring.

You and your liberal friends just can't accept the fact that the American voters elected Mr. Trump to end Socialism and bring Democrasy back to America and he is doing an excellent job!

Your constant whining and criticism of President Trump is tedious and boring.

You and your liberal friends can't get over the fact that the Amercan voters elected Mr. Trump to make America great again and he is doing an excellent job of accomplishing that objective!

https://youtu.be/8plLXbgskm0?si=ukBJqHYxUwSkREFV

Hold on. Who is repeating themselves? Bringing democracy back to America that's a really good one, most Americans and most people around the world would argue that he's trying to destroy Democracy in America, and bring fascism and an autocracy to America.

You have a fascinating and uniquely MAGA point of view.

5 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Hold on. Who is repeating themselves? Bringing democracy back to America that's a really good one, most Americans and most people around the world would argue that he's trying to destroy Democracy in America, and bring fascism and an autocracy to America.

You have a fascinating and uniquely MAGA point of view.

He's entitled to it.

Maybe he's a recovering <removed> victim, just as many bartenders I knew in my younger days were former alcoholics.

16 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Hold on. Who is repeating themselves? Bringing democracy back to America that's a really good one, most Americans and most people around the world would argue that he's trying to destroy Democracy in America, and bring fascism and an autocracy to America.

You have a fascinating and uniquely MAGA point of view.

American leftists and most leftists around the world would argue that he's trying to destroy Democracy in America and bring fascism and an autocracy to America.

There, fixed it for you

Post breaking forum rules removed. @MrRWB

2 hours ago, MrRWB said:

Your incessant whining and criticism of President Trump is tedious and boring.

You and your liberal friends just can't accept the fact that the American voters elected Mr. Trump to end Socialism and bring Democrasy back to America and he is doing an excellent job!

Your constant whining and criticism of President Trump is tedious and boring.

You and your liberal friends can't get over the fact that the Amercan voters elected Mr. Trump to make America great again and he is doing an excellent job of accomplishing that objective!

https://youtu.be/8plLXbgskm0?si=ukBJqHYxUwSkREFV

Out of curiosity, how would you know what is ‘incessant’ or ‘constant’ on this forum, you only joined 5 hour ago?!

5 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

what has Trump ever done that was overtly racist ?

This thread is discussing an example of just that.

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

This thread is discussing an example of just that.

Ah, retweeting a joke, got it.

Unlike the left that thinks blacks are not smart enough to get an ID card

4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Ah, retweeting a joke, got it.

Unlike the left that thinks blacks are not smart enough to get an ID card

If you think is a joke, go print the image on t-shirt and wear it on a few nights out in any American city of your choice.

Get back to us on how it goes for you.

Trump was just having a laugh , just some friendly banter with his arch enemies .

Yet another example of lefties feigning being furious to stop people having a laugh

16 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Trump was just having a laugh , just some friendly banter with his arch enemies .

Yet another example of lefties feigning being furious to stop people having a laugh

I think you and I have demonstrated that depicting ethnic minorities as animals has a well documented historical context that explains precisely why it’s not ‘just having a laugh’.

You’ll recall you were not laughing as we examined that very point.

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I think you and I have demonstrated that depicting ethnic minorities as animals has a well documented historical context that explains precisely why it’s not ‘just having a laugh’.

You’ll recall you were not laughing as we examined that very point.

There's a huge different between a Nazi depicting ALL Jews as rats to spread hatred of Jews and Trump playfully ridiculing Obama .

Does this photo really genuinely infuriate you ?

21 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

If you think is a joke, go print the image on t-shirt and wear it on a few nights out in any American city of your choice.

Get back to us on how it goes for you.

Now go to that same city and wear a T-shirt with a picture of Clarence Thomas as a monkey and see how many leftists think it's hilarious.

Countless Obama monkey memes on the internet, now all the sudden it's the end of democracy

5 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

There's a huge different between a Nazi depicting ALL Jews as rats to spread hatred of Jews and Trump playfully ridiculing Obama .

Does this photo really genuinely infuriate you ?

Maybe his critics called him "Orangeman" one time too many.

Incidentally, the AOC and Mamdani animals are priceless.

No wonder this vid triggered the Libs.

14 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

There's a huge different between a Nazi depicting ALL Jews as rats to spread hatred of Jews and Trump playfully ridiculing Obama .

Does this photo really genuinely infuriate you ?

There absolutely is not a huge difference.

I’ve explained to you precisely why depicting black people as apes or monkeys is so grossly offensive.

There is nothing playful about depicting black people as apes or monkeys, just as there’s nothing playful about depicting Jews as rats.

It’s exactly the same hate mongering dehumanization.

Of course I do accept only one of which offends you, with the other you have no objections whatsoever and are only too ready to excuse, obviate or otherwise defend it.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Out of curiosity, how would you know what is ‘incessant’ or ‘constant’ on this forum, you only joined 5 hour ago?!

I have been reading this forum for twentyfive years but have not decided to make an account and comment on posts.

That's not too difficult for you to understand, is it?

However, the clueless posts of whining uninformed liberals regarding the fantastic job that President Trump is doing on behalf of America has forced me to make an account and comment on these foolish liberal comments.

Have another glass of white wine and quiche and relax because President Trump still has another 3 years to continue making America Great Again!

21 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Now go to that same city and wear a T-shirt with a picture of Clarence Thomas as a monkey and see how many leftists think it's hilarious.

Why on earth would I do that?

I am not here defending depicting any black person as a monkey.

56 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

The video shows no such thing.
The Epstein files actually do contain those allegations against Trump.

Calling the 2016 Jane Doe case ‘debunked’ is false.
It was withdrawn after the plaintiff’s attorney said she received death threats, not adjudicated. No judge or jury ever ruled the allegations untrue.

‘Unproven’ does not mean ‘invented’.
It means never tested in court — which happens a lot in sexual-assault cases involving powerful people.
And it was not ‘dropped without evidence’. The complaint itself named two corroborating witnesses.

Brandolini’s Bulls*** Asymmetry Principle ensures I live a very fulfilling life.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660679.pdf

• Claims vs. Evidence: Presence in the files does not equal truth. The 2026 DOJ release is a "raw dump" that includes unverified FBI tip-line entries. The DOJ explicitly flagged many of these specific allegations as "unfounded," "fake," and "sensationalist"—clerical records of rumors, not investigative findings.

• The "Jane Doe" Fallacy: A lawsuit withdrawn three times before discovery or a merits hearing has zero evidentiary weight. You cannot cite "corroborating witnesses" as fact when they were never deposed, cross-examined, or even identified in court.

• The Burden of Proof: "Unproven" is a legal nullity. In a system based on the presumption of innocence, an unvetted, abandoned civil filing is not a "historical record"—it is a discarded accusation.

• Brandolini’s Irony: You are the one benefiting from the Asymmetry Principle. It’s easy to point to a PDF and claim "it’s in there," but it takes more energy to explain that the content of that PDF was officially dismissed by the DOJ as lacking "a shred of credibility."

You are conflating social proximity (flight logs) with criminality (unsubstantiated tips), a distinction the DOJ itself made clear in the 2026 final report.

On 2/7/2026 at 10:10 AM, save the frogs said:

The political divide isn't even about the actual person in power.

Westerners are losing their minds and western society is degrading.

Cities are violent, rampant drug use ....

These endless political battles on this forum are symptomatic of Westerners just being the most miserable people on the planet.

it used to be easy to avoid them here in thailand.

but lots of those miserable refugees from the west are invading our shores.

got a whole street of them just moved in to their new 100 DW (dalangwa) "pool" villas . and walking around doing videos.

sure glad i got in many years of the thai experience before this invasion. next stop : the twilight zone ..................

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

How have I lied about the left?

And here we have another example.

56 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Ah, retweeting a joke, got it.

Unlike the left that thinks blacks are not smart enough to get an ID card

1 minute ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

• Claims vs. Evidence: Presence in the files does not equal truth. The 2026 DOJ release is a "raw dump" that includes unverified FBI tip-line entries. The DOJ explicitly flagged many of these specific allegations as "unfounded," "fake," and "sensationalist"—clerical records of rumors, not investigative findings.

• The "Jane Doe" Fallacy: A lawsuit withdrawn three times before discovery or a merits hearing has zero evidentiary weight. You cannot cite "corroborating witnesses" as fact when they were never deposed, cross-examined, or even identified in court.

• The Burden of Proof: "Unproven" is a legal nullity. In a system based on the presumption of innocence, an unvetted, abandoned civil filing is not a "historical record"—it is a discarded accusation.

• Brandolini’s Irony: You are the one benefiting from the Asymmetry Principle. It’s easy to point to a PDF and claim "it’s in there," but it takes more energy to explain that the content of that PDF was officially dismissed by the DOJ as lacking "a shred of credibility."

You are conflating social proximity (flight logs) with criminality (unsubstantiated tips), a distinction the DOJ itself made clear in the 2026 final report.

You're confusing 'debunked', your claim, with 'unproven'.

4 minutes ago, MrRWB said:

However, the clueless posts of whining uninformed liberals regarding the fantastic job that President Trump is doing on behalf of America has forced me to make an account and comment on these foolish liberal comments.

It was around 15 years before i joined this motley crew of lonely hearts club expats .

welcome to the club . you will definitely regret it !

🙈😈🥳

LOL

9 minutes ago, MrRWB said:

is doing on behalf of America has forced me to make an account and comment on these foolish liberal comments.

anti-Trump crowd outnumbers the trump crowd.

a couple of the more vocal pro-trump guys have disappeared.

your posts will be met with a lot of .... resistance.

8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

There absolutely is not a huge difference.

I’ve explained to you precisely why depicting black people as apes or monkeys is so grossly offensive.

There is nothing playful about depicting black people as apes or monkeys, just as there’s nothing playful about depicting Jews as rats.

It’s exactly the same hate mongering dehumanization.

Of course I do accept only one of which offends you, with the other you have no objections whatsoever and are only too ready to excuse, obviate or otherwise defend it.

Didnt you see the difference ?

All Jews V Two specific Black people .

A whole all inclusive group of people V Two specific people whom are his rivals

Nazis depict ALL Jews as rats .

Trump depicts his political rivals and also himself as being an animal .

Had Trump suggested that all Black people are monkeys , then yes, that would have been offensive and unaceptable .

But, he didnt do that

12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Why on earth would I do that?

I am not here defending depicting any black person as a monkey.

Would you oppose it if a Black person got depicted as a Lion ?

33 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Would you oppose it if a Black person got depicted as a Lion ?

No, a black person depicted as a lion is not a well established racist trope.

36 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Didnt you see the difference ?

All Jews V Two specific Black people .

A whole all inclusive group of people V Two specific people whom are his rivals

Nazis depict ALL Jews as rats .

Trump depicts his political rivals and also himself as being an animal .

Had Trump suggested that all Black people are monkeys , then yes, that would have been offensive and unaceptable .

But, he didnt do that

How many Jews would depicted as rats before you would regard it as a problem?

41 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

anti-Trump crowd outnumbers the trump crowd.

a couple of the more vocal pro-trump guys have disappeared.

your posts will be met with a lot of .... resistance.

Perhaps reincarnation is a thing after all.