1 hour ago, riclag said:

Realization of foes, So much so that during the Michael Cohen hearing the Dem Stacey Plaskett who participated at the hearing was getting tips(questioning tips) in real time from her benefactor Epstein.

How quickly that fell silent with the Get Trump mob of Domestic & International leftist media outlets.

google ai overview:

"Yes, Representative Stacey Plaskett (D-USVI) received campaign contributions from convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, as well as his associates, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records and court documents".

And...

So you just wrote that when Dems needed tips about Trump, Epstein was their best source! 🤣

A baiting post has been removed:

11. You will not troll or stalk other members by misusing forum posts, private messages, reactions, emojis or by any other means.

12 hours ago, LosLobo said:

That’s argument from ignorance. Government inaction isn’t proof of absence — or exoneration.

So you refuse to answer the question.

On 2/12/2026 at 8:45 PM, Fact said:

There is nothing in the public files that would be useful in a court of law against Trump. I challenge you to prove me wrong.

Trump and his DOJ are already in breach of the law that requires full release of the Epstein files on at least two counts:

1. Failure to produce all the files.

2. Redactions from the files in breach of the law.

So you’ve been proved wrong already and we still haven’t seen the full release compliant to the law.

13 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

The realization that Trump and Epstein were foes, and that nothing untoward was discovered in the files sbout him(unlike democrats and prominent member of the liberal douche illuminati) seems to be severely triggering for the irrational hate crew.

Oh well, straight onto the next bs anti Trump narrative. No time to waste.

Around half the files have not yet been released, and what has been released is heavily redacted.

What has not been discovered is guesswork on your part.

5 hours ago, Yagoda said:

So you refuse to answer the question.

No. I refuse the premise.

A question built on a false premise forfeits credibility.