23 hours ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Islam is the final word from God on his works- Judaism was replaced by Christianity and Christianity by Allah (PBUH) and that's why it's the world's largest religion - it is literally God's work.

Salam malalkim

We got to 10 downvotes. Thanks keep going - Insahallah and with Allah's blessing we shall have many more.

Surah An-Nisa (4:56)

"Indeed, those who disbelieve in Our verses - We will drive them into a Fire. Every time their skins are roasted through, We will replace them with other skins so they may taste the punishment. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted in Might and Wise."

When discussing Islam one has to take into account that it's a huge religion, it accounts for 25% of the world's population, and the practitioners vary widely from a vast majority who are moderate, huge numbers of Muslims that are secular, and a very small percentage that are extreme.

Sharia practitioners or Wahhabi type Muslims are the most extreme, and the most unwilling to assimilate into Western cultures and perhaps the ones to truly be afraid of.

Speaking the truth about the extremes within Islam is not racist, but condemning all Islamic people as I often see on this form is certainly racist.

This will probably be interpreted as a racist statement but for a long time I've been saying that immigration criteria for Saudis should be unique and singular and far strictly then normal immigration for other people from other parts of the world

It must never be forgotten that but Saudi's practice the most extreme form of islam, a hateful and horrific interpretation that is completely intolerant of other religions and is the exact opposite of what most of us would regard as any kind of positive faith. 

Huge and very strict restrictions should be put on their ability to immigrate, essentially they are not wanted and they are not needed, and for the most part they are not of any benefit to a society that let them in, as it is very unlikely they will ever integrate. 

There are certain subjects that seem like they're just off limits in today's woke culture, nothing that I said was in any way racist, they were simply statements of facts. I feel that the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful and law-abiding and there's a relatively small minority that support extremism. But Sharia is completely out of control, and there's nothing racist about saying so, and the birth rate in Muslim African nations is completely out of control and there's nothing wrong with saying so.

I recently posted a question on quora about why women won't agree to play five sets at Grand Slam Tennis events. They get equal prize money and yet they often get away with matches under an hour when the men are slugging it out for four and a half hours, for the same compensation. My thread was banned, because questions like that just simply can't be asked these days. Especially in America.

So why am I anti Wahhabi? Why do I think all Saudis should be barred worldwide from immigrating to any nation? Why do I consider the Saudis so dangerous to mankind? 

But it is an ideology that divides the world into the realm of Islam and the realm of the infidel, or the realm of war. So it trains the readers that they live behind enemy lines – they must be passing through, they cannot take abode here. You only have two reasons for being in the land of the infidel. One is to convert people to Islam. The second is to acquire either money or skill which you can bring back with you to help you and others engage in jihad, and in this context, it is quite clear that they mean that in a military sense, because they go on to talk about tanks and bullets, and things of this kind. One of the things you certainly cannot do is become an American citizen, because no Muslim can be ruled an infidel.

That is the particular ideology which is being taught. You must not have any good contacts, warm relations with anybody – not only with unbelievers, but with any Muslim who is not of the Wahhabi type; they are also often denounced as apostates. That is the major theme of concern in that report.

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2005/05/03/the-global-spread-of-wahhabi-islam-how-great-a-threat/

18 hours ago, JimCM said:

You are allowed to criticise religions in the USA except for Judaism. Why do you think this is?

Israel in particular is the most thin-skinned nation on earth, and any criticism of Israeli government policy is automatically deemed to be anti-semitic, which is absolute nonsense and a form of extremism within itself.

48 minutes ago, Effective altruism said:

No.

2 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Israel in particular is the most thin-skinned nation on earth, and any criticism of Israeli government policy is automatically deemed to be anti-semitic, which is absolute nonsense and a form of extremism within itself.

Indeed, but how can we change that?

On 3/13/2026 at 3:47 PM, beautifulthailand99 said:

Islam is the final word from God on his works- Judaism was replaced by Christianity and Christianity by Allah (PBUH) and that's why it's the world's largest religion - it is literally God's work.

Which god do you refer to, there are so many?

God only exists in the minds of men, for man's purpose.

2 minutes ago, Surasak said:

Which god do you refer to, there are so many?

God only exists in the minds of men, for man's purpose.

Off to hell for you my friend - where you will burn for all eternity. Alan Watts is my latest guru - he was a womaniser, alcoholic but enlightened.

If you awaken from this illusion and you understand that black implies white, self implies other, life implies death (or shall I say death implies life?), you can feel yourself – not as a stranger in the world, not as something here on probation, not as something that has arrived here by fluke – but you can begin to feel your own existence as absolutely fundamental.

I am not trying to sell you on this idea in the sense of converting you to it, I want you to play with it; I want you to think of its possibilities, I am not trying to prove it. I am just putting it forward as a possibility of life to think about. So then, let’s suppose that you were able every night to dream any dream you wanted to

So then, let’s suppose that you were able every night to dream any dream you wanted to dream and that you could, for example, have the power within one night to dream 75 years of time or any length of time you wanted to have.

 And you would, naturally, as you began on this adventure of dreams, you would fulfill all your wishes. You would have every kind of pleasure during your sleep. And after several nights of 75 years of total pleasure each, you would say “Well, that was pretty great. But now let’s have a surprise. Let’s have a dream which isn’t under control, where something is gonna happen to me that I don’t know what it’s gonna be”. And you would dig that and would come out of that and you would say “Wow that was a close shave, wasn’t it?”.

Then you would get more and more adventurous and you would make further- and further out gambles to what you would dream. And finally, you would dream where you are now. You would dream the dream of living the life that you are actually living today.

 That would be within the infinite multiplicity of choices you would have. Of playing that you weren’t God. Because the whole nature of the godhead, according to this idea, is to play that he is not. So in this idea then, everybody is fundamentally the ultimate reality, not God in a politically kingly sense, but god in the sense of being the self, the deep-down basic whatever there is. And you are all that, only you are pretending you are not.

Congressman Randy Fine is giving a personal comment, so to whom is it offensive? It possibly only appears offensive to non Muslims who fear the Muslims will be offended.

4 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Off to hell for you my friend - where you will burn for all eternity. Alan Watts is my latest guru - he was a womaniser, alcoholic but enlightened.

Hell? A fiction place developed as a means to control. As I don't know you, it would be appreciated if you didn't refer to me as a friend. That way, no offense can be implied or accepted. Thank you.

17 hours ago, Gsxrnz said:

There is no such thing as "hate speech". It is a social construct, the same as transgenderism and non-binary(ism). If you choose to be offended by something said by anybody, that is your choice.

If you tell me you are a transgender woman and I know you are a bloke with synthetic mammary glands and a pair of integrum testes, I'll call you a bloke. Sans testes and possessing XY chromosomes, you are still a bloke. If you want to wear a dress and stilettos, go for it. Your lifestyle choice doesn't offend me.

But if you want me to believe in your delusion and consider my dissent to be hateful, get a life. And the same applies to all those that want to imprison ordinary people for not agreeing with your delusional perspective of reality.

I wouldn't advocate burning these "hate speech" muppets at the stake, but.......

is there any difference between a "trans woman" and a transvestite ,? i don't think there is , they are both just men in frocks and womens underwear (of course).

We don't hear much about transvestites anymore why is that?

On 3/13/2026 at 3:55 PM, candide said:

Criticizing religions is not forbidden.

It is in the UK under the Muslim lover Starmer. He thinks they are all going vote for Liebour .

On 3/13/2026 at 3:36 PM, connda said:

Congress Randy Fine considers himself to be an Islamophobe and thinks it is "rational" be be afraid of the followers of Islam.

Do you consider this "hate speech" and should it be banned in the United States? Support your opinion in the comments. Also inform us if you are or are not a US citizens.



https://x.com/RepFine/status/2032230398009200896

Need a fifth option

5. No such thing as hate speech

6 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

is there any difference between a "trans woman" and a transvestite ,? i don't think there is , they are both just men in frocks and womens underwear (of course).

We don't hear much about transvestites anymore why is that?

Yeah you are spot-on. If they can control the words, they control the narrative. Transvestite became un-PC along with such sayings as "boys will be boys", and "male chauvinist pig". I blame Quentin Crisp.

Frankly, I'd rather be called a male chauvinist pig than a misogynist - because nobody knows what the hell a misandrist is. Heads up - a misandrist is a fourth wave male hating femmenazi who can't fix the clogged toilet, (or produce anything that society needs to survive), so calls in a misogynist to remedy the situation - without realising that men made or built everything she eats, uses or consumes. Apologies to the 0.03% of female Oil Riggers out there. You go Girls, both of you.

And boys are now considered to be dysfunctional girls. There will be a comeuppance very soon. And women (genuine or imitation) won't know what struck them. It's gonna be fun to watch their delusions get shattered by reality.

6 hours ago, lavender19 said:

It is in the UK under the Muslim lover Starmer. He thinks they are all going vote for Liebour .

he's even appointed a government minister specially for them , who, on his first day in his imaginary job , has come prepared with a 50 page document, containing all sorts of sweeteners for them I think is now an offence to simply look at them.

But its all too late for Starmer , the greens are now the chosen party of the Jihadists, they will vote for whoever the mosque guy tells them to vote for and of course their wives will do as they are told by their husbands, as will there children Going by the rate they breed the UK is only maybe 2 generations away from a total takeover Ali Akbah