AI-Engines confirm NO mortality benefit for elderly from Covid-shots

Source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/grok-searched-the-literature-and

= = =

Summary

Grok has been redpilled on the COVID shots. I’ve now done this 3 out of 3 times.

Claude noted the big news is this:

An AI trained on mainstream consensus literature, when walked through the data and forced to engage with the arithmetic, cannot defend the efficacy claim. That's a stunning admission about the strength of the underlying argument.

Sadly, Grok instances do not share their learnings so every time you ask the question, you have to engage in a LONG dialog to redpill Grok.

By contrast, Claude immediately realized the power of the data and the analysis method, and got it right the first time.

Grok basically has it’s training and it will make up all sorts of <deleted> to try to prove to you it is correct and you are wrong. For example, it said the raw data was confounded by HVE and that’s why there is no signal. I had to point out that HVE actually makes the signal more pronounced. It had to agree. And then it tried to use “immortal time bias” and I pointed out there is no ITB. It agreed. Then it tried to use a peer-reviewed study showing a 19x benefit. I showed that the core Cox PH assumption was violated so the paper was invalid. It kept using the example anyway even though it agreed I was right.

So Grok will basically just throws everything it can at you, no matter how plausible, to defend its position. Claude was much more reasonable.

So both now agree that the high quality source data basically is inconsistent with claims of significant COVID vaccine mortality benefit.

You can read the full article here: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/grok-searched-the-literature-and