yes. that is plain and simple . if a international student in USA want to protest then they should go to there own country and protest until they drop dead and become martyr.
When any country's leader or government criticise something that China is doing, their official response is always 'do not interfere in another country's business'.
Ditto China - with bells on.
Surely you cannot be guilty of tampering with evidence without some incentive being given to you to tamper. So, I assume the court knows who bribed these guys (otherwise they wouldn't be able to prove tampering and rather just negligence of duty). Therefore, why isn't anyone else being charged in this case i.e. the people that paid the bribes/"requested" the tampering with evidence?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now