October 16, 201015 yr Author Back to the thread topic... It looks unanimous. Everyone here wants the Two State Solution. What has been Israel's position on that? Hamas? It doesn't count as two states if one is wiped off the map or at the bottom of the sea.
October 16, 201015 yr Back to the thread topic... It looks unanimous. Everyone here wants the Two State Solution. What has been Israel's position on that? Hamas? It doesn't count as two states if one is wiped off the map or at the bottom of the sea. Israel's position has been, "We will build more settlements" (to incite some more aggression so that we have an excuse to slaughter more of the Arab dogs and occupy more land). Hamas' position has been valid; "We can't negotiate while settlements continue".
October 16, 201015 yr Huh??? To be accurate, Hamas' position has been that they have no interest in peace, at all.
October 16, 201015 yr You could have done a bit of research on the background of Wilders, and understand why he takes such a position.
October 16, 201015 yr I am not really interested in him. I was posting the article because of the interesting facts presented by the author about Jordan.
October 16, 201015 yr Huh??? To be accurate, Hamas' position has been that they have no interest in peace, at all. correct!
October 16, 201015 yr I'd get all the parties involved into the same room. I'd make them roll their trouser legs up then I'd keep smacking their legs until they burst into tears and agreed to do anything I told them. See - it's easy when you know how.
October 17, 201015 yr I'd get all the parties involved into the same room. I'd make them roll their trouser legs up then I'd keep smacking their legs until they burst into tears and agreed to do anything I told them. See - it's easy when you know how. :ph34r:You should know better than to suggest violence as a solution.
October 17, 201015 yr I'd get all the parties involved into the same room. I'd make them roll their trouser legs up then I'd keep smacking their legs until they burst into tears and agreed to do anything I told them. See - it's easy when you know how. :ph34r:You should know better than to suggest violence as a solution. in principle Endure is right! only extreme pressure on both parties will render results. unfortunately there is no pressure at all but pussyfooting goddàmn politicians who are even scared shitless to just voice their thoughts because all what they have in mind are votes and the next election.
October 17, 201015 yr Author I'd get all the parties involved into the same room. I'd make them roll their trouser legs up then I'd keep smacking their legs until they burst into tears and agreed to do anything I told them. See - it's easy when you know how. :ph34r:You should know better than to suggest violence as a solution. in principle Endure is right! only extreme pressure on both parties will render results. unfortunately there is no pressure at all but pussyfooting goddàmn politicians who are even scared shitless to just voice their thoughts because all what they have in mind are votes and the next election. I seriously doubt Palestinian politicians are afraid of losing an election. Their life maybe, but not an election.
October 18, 201015 yr I'd get all the parties involved into the same room. I'd make them roll their trouser legs up then I'd keep smacking their legs until they burst into tears and agreed to do anything I told them. See - it's easy when you know how. :ph34r:You should know better than to suggest violence as a solution. in principle Endure is right! only extreme pressure on both parties will render results. unfortunately there is no pressure at all but pussyfooting goddàmn politicians who are even scared shitless to just voice their thoughts because all what they have in mind are votes and the next election. I seriously doubt Palestinian politicians are afraid of losing an election. Their life maybe, but not an election. when i talk about applying pressure on both parties it goes without saying that i neither refer to Palestinians nor to Israelis but to the hypocritic clowns on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean.
October 18, 201015 yr Some pressure on the hypocrites who surround Israel and interfere with any possibility of peace would be make a lot more sense.
October 18, 201015 yr Some pressure on the hypocrites who surround Israel and interfere with any possibility of peace would be make a lot more sense. Which hypocrites would that be then? Since whichever Arab antagonists are around are forthright in their antagonism, I guess you must be referring to the original (in Biblical terms) hypocrites, the Pharisees. Well spotted UG. (although you should have said "abound" (in), not "surround")
October 18, 201015 yr Some pressure on the hypocrites who surround Israel and interfere with any possibility of peace would be make a lot more sense. your remark is ridiculous U.G. and only proves that you possess a lot of "no idea" as far as the Midlle East is concerned. nota bene: most of the "surrounders" would consider to sacrifice their left balls if they could get rid of the Israel/Palestine problem. that also applies to a row of american presidents who would have gladly sacrificed their left balls if there was no extremely powerful domestic zionist loving lobby breathing down their necks. the latter is a quote from an american friend. yawnnn... i know you will now answer with some irrelevant Mel Gibson bullshit even though i have no idea what you are trying to convey i'm also patiently waiting for the opinion of our military expert and the input of some ethiopian drivers
October 18, 201015 yr your remark is ridiculous U.G. and only proves that you possess a lot of "no idea" as far as the Midlle East is concerned. Well if you are right, that would make two of us. It is pretty well known that the "Palestinians" have always been used as pawns by the Arab (and Persian) nations - who have little use for them otherwise.
October 18, 201015 yr most of the "surrounders" would consider to sacrifice their left balls if they could get rid of the Israel/Palestine problem. that also applies to a row of american presidents who would have gladly sacrificed their left balls if there was no extremely powerful domestic zionist loving lobby breathing down their necks. the latter is a quote from an american friend. I'm very impressed that you could find one American to support your opinion. I bet that he was a Jew as well!
October 18, 201015 yr your remark is ridiculous U.G. and only proves that you possess a lot of "no idea" as far as the Midlle East is concerned. Well if you are right, that would make two of us. It is pretty well known that the "Palestinians" have always been used as pawns by the Arab (and Persian) nations - who have little use for them otherwise. you forgot to mention the headhunters of Papua New Guinea, the Vikings and Gengis Khan
October 18, 201015 yr Don't forget Mel Gibson. isn't he the australian actor (Braveheart)? and did the Aussies use the Palestinians as pawns against the Aborigines?
Create an account or sign in to comment