lannarebirth Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 He may have been a terrorist, but he was THEIR terrorist, and shouldn't be overlooked. Double standards and all that. Well yes, but check the date of the newspaper article. It was not yet THEIR administration. Whoever's in charge, one thing I know with certainty, any egregiously bad behaviour that is rewarded will continue and likely expand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reasonableman Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 No need to believe all the "agenized" spin one reads here, then, eh? ;-) When will the payout/compensation occur? Any time in the near future? Rumor is it should come as a lump sum with the flooding compensation... only faster... Rumour wrong then if you read post #138. Best not to believe rumours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buchholz Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 (edited) He may have been a terrorist, but he was THEIR terrorist, and shouldn't be overlooked. Double standards and all that. Well yes, but check the date of the newspaper article. It was not yet THEIR administration. Whoever's in charge, one thing I know with certainty, any egregiously bad behaviour that is rewarded will continue and likely expand. and by extension, the higher the reward, eg. 7,500,000.00, the higher the likelihood for repetition and expansion of the egregiously bad behavior. . . Edited March 17, 2012 by Buchholz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now