Buying New Car

[stevenl]

Only going by what I read. You seem very defensive. You must be a Ranger owner. Why not enlighten us about the car?

Mike sorry, this is ridiculous. You don't know the car, out of the many reviews available you pick one where you claim it said 'Lack of interior space and poor handling. Also high depreciation in Thailand.', and you leave all other, positive reviews, alone. When asked about this review you can't produce it. Either produce it or don't mention it.

[anon210]

Only going by what I read. You seem very defensive. You must be a Ranger owner. Why not enlighten us about the car?

Mike sorry, this is ridiculous. You don't know the car, out of the many reviews available you pick one where you claim it said 'Lack of interior space and poor handling. Also high depreciation in Thailand.', and you leave all other, positive reviews, alone. When asked about this review you can't produce it. Either produce it or don't mention it.

And just for Mike, here is one of the positive reviews:

http://www.themotorreport.com.au/52543/2012-ford-px-ranger-xlt-xl-auto-manual-review

Comfort: With wide-opening doors, well-padded seats and appealing tactile surfaces - like 'cold-feel' door handles, appealing seat fabrics, padded door-rests – the Ranger XLT feels more like a modern sedan than a ‘fourby’ ute, both for the snug ambience of the interior, and for its isolation and refinement.

And, front and back, it’s roomy. The B-pillars have been moved forward in the twin-cab to create larger rear-door openings and larger rear glass. The doors open ‘square’, at close to 90-degrees, to make getting in and out easier.

And, in the back, there’s ample room for Lenny, Dags and Gino (we put a 6'2" guinea-pig in there for a knee and headroom check), and oodles of room for the young family.

[MESmith]

Only going by what I read. You seem very defensive. You must be a Ranger owner. Why not enlighten us about the car?

Maybe you read a review of the old Ranger?

[funcat]

Only going by what I read. You seem very defensive. You must be a Ranger owner. Why not enlighten us about the car?

Not defensive only don't want some others,who will be looking for a new car/truck to get the wrong information...

Here is some reading for you:

[MESmith]

But I do like the idea they won't make it any more new models. It will always be the latest model.

??

[funcat]

But I do like the idea they won't make it any more new models. It will always be the latest model.

??

...I was wondering about this too...obviously something mixed-up...but even the "old" model Ranger was not to bad....??

[mikekim1219]

Only going by what I read. You seem very defensive. You must be a Ranger owner. Why not enlighten us about the car?

Not defensive only don't want some others,who will be looking for a new car/truck to get the wrong information...

Here is some reading for you:

http://www.thaivisa....ger-t6-22-tdci/

http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/Ford_Ranger/

[anon210]

Only going by what I read. You seem very defensive. You must be a Ranger owner. Why not enlighten us about the car?

Not defensive only don't want some others,who will be looking for a new car/truck to get the wrong information...

Here is some reading for you:

http://www.thaivisa....ger-t6-22-tdci/

http://usnews.rankin...ks/Ford_Ranger/

As mentioned by other members, this refers to the older model. And it is quite obvious from the picture as well.

[funcat]

Only going by what I read. You seem very defensive. You must be a Ranger owner. Why not enlighten us about the car?

Not defensive only don't want some others,who will be looking for a new car/truck to get the wrong information...

Here is some reading for you:

http://www.thaivisa....ger-t6-22-tdci/

http://usnews.rankin...ks/Ford_Ranger/

Now I understand...you got the old review from US,where the "old" Ranger was,hmm...obviously not the top of the class ...now it was replaced with the Raptor ...in US of course...