Jump to content

Phuket Vs Yangon (Myanmar) - Same Same .. But Different


Recommended Posts

Posted

How would the selling of land to Farang aid in the distribution of wealth exactly?

When you have an promising startup company which lacks certain skills, it's good for the company to hire external experts to work as board member and give them part of the shares. They will do the work to make the company more profitable and therefore also gain more money to themselves.

When there is more money on the company, it's more easy to also share this money to the workers.

This works on country level as well. Country can invite people with skills and resources to make it better. This does not mean that let these people to take over the control, but it means that these people and companies are willing to invest. When people or companies own something, they are likely to preserve their environment as long as they are not doing one season harvesting.

That still makes the people creaming off the top, Farang and the people on basic wages Thai, which ever way you spin it.

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

It might be hard for you to understand...but I'll cut it short.

That's jolly considerate of you mate.

The thing is all those things happen now. Farang spend money on all those things you mentioned already without Thais having to relinquish any power by allowing them to buy land.

This "it would benefit Thais, they just don't know it" argument is so old. It would benefit Farang and Farang alone and that's why it puts every bodies nose out of place. Because they want something they can't have. Tuff titties we call that where I come from.

Posted

It might be hard for you to understand...but I'll cut it short.

That's jolly considerate of you mate.

The thing is all those things happen now. Farang spend money on all those things you mentioned already without Thais having to relinquish any power by allowing them to buy land.

This "it would benefit Thais, they just don't know it" argument is so old. It would benefit Farang and Farang alone and that's why it puts every bodies nose out of place. Because they want something they can't have. Tuff titties we call that where I come from.

I would never in a million years buy land in Thailand, for one I earn money in my home country so thats where I can obtain credit, I can read and understand the paperwork, there are laws to protect me. And I actually quite like the Thais patriotism and protectionism....I was just stating a few of my thoughts...I thought you might have been a timeshare tout BTB, sorry..its just the way you come accross

Posted

How would the selling of land to Farang aid in the distribution of wealth exactly

That was your question Hongkongphoey....I just answered it in my own opinion....Didnt say whether it was right or wrong.

Posted

How would the selling of land to Farang aid in the distribution of wealth exactly?

When you have an promising startup company which lacks certain skills, it's good for the company to hire external experts to work as board member and give them part of the shares. They will do the work to make the company more profitable and therefore also gain more money to themselves.

When there is more money on the company, it's more easy to also share this money to the workers.

This works on country level as well. Country can invite people with skills and resources to make it better. This does not mean that let these people to take over the control, but it means that these people and companies are willing to invest. When people or companies own something, they are likely to preserve their environment as long as they are not doing one season harvesting.

That still makes the people creaming off the top, Farang and the people on basic wages Thai, which ever way you spin it.

Ah you again. Why don't you make an agreement with TV support stuff and just start over again. You know by now that the rules does not allow to use alternative names. Make an agreement, create an user account BTB-england and respect other views as well. We are old enough to understand youth and idealism.

Anyway. Once an country or any other entity has a strong middle class, it's the best way to stability. We all know that middle class people are pretty much boring, who just wants to be conservatives. Those masses are needed keep the country on a track to go forward.

Now for the first steps in Burma, there is only high class and low class. Middle class will grow once there is more possibilities. This will take one or two decades. Until that the country is a land of possibilities and anointments. After that it simply becomes same kind of boring place as any other westernized country has become.

Posted

Ah you again. Why don't you make an agreement with TV support stuff and just start over again. You know by now that the rules does not allow to use alternative names. Make an agreement, create an user account BTB-england and respect other views as well. We are old enough to understand youth and idealism.

Anyway. Once an country or any other entity has a strong middle class, it's the best way to stability. We all know that middle class people are pretty much boring, who just wants to be conservatives. Those masses are needed keep the country on a track to go forward.

Now for the first steps in Burma, there is only high class and low class. Middle class will grow once there is more possibilities. This will take one or two decades. Until that the country is a land of possibilities and anointments. After that it simply becomes same kind of boring place as any other westernized country has become.

Only 3 classes in Burma, the Army (drug dealers), the workers and the monks

Posted

Ah you again. Why don't you make an agreement with TV support stuff and just start over again. You know by now that the rules does not allow to use alternative names. Make an agreement, create an user account BTB-england and respect other views as well. We are old enough to understand youth and idealism.

Anyway. Once an country or any other entity has a strong middle class, it's the best way to stability. We all know that middle class people are pretty much boring, who just wants to be conservatives. Those masses are needed keep the country on a track to go forward.

Now for the first steps in Burma, there is only high class and low class. Middle class will grow once there is more possibilities. This will take one or two decades. Until that the country is a land of possibilities and anointments. After that it simply becomes same kind of boring place as any other westernized country has become.

Only 3 classes in Burma, the Army (drug dealers), the workers and the monks

I disagree. There is/was a 4th Class - "the survivors."

  • Like 1
Posted

Garlic Breath

I don't believe anyone is going to take a chunk of land with them, so it would all still be here. Just like all the land in England, Japan and other countries who allow foreign ownership, is still there.

Sure some farangs already do that, but how many more would do it if the ownership laws were transparent, stable and allowed foreign ownership? How many more businesses would choose to locate here?

Those at the top still can sell land to foreigners, they just do it through BOI or other arrangements.

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

Just a quick update to this thread.

It was reported today in a news source that can not be named on this forum that new laws adopted last Friday by the Myanmar parliment allows foreign investors to lease land for an initial period of 50 years with an option to renew.

So, Myanmar, Same Same but - 20 years more and with an option - Different. smile.pngsmile.pngsmile.pngsmile.png

Edited by NamKangMan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...