Jump to content

Thailand's Farmer-Friendly Rice Subsidy Backfires


webfact

Recommended Posts

Thailand's farmer-friendly rice subsidy backfires
By Bruce Einhorn

r.jpg

file photo

BANGKOK: -- Until last year, business was good for Charoen Laothamatas, the president of Thai rice exporter Uthai Produce. With Thailand dominating the global market for rice exports, Uthai enjoyed strong demand. In 2012, though, Charoen had to cut his workforce by 40 percent.

The culprit: a Thai government policy that pays local farmers vastly inflated prices for their rice. While the government sees the program as a way to boost rural incomes, the policy has made Thai rice uncompetitive against rice from Vietnam and India. Before the new policy went into effect, Uthai exported 200,000 tons to the U.S., China, and Hong Kong. This year, he says, “we will be lucky if we get 80,000.”

Charoen’s troubles are related to the political challenges the kingdom has endured since a military coup ousted populist Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra in 2006. The current premier is his sister, Yingluck Shinawatra, and in 2011 she decided an easy way to cement her party’s grip on power was to win over farmers by paying above-market prices for their rice.

Full story: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-04-18/thailands-farmer-friendly-rice-subsidy-backfires

-- Bloomberg Businessweek 2013-04-19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

SURIN, 17 April 2013 (NNT) - More than 150 houses, rice barns and mills, and animal farms in Surin were destroyed after a tropical storm hit this northeastern province last evening.

Authorities said the trail of damages could be seen in Jom Phra and Muang Districts, adding the storm has blown away roofs of many houses a few kilometers away. The provincial rice depot belonging to the government’s rice pledging scheme was also completely torn down by the storm.

Theres some that they wont have to worry about getting rid of.

Wonder what sort of insurance they had if any?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the strong Baht against the $ they dont care as POTT are making billions for doing sweet fa and subsidising the farmers who then pay higher prices than needed for energy.....vicious circle reminisent of the Western world in the 70's. But still nice to be part of a booming economy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This Government is cementing more money from wherever they can to fill pockets of those who will support them. They are meglomaniacs.

See this article by Bloomberg on why the Thai baht is so strong.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-09/thai-baht-bonds-advance-as-boj-easing-seen-driving-more-inflows.html

Now this is also why the Government is supporting those rice farmers so they ghet more votes WITH BORROWED MONEY and rice they will not be able to sell. SHORT TERM VISON again - usual for MOST politiciands of all nations except here the pollies get all the casjh. And yes this is the government who pays the farmers to vote fopr them and the farmers burn the rice causing smoke issues - so round and round we go.

It is notable in the article I attached that THIS SAME SITUATION occurred prior to the big ASIAN CRASH of 1997.

Interesting.

Please also note, Thailand is a SMALL ECONOMY with a large population featuring 50 on the world index of the worlds biggest economies.

To put that in perspective, a company like PEPSICO can BUY ALL THAILAND if they wanted to.

So go figure whewre Thailand will be in 2 years... hmmm another Asian crash perhaps lead by dim wits at the ships helm? Rice pledging, over borrowing and an econoimy running on EXPORTS with a THAI BAHT so high no one wants the goods. Indeed a GENIOUS policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now what will happen? Will the government only pay 10K baht a tonne now to the farmers? Now if they did how would the farmers pay for their new morgaged house the new truck the 300 baht a day wage.. Farmers to sell more land off borrow more money? Its called digging yourself in deeper and who is to blame? Polititions to be perfectly 100% honest and do they care? No most dont they have made their money will in office.. What is the answer? Maybe a devaluation of the baht could help but better still is a reality check by the voters. Short term gain long term loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am for anything that trickels down to the farmers espically the small holdings the middle men get wealthy while the farmer struggles to survive.

Instead of a trickle down to farmers the Democrats had a scheme whereby a subsidy was paid directly to the farmer. It was less open to corruption so it's surprising PT didn't implement similar.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to me that it is based on a European idea of farm subsidies where, tax payers have to subsidies almost every product grown or produced by (unlike Thailand) very rich farmers! This also backfired and in Europe's case these subsidies are so high that the EU is screaming over how much money is being spent

There is some similarity and you're right that there is criticism over the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). There are many differences though and it's far more complex than the rice subsidy and has somewhat different objectives. I must admit to not fully understanding the Thai system but for some reason it seems that it's not the farmers that get most of the benefit but the millers. Maybe someone else can give some help on this.

The CAP has several functions.

It helps provide a decent income for farmers.

It is used to help farmers modernise and maintain competitiveness and protect the environment.

It also helps when there destabilising factors such as bad weather.

The Thai system is purely for increasing the price paid for rice and has no mechanism for modernisation, competitiveness, market stabilisation or protecting the environment.

I think you can judge the commercial success of the scheme by the lack of transfarency regarding the sale of this rice in G2G deals.

Edited by kimamey
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am for anything that trickels down to the farmers espically the small holdings the middle men get wealthy while the farmer struggles to survive.

Instead of a trickle down to farmers the Democrats had a scheme whereby a subsidy was paid directly to the farmer. It was less open to corruption so it's surprising PT didn't implement similar.

Corruption is the key word in your post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now anybody who watches FOX News realises what a one sided tv station it is. I can only compare it to 'The Nonsense' in its 135th attempt to raise the rise issue as a thread here. Tell those exporters its over and nobody cares about their plight. Tell them please go gracefully and quietly with the billions they have raped on the backs of the poor (my attempt at a 'Churchillian' speech. Seriously Thailand does not need to rely on rice exports, lets grow something else up North. These exporters are an open sore. Please editor no more rice stories, most people dont give a <deleted> about greedy multi billionaires who are having a hard time

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...