Jump to content

Drug-Taking Monks found at Sattahip Temple


Rimmer

Recommended Posts

Drug-Taking Monks found at Sattahip Temple

SATTAHIP:--Members of the public complained to the Sattahip District Authorities over concerns that Monks at the Sattahip Temple were using illegal drugs which was causing them to act in a way not considered as appropriate for Buddhist Monks.

After seeking permission from the Chief Abbot, a team of officials armed with drug testing kits conducted a check on 15 monks on Friday and found that 5 of them had recently consumed methamphetamine.

The Monks aged 25 to 35 were sent to the Chief Abbot and were removed from the monkhood
Full story:http://www.pattayaone.net/pattaya-news/94308/drug-taking-monks-sattahip-temple/

pattaya-one.jpg
-- Pattaya One 2013-07-06

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems no one is exempt from this criminal health problem. Surely the rich and the poor don't partake.

Law-breaking monks; what is the world coming to?

I’m sure we’re all very surprised.

Tissue, please

Edited by Scott
font
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure whether it's the same wat or not.. but I pretty clearly recall past news stories re some groups of monks from the Pattaya area getting caught out in the local "forest" doing drugs and partaking of paid female companionship.

With all of these kinds of sordid news reports over a period of time, you really have to wonder if the whole enterprise hasn't gone astray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Just because it's in your system doesn't mean you ever had the drug in your possession. It merely means you consumed it, big difference." Say what? Only excuse for having it in your system without having possessed it is if someone slipped it into your food or drink. That opinion makes as much sense as saying just because I am drunk doesn't prove I ever had a drink in my hand....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had a monk at our temple who commited suicide about 3 years ago.. He was hooked on yabaa, stole money from his friends, family, the abbot, to buy his drugs. No one knew about it, well, I didn't know about it, I just thought he was kind of strange. Rather than look for some help, hung himself.. He left us a note explaining why he did.. Very sad case..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure whether it's the same wat or not.. but I pretty clearly recall past news stories re some groups of monks from the Pattaya area getting caught out in the local "forest" doing drugs and partaking of paid female companionship.

With all of these kinds of sordid news reports over a period of time, you really have to wonder if the whole enterprise hasn't gone astray.

Nah, the enterprise is right on course and doing rather well thank you very much; drugs, Raybans, private jets, being paid to advertise aircon units that have the same wood facia effect as the controls of donated Rolls Royces, paid for female companionship, and the only thing my parents warned me about was rock N roll facepalm.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, Come-on now. There are a few more Monks in the news. But don't attach a label to them that they are 'typical'. Just like many things in life, there are a few rotten-eggs. Cull out the rotten ones but leave the rest alone for they still have a considerable value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Just because it's in your system doesn't mean you ever had the drug in your possession. It merely means you consumed it, big difference." Say what? Only excuse for having it in your system without having possessed it is if someone slipped it into your food or drink. That opinion makes as much sense as saying just because I am drunk doesn't prove I ever had a drink in my hand....

Let me give you an example: If there's a group of people who smoke a joint together then only the guy who brought the cannabis there is/was in possession of it. All the others merely consumed it. The difference is that, if it's legal in your country to consume the drug they can't charge you with smoking it, but they can definitely charge the guy for possession who brought it.

"...just because I am drunk doesn't prove I ever had a drink in my hand."

Really? You're completely missing the point! It's not about wether you had the drink in your hand, it's about wether or not you owned the drink you consumed. Once again, if there's a group, one brings a bottle and shares it with the others they were never in possession of it. They merely consumed it and wether or not you want to believe it doesn't matter because there is a legal difference.

Just to elaborate it a bit more for the sake of the argument. Let's say you're from Holland, or one of the 2 states in the US where it's legal now to grow, sell and smoke cannabis products and you have a joint there, legally. So then the next day you fly to Singapore where you find yourself subject to a random drug test and they find the THC in your system. It's illegal in Singapore to have any kind of drug in your system other than prescription drugs. The result will be that you either go to jail or you'll be heavily fined for something you haven't even done on their soil, whereas in countries where the consumption is legal you'd be free to go. They might search you, but if you've got nothing on you, you're on your way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...