Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

PT threatens charge against EC

BANGKOK: -- Pheu Thai Party threatens to file a charge against the Election Commission, if the latter fails to complete the general election within March 4.

Prompong Nopparit, the party’s spokesman, said the EC is authorised to complete the election in the 28 problematic constituencies but it is passing the burden to the caretaker government and now to the Constitutional Court.

He said PT’s members could charge the EC of negligence.

xnationlogo.jpg.pagespeed.ic.BfgaY1OWGm.
-- The Nation 2014-02-23

  • Like 1
Posted
He said PT’s members could charge the EC of negligence.

The peoples voice is asking that PT’s members should be charged with negligence.whistling.gif

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

The Election Commission have a role as defined by the constitution.

Because they are independent and do not do what this corrupt government wants, they are now trying to bully them into submission.

Time to install bullet proof glass before the messengers arrive.

Edited by Basil B
Posted

I don't pretend to understand the rules and laws that the EC must abide by, and whether they're right or wrong.....but I don't that PT threats are at all worrying for them.

Posted

The EC has pretty solid legal grounds for its argument that it cannot re-open candidate registrations without a new Royal Decree from Section 7 of the organic electoral law:

Section 7 After the promulgation of the Royal Decree on a general election of
Members of the House of Representatives, the Election Commission shall publish in the
Government Gazette the particulars relating to the election as follows:
(1) the date of an application for candidacy in the election on a constituency basis
which shall commence not later than twenty days as from the date the Royal Decree coming
into force and the period of application shall not be less than five days;
There is no legal way to commence candidate registrations more than 20 days after the Royal Decree and they must be open for not less than 5 days. Time is rather running for PT to issue to issue a new Royal Decree and have the EC re-open registrations for 5 days, print up and deliver ballot papers and hold all elections within 30 days of the 2 Feb elections. After the 2006 elections were annulled due to wrong positioning of the poll boths, the EC commissioners were convicted of malfeasance and sentence to 1 day in jail each suspended. I bet the current commissioners are quaking in their boots about Prompong's threat of legal action.
60 days after the elections a new government must be formed and there is to be no provision in the Constitution that permits the caretaker government to stay in power. Tough luck Prompong.
Tough luck Prompong.

hit-the-fan.gif.pagespeed.ce.6UelFDbFNJ.cool.png.pagespeed.ce.jz1nB6CMOI.png

Posted

As the courts tie the noose around the necks of the PT party, it seems the number of bombings is rapidly increasing now. Running out of time to complete the elections and also time is ticking until the caretaker government's power - or lack of it - expires at the end of March. It will be a turbulent next few weeks for sure.

Posted (edited)

Don't threaten, just do it - even if the judges are their grandfathers. No more negotiation, compromised - it is over.

Edited by icommunity
  • Like 1
Posted

They might have a case if they could show where the 500 billion baht went

And that I believe is at the heart of the matter.

An enormous amount of money is missing and unaccounted for and the PTP are afraid that any further examination of the books, if, of course, there are any left uncooked, will expose the true magnitude of their crimes.

This is what this desperate struggle is all about. Democracy and voting are secondary. The key is to keep the secret as to where the funds have gone.

Next week the PTP has promised to pay the farmers, those that were supposedly going to close the airport, and the finance master Kittirat has almost exhausted his repertoire of pleadings for loans from anywhere. It is downright embarrassing, but this is what Thailand has been reduced to at the moment.

The future month looks bleak as the powers that are in this struggle increase the rhetoric and threats.

Suthep is probing and baiting and Jatuporn and Nattawut are grandstanding equally as well.

Everyone is appalled by the deaths of innocent bystanders and protesters and police. What is about to come will make these seem like small events.............

There is also the amnesty bill that Thaksin, the red leaders and the 25,000 who have corruption cases pending desperately need.

Then the 2.2 trillion that would make a great going away present.

  • Like 1
Posted

weak effort

Please yourself, but only an idiot will expect a vote in that time frame. And the result in the South will be the same.

  • Like 1
Posted

Don't threaten, just do it - even if the judges are their grandfathers. No more negotiation, compromised - it is over.

PTP know they are wrong and are making empty threats. Just bluster. Hot air.

The goose is cooked

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

  • Like 1
Posted

Don't threaten, just do it - even if the judges are their grandfathers. No more negotiation, compromised - it is over.

PTP know they are wrong and are making empty threats. Just bluster. Hot air.

The goose is cooked

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Hahaha, afraid already? I encourage the PTP to "Don't threaten, just do it - even if the judges are their grandfathers. No more negotiation, compromised - it is over."

  • Like 1
Posted

The EC has pretty solid legal grounds for its argument that it cannot re-open candidate registrations without a new Royal Decree from Section 7 of the organic electoral law:

Section 7 After the promulgation of the Royal Decree on a general election of
Members of the House of Representatives, the Election Commission shall publish in the
Government Gazette the particulars relating to the election as follows:
(1) the date of an application for candidacy in the election on a constituency basis
which shall commence not later than twenty days as from the date the Royal Decree coming
into force and the period of application shall not be less than five days;
There is no legal way to commence candidate registrations more than 20 days after the Royal Decree and they must be open for not less than 5 days. Time is rather running for PT to issue to issue a new Royal Decree and have the EC re-open registrations for 5 days, print up and deliver ballot papers and hold all elections within 30 days of the 2 Feb elections. After the 2006 elections were annulled due to wrong positioning of the poll boths, the EC commissioners were convicted of malfeasance and sentence to 1 day in jail each suspended. I bet the current commissioners are quaking in their boots about Prompong's threat of legal action.
60 days after the elections a new government must be formed and there is to be no provision in the Constitution that permits the caretaker government to stay in power. Tough luck Prompong.

The Thai Constitution trumps organic law:

Section 108. The King has the prerogative to dissolve the House of Representatives for a new election of members of the House.

The dissolution of the House of Representatives shall be made in the form of a Royal Decree in which the day for a new general election must be fixed for not less than forty-five days but not more than sixty days as from the day the House of Representatives has been dissolved and such election day must be the same throughout the Kingdom.

The dissolution of the House of Representatives may be made only once under the same circumstance.

So they can't dissolve Parliament again, the constitution prevents it, and the constitution trumps the organic law, so in any clash between them, organic law loses!

Plus the original date is still in force if the original election decree is still in force! So even getting a second decree doesn't move the date forward.

i.e.

(1) the date of an application for candidacy in the election on a

constituency basis which shall commence not later than twenty days as from the date

the Royal Decree coming into force and the period of application shall not be less

than five days;

Not

(1) the date of an application for candidacy in the election on a

constituency basis which shall commence not later than twenty days as from the date

the lastest Royal Decree coming into force and the period of application shall not be less

than five days;

So claiming that getting a section dissolution decree somehow fixes this problem in organic law is not true anyway.

Ask youself who broke the law?

It was the Electoral Commission who failed to have candidate registrations within 20 days, and then refused to extend the registration process from the minimum 5 days, refused offers of help to clear the protestors, and refused to move registrations to a more secure site.

They've been very blatant about it all the way through, and it doesn't instill confidence in elections when they behave like that. So EC broke this law, but the law doesn't trump their duty under 236/6 of the Constitution anyway!

Section 236. The Election Commission shall have the following powers and duties:

(6) to order a new election or a new voting at a referendum to be held in any or all polling stations when there occurs convincing evidence that the election or the voting at a referendum in that or those polling stations has not proceeded in an honest and fair manner;

Section 236 says they have the duty to order new elections where polling stations had problems. An election does naturally include candidate registrations. So the power is there, they don't need a second dissolution resolution, and can't legally have one anyway.

Finger pointing is all well and good, but how to move forward?

Senate needs to choose new commissioners, to restore people's faith in the Electoral Commission.

Elections need to be held in these districts, as per 236/6 of the constitution. If the opposition then want to challenge the registration under Section 7, Constitutional Court can then rule whether organic law trumps their duty under 236/6 of the Constitution. (It doesn't).

Thailand gets back to boring democracy and Bluesky get back to their mindless droning again.

  • Like 1
Posted

Don't threaten, just do it - even if the judges are their grandfathers. No more negotiation, compromised - it is over.

PTP know they are wrong and are making empty threats. Just bluster. Hot air.

The goose is cooked

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Hahaha, afraid already? I encourage the PTP to "Don't threaten, just do it - even if the judges are their grandfathers. No more negotiation, compromised - it is over."

Might need to "persuade" a few judges 1st, just send out a list of addresses.

Posted

Don't threaten, just do it - even if the judges are their grandfathers. No more negotiation, compromised - it is over.

PTP know they are wrong and are making empty threats. Just bluster. Hot air.

The goose is cooked

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Hahaha, afraid already? I encourage the PTP to "Don't threaten, just do it - even if the judges are their grandfathers. No more negotiation, compromised - it is over."

Might need to "persuade" a few judges 1st, just send out a list of addresses.

No need. Just do it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...