Failed expats and the lies they tell others and themselves as to why ...
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
Latest posts...
-
19
Secret Meeting Held by U.S., Israel, and UAE to Discuss Post-War Gaza Plans
The hypocrisy of the liberals. -
17
Is Nissan going bust?
Ghosn was planning to merge Renault and Nissan which would have placed Nissan under French control. -
280
Kamala Harris Former Prosecutor v Convicted Criminal Energizing the Presidential Race
This made me laugh out loud. -
280
Kamala Harris Former Prosecutor v Convicted Criminal Energizing the Presidential Race
Show me on the doll were the Trump boats or trucks hurt you. -
42
Secret Service has advised Trump Campaign to Cease Scheduling Large Outdoor Rallies
For the “it wasn’t a bullet crowd”. By all means the forum MD’s are welcome to submit their report. -
92
What's your no 1 issue with the world?
That story have many edges and sides, -
17
-
0
London’s Knife Crime Crisis: Labour’s Promises Fall Short
Keir Starmer recently pledged swift intervention and harsh consequences to tackle knife crime, but mere words are insufficient to protect our children. Take the tragic case of Pharrell Garcia, a 15-year-old boy sent to pick up his sister from Benthal Primary, a school familiar to many in north London. Nearing his old school earlier this week, Pharrell was mugged and, after refusing to hand over his phone, was fatally stabbed. Despite paramedics' best efforts, he bled to death on the street at four in the afternoon. In another horrifying incident from May, a nine-year-old girl from Birmingham was excitedly heading out for dinner during a visit to London. The chosen venue was Evin, a popular Turkish restaurant where patrons often dine outside on warm evenings. Around 9pm, a helmeted figure on a stolen motorcycle opened fire, injuring three adults and critically wounding the little girl. She may never walk or talk again. These incidents highlight the stark reality of Hackney, a gentrified yet troubled area of multicultural London. Despite Victorian terraced homes valued at over £1.5 million, the neighborhood remains plagued by violence. Just before Christmas, local mother Lianne Gordon, 42, was killed in a bungled home attack meant for someone else. She was among three people shot, including a 20-year-old man and a 16-year-old boy. Violence seems ever-present, affecting even those of us who try to return to our routines after initial shock. We wonder if continuing to walk our dogs in the park where Lianne lived is foolish or simply a testament to Londoners’ resilience in the face of violence. But the brutal truth is that we are all personally affected by the knowledge that children are being killed and grievously injured in our streets. Calling it “black-on-black” violence diminishes its broader threat to our community and society as a whole. As Westminster debates the defense budget, it's crucial to remember that safety begins at home. For residents like me, who pay exorbitant income and council taxes, crime seems out of control. It’s unsettling that my children feel lucky to avoid crossfire on a night out. This leads to the pressing question: what concrete actions will Keir Starmer and Labour take? Their manifesto claims they will halve knife crime in a decade and end "empty warnings" with rapid intervention and tough consequences for knife-carrying individuals. But what is their actual plan? Telling teenagers not to carry knives has clearly failed. The shift towards guns is even more terrifying, with teenage gangs controlling entire postcodes. Hackney’s dual image is evident: to Gen Z, it’s a hub of edgy, artistic creativity, while to worried grandparents in the Shires, it’s a crime hotspot validating their preference for quieter towns like Chichester. Yet for families like mine, London is home, and we deserve to feel safe. Unfortunately, we don’t. The juxtaposition of affluence and violence isn’t unique to Hackney. Even Kensington & Chelsea, home to some of London’s safest streets, witnessed the shooting of 15-year-old Rene Graham at a family fun day. Four men were arrested on suspicion of murder, demonstrating that knife crime permeates even elite areas. The current situation demands more than hand-wringing and condolences. The debate over stop and search illustrates the divide: the black community often views it as harmful, while bereaved mothers see it as essential. Statistics from Statista show that 14% of stop and search interventions lead to arrests. Such measures might have prevented my daughter and her boyfriend from being mugged one Sunday afternoon near our home. Two men, smelling of skunk, separated them, and one threatened her boyfriend with a zombie knife, taking both their phones. The police responded quickly but were limited in their actions. My daughter chalked it up to experience. Boys are more often targeted for muggings due to being “less screamy,” while children in “posh” uniforms are frequently mugged. Parent groups in Enfield and Dulwich have started patrolling streets themselves, but citizen armies are not a long-term solution. Labour’s promise to ban zombie blades, ninja swords, and machetes is a start, but a more comprehensive policing strategy focused on youth is crucial. After all, the attacker arrested for Pharrell Garcia’s murder was another 15-year-old boy. In London, halving knife crime in a decade feels like an eternity. We need immediate and decisive action to stop the senseless violence and protect our communities. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information. -
0
Obama Endorses Harris: A Unified Democratic Front
In a significant political move, former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee on Friday morning. This endorsement arrives at a pivotal moment, just days after President Joe Biden announced his withdrawal from the race and threw his support behind Harris. The Obamas' backing solidifies Harris’s position as the leading candidate for the Democratic nomination. Barack and Michelle Obama expressed their enthusiasm and unwavering support for Harris in a campaign email and video. “This week, we got a chance to catch up with a friend who we've known for more than 20 years. She'd had a pretty busy couple of days, to say the least. But we couldn't be more excited for her — or more thrilled to endorse Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee for President of the United States,” they stated. The video showed the Obamas calling Harris to share their pride in her achievements and their commitment to supporting her campaign. Barack Obama emphasized, "We will do everything we can to get you through this election and into the Oval Office." Harris, expressing her gratitude for their friendship and support, responded, “We're gonna have some fun with this too, aren't we?” The Obamas’ endorsement brings substantial weight to Harris’s campaign. Barack Obama had previously supported Biden’s decision to step down, acknowledging the difficulty of the decision but affirming that it was made with the nation’s best interests at heart. He said, “For him to look at the political landscape and decide that he should pass the torch to a new nominee is surely one of the toughest decisions in his life. But I know he wouldn't make this decision unless he believed it was right for America.” Obama’s endorsement is not only a personal affirmation of Harris but also a strategic move to unify the Democratic Party behind a single candidate. Barack Obama has been a critical surrogate for Biden throughout his campaign, participating in fundraisers that set single-night fundraising records. His support for Harris now signifies a continuation of his influence in the Democratic Party. Obama has also served as a mentor and advisor to Harris over the two decades they have known each other, providing guidance and support. Michelle Obama, known for her popularity and effectiveness as a campaigner, is expected to play a significant role in Harris’s campaign. According to some polls, she remains the most popular figure in American politics, which could prove to be a valuable asset for Harris. The Democratic National Committee is set to formally select its nominee in a virtual roll call ahead of the party's convention, which begins on August 19. Since Biden’s endorsement, Harris’s campaign has seen record-setting donations and garnered numerous high-profile endorsements, further solidifying her position as the presumptive Democratic nominee. The endorsements from the Obamas are expected to rally the party’s base and bring together various factions within the Democratic Party. The unified support from the Obamas and other prominent Democratic figures signals a strong and cohesive front as Harris prepares for the general election. This consolidation of support is crucial for maintaining momentum and building a robust campaign infrastructure. With the backing of such influential figures, Harris’s campaign is poised to mobilize voters, attract funding, and navigate the complex political landscape ahead. Harris’s campaign is expected to leverage the Obamas’ endorsement to highlight her qualifications, vision, and readiness to lead the nation. The endorsement serves as a testament to Harris’s capabilities and her alignment with the values and goals of the Democratic Party. As the campaign progresses, the focus will be on uniting the party, reaching out to undecided voters, and countering the opposition’s narrative. The support from the Obamas underscores the importance of continuity and stability in leadership, especially in a time of political and social challenges. Their endorsement reflects a commitment to building on the progress made during their administration and ensuring that the Democratic Party remains focused on its core principles and objectives. Harris, with her experience, vision, and dedication, is presented as the candidate best suited to carry forward this legacy. As the Democratic National Committee prepares for the convention and the official nomination process, the focus will be on consolidating support, finalizing the campaign strategy, and preparing for the general election. The endorsement from the Obamas marks a significant milestone in Harris’s campaign, signaling a unified and determined Democratic Party ready to take on the challenges ahead and work towards victory in the upcoming election. Credit: AXIOS 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information. -
0
Opinion: A Trump Peace Plan for Ukraine: A Vision for Victory and Stability
Among the essentials are a lend-lease program, real sanctions on Russia, and a revitalized NATO. Pundits claim that if Donald Trump is re-elected, he will cut off aid to Ukraine, give away its territory, and deal directly with Vladimir Putin to impose an ignominious “peace” on the country. There’s no evidence that such capitulation will be part of President Trump’s policy and much evidence to the contrary. It was Mr. Trump who in 2017 lifted the Obama administration’s arms embargo on Ukraine, providing it with the Javelin missiles that helped save Kyiv in the earliest days of Russia’s invasion. More recently, Mr. Trump gave political cover to House Speaker Mike Johnson when he maneuvered to pass additional military aid. Helping Ukraine while revitalizing the American defense industrial base in Alabama, Pennsylvania, and Virginia is good policy—and good politics. The Biden administration’s weakness has left Ukraine where it is today: two years into a full-scale war, with cities destroyed, hundreds of thousands killed, millions of refugees, and without the means to win. The White House has no strategy for victory, and Americans are rightly concerned. While Mr. Biden stumbled into war through weakness, Mr. Trump could re-establish peace through strength. Here’s how a successful plan for Ukraine might look: Unleash America’s energy potential. This will fire up the U.S. economy, drive down prices and shrink Mr. Putin’s war-crimes budget. Rebuild ties with Saudi Arabia and Israel and work together against Iran. This will stabilize the Middle East, ease the Gaza crisis, and create an opening for the Saudis to join the U.S. in squeezing Russia out of global energy markets. Impose real sanctions on Russia. The Biden administration’s sanctions sound good on paper but are hollow. The Treasury, for example, exempts Russian banks from U.S. sanctions if their transactions are related to energy production—the most important revenue source for the Kremlin’s war machine. Bulk up America’s defense industry. We must show our adversaries, especially Russia and China, that they can’t compete with U.S. defense capabilities. Russia’s economy is smaller than Texas’. We can’t allow China to match and surpass the U.S. Revitalize the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. This includes making Europeans pay their fair share. It is time to raise the bar on spending to 3% of member countries’ gross domestic product. Create a $500 billion “lend-lease” program for Ukraine. Instead of saddling U.S. taxpayers with more bills, let Ukraine borrow as much as it needs to buy American weapons to defeat Russia. This is how we helped Britain in World War II before Pearl Harbor. It’s how we can send a clear signal to Mr. Putin that he will never win. Lift all restrictions on the type of weapons Ukraine can obtain and use. This will re-establish a position of strength, which Mr. Putin will understand means the war must end. He will face rising costs and no chance of further gain. These steps would position Mr. Trump to set the terms of a deal: The war stops immediately. Ukraine builds up substantial defense forces so Russia never attacks again. No one recognizes Russia’s occupation and claimed annexation of any Ukrainian territories—just as we never recognized the Soviet incorporation of the Baltic states and withheld recognition from East Germany until 1974. Crimea is demilitarized. Ukraine rebuilds with reparations from Russia’s frozen central-bank reserves, not U.S. taxpayer dollars. Ukraine joins NATO as soon as possible so all European allies assume the burden of protecting it. NATO should establish a $100 billion fund for arming Ukraine, with the U.S. share capped at 20%, as is the case with other alliance common budgets. The European Union should swiftly admit Ukraine and help it modernize and develop its economy. If Russia complies with these terms, the West will gradually lift sanctions. They will be fully removed once Ukraine is in both NATO and the EU. These steps, and not the half-measures of the Biden administration, will end the war, establish a lasting peace, ensure Europe bears the burden of maintaining it, and re-establish freedom and security on the Continent. To those who doubt: The last thing Mr. Trump wants in a second term is a foreign-policy failure that distracts from his domestic agenda and makes Mr. Biden’s botched withdrawal from Afghanistan look like a success in comparison. This comprehensive strategy highlights the belief that strength, clear policies, and strategic international alliances are essential to ending the conflict in Ukraine. By leveraging America's energy resources, reinforcing defense capabilities, and revitalizing NATO, a Trump-led administration could potentially navigate the complexities of the Ukraine-Russia conflict toward a resolution that prioritizes stability and security for Ukraine and the broader international community. Mr. Urban is managing director at the BGR Group and of counsel at Torridon Law. Mr. Pompeo served as secretary of state, 2018-21. Credit: Wall Street Journal 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information. -
0
Teacher Banned for Misgendering and Anti-Gay Statements Warns of Risks for Educators
Joshua Sutcliffe, a Christian former math teacher, has raised alarms about the potential risks for educators who share their personal beliefs in the classroom after he lost a High Court appeal against a decision to ban him from teaching. Sutcliffe was barred from the profession in 2023 after the Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) concluded that he breached safeguarding duties by refusing to use a transgender student’s preferred pronouns and telling students that homosexuality was a sin. This case, the first of its kind to reach and be dismissed at the appeal stage, underscores the challenges at the intersection of personal beliefs and professional conduct in education. Mr. Sutcliffe expressed his dismay at the ruling, stating, "I still stand by my Christian convictions that it is harmful and detrimental to affirm gender-confused children." He claimed that he had been targeted ever since he "dared to express [his] Christian beliefs in a school" and made public appearances in the media. He argued that the TRA had been intent on making him recant his views, punishing him severely for his refusal. Despite this setback, Sutcliffe vowed to continue his fight for justice and to reclaim his career. He lamented the lack of guidance for teachers on such issues during his early years in the profession, noting that schools were more likely to follow advice from organizations like Stonewall rather than the government or other experts. Sutcliffe's attempt to overturn the prohibition order from May 2023 was rejected. The TRA had found him guilty of "unacceptable professional conduct" while he was employed at The Cherwell School in Oxford from 2015 to 2018. The misconduct panel determined that Sutcliffe had repeatedly failed to use a pupil’s preferred pronouns, referring to the student in class, in an email to staff, and during an appearance on ITV’s This Morning. The panel also found that he had failed to safeguard students' wellbeing by telling them that God had stopped someone from being gay because it was wrong, and by expressing his disapproval of equal marriage. In his defense, Sutcliffe’s lawyers argued that the teaching ban represented an "unjustified interference" with his rights to freedom of speech and religion. They contended that the decision was "unsafe" and based on "perverse" findings, maintaining that Sutcliffe had a right "not to believe in gender identity belief." However, Mr. Justice Pepperall, in a written ruling, dismissed these arguments. The judge concluded that Sutcliffe "fails to understand or accept the harm that he caused vulnerable children in his class," asserting that there was "no merit" in his claim that the ban infringed on his religious expression. Justice Pepperall clarified that the case was not about a teacher who accidentally failed to adhere to a school's policy on pronouns or who tried to reconcile personal beliefs with such policies by avoiding pronouns altogether. Instead, it concerned a teacher who intentionally used female pronouns for a transgender male student, both in the classroom and on national television, thereby causing significant distress to a vulnerable child. The judge also condemned Sutcliffe for his comments implying that homosexuality was a sin that could be cured by God, noting that these remarks showed "no regard for the gay and lesbian children in his class" and made them feel "worthless." Additionally, Sutcliffe faced allegations of showing inappropriate videos to students while working as a math teacher at St Aloysius College in Islington, north London, from 2018 to 2019. The TRA found it "more likely than not" that he had shown students a video about masculinity, which suggested that women were only attracted to "real men" and not "a passive man who looks to her to be his provider, protector, and leader." Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information. -
0
Prosecutor Reveals Motivation Behind Attack on Salman Rushdie: Terrorism Charges Filed
In a significant development, federal prosecutors have announced that the man who severely injured author Salman Rushdie in a 2022 knife attack in western New York was driven by a Hezbollah leader's endorsement of a fatwa calling for Rushdie's death. The revelation came as new terrorism charges were filed against Hadi Matar, a U.S. citizen from New Jersey, marking a crucial step in the case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles Kruly disclosed that Matar was motivated by the fatwa originally issued in 1989, which called for the death of Rushdie over his novel "The Satanic Verses." Matar believed that the fatwa had the backing of Hezbollah, a Lebanon-based militant group, and was further endorsed by the group's secretary-general, Hassan Nasrallah, in a 2006 speech. According to Kruly, Matar's attack was an attempt to carry out this fatwa. "We allege that in attempting to murder Salman Rushdie in New York in 2022, Hadi Matar committed an act of terrorism in the name of Hezbollah, a designated terrorist organization aligned with the Iranian regime," said Attorney General Merrick Garland in a news release. He emphasized the Justice Department's commitment to prosecuting those who perpetrate violence in the name of terrorist groups and undermine fundamental freedoms. Matar, who already faces state charges of attempted murder and assault, pleaded not guilty to the new federal charges. These include terrorism transcending national boundaries, providing material support to terrorists, and attempting to provide material support to a terrorist organization. Matar's attorney, Nathaniel Barone, highlighted the complexity of the federal case, noting that it involved multiple agencies and countries over a two-year investigation. Barone indicated that the federal case would delve into broader conspiracies compared to the state charges, which primarily focus on the physical assault on Rushdie during a lecture at the Chautauqua Institution in August 2022. Despite the serious charges, Matar plans to mount a vigorous defense and maintains his innocence. Since the attack, Matar has been held without bail. During the assault, he stabbed Rushdie more than a dozen times in front of an audience of about 1,500 people, leaving the author with knife wounds that blinded him in one eye. The event moderator, Henry Reese, was also wounded before bystanders managed to subdue Matar. U.S. Attorney Trini Ross commended the bravery of those present at the scene, stating, "This defendant put time and effort into traveling to the western district of New York with the intent of taking the life of another. Only because of the brave efforts of those who were present that day, the defendant was prevented from completing his murderous intention." Rushdie detailed the harrowing attack and his subsequent painful recovery in a memoir published in April. The new federal charges against Matar follow his rejection of a plea deal offered by state prosecutors, which would have recommended a shorter prison sentence in exchange for guilty pleas to both state and federal charges. With this rejection, both cases are now set to proceed to trial separately. Jury selection for the state case is scheduled for October 15, while a detention hearing in the federal case is set for August 7. The attack on Rushdie has raised ongoing concerns about his security, given the persistent death threats against him. Although state police and a county sheriff's deputy were assigned to his lecture, the incident has sparked debate about whether adequate protection was in place. Historical precedents underscore the severity of the threat: in 1991, a Japanese translator of "The Satanic Verses" was murdered, and an Italian translator survived a knife attack the same year. In 1993, the book’s Norwegian publisher was shot but survived. Born in the U.S. to Lebanese parents, Matar holds dual citizenship. His mother has reported that her son became withdrawn and moody after visiting his father in Lebanon in 2018. The investigation into Rushdie's stabbing has also explored whether Matar acted alone or was in concert with militant or religious groups. As the legal proceedings continue, the case remains a poignant reminder of the enduring and dangerous reach of extremist ideologies. Credit: Time 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
Just Stop Oil Protesters Convicted for Soup Attack on Van Gogh's Sunflowers
Two Just Stop Oil activists have been found guilty of criminal damage after throwing soup over Vincent van Gogh’s renowned painting, "Sunflowers." Anna Holland and Phoebe Plummer, both 22, faced trial at Southwark Crown Court for their actions in October 2022, when they splashed tinned soup over the iconic artwork. The protesters, donned in Just Stop Oil T-shirts, hurled two tins of Heinz tomato soup at the 1888 masterpiece, which was displayed in the National Gallery. Following the act, they knelt in front of the painting and glued their hands to the wall beneath it. Although the painting itself remained unharmed, the 17th-century gold-coloured frame sustained damage. Prosecutors highlighted that the soup, purchased from a nearby Tesco, acted like paint stripper on the wooden frame, which they described as "a piece of art in itself." In a video captured during the protest, Plummer can be heard questioning, "What is worth more, art or life? Is it worth more than food? Worth more than justice?" She continued, "Are you more concerned about the protection of a painting, or the protection of our planet and people? The cost of living crisis is part of the cost of oil crisis." Despite their arguments, the two women denied the charge of criminal damage. Judge Christopher Hehir, who recently sentenced five other Just Stop Oil activists to prison terms ranging from four to five years for disruptions on the M25, released Holland and Plummer on bail. Their sentencing is scheduled for September 27. Until then, their bail conditions prohibit them from carrying glue, paint, or any adhesive substances in public, and they are barred from visiting galleries or museums. This incident was not an isolated one; it was the second attack on the National Gallery by Just Stop Oil in 2022. Earlier in July, two other supporters of the group glued themselves to John Constable’s "The Hay Wain." Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
Harris Challenges Trump Over Debate Commitment, Accuses Him of Backpedaling
In a recent turn of events in the political arena, Vice President Kamala Harris has accused former President Donald Trump of retracting his commitment to a September 10th presidential debate. Harris addressed reporters with a clear message: "I'm ready." Her comments came after she returned to Washington following a speech to the American Federation of Teachers in Houston. "I'm ready to debate Donald Trump. I have agreed to the previously agreed upon Sept. 10 debate. He agreed to that previously. Now it appears he's backpedaling. But I'm ready. And I think the voters deserve to see the split-screen that exists in this race on a debate stage. And so I'm ready. Let's go," she asserted. This accusation follows an earlier agreement between Trump and then-President Biden to participate in two presidential debates, the first of which took place on June 27th, hosted by CNN. The second debate was scheduled for September 10th and was to be hosted by ABC News. However, Biden's underwhelming performance in the first debate led to widespread calls for him to withdraw from his reelection campaign, a decision he announced on Sunday. Biden's exit from the race paved the way for Harris to announce her candidacy, and she has since garnered the support of a majority of delegates necessary to secure the Democratic nomination. Trump had previously indicated his willingness to debate Harris, expressing his openness to facing her "more than once." Nonetheless, he has now suggested a change in the debate's hosting network, advocating for Fox News instead of ABC News. Trump took to his social media platform to label ABC as "fake news" and a "joke," casting doubt on the network's credibility. Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung underscored this position in a statement on Thursday evening, noting, "general election debate details cannot be finalized until Democrats formally decide on their nominee." Harris’s readiness to confront Trump on the debate stage highlights her determination to engage in direct political discourse and underscores the significance of these debates in the eyes of the electorate. Her insistence on maintaining the original debate schedule reflects a broader commitment to transparency and accountability in the democratic process. Meanwhile, Trump's insistence on changing the debate host has sparked a contentious debate about media credibility and the platforms that should be entrusted with such pivotal events. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the potential showdown between Harris and Trump on September 10th remains a focal point of public interest. The outcome of these debates could significantly influence the direction of the upcoming election, providing voters with a clear comparison between the candidates. Harris’s bold stance and Trump’s contentious counter-moves set the stage for a highly anticipated and potentially transformative moment in American politics. Credit: CBS 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe -
92
What's your no 1 issue with the world?
I thought I turned on Eurovision Song contest for a moment 😄
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now