An event from 27 years ago when defensive systems were not as developed hardly makes for a trend. The aircraft at the time was determined to have been on a non evasive flight path, i.e. not taking into consideration the potential for anti aircraft missile systems. And again, if it had been an anti aircraft missile, the aircraft would have been lost, not able to keep flying and to land safely as it did. Perhaps it was anti aircraft fire, relying on infra red tracking, but it was unsuccessful because the aircraft landed safely. The celebratory excitement because a F35 was damaged, is hardly cause for celebration. All that has been demonstrated is that the aircraft is able to withstand groundfire and. return to a safe location intact and the pilot unharmed.
Create an account or sign in to comment