Qatar extends travel ban on ex-Gitmo inmates; talks continue

[webfact]

Qatar extends travel ban on ex-Gitmo inmates; talks continue
By MATTHEW LEE

WASHINGTON (AP) — Qatar has agreed to temporarily extend travel bans on five senior Taliban leaders released last year from the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in exchange for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, a senior U.S. official said on Sunday.

The official said the ban would remain in place until diplomatic talks for a longer-term solution are completed. The restrictions had been due to expire on Monday under a May 2014 exchange for Bergdahl. U.S. officials said Friday the Obama administration was closing in on an agreement with Qatar to extend the restrictions for six months that could be announced this weekend. It was not immediately clear why that agreement had not been finalized.

The official said the U.S. remains in "close contact" with Qatari authorities "to make sure these individuals do not pose a threat to the United States." As a result of the talks to date, Qatar "has agreed to maintain the current restrictive conditions on these individuals as we continue these discussions," the official said.

The official said the former detainees are all currently in Qatar and remain subject to the travel ban and extensive monitoring. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to publicly speak to the matter.

Under the terms of the exchange, the five detainees were sent to Qatar, where government officials agreed to monitor their activities and prevent them from traveling out of the country for one year. In return, Bergdahl, who had been held captive by the Taliban for nearly five years after walking away from his Army post in Afghanistan, was released to the U.S. military. He recently was charged with desertion.

At least one of the five allegedly contacted militants during the past year while in Qatar. No details have been disclosed about that contact, but the White House confirmed that one was put under enhanced surveillance.

One or more of the detainees met with some members of the al-Qaida-affiliated Haqqani militant group in Qatar earlier in the year, according to Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. That was an indication that the group was reaching out to communicate with the so-called Taliban Five, said Graham, who predicted all five will rejoin the fight.

Four of the five former detainees remain on the United Nations' blacklist, which freezes their assets and has them under a separate travel ban. But the U.N. itself has acknowledged that its travel ban has been violated. In a report late last year, the U.N. sanctions committee stated, "Regrettably, the monitoring team continues to receive a steady — albeit officially unconfirmed — flow of media reports indicating that some listed individuals have become increasingly adept at circumventing the sanctions measures, the travel ban in particular."

The State Department insists that U.S. officials work to mitigate the risk of former Guantanamo detainees returning to the fight, threatening Americans or jeopardizing U.S. national security. U.S. officials have noted in the past that the five Taliban leaders are middle-aged or older, were former officials in the Taliban government and probably wouldn't be seen again on any battlefield, although they could continue to be active members of the Taliban.

Members of Congress have repeatedly expressed concern about what will happen after the travel ban expires and criticized the administration for releasing the five in the first place. They have asked the Obama administration to try to persuade Qatar to extend the monitoring.

Many lawmakers from both parties disapproved when the five Guantanamo detainees were swapped for Bergdahl. They complained that the White House did not give Congress a 30-day notification of the transfer, which is required by law. The White House said it couldn't wait 30 days because Bergdahl's life was endangered.

After the transfer, the House Armed Services Committee demanded the Pentagon release internal documents about the swap. The committee received hundreds, but lawmakers complained that they were heavily redacted. The committee inserted language in the fiscal 2016 defense policy bill that threatens to cut Pentagon spending by about $500 million if the Defense Department doesn't provide additional information about the exchange.

On Friday, lawmakers stepped up their calls.

"This release was a complete overreach by the White House, ignoring U.S. law," said Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. "Already over the past year, it's been reported that the flimsy 'security assurances' in Qatar have been violated, jeopardizing our security. In a few days, these assurances disappear and Taliban leaders will be free to return to the battlefield, putting U.S. security interests and Americans at risk."

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, meanwhile, said Congress would "continue our efforts to investigate the administration's handling of the Taliban Five swap."


-- (c) Associated Press 2015-06-01

[Scott]

An oversized graphic has been removed. Pictures which are too large mess up the formatting of the forum and make reading it difficult because you must scroll back and forth.

[cookee68]

And I always thought that the US never does deals with terrorists, how wrong I was, and as far as it goes with that US soldier, he was a deserter who deflected to the other side on his own account, should have left the traitor there to die, now the US are putting his country and people in danger of the 5 Taliban members recouping to terrorise again

[NeverSure]

And I always thought that the US never does deals with terrorists, how wrong I was, and as far as it goes with that US soldier, he was a deserter who deflected to the other side on his own account, should have left the traitor there to die, now the US are putting his country and people in danger of the 5 Taliban members recouping to terrorise again

This was Obama's decision, much to the dismay of many Americans. Obama had an embarrassing welcome home event for Bergdahl at the White House.

The Army has charged Bergdahl with desertion but at the moment he's still in the military although in what Thailand might call an "inactive position". He is being carefully monitored by "counselors". His hometown had a welcome home parade planned for him but cancelled it as a result of the allegations against him.

His future is toast in America without even considering what if any prison time he may get for desertion. It is indeed a low point for the American Military of which Obama is Commander in Chief.

[Credo]

And I always thought that the US never does deals with terrorists, how wrong I was, and as far as it goes with that US soldier, he was a deserter who deflected to the other side on his own account, should have left the traitor there to die, now the US are putting his country and people in danger of the 5 Taliban members recouping to terrorise again

This was Obama's decision, much to the dismay of many Americans. Obama had an embarrassing welcome home event for Bergdahl at the White House.

The Army has charged Bergdahl with desertion but at the moment he's still in the military although in what Thailand might call an "inactive position". He is being carefully monitored by "counselors". His hometown had a welcome home parade planned for him but cancelled it as a result of the allegations against him.

His future is toast in America without even considering what if any prison time he may get for desertion. It is indeed a low point for the American Military of which Obama is Commander in Chief.

It was a good move to get Bergdahl out of there. The outrage would have been enormous if the world got to watch another one of those videos of someone being beheaded. He would have been a quasi-martyr and any wrongdoing would have been swept under the carpet.

He was traded for 5 worthless individuals who will be monitored one way or the other for the duration of there existence, which may not be long once they leave Qatar. They can spend there days looking at the sky wondering if it is a bird, a plane or a drone overhead. Some bits of information can be leaked and said it was given by them and then they can face the wrath of their own kind.

Bergdahl, however, will be accorded a trial and justice and then the truth, whatever it may be, will be out there.