Donald Trump: Relying on, trying to control free coverage

[blazes]

Such a lovely, warm human being.

I don't think he has it in him to go the distance to the actual election. As it gets closer to the election and the nation gets tired of his shtick, after losing a couple of primaries, he'll declare victory and bail. I give him another couple of months.

It doesn't matter who the Republicans prop up there. They're toast.

What a fun election. Fun like funhouse fun.

Compared to Hillary, Trump is a" lovely warm hearted human being." Besides being inept, Hillary is less than truthful, foul mouthed, and down right dangerous. Actually, that is some of her more endearing qualities. Whoever the next president is going to be, it won't be Hillary.

Totally agree (and, strangely, had a message similar to yours deleted).....

with the caveat that it really doesn't matter who becomes POTUS, cos the 'military/industrial complex" (thank you, Gen. Eisenhower) controls the ultimate agenda.....with that caveat, one can still point out that a woman who lies (in the Pinocchio sense) so much will not make a better President than Mr D. Trump) -- if you believe that telling lies is worse than casting insults

For her record of lies, see this article from the British Specator which compares Trump and HRC:

http://www.spectator.co.uk/2015/12/hillary-clinton-cant-be-that-bad-can-she-well/

Edited December 27, 2015 by blazes

[thaibeachlovers]

Such a lovely, warm human being.

I don't think he has it in him to go the distance to the actual election. As it gets closer to the election and the nation gets tired of his shtick, after losing a couple of primaries, he'll declare victory and bail. I give him another couple of months.

It doesn't matter who the Republicans prop up there. They're toast.

What a fun election. Fun like funhouse fun.

Compared to Hillary, Trump is a" lovely warm hearted human being." Besides being inept, Hillary is less than truthful, foul mouthed, and down right dangerous. Actually, that is some of her more endearing qualities. Whoever the next president is going to be, it won't be Hillary.

Totally agree (and, strangely, had a message similar to yours deleted).....

with the caveat that it really doesn't matter who becomes POTUS, cos the 'military/industrial complex" (thank you, Gen. Eisenhower) controls the ultimate agenda.....with that caveat, one can still point out that a woman who lies (in the Pinocchio sense) so much will not make a better President than Mr D. Trump) -- if you believe that telling lies is worse than casting insults

For her record of lies, see this article from the British Specator which compares Trump and HRC:

http://www.spectator.co.uk/2015/12/hillary-clinton-cant-be-that-bad-can-she-well/

and yet, even on this very forum, there are those that would vote for HRC. Democracy is going to have it's achilles heel exposed come the election- if there is no one standing that is a statesman, you end up voting for either a lying incompetent or a bombastic reality show host.

[louse1953]

Given anyone of a dozen or more countries around the world, Trump would have ended up as a harsh and uncompromising dictator.

Indeed. He can't help himself. He's just an undiplomatic, crass, uncouth, bully.

Sounds like that other clown, Bush the second. He got elected twice.

Of all the people in the US you would think they could come up with someone better than this and Bush got in twice!!!