Jump to content

Obama to nominate 1st woman to head US combatant command


Recommended Posts

Posted

Obama to nominate 1st woman to head US combatant command

LOLITA C. BALDOR, Associated Press


WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama will nominate the first woman to head a U.S. military combatant command, Defense Secretary Ash Carter said Friday, a major milestone in a department that this year opened all combat jobs to women.

Air Force Gen. Lori Robinson is being nominated to head U.S. Northern Command and the North American Aerospace Defense Command. If confirmed by the Senate, Robinson, would be the seventh commander to head the Colorado-based command. She currently is head of the Pacific Air Force.

Northern Command was created in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to coordinate and improve homeland defense and to provide support for national disasters. She would replace Adm. William Gortney, who is retiring.

Carter also said that Obama will nominate Gen. Vincent Brooks to head U.S. Forces Korea. Brooks currently is in charge of U.S. Army Pacific Command.

Brooks' nomination also is subject to Senate confirmation.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2016-03-19

Posted
Picking a woman over a man to prove some stupid point is one of the things that makes <deleted> a really offensive president.

How do you know if she is more or less qualified than any other?

Posted

Picking a woman over a man to prove some stupid point is one of the things that makes <deleted> a really offensive president.

I would almost like to agree with you as this sort of thing is not beyond the BO person....

However, I personally know Lori and have worked with her professionally. She is not a token but an extremely smart, focused and capable officer. She'll do a good job.

So...you're wrong.

Posted

Picking a woman over a man to prove some stupid point is one of the things that makes <deleted> a really offensive president.

Nice. With your comment, you have put ignorance and prejudice on full display. Sadly, it is unlikely that you are aware of how incredibly stupid the comment is.

1. You have no senior military command or leadership experience, yet, you provide a comment on her qualifications.

2. You obviously have no understanding of what the position is. Its primarily related to NORAD. NORAD is information and air traffic control driven. The other function is to oversee defense against an invasion of the U.S. mainland. As it is unlikely there will be a military invasion of the USA, the secondary role is to provide support for civil authorities, i.e. states and counties when there is a catastrophe such as windstorm or flood. It is a job that is heavy on management and logistics skills.

3. The nominee has an impressive educational background, and extensive on the job experience where she was tested and vetted since the 1990's.

What qualifies you to pass judgement on someone you know nothing about? Have you ever had a senior leadership role? Do you have more than a secondary education? Do you know what the General's responsibilities will be?

The answer is an obvious no.

What's even more pathetic is your use of the term Obongo. It must irk you to not be able to use the N word in the forum. Perhaps, you haven't gotten over the fact that a man of afro american heritage had a stellar career and was elected POTUS twice. Your comment wasn't just ignorant, it was pathetic.

Posted

When I first looked at this Obama to nominate 1st woman to head US combatant command

I thought, Michelle?......no way.......then I realised she's a lady not a woman

Posted

You guys are reading too much into this.

Yes or no: she got the position because she is a woman?

Maby you should start reading a little bit more.
Posted

When I first looked at this Obama to nominate 1st woman to head US combatant command

I thought, Michelle?......no way.......then I realised she's a lady not a woman

Which one is not a lady, and why???

Posted

You guys are reading too much into this.

Yes or no: she got the position because she is a woman?

Maby you should start reading a little bit more.

I have a master's degree. I read enough. Worry about yourself. Haha.

Posted

Picking a woman over a man to prove some stupid point is one of the things that makes <deleted> a really offensive president.

Are you really that uniformed, or is it even worse?

Apparently, you are unqualified to hold that post, so what makes you qualified to demean President Obama's choice or Gen. Robinson's qualifications?

Posted

You guys are reading too much into this.

Yes or no: she got the position because she is a woman?

Reading too much? Perhaps it is you who are not reading enough. You're statements appear based on ignorance and bigotry. You have provided no justification for your statements only your own ignorance.

Posted

When I first looked at this Obama to nominate 1st woman to head US combatant command

I thought, Michelle?......no way.......then I realised she's a lady not a woman

Which one is not a lady, and why???

I think he was punning on the headline, which could have been.

Obama to nominate 1st Lady to head US combatant command

(1st Lady being the president's wife, Michelle)

Posted
Picking a woman over a man to prove some stupid point is one of the things that makes <deleted> a really offensive president.

How do you know if she is more or less qualified than any other?

-----------------

I am not the person who made the original comment.

It just happens, however, that I have met her some years ago when she was a colonel

I was a civilian then working in Greece where she made an official visit to the site where I was working.

That was just after Obama was first elected.

She is an astute and intelligent woman, a lifelong officer and even then clearly was son her way to command rank.

Posted

Picking a woman over a man to prove some stupid point is one of the things that makes <deleted> a really offensive president.

How do you know if she is more or less qualified than any other?

-----------------

I am not the person who made the original comment.

It just happens, however, that I have met her some years ago when she was a colonel

I was a civilian then working in Greece where she made an official visit to the site where I was working.

That was just after Obama was first elected.

She is an astute and intelligent woman, a lifelong officer and even then clearly was son her way to command rank.

So astute of you to glean this wide-ranging endorsement of her from a chance meeting years ago.

Posted

Picking a woman over a man to prove some stupid point is one of the things that makes <deleted> a really offensive president.

How do you know if she is more or less qualified than any other?

-----------------

I am not the person who made the original comment.

It just happens, however, that I have met her some years ago when she was a colonel

I was a civilian then working in Greece where she made an official visit to the site where I was working.

That was just after Obama was first elected.

She is an astute and intelligent woman, a lifelong officer and even then clearly was son her way to command rank.

So astute of you to glean this wide-ranging endorsement of her from a chance meeting years ago.

Damn site more astute than your original comment................

And you ignored the post from the member who said he knew her.....

You are either trying to CYA on the original comment or just baiting................coffee1.gif

Posted

You guys are reading too much into this.

Yes or no: she got the position because she is a woman?

Maby you should start reading a little bit more.
I have a master's degree. I read enough. Worry about yourself. Haha.

Khao San road degrees don't count.

Posted

Picking a woman over a man to prove some stupid point is one of the things that makes <deleted> a really offensive president.

How do you know if she is more or less qualified than any other?

-----------------

I am not the person who made the original comment.

It just happens, however, that I have met her some years ago when she was a colonel

I was a civilian then working in Greece where she made an official visit to the site where I was working.

That was just after Obama was first elected.

She is an astute and intelligent woman, a lifelong officer and even then clearly was son her way to command rank.

So astute of you to glean this wide-ranging endorsement of her from a chance meeting years ago.

She isn't going to be leading an armored assault from the turret of a Sherman (or an Abrams), ala George S. Patton. She will not have to face close quarters combat in her new position.

I have worked for and with a number of Generals during my career and counted many of them as friends. I would expect her decision making ability is up to par with any of them. and they were all educated far beyond your self proclaimed Masters level.

She is a four star General and that doesn't come easily.

I don't like Obama, and many of his appointments I consider questionable. This would not be one of them.

Following is her educational background.

Education[edit]

In addition her military assignments can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lori_Robinson

Posted

You guys are reading too much into this.

Yes or no: she got the position because she is a woman?

Reading too much? Perhaps it is you who are not reading enough. You're statements appear based on ignorance and bigotry. You have provided no justification for your statements only your own ignorance.

"You're statements appear based on ignorance and bigotry. You have provided no justification for your statements only your own ignorance."

"You're"?!?! I find it hilarious that you make a really stupid grammar mistake like this is a sentence calling someone ignorant! You are really a piece of work. How do do even keep up with having Alzheimer's and all?

Should be 'in' not 'is' and wrong sentence structure. Please do not play the grammar police until you sort out your own inept communication style. coffee1.gif

Posted

Soi stalker wrote "Picking a woman over a man to prove some stupid point is one of the things that makes <deleted> a really offensive president".

Unbelievable that sort of sexist view still exists in 2016. How are you going to cope with a woman as President?

Posted

Picking a woman over a man to prove some stupid point is one of the things that makes <deleted> a really offensive president.

Nice. With your comment, you have put ignorance and prejudice on full display. Sadly, it is unlikely that you are aware of how incredibly stupid the comment is.

1. You have no senior military command or leadership experience, yet, you provide a comment on her qualifications.

2. You obviously have no understanding of what the position is. Its primarily related to NORAD. NORAD is information and air traffic control driven. The other function is to oversee defense against an invasion of the U.S. mainland. As it is unlikely there will be a military invasion of the USA, the secondary role is to provide support for civil authorities, i.e. states and counties when there is a catastrophe such as windstorm or flood. It is a job that is heavy on management and logistics skills.

3. The nominee has an impressive educational background, and extensive on the job experience where she was tested and vetted since the 1990's.

What qualifies you to pass judgement on someone you know nothing about? Have you ever had a senior leadership role? Do you have more than a secondary education? Do you know what the General's responsibilities will be?

The answer is an obvious no.

What's even more pathetic is your use of the term Obongo. It must irk you to not be able to use the N word in the forum. Perhaps, you haven't gotten over the fact that a man of afro american heritage had a stellar career and was elected POTUS twice. Your comment wasn't just ignorant, it was pathetic.

Stellar career? Hardly! A "constitutional lawyer" that flouts the Constitution! Other than a street rabble-rouser "organizer", what has he accomplished other than to put the U.S. in the toilet?

Posted

Problem with military leaders you don't know if they really are good until you see the outcome of an engagement. Believe most countries have had military leaders that turned out disasters. She may be a brilliant tactician or she just may play the promotion game better than most.

That aside, when making selections based on keeping interest groups happy there will always be doubt about actual competence. Political Correctness seems to be the new Nepotism, Meritocracy contradicts human nature's inclination to favouring friends or those of a similar outlook.

Posted

You guys are reading too much into this.

Yes or no: she got the position because she is a woman?

Reading too much? Perhaps it is you who are not reading enough. You're statements appear based on ignorance and bigotry. You have provided no justification for your statements only your own ignorance.

"You're statements appear based on ignorance and bigotry. You have provided no justification for your statements only your own ignorance."

"You're"?!?! I find it hilarious that you make a really stupid grammar mistake like this is a sentence calling someone ignorant! You are really a piece of work. How do do even keep up with having Alzheimer's and all?

Should be 'in' not 'is' and wrong sentence structure. Please do not play the grammar police until you sort out your own inept communication style. coffee1.gif

Thanks Andaman Al, but perhaps we both forgot to edit our words--for which we should be reprimanded.

Posted

Are these the same sexist dinosaurs that made death threats to some young woman recently for daring to describe herself as a "feminist" on facebook?

They make me laugh. They're so desperately insecure and frightened of women.

biggrin.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...