Thakkar Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 mtls2005, I would be interested to know, if you could provide it, the context of that first picture. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtls2005 Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 A pro-Nazi parade on Manhattan's Upper East Side in 1939. http://www.jta.org/2015/03/26/news-opinion/the-telegraph/from-the-archive-when-jewish-candy-stores-battled-upper-east-side-nazis For a guy with an Orthodox daughter and son-in-law you'd think he'd be a bit more, well...oh, never mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobFord Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 mtls2005, I would be interested to know, if you could provide it, the context of that first picture. Thanks. This is the one that gets me. http://mashable.com/2016/07/27/nazis-madison-square-garden/#3E8XB3FrRaqP Prior to Pearl Harbour and three days later Hitler declaring war on the US, the Nazis were filling Madison Square Gardens. Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thakkar Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 Thanks to mtls and Rob Ford. Cheers, guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joecoolfrog Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 13 hours ago, PattayaJames said: So you don't believe in free speech then. Not hate speech ! Speech that implicitly incites hatred and violence should not just be condemned , it should be illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joecoolfrog Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 13 hours ago, PattayaJames said: limits set by who? You? ANTIFA? The mob on the street? But BLM can say what they want. Society sets the limits. We all , including you , recognise that certain restrictions on posting are in place when acknowledging the rules of this very forum. It might be argued that the ban on flaming each other would be a restricton on ' free speech '. In actual fact it is a common sense and practical means of preventing us hurling abuse at each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balo Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 He is an IDIOT . In charge of your country . But we already knew that . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 34 minutes ago, balo said: He is an IDIOT . In charge of your country . But we already knew that . An idiot we could deal with. This situation is much more dangerous than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now