World News

Trump Portrait to Feature in Limited-Edition U.S. Passports

USA

Trump Portrait to Feature in Limited-Edition U.S. Passports

The United States plans to issue a limited-edition passport to mark the country’s 250th anniversary, featuring an image and signature of President Donald Trump inside the document.

Get today's headlines by email

A White House official and a source familiar with the plan confirmed that the commemorative passport will display Trump’s portrait on an inner page over a stylised depiction of the Declaration of Independence. Mock-ups of the design were shared on social media by the State Department.
Officials say the passports are part of wider celebrations marking the nation’s semiquincentennial in 2026.
Anniversary passport design
The State Department said it will release only a limited number of the specially designed passports.
State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott announced the initiative on social media, saying the department would “release a limited number” of the commemorative documents.
Images posted alongside the announcement show Trump’s portrait placed above an artistic rendering of the Declaration of Independence on the inside cover.
The design forms part of broader efforts by the administration to mark the 250th anniversary of the United States, commonly referred to as the semiquincentennial.
White House says design reflects patriotism
A White House spokesperson said the passport design would allow Americans to participate in the anniversary celebrations.
“President Trump’s new patriotic passport design provides yet another great way Americans can join in the spectacular celebrations for America’s 250th birthday,” the spokesperson said in a statement.
The spokesperson added that the president was leading a “renewal of national pride and patriotism” during the anniversary year.
Details about how the limited-edition passports will be distributed, or how many will be produced, have not yet been released.
Currency and coin proposals
The passport announcement follows earlier moves by the administration connected to the anniversary.
In March, the Treasury Department said Trump’s signature would appear on future U.S. paper currency. If implemented, it would make him the first sitting president to have their name appear on U.S. banknotes.
The Treasury said the change was also intended to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the United States.
The decision comes alongside proposals to create two coins bearing Trump’s image: a one-dollar coin and a special 24-karat commemorative gold coin.
Under federal law, living presidents cannot appear on U.S. currency. However, the administration has argued that the restriction applies only to paper notes and not to coins.
Historically, only one sitting president has appeared on a coin. In 1926, a commemorative coin issued during the presidency of Calvin Coolidge included his likeness.
Anniversary initiatives continue
The passport, currency proposals and commemorative coins are among several initiatives tied to the upcoming 250th anniversary celebrations.
Officials say the measures are intended to mark the milestone year and highlight American history and national identity as the country approaches the 2026 anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 155 comments
• 606 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

89-Year-Old Man Held After Five Wounded in Greece Shooting

EU

89-Year-Old Man Held After Five Wounded in Greece Shooting

An 89-year-old man has been arrested in Greece after a series of shootings in Athens left five people injured, police say. Authorities say the suspect first opened fire on Tuesday at a social security office in the Kerameikos district of the Greek capital, wounding an employee in the leg.

Get today's headlines by email

He then travelled about 5km (3.1 miles) to a courthouse in the Ambelokipi area, where four more people were reportedly hurt before the gunman fled the scene.
Police later arrested the man in the port city of Patras, roughly 200km from Athens. Officers say he was carrying a second weapon, a loaded .38 calibre revolver, at the time of his arrest.
Officials say the motive for the attacks remains unclear.
Two locations targeted
The first shooting took place at a social security agency in Kerameikos, where police say the suspect fired a shotgun and injured one employee.
After leaving the building, the man is believed to have travelled across the city to the Ambelokipi district. There, at a courthouse, he allegedly carried out a second shooting that left four people wounded.
Local media reported that the suspect had entered both buildings with a shotgun concealed under his coat.
Greek authorities deployed a large police presence at both sites following the incidents as investigators worked to piece together how the suspect moved between the two locations.
Footage and witness accounts
State broadcaster ERT aired surveillance footage showing a man believed to be the suspect calmly walking away from one of the buildings on foot.
Investigators are examining whether he used a taxi to travel from the first scene to the courthouse.
One eyewitness described the moment shots were fired.
“I saw the whole thing... he was firing at the ground,” the witness told the state news agency AMNA.
The head of the judiciary employees’ union in Athens, Stratis Dounias, said four women working at the small claims court were injured.
“Four women working at the small claims court were slightly injured,” he told a broadcaster.
Authorities say the victims — one man and four women — all suffered injuries that were not considered life-threatening.
Arrest in Patras
Police said the suspect was tracked to Patras, a port city about 200km west of Athens.
He was arrested at a hotel near the city’s bus station.
According to reports from state broadcaster ERT, the suspect’s niece alerted authorities after recognising him as the individual involved in the shootings.
When officers detained him, they discovered he was carrying a second firearm, described as a loaded .38 calibre revolver.
Rare incident of gun violence
Gun violence is relatively uncommon in Greece. Firearm ownership is legal but tightly regulated under national laws governing possession and licensing.
Authorities say investigations into the circumstances of the attacks and the suspect’s possible motives are continuing.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 1 comment
• 175 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

Starmer Avoids Commons Probe Over Mandelson Vetting

UK-Politics

Starmer Avoids Commons Probe Over Mandelson Vetting

The UK prime minister will not face a parliamentary investigation over accusations that he misled MPs about the vetting process used to appoint Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the United States.

Get today's headlines by email

The House of Commons voted by 335 to 223 against a motion brought by the Conservative Party seeking to refer the matter to the Privileges Committee, which examines potential breaches of parliamentary rules.
The vote followed a strong push by Downing Street to ensure Labour MPs opposed the proposal, although several members of the governing party broke ranks.
Commons vote and Labour divisions
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch tabled the motion after questioning the prime minister’s statements to MPs about whether Mandelson’s appointment had gone through “full due process” and whether officials had faced any pressure during the vetting process.
Under the Ministerial Code, ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament are expected to resign, while inadvertent mistakes should be corrected as soon as possible.
Fourteen Labour MPs voted with the Conservatives in favour of the inquiry, while another cast votes on both sides, which is commonly treated as a formal abstention. The voting record also showed that 53 Labour MPs did not have a vote registered, which can occur when members are absent with permission or engaged in official duties.
Some Labour MPs expressed unease about opposing the motion. South Shields MP Emma Lewell, one of the rebels, told the debate the government’s handling of the issue risked appearing disconnected from public concerns.
She said the approach had fed perceptions that something was being concealed and argued the prime minister should have referred himself to the committee to clear his name.
Other Labour MPs defended the government. Cardiff West MP Alex Barros-Curtis said the Conservatives had failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for launching an inquiry, while Gurinder Singh Josan described the move as premature because the appointment process was already being examined elsewhere in Parliament.
Opposition criticism
Opening the debate, Badenoch argued that the prime minister’s previous comments in the Commons were inaccurate and said the record should be corrected.
She said it was clear that the vetting process had not followed full procedure.
Senior cabinet minister Darren Jones rejected the accusation, saying the prime minister had been responding to claims that Mandelson had been sent to Washington without any vetting at all. Opposition MPs repeatedly interrupted Jones during his defence.
Opposition parties also used the debate to question the government’s credibility. Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey said the country needed a government focused on addressing cost-of-living pressures and one the public could trust.
Scottish National Party Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said Labour MPs could not escape the controversy surrounding Mandelson’s appointment.
Scrutiny of Mandelson appointment
Mandelson took up the ambassadorial post in Washington in February 2025 but was dismissed in September after Downing Street said new information had emerged about the extent of his links with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The prime minister has since faced repeated questions about the appointment, including why the Foreign Office granted Mandelson security clearance despite concerns raised by vetting officials.
During evidence to the Foreign Affairs Committee, senior civil servant Sir Philip Barton said Downing Street had not consulted him before the decision was made. He told MPs he had been presented with the choice and instructed to proceed with the appointment.
Morgan McSweeney, the prime minister’s former chief of staff, also told MPs he had made “a serious mistake” in recommending Mandelson for the role.
McSweeney said Number 10 had wanted the ambassador in place quickly but insisted that officials were never instructed to bypass the standard vetting steps.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 2 comments
• 152 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

UK Ambassador Says US ‘Special Relationship’ May Be With Israel

USA

UK Ambassador Says US ‘Special Relationship’ May Be With Israel

Leaked comments from the United Kingdom’s ambassador to the United States suggest that Washington’s only true “special relationship” may now be with Israel, remarks that surfaced just as King Charles III began a state visit aimed at reinforcing ties between London and Washington.

Get today's headlines by email

Sir Christian Turner made the comments during a private meeting in February with British sixth-form students visiting the United States. An audio recording of the discussion, first reported by the Financial Times, was published on Tuesday.
Britain’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said the remarks were informal and did not reflect official government policy.
Leaked remarks question historic phrase
In the recording, Sir Christian suggested the long-standing description of the UK–US partnership as a “special relationship” may be outdated.
“‘Special relationship’ is a phrase I try not to utter because it’s quite nostalgic, it’s quite backwards-looking, and it has a lot of baggage,” he told the students.
He added that Israel might now occupy that role in Washington’s foreign policy.
“I think there is probably one country that has a special relationship with the United States, and that is probably Israel,” he said.
His comments emerged at a sensitive moment. King Charles III arrived in Washington on Tuesday for a state visit designed in part to strengthen relations between the two countries.
The visit comes as relations between US President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer are strained, particularly over the ongoing war in Iran.
Shared history but changing era
Despite questioning the phrase itself, Sir Christian emphasised the depth of ties between the UK and the US, especially in defence, security and economic cooperation.
In the recording he described the two countries as sharing “a deep history and affinity”, adding that their economies remain closely connected.
“There are things we do together that no two other countries do,” he said.
However, he also suggested the broader geopolitical environment was shifting.
He told the students he did not believe the alliance was facing a “moment of rupture”, but argued that the relationship was entering a new phase.
“We’re certainly at the end of an era, and the era is changing,” he said.
He added that European countries could no longer rely solely on American security guarantees and would need to contribute more.
“My advice to my prime minister is: I can’t just put my hands on my ears and say it’s special, it’s going to be fine,” he said, adding that Britain must demonstrate clearly what it brings to the partnership.
Additional comments draw attention
In the same discussion, Sir Christian also reflected on the political impact of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.
He said it was “extraordinary” that the controversy surrounding the disgraced financier had “not touched anybody” in the United States.
By contrast, he noted the scandal had “brought down” figures in Britain, including Prince Andrew and Sir Christian’s predecessor as ambassador to Washington, Lord Peter Mandelson.
Prince Andrew has repeatedly denied wrongdoing connected to Epstein. Lord Mandelson has previously apologised for maintaining a friendship with Epstein, saying he only learned the full extent of the financier’s actions after his death.
The comments have drawn renewed attention to the issue during the royal visit. King Charles and Queen Camilla are under pressure from some campaigners to meet survivors of Epstein’s abuse during their time in the United States, although they are not expected to do so.
Government distances itself
Sir Christian, a career diplomat, was appointed Britain’s ambassador to Washington in December.
Responding to the reports, the Foreign Office said the remarks were made privately and should not be interpreted as the UK government’s official position.
“These were private, informal comments made to a group of UK sixth-form students visiting the US in early February,” a spokesperson said.
“They are certainly not any reflection of the UK government’s position.”


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 16 comments
• 183 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

King Charles Urges U.S. Congress to Renew U.K. Alliance

USA

King Charles Urges U.S. Congress to Renew U.K. Alliance

King Charles III told U.S. lawmakers that the alliance between Britain and the United States is “more important today than it has ever been” as he addressed Congress during a state visit to Washington.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking to a packed chamber in the House of Representatives on Tuesday, the monarch urged both nations to reaffirm their commitment to cooperation and resist pressures to become more inward-looking. He said he felt the “weight of history” while becoming the first British monarch in 35 years to speak before Congress.
The speech came during a week-long visit to the United States with Queen Camilla and amid strains between President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer over issues including the war in Iran.
Renewing a historic partnership
In his nearly 30-minute address, Charles highlighted the long-standing ties between the two countries, describing their relationship as one of reconciliation and enduring partnership.
He noted that the connection between Britain and the United States stretches beyond the 250 years since American independence, saying it reflects more than four centuries of shared history.
“The modern relationship between our two nations and our own peoples spans not merely 250 years, but over four centuries,” he told lawmakers.
Charles also paid tribute to the role of Congress as a cornerstone of American democracy, calling it a “citadel of democracy” created to represent the voices of the American people and defend their freedoms.
He urged both countries to renew their commitment to cooperation as the United States approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence.
Challenges facing the international community
The king said the address came at a time of global uncertainty, citing conflicts in Europe and the Middle East that are affecting communities in both countries.
While acknowledging that the United States and the United Kingdom do not always agree on policy, he said their alliance remains one of the most significant in modern history.
“Our two countries have always found ways to come together,” Charles said, adding that the partnership between them is “truly unique.”
He warned that the alliance must continue to evolve rather than rely solely on past achievements.
“The challenges we face are too great for any one nation to bear alone,” he said.
Security ties and global cooperation
Charles also emphasized the close defense and security links between the two countries. He pointed to their cooperation through NATO and joint military projects, including work on the F-35 fighter jet and a submarine partnership involving the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia.
He said these initiatives help strengthen collective security and resilience for the future.
The king added that the determination shown by the two nations during World War II, the Cold War and the period after the September 11 attacks remains relevant today.
He said the same resolve is needed in support of Ukraine as it seeks what he described as a “just and lasting peace”, a remark that drew bipartisan applause from lawmakers.
Response to recent violence
Charles also referred to the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner over the weekend, where the president and members of Congress were present.
He said acts of violence would not succeed and praised the courage of those who work to protect others.
“Whatever our differences, whatever disagreements we may have, we stand united in our commitment to uphold democracy and protect all our people from harm,” he said.
A rare address to Congress
The speech marked only the second time a British monarch has addressed the U.S. Congress. Queen Elizabeth II delivered the first such address in 1991.
Charles said speaking in the chamber reminded him of his late mother’s appearance there more than three decades ago.
Before the address, the king met congressional leaders including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.
Earlier in the day, President Trump and first lady Melania Trump welcomed Charles and Queen Camilla to the White House during a formal arrival ceremony. Trump praised the longstanding ties between the two countries, describing them as a “special relationship” he hoped would endure.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• UK Monarchy

• 10 comments
• 210 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

FCC orders review of Disney licences after Jimmy Kimmel joke

USA

FCC orders review of Disney licences after Jimmy Kimmel joke

The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has ordered an early review of television broadcast licences held by stations operated by The Walt Disney Company following remarks by late-night host Jimmy Kimmel about Melania Trump.

Get today's headlines by email

The move comes days after US President Donald Trump publicly urged ABC — owned by Disney — to remove Kimmel from the air over a joke made shortly before a shooting incident at a Washington gala attended by the president and first lady.
The FCC said on Tuesday it had already been examining Disney’s ABC stations for possible regulatory breaches, including allegations of unlawful discrimination.
A spokesperson for Disney told the BBC that ABC and its affiliated stations operate within FCC guidelines and serve the public interest.
Joke sparks political backlash
The controversy centres on a comment Kimmel made about Melania Trump during his late-night programme. The comedian said the first lady had the glow of an “expectant widow”.
The remark was made days before a gunman opened fire near a security checkpoint at a gala attended by the Trumps.
President Trump criticised the joke earlier this week, describing it as a “call to violence”. Melania Trump also condemned the comments, saying they contributed to what she called “the political sickness within America”.
Kimmel rejected the accusation, saying his remarks were not intended to encourage violence.
“I’ve been very vocal for many years speaking out against gun violence in particular,” he said.
Shooting at Washington gala
The dispute follows a security incident at the annual White House Correspondents' Dinner held at the Washington Hilton on Saturday night.
Authorities said a suspect, identified as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, fired shots near a security checkpoint outside the venue.
The president and first lady were evacuated unharmed.
Officials said Allen was subdued by security personnel near a staircase leading to a ballroom where more than 2,000 guests — including journalists, government officials and public figures — had gathered.
He has since been charged with attempting to assassinate the president.
Rare regulatory step
Legal experts say the FCC’s decision to bring forward a review of Disney’s broadcast licences is unusual.
Jeffrey Schneider, a professor at the USC Gould School of Law, said early licence reviews have occurred before but typically involve technical failures or fraudulent conduct.
He said the threshold for revoking broadcast licences is high, requiring regulators to demonstrate “intentional and repeated violations” of federal rules.
Schneider said it was unlikely that Disney would ultimately lose its licences, noting the burden of proof lies with the regulator.
Previous tensions
Kimmel has previously faced backlash for political remarks made on his programme.
Last September he was temporarily taken off air after comments about the killing of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk. During a monologue, Kimmel said supporters of Trump — whom he referred to as the “Maga gang” — were attempting to use the killing to gain political advantage.
His show returned to air a week later.
The FCC, established in 1934, regulates radio and television broadcasting in the United States. The agency oversees licensing of frequencies and enforces rules covering sponsorship disclosures, emergency broadcasts and standards related to obscenity and decency.
President Trump has previously suggested that television networks providing him with what he calls “bad publicity” should risk losing their licences, raising questions about how much authority the administration has over broadcasters.
Last year, FCC chairman Brendan Carr notified Disney that regulators were investigating the company’s diversity and inclusion programmes amid concerns they might conflict with federal regulations.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 169 comments
• 657 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

DOJ indicts former FBI Director James Comey for second time

USA

DOJ indicts former FBI Director James Comey for second time

Former James Comey has been indicted for a second time by the US Department of Justice, according to sources cited by CBS News, the BBC’s US partner. year that showed seashells arranged to form the numbers “86 47”.

Get today's headlines by email

The new charges reportedly relate to an image Comey briefly posted on Instagram last Officials in the administration of Donald Trump have argued the message amounted to a threat against the 47th US president.
Comey has denied any such intent, saying he did not initially recognise the possible meaning of the numbers.
Social media post at centre of case
The exact charges in the new indictment have not yet been made public. However, sources said the case focuses on the now-deleted Instagram photo.
After posting the image, Comey later removed it and explained his reasoning in a follow-up message. He said he had assumed the arrangement of seashells was a political statement but had not realised some people associated the phrase “86 47” with violence.
“I didn’t realise some folks associate those numbers with violence,” he wrote at the time, adding that he opposes violence and therefore took the post down.
In American slang, the term “eighty-six” can mean to remove or eject something. Critics of Comey’s post argued the phrase could be interpreted as a call to remove the 47th president.
Trump dismissed Comey’s explanation, saying the meaning was obvious. “A child knows what that meant,” the president said.
Earlier case dismissed by judge
The new indictment follows a previous case brought against Comey in September. In that earlier indictment, federal prosecutors accused him of lying to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding during testimony in 2020 related to press leaks.
Comey pleaded not guilty when he appeared briefly in court the following month.
However, in November a federal judge dismissed the case. Cameron Currie ruled that the prosecutor who filed the charges had not been properly appointed, rendering the indictment invalid.
The charges had been brought by Lindsey Halligan, a former White House aide who had not previously prosecuted a case. The judge said Halligan had not been authorised to present the case to a grand jury.
Although the court dismissed the indictment, the ruling left open the possibility that prosecutors could bring the case again.
Long-running tensions with Trump
Comey suggested after the ruling that further legal action from the administration was likely.
“I believe Trump will probably come after me again,” he said at the time.
The former FBI chief has had a strained relationship with Trump for years. Trump dismissed Comey during his first term in office while the FBI was investigating Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election.
Since then, Comey has been a frequent critic of the president and has often been targeted by Trump in public statements.
Separately on Tuesday, another court decision involved Comey’s family. A judge ruled that Maurene Comey — the daughter of the former FBI director — may proceed with a lawsuit challenging her dismissal from a federal prosecutor role during the Trump administration.
The Justice Department has not yet commented publicly on the new indictment. The White House referred questions to the department, which is expected to address the matter during a scheduled briefing later on Tuesday.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

• 54 comments
• 297 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

UAE Quits OPEC Amid Tensions During Iran War

Middle East

UAE Quits OPEC Amid Tensions During Iran War

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) faces a significant setback after the United Arab Emirates announced it will leave the oil producers’ group, highlighting growing tensions among Gulf states during the ongoing conflict involving Iran.

Get today's headlines by email

The decision, confirmed on Tuesday, ends the UAE’s longstanding membership in OPEC and its broader alliance known as OPEC+. Analysts say the move could undermine the group’s ability to maintain unity at a time when the global energy market is already strained.
UAE Energy Minister Suhail Mohamed al-Mazrouei said the withdrawal followed a review of the country’s long-term energy policies and production strategy.
“This is a policy decision,” he told Reuters. “It has been done after a careful look at current and future policies related to the level of production.”
He added that the UAE did not consult other members about the move, including OPEC’s leading producer, Saudi Arabia.
Disruptions in Gulf Energy Routes
The announcement comes during a period of severe disruption in the region’s energy trade.
Oil exporters in the Gulf have faced growing difficulties moving shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman that normally handles roughly one-fifth of global crude oil and liquefied natural gas flows.
Iranian threats and attacks on vessels during the conflict have raised security risks in the area, complicating exports from Gulf producers.
Mazrouei suggested the UAE’s departure from the producer alliance would have limited impact on global markets because of the already strained conditions in the strait.
Political Fallout and US Reaction
The decision may also carry geopolitical implications.
The UAE’s exit from OPEC could be seen as a political win for US President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly criticised the organisation for driving up oil prices.
In a speech to the United Nations General Assembly in 2018, Trump accused OPEC of “ripping off the rest of the world” through high energy prices. He has also argued that Gulf states benefit from US military protection while keeping oil prices elevated.
The UAE, a key US partner and regional financial hub, has recently expressed frustration with the response of neighbouring Arab states to Iranian attacks during the conflict.
Gulf Frustration Over Security Response
Anwar Gargash, diplomatic adviser to the UAE president, criticised the reaction from regional organisations during a discussion at the Gulf Influencers Forum.
He said that while countries within the Gulf Cooperation Council provided logistical assistance, their political and military response had been historically weak.
Gargash added that the lack of a stronger stance from the Arab League was expected, but he had anticipated greater support from Gulf allies.
Strategy Shift in Global Energy Market
Mazrouei emphasised that the UAE had been a member of both OPEC and OPEC+ for many years, but argued that global demand for energy will continue to grow.
Operating outside the producer alliance will allow the UAE to pursue its own production strategy and fully utilise its capacity to supply oil.
Officials say the country can increase output of some of the world’s lowest-cost and lowest-carbon barrels, potentially improving supply flexibility in a tight market.
The departure comes at a time when global spare oil production capacity is already at historically low levels, leaving markets vulnerable to further supply disruptions.
UAE leaders argue that leaving the group could ultimately benefit consumers by supporting a more responsive and reliable global energy supply.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 9 comments
• 177 views

webfact

April 28Apr 28

False-flag claims spread after White House dinner shooting

USA

False-flag claims spread after White House dinner shooting

Misinformation spread rapidly online after the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, with unfounded claims that the incident had been staged gaining traction across several social media platforms. Within minutes of the first reports of gunfire at Saturday night’s event, posts speculating that the attack was a “false flag” began circulating. By the following day the theory had spread widely, despite authorities and journalists who attended the dinner releasing verified information about what had occurred. Officials say there is no evidence the attack was staged.

Get today's headlines by email

Authorities have identified the suspect as Cole Tomas Allen, 31, from Torrance, California. Investigators say Allen rushed toward the event while armed before being stopped by law enforcement officers.
A senior administration official said Allen’s brother had previously received writings from him expressing anti-Trump views, which had also been shared with other family members before the incident.
Conspiracy claims spread online
Online speculation accelerated through the weekend as posts questioning the authenticity of the incident appeared across multiple platforms.
On Reddit, several widely shared posts suggested or joked that the shooting might have been staged. Comment threads frequently reflected skepticism toward official accounts.
On Instagram, posts proposing that the White House or the president had been involved attracted thousands of interactions. On X, the term “staged” trended alongside “Butler,” referencing a previous assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Pennsylvania that has also been the subject of conspiracy theories.
Trump himself commented on how quickly the speculation had emerged. In an interview with CBS’s “60 Minutes” on Sunday, he remarked that conspiracy theories about major events usually take longer to appear.
“Usually it takes a little bit longer,” he said. “Usually they wait about two or three months to start saying that.”
Experts warn of rising conspiratorial thinking
Researchers who study misinformation say the speed of the response reflects a broader trend in public discourse.
Michael Barkun, a political science professor emeritus at Syracuse University, said the rapid spread of conspiracy theories was not surprising.
He said society had become “saturated with conspiracism,” adding that suspicion toward official explanations had become a common reaction to breaking news events.
Although staged or “false flag” attacks have occasionally occurred in history, experts say they are extremely rare. Nevertheless, the idea has become a recurring theme in online conspiracy culture.
In recent years, some commentators have claimed that events ranging from the Sandy Hook school shooting to the 6 January 2021 attack on the US Capitol were orchestrated as false flags.
Mark Fenster, a scholar at the University of Florida who researches conspiracy theories and government transparency, said such beliefs tend to rise and fall over time.
He noted that the modern media environment allows these claims to circulate faster and more visibly than before.
False images and misleading clips
Alongside speculation about the motive for the shooting, other misleading or fabricated content also circulated widely.
Some posts shared images falsely claiming to show the suspect, while others distributed altered security footage of him running through a checkpoint. One viral post suggesting the attack involved time travel drew more than 1.2 million views.
An apparently AI-generated video featuring a fabricated clip of commentator Tucker Carlson discussing the theory also spread online. A propaganda video linked to pro-Iran accounts referenced the conspiracy claims as well.
Another widely shared clip showed White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt speaking on the red carpet before the dinner. In the interview she said “shots will be fired,” referring to remarks planned for the president’s speech. Edited versions of the video circulated online suggesting the comment was evidence of foreknowledge.
Political reactions and concerns
Some political figures from both sides criticised the speculation.
A White House spokesman dismissed the claims outright, saying anyone who believed the president had staged an assassination attempt was “a complete moron”.
Others argued that mistrust of institutions and increasingly partisan politics had helped fuel such reactions.
Analysts warn that the spread of conspiracy theories can have broader consequences for democratic systems. Fenster said widespread suspicion of political opponents and government institutions could make cooperation and compromise more difficult.
Even before the dinner concluded, some attendees predicted that conspiracy narratives would emerge. Representative Jamie Raskin told reporters as he left the event that the attack was likely to intensify existing conspiracy theories surrounding earlier assassination attempts on Trump.
Growing visibility of misinformation
Researchers say the episode illustrates how quickly misinformation can develop during breaking news events.
The combination of algorithm-driven social media platforms, political polarization and declining trust in institutions has created an environment in which speculative claims often circulate alongside verified information.
While investigators continue examining the shooting itself, experts say the online response highlights a parallel challenge: the rapid spread of false or misleading narratives in the aftermath of major incidents.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 62 comments
• 221 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

White House to Review Trump Security After Dinner Shooting

USA

White House to Review Trump Security After Dinner Shooting

The White House will review security arrangements for President Donald Trump following a shooting during the annual White House Correspondents' Dinner, after an armed suspect approached a ballroom where more than 2,000 guests had gathered. A senior administration official said a meeting would be held this week to examine the security response to Saturday’s incident at the Washington Hilton, where Trump, cabinet members and senior political figures were attending the event.

Get today's headlines by email

Authorities said the suspect, identified as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, was subdued by officers near the entrance to the ballroom after a brief exchange of gunfire. A federal agent was wounded during the confrontation but was protected by a bullet-proof vest and is expected to recover.
Despite the breach, Trump has defended the actions of the US Secret Service, the agency responsible for protecting the president and other senior officials.
Security procedures under review
In a statement, a senior White House official said Trump believed the Secret Service had “done an excellent job” neutralising the suspect and escorting him and his team safely from the scene.
Nevertheless, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles is expected to convene a meeting with operations staff, along with representatives from the Secret Service and the Department of Homeland Security, to review security arrangements for events involving the president.
The discussion will examine how the response unfolded and consider whether additional precautions are needed ahead of several major public appearances planned for the coming months.
“The meeting will discuss the processes and procedures that worked to stop Saturday’s attempt, while exploring additional options to ensure all relevant components are doing everything possible to secure the many major events planned for President Trump,” the official said.
Secret Service response defended
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also defended the agency’s response, telling reporters that officers prevented the suspect from reaching the ballroom and quickly escorted the president and other officials to safety.
However, she said potential adjustments to security protocols could be considered. Any changes would not be publicly disclosed, she added, in order to avoid revealing details that could be exploited by future attackers.
Leavitt said the White House would also review which public events Trump attends, though she stressed that the president did not want violent incidents to alter normal public life.
“He’s undeterred,” she said, adding that Trump intends to take part in several upcoming events.
Concerns over event security
The shooting has raised questions about security arrangements at the high-profile dinner, which brought together journalists, politicians and public figures.
Guests entering the Washington Hilton were not asked to show identification, according to attendees. Tickets displayed table numbers but did not include names.
Those attending the event passed through a single security checkpoint with metal detectors located one level above the ballroom. The suspect was stopped near the top of a staircase leading to the ballroom doors.
Separately, Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley said he would seek a briefing from Secret Service leadership about the incident and current protection protocols. Grassley, 92, is fourth in the presidential line of succession after Trump, Vice-President JD Vance and House Speaker Mike Johnson, all of whom attended the dinner.
Major events ahead
The review comes as Trump is expected to attend several large public gatherings in the coming months.
These include events connected to the United States’ 250th anniversary celebrations in July, as well as appearances linked to the upcoming World Cup. The president is also expected to attend other high-profile events, including a proposed UFC fight planned for the White House grounds.
Speaking shortly after the incident on Saturday, Trump acknowledged the risks associated with public life.
“I can’t imagine that there’s any profession that is more dangerous,” he said.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 0 comments
• 125 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

Iran FM Meets Putin as Israel Strikes Continue in Lebanon

Russia

Iran FM Meets Putin as Israel Strikes Continue in Lebanon

Iran’s foreign minister has met Russia’s president in St Petersburg, praising close ties between the two countries while fighting continues between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Abbas Araghchi held talks with Vladimir Putin on Monday, describing the relationship between Iran and Russia as a “strategic partnership”.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking to reporters in St Petersburg, Araghchi said Tehran was confronting what he called “the world’s greatest superpower”, referring to the United States. He said Washington had failed to achieve its objectives and suggested the US had sought negotiations.
“We are standing up to the world’s greatest superpower,” Araghchi said. “They have not achieved a single one of their goals.”
He added that Iran had not yet received direct communication from Washington but said Tehran was considering the possibility of talks.
Russia offers mediation role
During the meeting, Putin signalled Moscow’s support for Tehran and indicated that Russia could play a role in diplomatic efforts.
According to the Kremlin, the Russian president told Araghchi he had received a message last week from Iran’s Supreme Leader, although he did not disclose its contents.
Putin described the Iranian nation as “fighting for its sovereignty” and said Russia would do everything possible to promote peace in the region while protecting the interests of Iran and neighbouring countries.
Dmitry Peskov said Moscow was prepared to offer mediation or other assistance if negotiations between Iran and the United States were to take place.
Russia has previously suggested it could help broker talks or store Iran’s enriched uranium as part of a possible settlement, though Washington has not accepted the proposal.
Delegations hold ‘useful’ talks
The meeting between Russian and Iranian delegations lasted about 90 minutes, according to Russian media reports.
Afterwards, Russia’s foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said the discussions had been productive, describing them as “useful”.
Among those attending the talks was Igor Kostyukov, underscoring the security dimension of the relationship between the two countries.
Moscow and Tehran maintain a comprehensive strategic partnership, though Russia is not formally obliged to provide military assistance to Iran. At the same time, the Kremlin has sought to keep working relations with Gulf states, Israel and the US.
European intelligence agencies warned last month that Russia might supply advanced drone technology to Iran, though no such transfer has been publicly confirmed.
The conflict has also had economic implications. Higher global oil prices linked to the war have increased revenue from Russian energy exports.
Separately, former US president Donald Trump said a planned trip by American officials to Pakistan to discuss the conflict had been cancelled over the weekend, saying it would have taken “too much time”.
Fighting continues in Lebanon
While diplomatic contacts continued in Russia, violence persisted in Lebanon.
Lebanon’s health ministry said Israeli strikes on Sunday killed 14 people. The Israeli military said one soldier from the Israel Defense Forces was killed in a drone attack by Hezbollah.
According to Lebanon’s National News Agency, the death toll since Israel launched its latest offensive against Hezbollah has reached 2,521, with 7,804 people wounded. Those figures have not been independently verified.
The fighting marks the latest escalation along Israel’s northern frontier, as regional tensions remain high.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 5 comments
• 167 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

French Coastguard Rescues 106 Migrants in Channel Boat Incident

Report

French Coastguard Rescues 106 Migrants in Channel Boat Incident

French rescue crews have saved more than 100 migrants after a boat attempting to cross the English Channel broke down off the northern coast of France, authorities said. The French coastguard said 106 people were rescued from a single vessel that had run into difficulty during the journey towards the United Kingdom.

Get today's headlines by email

The migrants were transferred to a rescue ship and brought to Calais in the early hours of Sunday. Officials said they were first alerted to the stricken boat on Saturday.
Rescue operation off northern coast
Earlier in the incident, rescue teams intervened to assist several people who encountered problems while boarding the vessel near Wimereux.
Seven migrants got into difficulty while climbing into the boat. Among them was a woman who lost consciousness and had to be airlifted by helicopter for medical treatment.
Authorities later recovered the remaining passengers and transported them safely to shore.
In a separate operation, six additional migrants were rescued from another boat, bringing the total number of people assisted during the incidents to 119.
One of the world’s busiest sea routes
A spokesperson for the French coastguard warned that the Channel remains a particularly hazardous area for small craft.
They noted that the stretch of water is among the busiest shipping routes in the world and can present dangerous conditions even when the sea appears calm.
Strong winds, powerful currents and shifting sandbanks can make navigation difficult, while cold water temperatures significantly reduce survival time for anyone who falls overboard, especially during winter months.


New UK–France migration agreement
The rescue comes days after the United Kingdom and France announced a new three-year agreement aimed at preventing migrants from attempting the dangerous crossing.
Under the £662m deal, riot-trained French police are expected to patrol beaches along the northern coastline to stop small boats launching towards the UK.
The British government said the agreement could lead to hundreds of migrants each year being removed from French beaches and deported either to their countries of origin or to other European Union states they previously travelled through.
Around £501m of the funding will be used to strengthen enforcement efforts along the coast.
An additional £160m may be made available if the measures prove effective in reducing the number of crossings. However, officials said that funding could be reduced if the new approach fails to deliver results.
Crossings down compared with last year
Official figures suggest the number of people making the journey so far this year has fallen compared with the same period in 2025.
Between 1 January and 22 April 2026, 6,077 people crossed the English Channel in small boats from France. That represents a 37% decrease compared with the same period the previous year.
Authorities on both sides of the Channel have repeatedly warned that the route remains extremely dangerous for migrants attempting the journey in overcrowded and often unseaworthy boats.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• UK-Asylum crisis

• 5 comments
• 221 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

Starmer Faces MP Vote on Mandelson Vetting Inquiry

UK-Politics

Starmer Faces MP Vote on Mandelson Vetting Inquiry

Sir Keir Starmer is facing a vote in Parliament over whether MPs should launch an investigation into claims he misled the Commons about the vetting of Lord Peter Mandelson. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle confirmed that MPs will debate the issue on Tuesday before deciding whether to refer the matter to the Privileges Committee for investigation.

Get today's headlines by email

The prime minister denies accusations that he misled Parliament about the process that cleared Lord Mandelson to become the UK’s ambassador to the United States. The dispute centres on Starmer’s statements that the vetting followed “due process” and that “no pressure whatsoever” had been placed on Foreign Office officials.
Starmer has dismissed the move as a politically motivated attempt by the Conservative Party to undermine his government.
Debate and potential inquiry
If MPs approve the motion, the Privileges Committee would examine whether the prime minister misled Parliament — a breach of parliamentary rules.
Addressing a meeting of Labour MPs on Monday evening, Starmer described the planned vote as “pure politics” and urged his party to unite against it.
The BBC understands Labour MPs are likely to be formally instructed to vote against the Conservative motion rather than being granted a free vote. Because Labour holds a majority in the House of Commons, a large number of its backbench MPs would have to rebel or abstain for the proposal to pass.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has accused Starmer of misleading MPs “multiple times” over the appointment.
She has called on Labour MPs to support an inquiry, urging them to “look into their consciences” and back a referral to the Privileges Committee.
Downing Street rejected the criticism, saying the government was already cooperating with existing parliamentary scrutiny over Mandelson’s appointment.
A spokesperson said the Conservatives were staging a “desperate political stunt” ahead of local elections, adding that the opposition had “no answers on the cost of living or the NHS”.
Existing parliamentary scrutiny
Two separate parliamentary processes examining Mandelson’s appointment are already underway.
Under a procedure known as a humble address, the government must publish documents relating to the decision. Meanwhile, the Foreign Affairs Committee is holding evidence sessions to assess how the vetting process was carried out.
On Monday, the government released a letter from September 2025 written by the then head of the civil service, Sir Chris Wormald. In the letter, Wormald told the prime minister that “appropriate processes” had been followed during the appointment.
Additional written evidence from the Foreign Office was also published by the Foreign Affairs Committee.
Evidence about pressure claims
The evidence included comments from Ian Collard, the Foreign Office’s former head of security, who oversaw the vetting clearance.
According to the committee documents, Collard said he “felt pressure to deliver a rapid outcome” because of “regular contact from No 10” with the department’s permanent under-secretary.
However, the evidence also stated that Collard did not personally speak with Downing Street officials and did not believe the contact affected the professional judgement of himself or his team.
The Privileges Committee has previously investigated allegations that a prime minister misled Parliament. In 2023 it concluded that former prime minister Boris Johnson had misled MPs over gatherings held in Downing Street during the Covid pandemic.
Under the Ministerial Code, ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament are expected to resign, while any inadvertent mistake should be corrected as soon as possible.
Speaker allows vote
At the start of parliamentary business on Monday, Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle said “numerous” MPs had requested a vote on the issue.
He said his role was to act as a “gatekeeper” for such debates and to allow them only sparingly. Hoyle emphasised that permitting the vote did not represent a judgement on the substance of the allegations.
MPs will now decide whether the matter should proceed to a formal inquiry.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 4 comments
• 140 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

Melania Trump Condemns Jimmy Kimmel Over ‘Widow’ Joke

USA

Melania Trump Condemns Jimmy Kimmel Over ‘Widow’ Joke

Melania Trump has criticised late-night host Jimmy Kimmel after he joked that she looked like an “expectant widow” days before a shooting disrupted the White House Correspondents’ Dinner attended by the US president and first lady.

Get today's headlines by email

The comment, delivered during Kimmel’s show ahead of the annual Washington event, has drawn renewed scrutiny following the weekend attack. Melania Trump said the remarks were “hateful and violent” and called on broadcaster ABC to take action. The network has not yet publicly responded.
First Lady Calls for Action
In a post on social media platform X on Monday, Melania Trump said Kimmel’s comments went beyond comedy and contributed to a harmful political climate.
“People like Kimmel shouldn’t have the opportunity to enter our homes each evening to spread hate,” she wrote, urging ABC to “take a stand”.
She described the remarks about her family as “corrosive” and said they deepened political divisions in the United States.
The joke had aired on Thursday during a monologue in which Kimmel previewed the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Referring to the first lady in the audience at the upcoming event, he said: “Look at Melania, so beautiful. Mrs Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow.”
President Trump Joins Criticism
President Donald Trump also criticised the comedian, saying he was grateful that many people had expressed anger about the comments.
Writing on his Truth Social platform on Monday, Trump described the joke as a “call to violence”.
“This is something far beyond the pale,” he wrote. “Jimmy Kimmel should be immediately fired by Disney and ABC.”
ABC’s parent company, the Walt Disney Company, has not responded to requests for comment.
Joke Resurfaces After Shooting
The monologue resurfaced on social media following the shooting at Saturday’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington.
Authorities say a gunman opened fire near a security checkpoint at the event, which was held at the Washington Hilton and attended by hundreds of journalists, government officials and public figures.
President Trump and Melania Trump were evacuated from the venue but were not injured.
Law enforcement officials identified the suspect as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen. He was tackled by security agents near a staircase leading to the ballroom where the dinner was taking place.
Officials say the attack may have been intended to target members of the Trump administration.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt criticised Kimmel’s remarks during a news conference on Monday, describing such rhetoric about the president, the first lady and their supporters as “completely deranged”.
Previous Controversy
Kimmel has faced criticism in the past over comments related to political violence.
Last September, his late-night programme was temporarily taken off air after he discussed the shooting of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk during a monologue. In that segment, he accused what he called the “MAGA gang” — referring to supporters of President Trump — of attempting to score political points from Kirk’s death.
The show returned to broadcast a week later.
After resuming the programme, Kimmel acknowledged that some viewers believed his remarks had been poorly timed or unclear.
“I get why you’re upset,” he said at the time, adding that he understood why some people viewed the comments as inappropriate.
In the wake of the latest controversy, some conservative commentators and social media users have again called for Kimmel to be removed from television.
Speaking after the shooting at the correspondents’ dinner, President Trump said the incident had been “a rather traumatic experience” for his wife.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 39 comments
• 198 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

King Charles III begins US state visit

UK Monarchy

King Charles III begins US state visit

King Charles III arrived at the White House on Monday for a four-day state visit to the United States, taking place amid political tensions between London and Washington and heightened security concerns following a weekend shooting incident in the capital.

Get today's headlines by email

The visit comes nearly 250 years after the American colonies declared independence from Britain during the reign of Charles’s ancestor, King George III. Officials on both sides say the trip is meant to highlight the enduring relationship between the two countries as the United States prepares to mark its 250th anniversary.
Security was reassessed shortly before the visit after gunfire erupted near a Washington dinner attended by President Donald Trump on Saturday. Buckingham Palace said the king was “greatly relieved” that the president, Melania Trump, and other guests were unharmed.
Trump and the first lady welcomed Charles and Queen Camilla at the White House’s South Portico. The two couples were scheduled to share tea before viewing a beehive shaped like the White House, recently installed by the first lady. Charles has long supported beekeeping and maintains several hives at his private residence in England as part of his environmental advocacy.
Political strains between allies
The visit takes place against the backdrop of a diplomatic rift between the United States and the British government. Trump has publicly criticised Prime Minister Keir Starmer for declining to support U.S. military strikes against Iran.
In recent remarks, Trump dismissed Starmer as “not Winston Churchill,” referencing the wartime leader who popularised the phrase “special relationship” to describe U.S.-U.K. ties. The president has also criticised several NATO allies for failing to join the campaign against Iran.
Despite the political disagreement, Trump has said tensions with the British government would not affect the royal visit, emphasising his personal respect for the king. He has repeatedly referred to Charles as a friend and praised their relationship following his own visit to Britain last year.
During that trip, the royal family hosted Trump and the first lady with ceremonial events, including a state banquet at Windsor Castle.
Debate over the visit
Some British politicians and commentators have questioned whether the visit should proceed under current circumstances.
Ed Davey called earlier this month for the trip to be cancelled, warning that Trump’s conduct could place the monarch in an uncomfortable position during public appearances.
Starmer defended the visit, arguing that the monarchy can play a unique diplomatic role. He said the institution often helps maintain relationships across decades through personal connections and symbolic engagement.
Kristofer Allerfeldt, a historian at the University of Exeter, said the two governments likely view the visit differently. According to Allerfeldt, the monarchy seeks to reinforce long-term diplomatic ties and demonstrate Britain’s continuing influence, while the White House may see the trip as a high-profile public event.
Past controversies and royal diplomacy
The visit also comes amid renewed attention on Charles’s younger brother, Prince Andrew, whose association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has drawn criticism. Andrew, whose full name is Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, stepped back from public duties and lost his royal titles following the scandal. He denies wrongdoing.
Advocates for survivors of sexual abuse have urged the king to meet victims during his trip, though such a meeting is considered unlikely.
Charles, 77, has visited the United States many times but this marks his first state visit since becoming monarch in 2022 following the death of Queen Elizabeth II. Elizabeth made four state visits to the U.S., including a landmark address to Congress in 1991.
During the current visit, Charles is expected to deliver a speech to a joint session of Congress — only the second time a British monarch has done so. Other events include a White House state dinner, a visit to the September 11 memorial in New York, and participation in anniversary celebrations in Virginia.
The king will also meet Indigenous leaders involved in conservation projects, reflecting his long-standing interest in environmental protection.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• USA

• 0 comments
• 154 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

Press Gala Gunman Charged in Attempted Trump Assassination

USA

Press Gala Gunman Charged in Attempted Trump Assassination

A man accused of attempting to assassinate US President Donald Trump during the White House Correspondents’ Dinner has been charged with three federal crimes, prosecutors said following his first court appearance.

Get today's headlines by email

Cole Tomas Allen, 31, from Torrance, California, appeared in federal court on Monday after authorities said he tried to force his way toward the ballroom hosting the annual press gala in Washington on Saturday night. Prosecutors charged him with attempting to assassinate the president, transporting firearms to commit a felony and unlawfully discharging a firearm during a violent crime.
The attempted assassination charge carries a possible life sentence if he is convicted.
Allen, dressed in a blue jail jumpsuit, sat beside lawyers from the federal defender’s office during the hearing. Three US marshals stood behind him throughout the proceedings.
Alleged attack at hotel gala
According to prosecutors, Allen arrived at the Washington Hilton on Friday, 24 April, where the high-profile dinner was being held. Authorities said that shortly before 8:40 p.m. on Saturday he rushed through security on a floor above the event’s reception area.

Officials said he was confronted by law enforcement officers as he attempted to move toward the ballroom where the black-tie event was under way.
During the confrontation, a federal officer was shot in the chest. The officer was protected by a ballistic vest and survived the incident. The officer returned fire five times but did not hit the suspect, officials said.
Allen was arrested at the scene.
Prosecutors told the court that the suspect was carrying a 12-gauge pump-action shotgun, a handgun and three knives when he was detained.
Officials say more charges possible
Jeanine Pirro, the US attorney for the District of Columbia, attended the hearing and later spoke at a press conference alongside acting attorney general Todd Blanche and FBI director Kash Patel.
Pirro said prosecutors expected additional charges to be filed as investigators continue examining the case.
“Let this be a message to anyone who thinks Washington DC is the place to act out political violence,” she said. “If you cross state lines with a firearm to carry out such plans, we will track you and prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law.”
Blanche told reporters that authorities believe Allen had travelled by train from California to Chicago and then onward to Washington before checking into the hotel.
Investigators have been searching an address in Torrance linked to the suspect and are examining writings reportedly found in his hotel room. Officials said Allen is not actively cooperating with investigators.
A records search in Los Angeles County found no previous criminal or civil court cases linked to Allen.
Security response and investigation
Authorities said the suspect is believed to have acted alone, and investigators have not yet determined a clear motive.
President Trump and senior administration officials were moved to safety during the incident. A federal agent who was injured in the shooting was later released from hospital on Sunday.
Trump had agreed to attend the White House Correspondents’ Dinner for the first time as a sitting president after previously declining invitations during earlier years of his presidency.
Several senior officials were present at the event, including Vice-President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, along with hundreds of journalists and invited guests.
After the incident, Trump described the suspect as a “lone wolf” attacker and said being president was “a dangerous profession”.
Allen is scheduled to return to court for a detention hearing on 30 April and a preliminary hearing on 11 May as the investigation continues.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 April 2026

• 3 comments
• 144 views

webfact

April 27Apr 27

UK Warns Price Rises May Last Months After Iran War

UK

UK Warns Price Rises May Last Months After Iran War

Britons could face higher energy, food and air travel costs for at least eight months after the conflict between the United States, Israel and Iran ends, according to a senior government minister. Darren Jones, the UK government's chief secretary to the Treasury, said the economic effects of the war would continue to filter through the global economy long after fighting stops. He said the government was preparing for possible supply disruptions as the conflict continues to affect energy production and transport routes across the Middle East.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Jones said ministers were closely examining the economic consequences of the war and developing contingency plans.
“Our best estimate is that economic impacts could last eight months or more after the conflict is resolved,” he said. “That means people could see higher energy bills, rising food prices and more expensive flights.”
Supply disruptions and global impact
Energy production and transportation in parts of the Middle East have slowed significantly during the conflict, creating supply chain problems and pushing up prices worldwide.
Earlier this month, UK officials drafted a worst-case scenario in which prolonged disruption could lead to food shortages by the summer. Items such as chicken and pork were identified as particularly vulnerable if supply chains are affected for an extended period.
The government has also attempted to reassure the public that there is currently no need to change daily behaviour. Ministers have urged motorists to continue buying petrol as normal and travellers to avoid altering flight plans because of fears about jet fuel shortages.
Jones suggested that price increases were more likely than widespread shortages on supermarket shelves.
Government planning and emergency measures
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is expected to chair another meeting of a Cabinet committee on Tuesday focused on preparing for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions linked to the war.
A group of ministers is also meeting twice a week to monitor stock levels of key goods and assess risks to supply chains. Jones is leading the government’s contingency planning meetings.
He said the UK had chosen not to become directly involved in the conflict, aside from taking defensive steps to protect national interests.
“This is not our war,” he said previously, adding that the government was working to prepare for any economic or security consequences.
The International Monetary Fund warned last week that the energy shock caused by the conflict could hit the UK harder than other advanced economies. The organisation lowered its forecast for UK economic growth this year to 0.8%, down from a previous estimate of 1.3%.
Food production and CO₂ supply concerns
Officials have also considered potential disruptions to the supply of carbon dioxide, which is widely used in food processing and preservation.
The concern stems from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping route, which could affect supplies of natural gas needed for fertiliser production — a process that produces CO₂ as a by-product.
To help maintain supplies, the government has provided funding to restart the Ensus bioethanol plant, which generates carbon dioxide during production. The company says it expects to continue supplying CO₂ for the foreseeable future.
Jones said ministers had even discussed the possibility of pubs running short of draught beer during the summer’s Men’s Football World Cup if CO₂ supplies were disrupted, though he stressed efforts were underway to prevent that scenario.
Political pressure and global tensions
Supermarkets say they are working with the government to plan for possible supply challenges, while the National Farmers’ Union has warned that prices for crops such as cucumbers and tomatoes could rise within weeks, with other agricultural costs potentially increasing over several months.
The Liberal Democrats have called for food security to be made a central government priority. The party has proposed measures including a cut in fuel duty and lower public transport costs to help households cope with rising prices.
Meanwhile, tensions around the Strait of Hormuz remain unresolved. Iran’s chief negotiator said reopening the route would be impossible while the United States maintains a naval blockade of Iranian ports.
Negotiators from Iran travelled to Islamabad on Saturday for talks aimed at ending the conflict.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026

• 0 comments
• 120 views

webfact

April 26Apr 26

Polls Show Growing Pessimism Over US Economy

USA

Polls Show Growing Pessimism Over US Economy

Americans are becoming increasingly pessimistic about the state of the US economy, with large majorities saying conditions are deteriorating and many blaming President Donald Trump’s policies, according to several national polls released over the past week.

Get today's headlines by email

The surveys indicate rising concern over inflation, high fuel and food costs, and personal financial pressures, even as financial markets have recently reached record highs.
Majority say economy is worsening
A poll by Gallup found that nearly half of Americans, 47%, now describe current economic conditions as “poor,” an increase of seven percentage points since March. At the same time, 73% said the economy is getting worse, also up seven points over the past month.
A separate Fox News survey reported similar sentiment. About 70% of registered voters said they believed the economy was deteriorating, matching a record level previously seen in 2023 and rising 15 points compared with April last year.
In the Fox poll, 41% of respondents rated the economy poorly, while roughly a quarter said it was performing well. Republicans were significantly more likely than Democrats to view the economy positively.
The Gallup Economic Confidence Index also fell sharply. The measure dropped from -27 in March to -38 in April, its lowest reading since November 2023. The index ranges from -100, indicating extremely negative sentiment, to +100, representing strong confidence.
Although Republicans remained the only political group giving the economy a positive overall rating, their confidence declined markedly, falling 15 points between March and April. Democrats and independents also reported declines, though less steep.
Concerns about inflation and policy
Several polls suggest many Americans expect price pressures to worsen.
A survey conducted by Marquette Law School found that 70% of respondents believe inflation will increase over the next 12 months, up nine points from January. The same poll found 62% saying Trump’s policies would contribute to higher inflation, compared with 45% who held that view at the end of 2025.
In the Fox News poll, voters said by a two-to-one margin that Trump’s policies were harming the economy rather than helping it. Fifty-six percent said the policies were hurting economic conditions, while 28% said they were helping.

Among Republicans, opinion was divided. Seventy percent of voters identifying with the “Make America Great Again” movement said Trump’s policies were benefiting the economy, compared with 30% of Republicans who do not identify with that group.
Disapproval ratings of the president’s handling of the economy were also high. The Fox News poll showed 66% of voters disapproving and 34% approving, matching a record low approval rating across both of Trump’s terms. The Marquette survey reported similar findings, with 68% disapproving of Trump’s economic management and 76% expressing disapproval of his handling of inflation and the cost of living.
The White House has defended its policies, arguing that tax cuts have increased household incomes. Trump said earlier this month that Republican tax measures had left Americans with more money in their pockets, including through a proposal to eliminate taxes on tips.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also highlighted the administration’s tax policies, saying they had returned a “historic amount of money” to working families.
Rising pressure on household finances
Polls also show many Americans struggling with personal finances and rising living costs.
According to the Fox News survey, six in ten voters described their own financial situation as either “only fair” or “poor,” including 28% who said it was poor. Majorities of Democrats, independents and Republicans all expressed negative views about their finances.
The Marquette poll found that just 20% of Americans said they were financially better off than a year ago, a drop of eight points since January.
High prices appear to be a major concern. Eighty-two percent of respondents in the Marquette survey said grocery prices had risen in the past six months, while 93% said gasoline prices had increased. In January, only 21% reported higher gas prices.
Voters widely described several costs as major financial burdens, including groceries (62%), fuel (60%), healthcare (55%) and housing (52%).
A CNBC survey found many households adjusting their spending to cope with rising costs. Nearly eight in ten respondents said they had taken steps such as reducing spending on entertainment, cutting travel because of fuel costs, or limiting purchases.
More than half said they were travelling less, while around four in ten said they had reduced spending on essential items like groceries or medical care. About three in ten reported putting more purchases on credit cards.
War and labour market concerns
External factors are also shaping public sentiment.
The CNBC poll found 64% of voters said the war involving Iran was not worth the increase in gasoline prices associated with the conflict.
Americans are also increasingly pessimistic about the job market. Gallup reported that 63% of respondents believe it is a bad time to find a job, compared with 33% who said it is a good time. That level matches the worst readings since the COVID-19 pandemic.
Despite strong stock market performance, attitudes toward investing remain cautious. A narrow majority of Americans, 53%, said it would be a bad idea to invest $1,000 in the stock market at the moment.
The polls were conducted between early and mid-April among roughly 1,000 respondents each and carried margins of error of around three to four percentage points.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026

• 39 comments
• 203 views

webfact

April 26Apr 26

Iran Strikes Leave Costly Damage to US Bases

Iranian Conflict

Iran Strikes Leave Costly Damage to US Bases

Iranian attacks on US military facilities across the Gulf region have caused billions of dollars in damage, according to officials familiar with the assessments, raising questions in Washington about the scale of the losses and the information provided to lawmakers. Six people briefed on the damage told NBC News that Iranian strikes hit a range of infrastructure and equipment, including runways, radar systems, aircraft, command centres and satellite communications facilities. The destruction spans several countries in the Middle East and could cost as much as $5bn to repair.

Get today's headlines by email

The estimated figure covers structural damage to bases and infrastructure but does not include the cost of repairing or replacing radar equipment, weapons systems, aircraft and other military assets that were damaged or destroyed.
US defence officials have not publicly detailed the full scale of the damage. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to requests for comment from The Hill.
Damage reported across multiple bases
According to officials familiar with the assessments, the attacks affected several American installations across the region.
Early in the conflict, an Iranian F-5 fighter jet reportedly struck the US base at Camp Buehring in Kuwait within the first few days of fighting. The war began on 28 February following a wave of US and Israeli strikes.
Other facilities also sustained damage. At Al Dhafra Air Base and Al Ruwais military base in the United Arab Emirates, Iranian strikes reportedly damaged fuel storage sites, aircraft hangars, barracks, warehouses and a medical clinic.
Additional US-linked installations reported damage as well, including Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia and Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan.
In Kuwait, officials said Camp Arifjan, Camp Buehring and the Shuaiba Port facility were also affected.
Three officials told NBC News that Iranian attacks later caused extensive damage to the headquarters building used by the US Navy in Bahrain and destroyed at least two air defence systems.
Repairs to the headquarters of the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet in Bahrain alone could cost around $200m, according to a congressional official cited by The New York Times following a Pentagon review.
Independent assessment points to wider impact
An external analysis by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) suggests the damage may extend further.
The think tank said Iranian strikes also hit Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait, damaged a runway at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar and struck a munitions storage facility at a base in northern Iraq.
Mackenzie Eaglen, a senior fellow at AEI, said rebuilding costs could include repairing damaged infrastructure, reconstructing facilities or replacing equipment entirely.
She noted that in some cases the destruction may require the abandonment or decommissioning of damaged sites.
“War damage also includes estimated costs for infrastructure that is unsalvageable,” Eaglen said in comments reported by NBC News.
Military equipment also affected
Officials familiar with the damage said several aircraft and systems were also hit.
Among the reported losses were at least one fighter jet, a dozen MQ-9 Reaper drones, two MC-130 tanker aircraft, helicopters and an E-3 Sentry surveillance plane.
The cost of repairing or replacing such equipment has not been included in the initial $5bn estimate for infrastructure damage.
Questions over war costs
The scale of the damage has also drawn attention in Congress, where lawmakers say they have received limited information about the financial cost of the conflict.
In March, the Pentagon estimated that the first six days of military operations against Iran cost more than $11.3bn. That figure did not include reconstruction or repair expenses.
Officials also said $5.6bn was spent on munitions during the first two days of fighting.
Some congressional aides said briefings from the Pentagon about the costs of the war have been limited.
“No one knows anything. And it’s not for lack of asking,” one aide told NBC News, adding that staff had repeatedly requested more detailed figures.
The aide said the lack of information has caused concern among lawmakers, particularly as the Pentagon seeks approval for a record defence budget.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026

• Middle East

• 37 comments
• 376 views

webfact

April 26Apr 26

King’s US State Visit to Proceed After DC Shooting

UK Monarchy

King’s US State Visit to Proceed After DC Shooting

Buckingham Palace has confirmed that King Charles III and Queen Camilla will continue with their planned state visit to the United States, despite security concerns raised by a shooting incident in Washington, DC. The palace said on Sunday that the four-day visit would go ahead “as planned” following discussions between British and US officials throughout the day. Some adjustments are expected to be made to parts of the programme for security reasons.

Get today's headlines by email

The incident occurred on Saturday night when a gunman attempted to enter the White House Correspondents’ Dinner at a Washington hotel. Authorities say the suspect fired several shots near a security checkpoint before being detained.
US officials believe the attacker was likely targeting Donald Trump, who was attending the event.
Security concerns after shooting
The palace said the King was “greatly relieved” to learn that the US president, Melania Trump and other guests had not been harmed.
It is understood that the King and Queen privately contacted the Trumps to express sympathy for those affected by the incident.
The suspect, identified by US media as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, was arrested at the scene. During the confrontation, one US Secret Service agent was shot but survived because his bullet-proof vest stopped the round. No other injuries were reported.
Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche said he was “very confident” that the British monarch would be safe during the upcoming visit. Speaking to NBC News, Blanche said the events of Saturday night demonstrated that US security systems were functioning effectively.
Even before the shooting, preparations for the royal visit had included extensive security arrangements. Officials are now expected to review those plans and implement additional measures.
Programme may see minor changes
Buckingham Palace said there had already been discussions about how the incident might affect operational planning for the trip.
The palace statement thanked officials who had worked quickly on both sides of the Atlantic and said the King and Queen were “looking forward to the visit getting under way tomorrow”.
While the visit will proceed, some events could be modified. Planned engagements include an address to both houses of Congress, a visit to the 9/11 memorial in New York, and a wreath-laying ceremony in Virginia honouring US and UK service members who died in combat.
Political backdrop to the visit
The visit takes place amid diplomatic tensions between the two countries. Reports have suggested the US may reconsider its position on British sovereignty over the Falkland Islands, while Trump has criticised the UK government and other allies over their response to the ongoing Iran conflict.
Despite those disagreements, Trump has spoken warmly about the British monarch. In an interview with the BBC earlier in the week, the president said he had known the King for many years and suggested the visit could help strengthen relations between the two countries.
UK leaders respond
British political leaders also reacted to the Washington shooting.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he had offered his “best wishes” to Trump and the first lady following what he described as “shocking scenes”. During a phone call on Sunday, he expressed relief that the couple were safe and wished the injured Secret Service officer a swift recovery.
Opposition figures likewise condemned the violence. Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats, said political violence must be rejected, while Nigel Farage of Reform UK said it was a relief that no lives had been lost.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said it was essential that security arrangements for the royal visit were fully reviewed to ensure the monarch’s protection.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026

• USA

• 6 comments
• 175 views

webfact

April 26Apr 26

Starmer says most Labour MPs still support him

UK-Politics

Starmer says most Labour MPs still support him

Sir Keir Starmer has said the “vast majority” of Labour MPs back his leadership, as speculation grows about a potential challenge to his position as prime minister. Speaking to the Sunday Times after a week of mounting political pressure, Sir Keir said internal party support remained strong despite criticism from opposition parties and some dissent within Labour ranks.

Get today's headlines by email

“In politics, you get this sort of thing all of the time,” he said, adding that there was always speculation about leadership.
Leadership speculation grows
Questions about Sir Keir’s future intensified following controversy over his decision to appoint Lord Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to the United States.
Opposition figures have called for the prime minister to step down, pointing to concerns raised by UK security officials during the vetting process for the appointment.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said Sir Keir should resign over the decision. Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Philp said some ministers had been “equivocating” about the prime minister’s future.
He also said a small number of Labour MPs had publicly urged Sir Keir to go and argued that MPs should remove him if he did not step down voluntarily, saying it would be “in the national interest”.
Sir Keir rejected suggestions that criticism reflected wider dissatisfaction among Labour MPs.
“What you never hear from are all the people who are supportive, loyal and just want to get on with the job,” he told the newspaper. “That is the vast majority of people in the Parliamentary Labour Party.”
He added that many MPs were focused on governing rather than internal disputes.
“They’re pleased to be in power,” he said. “They’ve waited a long time to be in power and they just want to get on with their job.”
Dispute over security vetting
The controversy centres on concerns raised by security officials during Lord Mandelson’s vetting process.
Sir Keir told MPs earlier in the week that officials had recommended against granting security clearance but that this information had not been passed on to him at the time.
He also defended his decision to dismiss the Foreign Office’s most senior civil servant, Sir Olly Robbins, who had not informed him of the concerns.
“When there’s a double red flag not to give clearance and showing high concern, then I do not accept the argument that that is something which should not be told to the prime minister,” Sir Keir said.
Sir Olly later told MPs he had not been told there was a formal recommendation to deny clearance. Instead, he said officials had been “leaning against” approving it, and he ultimately authorised the clearance with mitigation measures in place.
Sir Keir dismissed criticism that he should have sought further clarification about the vetting outcome.
“When I’m told there’s security clearance, should I go back and quiz officials and say, ‘Are you telling me the truth?’” he said.
“If I questioned every bit of information put in front of me I would never get anything done.”
Focus on wider challenges
The prime minister said his attention was focused on international conflicts rather than domestic political speculation.
He pointed to the wars in Ukraine and Iran as the most pressing issues facing the UK.
“This is the urgent issue of our time,” he said. “This is going to reshape our country.”
Sir Keir added that tensions involving Iran were having wider effects, including the use of proxies inside the UK.
Meanwhile, Philp said the parliamentary Privileges Committee should investigate whether the prime minister had misled Parliament over the Mandelson appointment. Any inquiry would require approval from MPs in the House of Commons.
Darren Jones, the government’s chief secretary to the Treasury, said the administration had “nothing to hide” over the appointment and described the ongoing debate as frustrating.
He acknowledged that upcoming elections in May would be challenging for Labour and said the controversy had made campaigning more difficult. However, he added that voters he had spoken to during campaigning had not raised the Mandelson issue.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026

• 9 comments
• 158 views

webfact

April 26Apr 26

Authorities Say Trump Likely Target in Dinner Shooting

USA

Authorities Say Trump Likely Target in Dinner Shooting

US authorities believe a suspected gunman who opened fire near the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington was likely aiming at President Donald Trump and senior members of his administration, according to Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche. The suspect, identified by US media as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, was arrested after shots were fired near a security checkpoint at the Washington Hilton hotel on Saturday evening. The annual event was being held in a ballroom inside the hotel at the time.

Get today's headlines by email

Blanche said investigators are still examining the suspect’s motive but early findings suggest the attacker intended to target government officials attending the gathering.
The FBI’s criminal division and a terrorism task force are leading the investigation.
Security rushes president to safety
Gunfire was reported at about 20:35 local time (00:35 GMT) in the hotel’s foyer, several floors above where the dinner was taking place.
Secret Service agents quickly escorted President Trump, First Lady Melania Trump and Vice-President JD Vance out of the ballroom. The president had been speaking at the event when the disturbance occurred.
Law enforcement officers exchanged fire with the suspect and subdued him. Officials said they believe the man discharged his weapon during the confrontation. He was not shot but was taken to hospital for evaluation.
Police said the suspect was carrying two firearms as well as knives.
One officer was wounded during the incident but has since been released from hospital. Secret Service communications chief Anthony Guglielmi said the officer’s bullet-resistant vest helped prevent more serious injuries.


Investigators examine suspect writings
Authorities are reviewing documents believed to have been written by the suspect that indicate a desire to target members of the administration, according to a senior US official.
One of Allen’s relatives contacted police before the attack after receiving writings from him. Those documents reportedly did not mention the correspondents’ dinner specifically.
Officials also said investigators believe Allen travelled to Washington by train, first going from Los Angeles to Chicago before continuing to the US capital.
Allen describes himself on LinkedIn as a mechanical engineer, game developer and teacher. He is from Torrance, California, and police are searching a property believed to be linked to him there.
He is expected to appear in federal court on Monday, where he will face charges including assaulting a federal officer and using a firearm during a violent crime.
Event halted amid confusion
Journalists attending the dinner described confusion as the gunshots echoed through the hotel.
The room hosting the event was briefly placed under lockdown before organisers announced the dinner would be rescheduled and began escorting guests out.
Weijia Jiang, president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, called the incident “harrowing” and thanked the Secret Service for protecting those present. She said the organisation’s board would meet to determine next steps.
Speaking later from the White House, Trump praised the security services, telling reporters those at the dinner owed them a “tremendous debt of gratitude”. He also thanked journalists for what he described as responsible reporting on the incident and urged people to “resolve our differences peacefully”.
Third known threat against Trump
The president described the suspect as someone who had “a lot of hatred in his heart for a while” and said the man’s family had been aware he was struggling. Trump also said the suspect had produced a manifesto.
The incident marks the third known assassination threat against Trump. In July 2024, a bullet grazed his ear during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Two months later, another suspected gunman was discovered hiding near Trump’s golf club in West Palm Beach, Florida.
World leaders condemned the shooting attempt. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said he was “shocked” and stressed that attacks on democratic institutions or press freedom must be strongly condemned.
Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney and Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also expressed relief that those attending the dinner were unharmed.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026

• 6 comments
• 157 views

webfact

April 26Apr 26

Bennett, Lapid Unite Parties to Challenge Netanyahu

Israel

Bennett, Lapid Unite Parties to Challenge Netanyahu

Two former Israeli prime ministers have agreed to merge their political parties ahead of upcoming elections in a coordinated attempt to defeat Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and consolidate a divided opposition. Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid announced on Sunday that they would form a joint political faction, with Bennett set to lead the combined party. The move marks a renewed partnership between the two leaders, who previously shared power under a coalition government formed in 2021.

Get today's headlines by email

Lapid’s Yesh Atid party said the merger was designed to strengthen the opposition bloc and improve its chances in the next national vote.
“The move is intended to unite the bloc, put an end to internal divisions and focus all efforts on winning the critical upcoming elections,” the party said in a statement.
The two politicians planned to appear together at a news conference later on Sunday to outline the agreement.
Renewed partnership
Bennett and Lapid previously worked together in a power-sharing arrangement that briefly removed Netanyahu from office. Their 2021 coalition brought together an unusually broad alliance of parties with differing ideological positions.
Under the deal, Bennett served as prime minister first, with Lapid scheduled to take over later in the term.
The coalition ended Netanyahu’s 12 consecutive years in power at the time. Bennett held the premiership during the government’s first year before the alliance began to unravel amid internal disputes.
As the coalition collapsed, Lapid assumed the role of caretaker prime minister for the final six months of the government’s term. Subsequent elections returned Netanyahu to office.
Different political backgrounds
Since that election, Lapid has led Israel’s parliamentary opposition. Bennett, meanwhile, stepped away from political life after the collapse of the coalition government.
Despite having governed together, the two leaders represent different political traditions within Israeli politics.
Bennett is an Orthodox Jew who has taken a more hard-line stance on issues related to the Palestinians. Lapid, by contrast, is secular and generally viewed as a more moderate political figure.
Even so, the two men developed a cooperative working relationship during their time in government, helping them manage the diverse coalition that temporarily replaced Netanyahu’s long-running administration.
Attempt to unify opposition
The planned party merger reflects an effort to consolidate Israel’s opposition landscape, which has been fragmented across several political factions.
Analysts have long noted that the various opposition parties share few ideological similarities. However, many are united in their desire to challenge Netanyahu’s continued leadership.
By combining their parties into a single political force, Bennett and Lapid appear to be seeking greater cohesion among anti-Netanyahu voters ahead of the next election.
Their alliance signals a renewed attempt to build a viable alternative to the current government, which returned Netanyahu to power after the previous coalition collapsed.
Whether the merger can overcome the opposition’s broader ideological divisions remains unclear, but both leaders are presenting the move as a necessary step toward mounting a stronger electoral challenge.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026

• 1 comment
• 147 views

webfact

April 26Apr 26

Washington Hotel Shooting Triggers Scrutiny of Trump Security

USA

Washington Hotel Shooting Triggers Scrutiny of Trump Security

A shooting outside a Washington hotel during a high-profile media dinner has renewed concerns about security surrounding US President Donald Trump, after a suspected gunman came close to the venue where he was attending the event.

Get today's headlines by email

The incident occurred late on Saturday at the Washington Hilton during the annual White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, which draws senior politicians, diplomats and journalists. Authorities say a suspect armed with multiple weapons exchanged gunfire with security before being subdued.
Trump later remarked on the risks associated with the presidency, saying he could not imagine “any profession that is more dangerous”.
Gunman stopped near security checkpoint
Police identified the suspect as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen. Authorities say he was carrying a shotgun, a handgun and several knives.
According to officials, the man ran toward a security checkpoint inside the hotel before agents opened fire. CCTV footage later shared on social media by Trump appeared to show the suspect charging toward the area before being confronted by officers.
Witnesses reported hearing gunshots outside the ballroom where the dinner was taking place. Wolf Blitzer, who was attending the event, told CNN he saw the suspect fire several shots using what he described as a “very very serious” weapon.
After the shooting, Trump posted an image on social media showing a shirtless man on the floor with his hands restrained while surrounded by Secret Service personnel.


Questions over security arrangements
The suspect’s motive remains unclear, though acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche said investigators believed the man may have been targeting government officials, “likely including the president”.
Attention has also turned to security procedures at the hotel. While roads around the building were closed for hours ahead of the dinner, some attendees described relatively limited checks at the entrance.
BBC Chief North America correspondent Gary O'Donoghue, who was present at the event, said staff at the door only briefly glanced at tickets before allowing guests inside. He noted that the tickets displayed table numbers but not the names of attendees, and that identification was not checked.
Guests entered the venue through the hotel lobby before moving down escalators to reach a security checkpoint above the ballroom level.
Authorities said the suspect was staying at the hotel, which remained open to guests even as the event was underway. Access had been restricted to hotel residents and people with tickets to the dinner or related receptions.
Security response praised
Despite the breach, some security experts said the response from agents suggested protective measures worked as intended.
Former FBI agent Jeff Kroeger said Secret Service personnel quickly formed a protective barrier around Trump once shots were heard.
“They converged on the president,” he said, describing how agents shielded him and moved him away from danger.
Former Secret Service agent Barry Donadio said there appeared to be “no lack of agents, officers and police” at the event.
Trump himself praised the Secret Service response and said they had done “a great job” removing him and Vice-President JD Vance from the stage after the gunfire.
The president also criticised the hotel’s layout, calling it “not a particularly secure building”. He used the incident to highlight plans for a new ballroom at the White House, which he said would include bullet-resistant glass and enhanced security features.
Rising political violence in the US
The shooting comes amid wider concerns about increasing political violence in the United States.
Data from the United States Capitol Police show that more than 8,000 threats were investigated in 2023, roughly 50% higher than in 2018.
Several violent attacks against political figures or commentators have taken place in recent years, underscoring deep political divisions in the country.
Trump has also been the target of previous assassination attempts, including a 2024 incident in Butler, Pennsylvania, where a bullet grazed his ear.
Reflecting on the dangers faced by US presidents, Trump said he had studied past attacks on national leaders, including the 1981 shooting of Ronald Reagan.
He added that well-known leaders have historically been targets, citing the assassination of Abraham Lincoln.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026

• 7 comments
• 151 views

webfact

April 26Apr 26

Russian Strikes Kill Seven Across Ukraine

Ukraine Conflict

Russian Strikes Kill Seven Across Ukraine

Russian missile and drone strikes killed at least seven people across Ukraine overnight, including five in the central city of Dnipro, as attacks continued across multiple regions. Ukrainian officials said an apartment building in Dnipro was hit during the bombardment, while emergency workers spent Saturday morning searching for survivors trapped beneath rubble.

Get today's headlines by email

President Volodymyr Zelensky said the assault lasted “practically all night”, describing a sustained wave of drones, cruise missiles and ballistic weapons aimed largely at civilian infrastructure.
Dnipro Hit in Overnight Assault
Regional authorities in Dnipro said five people died when a residential building was struck during the attack.
Emergency crews were deployed to the site to search for survivors and clear debris as daylight broke on Saturday.
Elsewhere, officials reported that two people were killed in the northern city of Chernihiv after Russian missiles and drones struck the area. Attacks were also reported in Odesa and Kharkiv.
Ukrainian air defences were activated across the country during the assault. Authorities said more than 600 Russian drones were launched overnight, describing it as one of the largest barrages in recent days.
According to Ukrainian officials, the majority of the drones were intercepted before reaching their targets.
Writing on social media, Zelensky said Russia’s approach to the war had remained unchanged.
“The Russians’ tactics have not changed: strike drones, cruise missiles, and a significant amount of ballistics,” he said, adding that many targets were “ordinary infrastructure in cities”, including residential buildings, energy facilities and businesses.
Long-Range Drone Strikes Inside Russia
While Russia carried out attacks across Ukraine, Ukrainian forces launched long-range drone strikes deep into Russian territory.
In Yekaterinburg, about 1,000 miles (1,600 km) from the Ukrainian border, the regional governor said six people were injured after a building was struck.
In the neighbouring region of Chelyabinsk, a local official said drones targeting an industrial site had been intercepted.
Russia’s defence ministry said its air defence systems shot down 127 Ukrainian drones across more than a dozen regions.
The ministry also claimed Russian forces had captured the village of Bochkove in the Kharkiv region near Ukraine’s northern border. Ukrainian authorities have not commented on the claim, and it has not been independently verified.
Nato Aircraft Scrambled Near Border
During the overnight attack, British Typhoon fighter jets stationed in Romania were scrambled after Russian drones were detected approaching the area.
Romania’s defence ministry later said it was investigating the fall of an unidentified object on its territory near the Ukrainian border.
The ministry clarified earlier comments suggesting British aircraft had shot down drones, saying the jets did not enter Ukrainian airspace and did not engage any targets.
It said the drones never entered Romanian airspace.
A Nato official said the British aircraft had been authorised to engage if necessary but that no action was required because the threats were neutralised outside Romanian territory.
Ukraine Seeks Stronger International Support
The renewed wave of attacks comes as diplomatic efforts to end the war remain stalled.
Ukraine continues to seek international support for its military and defence capabilities.
On Friday, Zelensky met Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman for talks aimed at strengthening cooperation, including in air defence and military production.
According to officials, the discussions focused on expanding defence collaboration between Ukraine and Gulf partners, particularly as regional countries have shown growing interest in Ukraine’s drone warfare experience.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 2026

• 0 comments
• 124 views

webfact

April 26Apr 26