World News

Judge Declares Mistrial in Harvey Weinstein Rape Retrial

USA

Judge Declares Mistrial in Harvey Weinstein Rape Retrial

A judge in New York has declared a mistrial in the rape case against disgraced film producer Harvey Weinstein after jurors said they could not reach a unanimous verdict.

Get today's headlines by email

The ruling marks the third time a New York jury has considered allegations that Weinstein raped aspiring actress Jessica Mann more than a decade ago. The 74-year-old former Hollywood executive remains imprisoned on other convictions.
The month-long trial focused on whether Weinstein raped Mann in a hotel room in 2013. He had previously been convicted over the allegation, but that verdict was later overturned on appeal. A retrial last year also ended without a resolution after jurors became deadlocked.
Dozens of women have accused Weinstein of sexual misconduct since 2017, including claims of rape. He has repeatedly denied wrongdoing.
Jury unable to reach unanimous verdict
The decision followed three days of deliberations by a jury in Manhattan. On Friday morning, jurors sent a note to the court stating they had concluded they could not agree on a verdict.
Judge Curtis Farber initially instructed the panel to continue discussing the case. Later, he declared a mistrial, saying it was clear the jury was “hopelessly deadlocked”.
“I see no reason to go any further,” the judge said as he thanked and dismissed the jurors.
Weinstein, who used a wheelchair during the proceedings, did not visibly react as court officers wheeled him out of the courtroom following the announcement.
According to the Associated Press, one juror later said that nine members of the panel supported acquittal while three favoured conviction.
Prosecutors weighing next steps
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said prosecutors would now decide whether to attempt another trial.
“While we are disappointed that the proceedings ended with a mistrial, we deeply respect the jury system and sincerely thank all of the jurors for their time and dedication,” he said in a statement.
Bragg also thanked Mann for bringing the allegation and said prosecutors would consult with her before deciding on the next course of action. He added that authorities would continue pursuing sexual violence cases “no matter who the defendant is”.
Weinstein’s lawyers said the outcome reflected the influence of public opinion surrounding the former producer.
They argued that prejudice against him had become so strong that some jurors felt unable to consider a not-guilty verdict, regardless of the evidence. The defence team also criticised prosecutors for repeatedly pursuing the case rather than focusing on other crimes affecting New York residents.
Long legal battle in New York
The mistrial represents the latest chapter in a complex legal battle in New York courts.
In 2020, Weinstein was convicted on several sex-crime charges following testimony from multiple women. But an appeals court overturned that conviction in 2024, ruling he had not received a fair trial because jurors were allowed to hear allegations from women whose claims were not directly tied to the charges.
After the ruling, prosecutors brought new sexual assault charges and the case returned to court.
The original trial involved testimony from three women — Mann, former production assistant Miriam Haley, and model Kaja Sokola — who said Weinstein used his power in the entertainment industry to abuse them.
The latest retrial centred primarily on allegations from Mann and Haley. Mann testified that although she had consensual encounters with Weinstein in the past, he forced her into sex in a hotel room in March 2013 despite her objections. Weinstein’s lawyers maintained the encounter was consensual.
Wider impact and legacy
More than 100 women have accused Weinstein of misconduct, assault or rape. While many allegations did not lead to criminal charges, his conviction in California means he is likely to spend the rest of his life in prison.
The accusations against him helped ignite the #MeToo movement, which exposed sexual abuse and misconduct by powerful figures across multiple industries.
Before the allegations emerged, Weinstein and his brother Bob were influential figures in Hollywood. They co-founded Miramax, a studio behind award-winning films including Shakespeare in Love and Pulp Fiction.
In addition to criminal proceedings, Weinstein has faced civil lawsuits from women who accused him of sexual harassment and rape. One group case ended in a $19m settlement in 2020.
Weinstein has also experienced health problems in recent years and was diagnosed with bone marrow cancer in 2024.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 May 2026

• 3 comments
• 261 views

webfact

May 15May 15

Kemi Badenoch Flattered by Nicki Minaj's Thatcher Comparison

UK-Politics

Kemi Badenoch Flattered by Nicki Minaj's Thatcher Comparison

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has said she felt “very flattered” after rapper Nicki Minaj compared her to former UK prime minister Margaret Thatcher.

Get today's headlines by email

The comment came after Minaj shared a video clip of Badenoch speaking during Prime Minister’s Questions in the House of Commons earlier this week. Posting the clip online, the Trinidad and Tobago-born artist wrote that the UK was “truly one of a kind” and suggested Badenoch could one day be portrayed on screen in the same way Thatcher had been.
“They will portray her in film & TV one day… just like they did with Margaret Thatcher,” Minaj wrote.
Badenoch responds to praise
Speaking on Friday, Badenoch said the comparison was flattering, noting Thatcher’s importance within the Conservative Party.
“It was very flattering to hear Nicki Minaj compare me to Margaret Thatcher, who is a heroine of mine, and in fact a heroine to all Conservatives,” she said.
Badenoch also praised Minaj’s music, mentioning the rapper’s hit song Starships.
“I do like her song Starships. I’ve been dancing to it for a long time, as do my children,” she added.
She said the comment from the US-based artist showed that observers abroad could see the role she believed the Conservatives were playing in challenging the Labour government.
“So it’s very flattering that even in the US they can see who is holding Labour to account — it’s the Conservatives, it is me — and that’s quite a nice thing to see,” Badenoch said.
Thatcher’s legacy in British politics
Margaret Thatcher served as the UK’s first female prime minister from 1979 until 1990 and remains one of the most influential and controversial figures in modern British politics.
Her life and leadership were later depicted in the 2011 film The Iron Lady, in which Meryl Streep portrayed the Conservative leader.
Minaj’s comparison linked Badenoch’s combative style in Parliament to Thatcher’s political legacy, although the musician did not elaborate further on the remark.
Political backdrop
The exchange comes shortly after the Conservative Party suffered significant setbacks in regional elections held across England, Scotland and Wales last week.
Despite the losses, there has been little public speculation about Badenoch’s leadership. She has said the party remains confident it can recover politically and has insisted the Conservatives are “coming back”.
Minaj herself has drawn attention for her political comments in the United States. Earlier this year she described herself as the “number one fan” of US President Donald Trump.
The rapper has also appeared alongside Trump publicly. In January she joined him on stage while displaying a “gold card” visa linked to a fast-track immigration programme launched last December for wealthy applicants seeking US citizenship.
Minaj moved to the United States with her family as a child and has since become one of the most commercially successful and influential figures in modern rap.
Her recent remark about Badenoch quickly attracted attention online, prompting the Conservative leader’s light-hearted response during Friday’s comments.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 May 2026

• 0 comments
• 237 views

webfact

May 15May 15

UK Backs Plan to Ease Deportation of Migrants

UK-Politics

UK Backs Plan to Ease Deportation of Migrants

European countries including the United Kingdom have endorsed a declaration urging courts to reconsider how migration-related cases are judged, in an effort to make it easier for governments to deport people staying in their countries illegally.

Get today's headlines by email

The agreement was unveiled at a summit in Chisinau, Moldova, on Friday and was signed by all 46 member states of the Council of Europe. It calls on judges at the European Court of Human Rights to give greater weight to national governments when handling migration disputes.
Supporters say the initiative reflects growing pressure from irregular migration and people-smuggling networks, while critics warn the proposal could weaken existing human rights protections.
Push for greater national authority
The declaration encourages the Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights to defer more migration decisions to national authorities. Governments argue they are better positioned to weigh public interest and security concerns when dealing with immigration enforcement.
Ahead of the summit, UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper described the initiative as a “common-sense approach”. She said the goal was to ensure migration systems cannot be “unfairly gamed” through repeated legal challenges.
The European Convention on Human Rights was drafted after the Second World War to guarantee fundamental freedoms across Europe. It is enforced by the European Court of Human Rights and overseen politically by the Council of Europe.
Friday’s declaration does not amend the convention itself, a process that would require lengthy negotiations and formal legal changes. Instead, it represents a political signal from member states urging the court to take public interest and democratic considerations more fully into account in migration rulings.
The document notes that migration pressures facing European countries have evolved significantly since the convention was written, and in some cases were not anticipated at the time.
It also affirms that states have what it calls an “undeniable sovereign right” to establish immigration policies and remove foreign nationals where this serves the public interest.
Tackling people smuggling
The declaration highlights concerns about organised people-smuggling operations and migration flows that governments say may be encouraged or exploited by hostile states.
It warns that such activities could weaken public support for the European human rights system if governments are perceived as unable to manage migration effectively.
The document also suggests countries should be free to pursue agreements with other nations, including arrangements to process or accommodate rejected asylum seekers outside Europe through so-called “return hubs”.
Italy has already signed an agreement with Albania to house rejected migrants on its territory.
The UK has also explored similar arrangements with other countries, although no formal agreements have yet been reached.
Limits on legal challenges
Another section addresses the interpretation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment.
While reaffirming that this ban remains absolute, the declaration argues that deportation should not automatically be blocked simply because conditions in the destination country are worse than those in Europe.
It states that concerns about healthcare systems or social conditions in a receiving country should only prevent deportation in “very exceptional circumstances” where there is a genuine risk of inhuman treatment.
Governments backing the declaration hope this approach will reduce legal challenges that delay deportations.
Balancing family rights and public interest
The document also addresses cases involving the right to family life, another provision frequently cited in legal challenges against deportation.
It reiterates that this right does not automatically prevent authorities from removing someone from a country.
Instead, it says national courts should normally determine how to balance personal rights against broader public interests such as national security and public safety.
Critics of the declaration argue its language could weaken existing protections or ultimately have little practical impact if judges choose not to follow its guidance.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 May 2026

• UK-Asylum crisis

• 13 comments
• 287 views

webfact

May 15May 15

Israel Says Hamas Commander Killed in Gaza Strike

Gaza

Israel Says Hamas Commander Killed in Gaza Strike

Israel says it has killed senior Hamas commander Izz ad-Din al-Haddad in an air strike on Gaza City, describing him as a key figure behind the group’s 7 October 2023 attack on southern Israel.

Get today's headlines by email

In a joint statement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yisrael Katz said Haddad had been “one of the architects of the October 7 massacre” and was responsible for the killing, kidnapping and injury of thousands of Israeli civilians and soldiers.
Hamas has not confirmed or denied the claim that Haddad, a commander in the group’s armed wing, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, was killed.
Air strike hits Gaza City building
According to three eyewitnesses who spoke to the BBC, the attack targeted a residential building known as Al-Mu’taz in central Gaza City.
Witnesses said the building was struck by three missiles launched simultaneously from two directions, triggering a large fire.
Rescue teams rushed to the site but faced difficulties evacuating those injured in the blast, they said.
One witness reported that at least one body and several wounded people were removed from the building. The extent of casualties was not immediately clear.
Second strike targets fleeing vehicle
A second Israeli air strike reportedly targeted a vehicle leaving the scene shortly after the initial attack.
Eyewitnesses and a local source said the car was struck around 1.5km (0.9 miles) from the apartment building, killing three people.
Local sources suggested the vehicle may have been transporting Haddad after he was seriously wounded in the first strike.
Witnesses said armed Hamas members wearing civilian clothes had evacuated a badly injured person through a side entrance of the building and placed him in the car before it drove away.
A senior Israeli security official later said preliminary information indicated that Haddad had been successfully targeted.
Strike during ongoing ceasefire
The strike comes despite a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas that took effect on 10 October. Israel has continued to carry out regular attacks across the Gaza Strip since the truce began.
Hamas has repeatedly accused Israel of violating the ceasefire and targeting civilians. The Israeli government says it retains the right to strike Hamas members.
Israel has also accused Hamas of breaching the agreement by refusing to disarm.
Netanyahu and Katz said Haddad had rejected a US-backed plan led by Donald Trump aimed at disarming Hamas and demilitarising Gaza.
“We will continue to act forcefully and decisively against anyone who took part in the October 7 massacre,” the statement said.
Peace plan stalled as conflict continues
Diplomatic efforts led by the United States have struggled to advance since the start of the conflict involving Iran earlier this year.
Washington announced the launch of the second phase of its Gaza plan in January. The proposal envisaged governance of Gaza by a transitional technocratic administration alongside the territory’s demilitarisation and reconstruction.
However, negotiations over Hamas disarmament remain deadlocked.
Hamas has meanwhile reactivated its police force and appears to be reasserting its authority within Gaza.
The war began after a Hamas-led assault on southern Israel on 7 October 2023 that killed about 1,200 people and saw 251 taken hostage.
Israel responded with a military campaign in Gaza that has killed more than 72,744 people, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. The ministry says 857 of those deaths occurred after the ceasefire came into force.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 May 2026

• Israel

• 1 comment
• 266 views

webfact

May 15May 15

Israel, Lebanon Extend Ceasefire by 45 Days

Middle East

Israel, Lebanon Extend Ceasefire by 45 Days

Israel and Lebanon have agreed to prolong their fragile ceasefire for another 45 days following two days of negotiations in Washington, D.C., according to the United States Department of State.

Get today's headlines by email

State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott said the extension was intended to support wider diplomatic efforts aimed at stabilising the situation along the countries’ shared border.
“We hope these discussions will advance lasting peace between the two countries, full recognition of each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and establishing genuine security along their shared border,” Pigott said.
Extension agreed after Washington talks
The ceasefire was first announced on 16 April by US President Donald Trump. However, clashes between Israeli forces and the Lebanese armed group Hezbollah have continued since the truce was declared.
Despite the agreement, hostilities have persisted along the southern Lebanese border. Reports of cross-border strikes and retaliatory attacks have occurred almost daily since the ceasefire began.
On Wednesday, Lebanon’s health ministry said Israeli air strikes killed 22 people in southern Lebanon, including eight children.
Continued exchanges of fire
Israeli forces have stepped up air and artillery attacks in recent days, particularly in the south of the country. The Israeli military says it is targeting Hezbollah fighters and infrastructure.
Lebanese authorities have accused Israel of striking civilians and medical workers, an allegation the Israeli military denies.
Israel says its operations aim to establish a buffer zone in southern Lebanon that would reduce the threat of future Hezbollah attacks across the border.
Diplomatic and military talks planned
Washington said further negotiations are planned as part of efforts to stabilise the situation.
The State Department said the political track of talks would resume in June. In parallel, a separate security dialogue involving military delegations from both sides is scheduled to begin at the United States Department of Defense on 29 May.
Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Yechiel Leiter, described the discussions as “frank and constructive”.
Southern Lebanon, which is largely populated by the country’s Shia community and forms Hezbollah’s main support base, has been heavily affected by the conflict. The region has been under frequent Israeli bombardment during the fighting.
Human rights groups say some destruction of villages in southern Lebanon resembles tactics used by Israeli forces in the Gaza conflict, raising concerns that some incidents could amount to war crimes. Israel rejects those accusations.
Widespread displacement and rising toll
The fighting has forced more than one million people in Lebanon from their homes, according to officials. Many displaced residents come from southern Lebanon, the Bekaa Valley in the east, and the southern suburbs of Beirut known as Dahieh, areas where Hezbollah has significant influence.
The current conflict began on 2 March, two days after the United States and Israel launched a joint attack on Iran.
Hezbollah responded by firing rockets into Israel, prompting Israeli air strikes and a ground incursion into southern Lebanon.
Lebanon’s health ministry says at least 2,896 people have been killed in the country since the conflict began. Israeli authorities report that 18 soldiers and four civilians have been killed during the same period.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 May 2

• 7 comments
• 262 views

webfact

May 15May 15

Trump Warns Taiwan Not to Declare Independence

BREAKING NEWS

Trump Warns Taiwan Not to Declare Independence

US President Donald Trump has warned Taiwan against formally declaring independence from China, reiterating that Washington’s long-standing policy on the issue remains unchanged.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking to Fox News on Friday, shortly after concluding a two-day summit in Beijing with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump said he was not seeking a situation in which Taiwan moves toward independence.
“I’m not looking to have somebody go independent,” Trump said in the interview.
His remarks came after earlier comments in which he said he had made “no commitment either way” regarding the self-governing island, which Beijing considers part of its territory and has not ruled out taking by force.
US policy and the Taiwan question
The United States has historically supported Taiwan and is legally required to provide the island with the means to defend itself. At the same time, Washington maintains diplomatic relations with China and adheres to the “One China” policy, which recognises Beijing as the sole Chinese government.
Under this framework, the United States does not support Taiwanese independence, a position that has been central to maintaining diplomatic ties with China.
Xi Warns Trump Taiwan Dispute Could Lead to Conflict
Public opinion in Taiwan has long favoured maintaining the current situation. While many people on the island consider Taiwan a separate nation, most support preserving the status quo in which Taiwan neither formally declares independence nor unifies with China.
In the Fox News interview, Trump said he wanted both sides to avoid escalating tensions.
“You know, we’re supposed to travel 9,500 miles to fight a war. I’m not looking for that,” he said. “I want them to cool down. I want China to cool down.”
Summit discussions with Xi
Trump told reporters during his return flight to Washington that Taiwan had been a major topic during his discussions with Xi.
He said the Chinese leader had strong views on the issue and opposed any move toward Taiwanese independence.
According to Chinese state media, Xi warned during the summit that the Taiwan issue remained the most important matter in relations between the two countries. He cautioned that if the matter were mishandled, it could lead to a confrontation or conflict.
Despite the warnings, Trump said he did not expect tensions over Taiwan to escalate into war.
“No, I don’t think so. I think we’ll be fine,” he said. “He doesn’t want to see a war.”
Weapons sales under consideration
The discussions also included a potential US arms sale to Taiwan. Late last year, the Trump administration announced a proposed package worth about $11 billion that would include advanced rocket launchers and various missile systems.
Beijing condemned the plan, which it views as interference in its internal affairs.
Trump said he had discussed the proposal with Xi “in great detail” and would soon decide whether to proceed. He added that he intended to speak with Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te before making a final decision.
“I may do it. I may not do it,” he said.
The United States has previously angered China with actions seen as weakening its stance against Taiwanese independence. In February 2025, the US State Department removed language from its website that explicitly stated Washington did not support Taiwanese independence, prompting criticism from Beijing.
US officials in Taiwan later reiterated that Washington opposes any unilateral attempts by either side to change the status quo.
Taiwan responds
Taiwan’s Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung said officials had closely monitored the US-China summit and remained in contact with the United States and other partners.
He said the goal was to ensure continued development of Taiwan–US relations while protecting the island’s interests.
Lin also described Taiwan as a “guardian of peace and stability” in the region, while accusing China of increasing tensions through military activity and political pressure.
China has stepped up military drills around Taiwan in recent years, raising concerns about security in the region and testing the delicate balance that Washington has sought to maintain.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 16 May 2026

• Trump

• 55 comments
• 465 views

webfact

May 15May 15

Xi Warns Trump Taiwan Dispute Could Lead to Conflict

China

Xi Warns Trump Taiwan Dispute Could Lead to Conflict

China’s President Xi Jinping warned U.S. President Donald Trump that tensions over Taiwan could lead to conflict if the issue is mishandled, highlighting deep divisions between the two powers during talks in Beijing.

Get today's headlines by email

The warning came during a highly anticipated summit between the leaders, where disagreements also emerged over the war in Iran, trade disputes and Washington’s relationship with Taiwan, the self-governed island claimed by China.
While the two sides struck a cordial tone publicly, the exchange underscored the continuing strain in relations between the world’s two largest economies.
Taiwan at the centre of tensions
According to comments shared by Chinese officials after the meeting, Xi told Trump that the Taiwan issue remained the most important matter in relations between the two countries.
The remarks were delivered during closed-door talks that followed a public greeting at Beijing’s Great Hall of the People.
Before the meeting, Trump praised his Chinese counterpart, telling Xi he was a “great leader” and saying it was an honour to call him a friend. The U.S. president also said he expected ties between the two countries to improve.
Xi’s own public remarks struck a more cautious tone. He said China and the United States must determine whether they could avoid falling into what scholars call the Thucydides Trap — the idea that war can occur when a rising power threatens to displace an established one.
The Chinese leader has invoked the concept before, but its use during the summit underscored Beijing’s concern over tensions surrounding Taiwan.
Later, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said American policy toward Taiwan had not changed. He also warned that it would be a “terrible mistake” if China attempted to take the island by force.
Ceremony and diplomacy
The leaders met for around two hours behind closed doors following an elaborate welcome ceremony that included military honours, national anthems and schoolchildren waving U.S. and Chinese flags.
After the talks, Xi hosted Trump on a tour of the Temple of Heaven and later held a state banquet in his honour.
During a toast at the event, Xi said the two countries had kept relations “generally stable” despite global turbulence. He added that China’s national ambitions and Trump’s political slogan of making America great again could coexist.
Trump described the visit as an honour and said discussions had focused on matters beneficial to both countries.
He also said Xi would make a reciprocal visit to the White House on 24 September, a date that had not previously been announced.
Iran war and economic issues
Trump later said Xi had indicated he was willing to help negotiate an end to the conflict involving Iran and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a key route for global oil shipments.
The closure of the strait has disrupted tanker traffic and contributed to rising energy prices, raising concerns about global economic growth.
China is the largest buyer of Iranian oil, and U.S. officials have urged Beijing to use its influence with Tehran.
Rubio said the administration would argue that the crisis was hurting global economies and reducing demand for Chinese exports.
The White House said both leaders agreed the strait should remain open, though it did not state whether China would intervene diplomatically.
Trade talks and future cooperation
Despite political tensions, both governments said they were seeking progress on economic cooperation.
The White House said the leaders discussed expanding market access for American businesses in China and increasing Chinese investment in U.S. industries.
Trump said Xi had signalled a willingness to purchase 200 aircraft from Boeing. The administration is also hoping for commitments from China to buy more U.S. soybeans, beef and other agricultural products.
Officials have proposed creating a joint trade board to manage economic disputes between the two countries.
Meanwhile, Taiwan’s government said it remained grateful for Washington’s longstanding support after the summit, adding that the United States had repeatedly reaffirmed its backing for the island.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 May 2026

• Trump

• 44 comments
• 325 views

webfact

May 14May 14

Israeli Marchers Chant ‘Death to Arabs’ in Jerusalem

Middle East

Israeli Marchers Chant ‘Death to Arabs’ in Jerusalem

Israeli nationalists marched through Jerusalem’s Old City on Thursday chanting anti-Arab slogans during the annual Jerusalem Day procession, an event marking Israel’s capture of East Jerusalem in 1967.

Get today's headlines by email

Participants shouted phrases including “death to the Arabs,” “may your villages burn,” and “Gaza is a graveyard” as thousands gathered to celebrate what many Israelis regard as the reunification of the city. Critics, including Palestinians and rights groups, view the event as a display of dominance over Palestinian residents in East Jerusalem.
The march concluded with Israel’s national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, raising an Israeli flag near the al-Aqsa mosque compound, one of Islam’s holiest sites.
Tensions in the Old City
Much of the Muslim quarter of the Old City was largely deserted before the march began, as many Palestinian shopkeepers closed their businesses and residents left the area in anticipation of unrest.
Some far-right Jewish activists entered the quarter and clashes broke out between them and Palestinians who remained. Witnesses said both sides threw chairs during confrontations before police intervened and separated the groups. Officers had deployed in large numbers across the area earlier in the day.
Many participants in the march were transported to Jerusalem by bus from across Israel and from Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank. The event was organised with support from the Jerusalem municipality and government ministries.
Israel’s finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, also took part in the procession.
One marcher, a 19-year-old named Ariel Amichai from Modi’in, said he had come to demonstrate Jewish claims to the city.
“I’ve come to show all the world that this is our city,” he said. “God gave us this country and this city.”
Asked what message the march was intended to send to Palestinians, he said they should leave the area and that Jerusalem belonged to Israel.
Counter-Protesters Form Protective Presence
After Palestinian residents withdrew from the Old City, tensions also emerged between nationalist marchers and activists from Standing Together, a Jewish-Arab grassroots group that organised volunteers to monitor the situation.
The organisation said about 400 volunteers wearing purple high-visibility vests had gathered in the city to help protect Palestinian residents and deter violence.
Standing Together organiser Suf Patishi said volunteers were positioned throughout the Old City to try to prevent attacks.
“It is dangerous for us,” he said, adding that Palestinians living in the area faced greater risks.
Some religious Jews also joined the counter-protest effort. One ultra-Orthodox participant, who identified himself only as David, said he was troubled by the behaviour of some in the nationalist march.
“I’ve become appalled by the violent behaviour of people in my community,” he said, adding that he felt compelled to act in contrast to what he described as a desecration of religious values.
Flag Raised at Al-Aqsa Compound
Later in the day, Ben-Gvir visited the al-Aqsa compound — known to Jews as the Temple Mount — where he danced with supporters and raised an Israeli flag.
The move came amid ongoing tensions surrounding the sensitive religious site. Under a long-standing arrangement dating back nearly six decades, non-Muslims are allowed to visit the compound but are not permitted to pray there.
Ben-Gvir has previously called for changes to these rules and has repeatedly visited the site since taking office.
In a message posted on Telegram later on Thursday, he said that raising the flag marked a sign of renewed Israeli authority over the area, adding that governance had returned to the Temple Mount.
Jerusalem Day’s Political Significance
Jerusalem Day commemorates Israel’s capture of East Jerusalem during the Six-Day War in 1967. Israel later annexed the area in a move not recognised by most of the international community.
For many Israelis, the event celebrates the unification of Jerusalem under Israeli control. Palestinians, however, regard East Jerusalem as the future capital of a Palestinian state and view the annual march as a provocation.
The event has become increasingly contentious in recent years, with critics saying the procession through the Muslim quarter heightens tensions between Jewish nationalists and Palestinian residents.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 May 2026

• 38 comments
• 339 views

webfact

May 14May 14

FBI Offers $200K Reward for Ex-Air Force Iran Spy

USA

FBI Offers $200K Reward for Ex-Air Force Iran Spy

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has announced a $200,000 reward for information that leads to the arrest of Monica Witt, a former U.S. Air Force officer charged with espionage for allegedly sharing classified intelligence with Iran.

Get today's headlines by email

Authorities said on Thursday they are still attempting to locate Witt, who investigators believe defected to Iran in 2013.
Witt, a former special agent and counterintelligence specialist in the United States Air Force, was charged in 2019 with passing sensitive U.S. intelligence to the Iranian government. Officials allege she also helped Iranian intelligence services identify and target her former colleagues within the U.S. government.
Espionage Charges Filed in 2019
According to prosecutors, Witt disclosed details about a classified U.S. Department of Defense program and assisted Iranian intelligence efforts after leaving U.S. government service.
Investigators said she collaborated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, an elite Iranian military force responsible for advancing Tehran’s strategic influence abroad.
The indictment filed in 2019 accused Witt of providing classified material and other sensitive information that could compromise U.S. intelligence operations. Authorities said the alleged disclosures also enabled Iranian intelligence to pursue former U.S. intelligence officials connected to Witt’s previous work.
Career in the U.S. Military
Witt joined the U.S. Air Force in 1997 and served until 2008, according to the Justice Department. After leaving the military, she worked as a contractor for the Defense Department until 2010.
Officials say her background as a counterintelligence specialist gave her access to sensitive information and contacts within the U.S. intelligence community.
Travel to Iran
Prosecutors say Witt traveled to Iran in 2012 to attend a conference that criticised what organisers described as American moral standards and promoted anti-U.S. messaging.
Authorities allege she returned to Iran in 2013, where officials provided her with accommodation and computer equipment.
Investigators say she then began working with Iranian intelligence, sharing classified information and helping collect intelligence on former U.S. colleagues.
Others Charged in the Case
The same 2019 indictment also charged four Iranian nationals with conspiracy and aggravated identity theft. Prosecutors accused them of assisting Witt in gathering information about individuals who had previously worked with her in the U.S. government.
U.S. authorities continue to seek information that could help locate Witt, whose current whereabouts remain unknown.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 May 2026

• Iran

• 2 comments
• 297 views

webfact

May 14May 14

Oklahoma Executes Man for 2007 Killing of Woman and Baby

USA

Oklahoma Executes Man for 2007 Killing of Woman and Baby

Oklahoma has carried out the execution of a man convicted of killing his former girlfriend and her infant daughter nearly two decades ago.

Get today's headlines by email

Raymond Johnson, 52, was pronounced dead at 10:12 a.m. on Thursday after receiving a three-drug lethal injection at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary, according to prison officials.
Johnson had been sentenced to death for the June 2007 killings of Brooke Whitaker, 24, and her seven-month-old daughter, Kya Whitaker.
Fatal attack in Tulsa home
Prosecutors said Johnson and Whitaker were arguing at her home in Tulsa when the violence occurred.
According to court documents prepared for Johnson’s clemency hearing in April, Johnson repeatedly struck Whitaker with a metal claw hammer, fracturing her skull and causing more than 20 lacerations to her face and scalp. Despite her injuries, Whitaker remained conscious and pleaded with Johnson to spare her life and the life of her baby, who was asleep in another room.
“She begged him to call 911. She begged him to let her mom come get baby Kya. She begged him to think of her children,” prosecutors from the Oklahoma Attorney General's Office said in the clemency documents. Whitaker had three other children.
Authorities said Johnson then retrieved gasoline from a shed behind the home. Prosecutors said he poured fuel on Whitaker and inside the house before igniting a dish towel and throwing it at her before leaving the scene.
Whitaker died from head injuries and smoke inhalation, while her daughter died from severe burns.
Appeals and clemency request rejected
In a statement after the execution, Gentner Drummond described Johnson as “a cruel murderer who inflicted unimaginable pain and suffering on his victims.”
Johnson’s legal team did not file a final appeal with the Supreme Court of the United States seeking to halt the execution.
Earlier appeals had argued that Johnson’s arrest was unlawful, that police coerced a confession, and that his trial attorney conceded his guilt in Whitaker’s death without Johnson’s consent. Those arguments were rejected by the courts.
In April, the five-member Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board unanimously denied Johnson’s request for clemency.
During that hearing, Johnson apologized to the victims’ family and said he had changed during his years in prison.
“I apologize. No excuses, no justifications, a sincere apology,” he said in an interview with the advocacy group Death Penalty Action.
Family sought execution to proceed
Members of Whitaker’s family urged officials to carry out the execution.
In a letter to the clemency board, Whitaker’s eldest daughter, Logan Kleck, said the execution would not erase years of loss but would bring an end to the pain caused by the case.
“Executing him will not give me my mom or sister back,” she wrote, adding that it would stop him from continuing to hurt the family.
Before the murders, Johnson had also served nine years of a 20-year sentence after a 1996 manslaughter conviction.
Johnson was the second inmate executed in Oklahoma this year and the 11th execution carried out in the United States in 2026.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 May 2026

• 19 comments
• 303 views

webfact

May 14May 14

Health Secretary Streeting Resigns Amid Challenge to Starmer

UK-Politics

Health Secretary Streeting Resigns Amid Challenge to Starmer

Britain’s health secretary Wes Streeting has resigned from Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s cabinet, a move widely seen as the opening step toward a leadership challenge following Labour’s poor showing in recent local elections.

Get today's headlines by email

The resignation marks the first departure of a senior minister linked directly to the growing unrest inside the governing Labour Party, where pressure has been mounting on Starmer to step down.
Streeting confirmed his decision in a letter to the prime minister, praising Starmer’s international leadership while sharply criticising his domestic political direction.
“You have shown courage and statesmanship on the world stage — not least in keeping Britain out of the war in Iran,” Streeting wrote. “But where we need vision, we have a vacuum. Where we need direction, we have drift.”
He added: “It is now clear that you will not lead the Labour Party into the next general election.”
Growing pressure after election losses
Calls for Starmer to stand aside intensified after Labour suffered heavy losses in local and regional elections last week, results that highlighted voter frustration with the government’s economic record.
Despite winning a landslide victory less than two years ago, Labour has struggled to deliver on pledges to accelerate economic growth and raise living standards.
A sluggish economy and persistent consumer price inflation have made it harder for the government to meet expectations among voters and within the party.
Streeting, long viewed as an ambitious figure within Labour’s moderate wing, is widely regarded as one of several potential challengers to Starmer.
Rayner signals possible leadership bid
Another possible contender, former Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, also signalled she could take part in a leadership contest.
Rayner, who left the cabinet last September amid questions about her tax affairs, said she had reached an agreement with tax authorities to resolve the issue.
Speaking to the Guardian newspaper, she said Starmer should “reflect on” his position and indicated she was ready to “play my part” in any leadership election if one were triggered.
Streeting and Starmer are both associated with the party’s moderate faction, while Rayner has strong support among Labour’s left wing and has called for higher minimum wages and increased taxes on wealthier individuals.
Starmer resists calls to quit
Starmer has insisted he will remain in office, warning that a leadership contest would destabilise the government at a time when it faces major domestic and international challenges.
He told lawmakers that an internal fight could create “chaos” when the government should instead focus on issues including the cost-of-living crisis and conflict in the Middle East.
Some economic data offered the prime minister limited support. Britain’s economy grew by 0.6% in the first quarter of the year, up from 0.2% in the previous three months, according to the Office for National Statistics.
Finance minister Rachel Reeves said the figures suggested the government’s economic strategy was beginning to deliver results.
She told the BBC that the recovery was possible because the government had restored economic stability, adding that political upheaval could put that progress at risk.
Other figures linked to leadership race
Within Labour, attention has also turned to other figures who might enter a potential leadership contest.
Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham has been widely mentioned as a possible candidate, although he would first need to return to Parliament. Allies have suggested a sitting MP could resign to allow him to contest a by-election.
Burnham cancelled his regular appearance on a local BBC radio programme this week, saying he needed to prioritise discussions following the election results.
Political analysts say Labour has historically been reluctant to remove its leaders while in government, unlike the Conservative Party.
Jonathan Tonge, a politics professor at the University of Liverpool, said Labour had often endured electoral defeats but rarely moved against its leaders.
Still, he warned the current unrest could evolve into a serious internal conflict despite the party’s large parliamentary majority.
“If a civil war opens up within a Labour Party that’s supposed to be governing us at present, it’s an extraordinary state of affairs given it’s less than two years since Keir Starmer won one of Labour’s greatest election victories ever,” he said.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 May 2026

• 6 comments
• 300 views

webfact

May 14May 14

Farage’s £5m Gift From Thailand-Based Donor to Be Probed

UK-Politics

Farage’s £5m Gift From Thailand-Based Donor to Be Probed

Nigel Farage has said a £5m gift from a billionaire supporter was intended as a reward for his long-running campaign in favour of Brexit, as questions continue over whether the payment should have been declared after he entered Parliament.

Get today's headlines by email

The leader of Reform UK told The Sun that the money, provided by donor Christopher Harborne, was given on a “completely unconditional basis” and did not influence his return to politics.
The payment is now under scrutiny after critics argued it should have been disclosed when Nigel Farage was elected as MP for Clacton in 2024.
Gift linked to Brexit campaigning
Farage said the donation reflected appreciation for his decades-long involvement in the campaign that led to the UK leaving the European Union.
“It’s very unusual for someone to give up 27 years of their life to campaign for something,” he said, adding that the gift was provided without conditions.
According to Farage, the money was “given as a reward for campaigning for Brexit for 27 years”.
He also rejected suggestions that the payment influenced his political decisions.
Asked whether the donation affected his return to public life, he said it had not, adding: “I cannot be bought by anybody.”
Investigation into declaration rules
The UK Parliament’s standards watchdog has opened an inquiry to determine whether Farage breached Commons rules by not registering the payment.
Under parliamentary guidelines, MPs must declare financial interests and certain benefits received in the year before they are elected within one month of entering Parliament.
Farage has previously argued that he had no obligation to register the payment. He said the gift was made before he became an MP and was intended to fund his personal security rather than political activity.
Rules governing MPs’ conduct state that purely personal gifts or benefits — including family gifts or commercial loans — would not normally require registration. However, they also say that both the donor’s motives and the intended use of a gift should be considered. If there is uncertainty, MPs are advised to register the benefit.
If an investigation finds that the code of conduct has been breached, sanctions can range from a written or oral apology to suspension from the House of Commons or, in serious cases, expulsion.
Political criticism and donor response
Opposition parties have said Farage must clarify the circumstances surrounding the payment.
Both the Conservative Party and the Labour Party have raised concerns about the donation, with the Conservatives writing to the parliamentary standards commissioner and the Electoral Commission to request further scrutiny.
Harborne, a British cryptocurrency investor based in Bangkok, has previously defended the gift. In comments reported by The Telegraph in April, he said he did not expect anything in return beyond helping ensure Farage’s safety.
Harborne also said the donation reflected his admiration for Farage’s efforts over many years to achieve Brexit.
The businessman has been a major financial backer of Reform UK. Last year he gave the party £9m in a single donation, the largest ever contribution to a UK political party from a living individual.
In total, Harborne provided £12m to Reform UK in 2025 and has previously donated to the Conservative Party.
Sources within Reform say the separate £5m payment to Farage was made in early 2024, before he had decided to stand as a parliamentary candidate.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 May 2026

• 63 comments
• 397 views

webfact

May 14May 14

Forecasters Warn of Potential ‘Super’ El Niño Event

Weather

Forecasters Warn of Potential ‘Super’ El Niño Event

New climate forecasts indicate growing confidence that a developing El Niño in the tropical Pacific Ocean could become one of the strongest on record, raising concerns about record global temperatures and significant humanitarian consequences.

Get today's headlines by email

Sea surface temperatures across parts of the Pacific have been rising quickly, with recent data showing waters around 0.5C above the long-term average — a threshold often used to signal the onset of El Niño, a natural climate pattern marked by warming ocean waters in the equatorial Pacific.
Scientists expect the event to intensify over the coming months and possibly peak in autumn as a very strong, or “super,” El Niño.
Meteorologists warn that such an event could disrupt weather systems worldwide and increase the likelihood that 2027 becomes the hottest year ever recorded.
Forecasts point to rapid development
In its latest outlook, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said El Niño is likely to begin within weeks. The agency estimates a roughly two-in-three probability that the event will become strong or very strong by winter.
The recent pace of warming in the tropical Pacific has been unusually rapid.
Nathaniel Johnson, a meteorologist at NOAA, described the development as potentially rare if the trend continues, noting the shift from last winter’s La Niña — the cooler phase of the Pacific climate cycle — to a powerful El Niño within a year.
Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) also tracks the phenomenon but uses slightly stricter criteria. Its forecasts require sea surface temperatures in the tropical Pacific to exceed 0.8C above average and signs that trade winds in the western Pacific have reversed, indicating the warming ocean is beginning to influence the atmosphere.
Seasonal forecasts made during spring have historically been less reliable, but scientists say predictive models are unusually consistent this year.
What defines a strong El Niño?
Forecasters monitor a key region of the Pacific known as Niño3.4, calculating a three-month average of sea surface temperatures compared with historical norms.
A strong El Niño occurs when this temperature anomaly exceeds 1.5C.
Forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), NOAA and BoM broadly agree on the potential scale of the event.
The latest ECMWF projections show that more than half of its models expect temperatures in the region to rise by over 2.5C by autumn. Johnson said values above this threshold would represent a historically powerful event.
Some forecasts even indicate the temperature anomaly could exceed 3C. That would surpass the current known peak of 2.7C recorded in 1877, although scientists note that measurements from that period were limited and uncertain.
The 1877 event lasted about 18 months and was associated with severe droughts and widespread famine across Asia, Brazil and Africa, while causing intense flooding in areas including Peru.
More recently, a very strong El Niño occurred in 2015–2016 when the three-month Niño3.4 temperature anomaly reached 2.4C.
Possible global consequences
El Niño events typically raise the global average temperature by about 0.2C as warmer waters release additional heat into the atmosphere.
Liz Stephens, professor of climate risk and resilience at the University of Reading, said a strong event could push global temperatures to new records.
“We’re probably looking at record global temperatures next year, especially if this is a very strong El Niño event,” she told the BBC.
El Niño can significantly alter weather patterns around the world. Flooding is common in northern Peru and southern Ecuador, and heavy rainfall can also affect East Africa, Central Asia and parts of southern North America.
At the same time, the phenomenon tends to suppress Atlantic tropical storms. Early forecasts already suggest this year’s Atlantic hurricane season may be quieter than usual.
However, fewer storms can bring reduced rainfall to Central America, raising the risk of drought.
Other regions, including Australia, Indonesia and northern South America, often experience increased drought and wildfire risk during strong El Niño periods, potentially damaging agriculture and global food supplies.
Stephens warned that these effects could carry major humanitarian consequences, especially as global food markets face pressure.
“If you get a reduction in crop yields because of drought or flooding, that drives prices even higher,” she said.
Wider climate pressures
Supply disruptions in fertiliser markets — linked to tensions affecting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz — are already pushing up costs. Combined with potential crop losses linked to El Niño, this could reduce food availability and increase prices in the months ahead.
Scientists say the overall humanitarian impact will depend on the strength of the event and other global developments.
For the UK, the direct effects are less predictable. However, climate researchers at the Met Office say El Niño conditions are among several factors that can increase the likelihood of colder winters.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 May 2026

• 10 comments
• 336 views

webfact

May 14May 14

Trump Says Xi Won’t Provide Military Equipment to Iran

China

Trump Says Xi Won’t Provide Military Equipment to Iran

US President Donald Trump said Chinese President Xi Jinping pledged during talks in Beijing that China would not supply military equipment to Iran, while noting that Beijing intends to maintain its economic relationship with Tehran.

Get today's headlines by email

Trump made the remarks during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday, describing what he said was a clear commitment from the Chinese leader during their discussions.
Claim of pledge during Beijing talks
Trump said Xi directly assured him that China would not send military equipment to Iran.
“He said he’s not going to give them military equipment. That’s a big statement. He said that today,” Trump told Hannity in the interview clip. He added that Xi had delivered the message firmly, saying the Chinese leader “said that strongly.”
Trump did not provide additional details about the context of the discussion or whether the pledge was part of a broader agreement between the two countries.
China’s oil purchases from Iran
While describing the conversation, Trump said Xi also stressed China’s economic ties with Iran, particularly Beijing’s continued purchase of Iranian oil.
According to Trump, Xi indicated that China planned to maintain those purchases.
China buys “a lot of their oil” from Iran, Trump said, adding that Xi told him “they’d like to keep doing that.”
China has long been one of the main buyers of Iranian crude, maintaining energy trade with Tehran despite various international tensions and sanctions regimes.
Strait of Hormuz discussed
Trump also said the two leaders discussed the situation in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping route for global oil supplies.
He said Xi expressed support for reopening the strait after disruptions and shared what Trump described as a light-hearted remark about recent events affecting the waterway.
Recounting the exchange, Trump said Xi joked: “You know, they stopped it, then you stopped them.”
According to Trump, the Chinese leader also raised concerns about reports that Iran had been charging tolls to vessels passing through the strait.
Trump said Xi conveyed frustration about the situation and indicated he would prefer the route to operate normally.
The Strait of Hormuz, which links the Persian Gulf to global shipping lanes, is one of the world’s most strategically important maritime corridors, with a significant share of global oil shipments passing through it.
Focus on security and trade
Trump’s comments suggest the discussions with Xi touched on both regional security issues and China’s economic relationship with Iran.
While Trump highlighted Xi’s alleged pledge on military equipment, he also emphasized that China intends to continue buying Iranian oil, underscoring the dual track of security concerns and commercial interests raised during their talks.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Compiled from various sources. 15 May 2026

• Iranian Conflict

• 8 comments
• 274 views

webfact

May 14May 14

US Intelligence Casts Doubt on Trump Iran Claims

Iranian Conflict

US Intelligence Casts Doubt on Trump Iran Claims

US intelligence assessments indicate that Iran’s military capabilities—particularly its missile systems—remain more intact than public statements by President Donald Trump have suggested following US-Israeli strikes earlier this year.

Get today's headlines by email

The Trump administration has repeatedly argued that Iran’s forces were heavily weakened during bombing campaigns that preceded a ceasefire in April. However, intelligence findings reported by US media outlets indicate that Iran retains significant operational capacity.
Trump on Tuesday denounced reporting on those assessments, calling it “virtual treason” in a social media post.
Intelligence assessments on Iran’s capabilities
In early April, CNN reported that an intelligence review found Iran still possessed a substantial portion of its drone arsenal as well as a large share of its coastal missile systems.
Those findings contrasted with Trump’s public remarks during a national address that week. The president said Iran’s ability to launch missiles and drones had been “dramatically curtailed” and described the damage to its weapons factories and rocket launchers as severe.
“Very few of them left,” Trump said at the time, adding that the scale of losses inflicted on Iran was unprecedented in modern warfare.
Yet in the weeks following the ceasefire, Iran reportedly used the pause in fighting to recover launchers buried or damaged in earlier strikes, according to subsequent reporting by CNN.
Analysts say this helps explain how Iran has been able to restrict shipping through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, a choke point for global energy supplies.
Missile sites still operational
Further reporting by The New York Times cited a US intelligence assessment indicating Iran still has “operational access” to most of its missile infrastructure along the strait.
According to the report, Iran can access all but three of its 33 missile sites positioned along the waterway.
Intelligence sources cited in the coverage also suggested Iran’s economy could withstand the current US naval blockade of its ports for up to four months without severe destabilization.
Despite these assessments, Trump has continued to describe Iran’s military capabilities using terms such as “decimated,” and has argued the United States could quickly end the conflict if it chose to do so.
Officials decline to discuss classified findings
Senior military and defence officials have declined to confirm or dispute the intelligence reports publicly.
During a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine was asked whether the Times report contradicted Trump’s earlier claim that 80% of Iran’s missile capability had been destroyed.
Caine said battle damage assessments were classified and he could not comment in that forum.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also declined to address the reports directly.
“Why would I validate what people may leak or not leak?” Hegseth told lawmakers. “We don’t talk about those things.”
Earlier in April, however, Hegseth said Iran’s missile programme had been “functionally destroyed,” saying launchers, production facilities and stockpiles had been depleted and largely rendered ineffective.
Dispute over administration messaging
During the same hearing, Democratic Senator Chris Murphy suggested the administration’s statements in classified briefings differed from its public messaging.
Murphy argued that private briefings had indicated there were limited military options available to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Hegseth rejected that claim, saying the United States had multiple potential military means to reopen the shipping lane if required.
He added that the administration’s preferred approach was to pursue a longer-term arrangement that would restore international trade through the waterway.
Earlier intelligence warnings
Some intelligence projections before the conflict had anticipated Iran might attempt to disrupt the Strait of Hormuz if attacked. Analysts had also assessed that killing Iran’s supreme leader would not necessarily bring down the country’s ruling system.
Retired US Navy Admiral James Stavridis said intelligence agencies were fulfilling their role by presenting assessments regardless of political implications.
“If these reports are accurate, this is what you want your intelligence agencies to do,” Stavridis said during an interview on CNN.
Wider debate over administration claims
The dispute reflects a broader pattern in which critics argue the Trump administration has used strong or exaggerated language in defending its policies.
Questions have been raised about the scale of arrests in immigration enforcement, the justification for certain federal spending cuts and claims of widespread voter fraud—issues where critics say evidence has not supported the administration’s assertions.
Some analysts say the administration’s description of the war’s impact on Iran may fit within that wider debate over how its policies and outcomes are presented to the public.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 May 2026

• Trump

• 2 comments
• 240 views

webfact

May 14May 14

Senate Rejects 7th Bid to Limit Trump’s Iran War Powers

USA

Senate Rejects 7th Bid to Limit Trump’s Iran War Powers

The U.S. Senate has narrowly rejected another Democratic attempt to limit President Donald Trump’s authority to use military force against Iran, though the latest vote saw an additional Republican senator break ranks to support the measure.

Get today's headlines by email

A procedural motion to discharge the resolution from committee failed by a vote of 49 to 50 on Wednesday. Republican Senators Rand Paul of Kentucky, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska joined most Democrats in backing the move. Democratic Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania was the only member of his party to oppose it.
The vote marked the seventh effort by Senate Democrats since the conflict with Iran began on Feb. 28 to advance a resolution under the War Powers framework aimed at restricting the president’s military authority.
New Republican Support
Murkowski’s vote represented a shift from her earlier position. She had previously opposed similar measures but said circumstances had changed after a key 60-day period outlined in the War Powers Resolution passed earlier this month.
Speaking to reporters, Murkowski said she had expected greater clarity from the administration about its legal position once that period ended but had not received it. She said this prompted her to support moving the resolution forward so lawmakers could examine Congress’s responsibilities under the law.
“We’re in a different place than we were last time we voted on this,” she said.
The resolution, introduced by Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon, would have required the president to withdraw U.S. armed forces from hostilities involving Iran unless Congress approved the action through a declaration of war or a specific authorization for the use of military force.
Debate Over War Powers Deadline
Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, presidents must inform Congress within 48 hours of deploying military forces into hostilities if there is no prior authorization. The law also limits such engagements to 60 days without congressional approval.
As that deadline approached, however, the Trump administration argued the requirement did not apply because active hostilities had ended with a ceasefire reached on April 7. In a letter to congressional leaders dated May 1, the president said fighting with Iran had “terminated.”
Some lawmakers have challenged that interpretation. Merkley told reporters before the vote that he did not accept the administration’s claim that the 60-day clock had effectively stopped.
He said the conflict may currently be at a different stage but could escalate again, making congressional oversight necessary.
Republicans Back Administration View
Republican Senator Jim Risch of Idaho, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, defended the administration’s position during debate ahead of the vote.
Risch said the hostilities referenced in the War Powers law had ended with the April ceasefire and therefore the time limits imposed by the legislation were not applicable.
“The operations that began on Feb. 28 have been terminated,” he said. “The hostilities ended with the April 7 ceasefire. They’re over — full stop.”
Political Pressure Around the Vote
Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, who has led the Senate effort to invoke war powers restrictions, said the vote would test Republican willingness to assert Congress’s role in decisions over war.
Kaine said lawmakers were facing increasing questions from constituents about the economic impact of the conflict, including rising fuel costs.
He said he believed the Senate could eventually vote to halt the war, even if that outcome was not achieved this time.
Merkley also argued that some Republican lawmakers were growing more skeptical about the military operation but remained reluctant to oppose the president.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune urged colleagues to support the administration, noting that Trump was abroad in China at the time of the vote for talks covering trade and security matters.
Ongoing Questions Over Authority
Murkowski has indicated she intends to introduce legislation formally authorizing the use of military force against Iran.
During a Senate hearing on Tuesday, she questioned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about whether congressional approval would strengthen the administration’s legal footing. Hegseth responded that the administration believes the president already possesses the necessary authority under Article II of the Constitution to carry out military action if required.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 May 2026

• Iranian Conflict

• 12 comments
• 280 views

webfact

May 13May 13

China Alters Rubio Name to Allow Visit for Trump-Xi Talks

China

China Alters Rubio Name to Allow Visit for Trump-Xi Talks

China adjusted the Chinese transliteration of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s name to enable his entry for high-level talks between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to media reports.

Get today's headlines by email

Rubio had previously been barred from entering China after the government sanctioned him in 2020 while he was serving as a US senator. The measures were imposed in response to his criticism of Beijing’s policies toward the Uyghur minority in the Xinjiang region and other alleged human rights violations.
The sanctions included a travel ban that could have complicated plans for Rubio to accompany Trump to Beijing for this week’s summit with Xi.
However, a spokesperson for the Chinese embassy said the restrictions would not prevent Rubio from travelling as part of the US delegation.
“The sanctions target Mr Rubio’s words and deeds when he served as a US senator concerning China,” embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu told Agence France-Presse (AFP) on Tuesday.
Linguistic workaround
According to AFP, Chinese authorities began using a slightly different character to represent the first syllable of Rubio’s surname after he became secretary of state last year.
The change altered the way his name appears in Chinese without significantly affecting how it is pronounced.
Two diplomats told AFP they believed the adjustment functioned as a bureaucratic workaround. Because the sanctions were imposed using the earlier version of Rubio’s name, the altered spelling effectively sidestepped the restriction.
Chinese state media and official government communications have since used the revised transliteration when referring to Rubio.
When asked about the change last year, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said she had not noticed the shift but would look into the matter, according to The Guardian.
Background to the sanctions
Beijing sanctioned Rubio in 2020 after he criticised the Chinese government’s policies in Xinjiang and supported measures in Washington addressing alleged human rights abuses against the Uyghur population.
At the time, China announced counter-sanctions against several US lawmakers and officials who had backed legislation or public statements condemning its actions in the region.
Despite the earlier restrictions, Rubio joined Trump’s delegation to China for a two-day visit centred on strategic issues between the two powers.
Taiwan and regional tensions
Rubio has been a long-time critic of China’s government and has frequently warned about the strategic rivalry between Washington and Beijing.
During his confirmation hearing as secretary of state in January last year, he described China as the “most potent and dangerous” near-peer adversary the United States has ever faced.
He has also consistently advocated for strong US ties with Taiwan, the self-governing island claimed by China.
Speaking to reporters ahead of the summit, Rubio said Taiwan was likely to feature in discussions between the two leaders.
“I’m sure Taiwan will be a topic of conversation; it always is,” he said last week.
Rubio added that both countries understood the importance of avoiding instability in the region.
“I think both countries understand that it is in neither one of our interests to see anything destabilizing happen in that part of the world,” he said, referring to Taiwan and the broader Indo-Pacific.
The US State Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 May 2026

• USA

• 4 comments
• 308 views

webfact

May 13May 13

US Senate Confirms Kevin Warsh as Next Fed Chair

USA

US Senate Confirms Kevin Warsh as Next Fed Chair

The US Senate has confirmed Kevin Warsh as the next chair of the Federal Reserve, clearing the way for him to succeed Jerome Powell when Powell’s term ends later this week.

Get today's headlines by email

Lawmakers approved Warsh on Wednesday in a 54–45 vote. Democratic Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania was the only member of his party to support the nomination.
The confirmation follows weeks of political tension surrounding a criminal investigation into Powell that had stalled progress on Warsh’s nomination.
Probe into Powell Dropped
The Department of Justice moved last month to drop its criminal investigation into Powell, which had focused on alleged false testimony to Congress related to an office renovation project at the central bank.
Powell has consistently rejected the allegations, describing the probe as a politically motivated attempt to influence the Federal Reserve’s decisions on interest rates.
Following the Justice Department’s decision, Washington US Attorney Jeaninne Pirro said the matter would instead be reviewed by the Federal Reserve’s inspector general.
The investigation had complicated Warsh’s path to confirmation. Several senators from both parties had previously blocked the nomination in the Senate Banking Committee while the inquiry remained active.
Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who had vowed to oppose Warsh while the probe was ongoing, changed his position after the Justice Department dropped the case. Tillis later supported advancing the nomination in committee, helping send it to a full Senate vote.
Powell to Remain on Fed Board
Powell’s four-year term as Federal Reserve chair ends on Friday. However, he has said he intends to remain a member of the central bank’s Board of Governors while the inspector general’s investigation continues.
Speaking at a press conference in Washington last month, Powell said he would stay in place until the inquiry had been completed with full transparency.
He also warned that legal challenges targeting the central bank could undermine its ability to conduct monetary policy independently of political pressure.
Powell’s term as a member of the board runs until 2028, allowing him to continue participating in decisions on US interest rates and monetary policy even after stepping down as chair.
Warsh Takes Helm Amid Economic Pressures
Warsh, a former Federal Reserve governor, will begin a four-year term as chair. He is currently a fellow at the Hoover Institution, a conservative think tank based at Stanford University.
During his earlier tenure at the Fed in the late 2000s and early 2010s, Warsh was widely viewed as an advocate of higher interest rates, arguing they were necessary to keep inflation low and stable.
More recently, however, he has expressed support for lower borrowing costs and criticised the central bank’s warnings that tariffs introduced last year could push inflation higher.
Warsh assumes leadership of the Fed at a time of renewed inflation pressures. US government data released on Tuesday showed prices rising for a second consecutive month as the ongoing US-Israeli war with Iran pushed gasoline costs higher.
According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, annual inflation has climbed to its highest level in three years.
Interest Rate Outlook
The Federal Reserve has kept interest rates unchanged at its past three policy meetings in 2026. Prior to that, the central bank lowered rates by a quarter of a percentage point at three consecutive meetings.
Any move to raise rates could increase borrowing costs for households and businesses, potentially slowing economic growth.
Financial markets currently expect a roughly 60% chance that interest rates will remain unchanged for the rest of the year, according to the CME FedWatch Tool. The probability of a rate increase by year’s end stands at about 30%.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 May 2026

• 0 comments
• 207 views

webfact

May 13May 13

Three Women Found Dead in Sea off Brighton Coast

UK

Three Women Found Dead in Sea off Brighton Coast

The bodies of three young women have been recovered from the sea off the coast of Brighton, prompting a police investigation into how they entered the water.

Get today's headlines by email

Sussex Police said officers launched a search early on Wednesday after receiving a report of a person in the sea at about 05:45 BST. Emergency services were called to the area near Black Rock Beach, close to the Black Rocks car park on Madeira Drive along the seafront.
When teams arrived at the scene, they recovered three bodies from the water nearby. Authorities later confirmed that the coastguard had ended its search and was not looking for any other people.
Police said the women have not yet been formally identified and inquiries are still at an early stage.
Early stages of investigation
Chief Superintendent Adam Hays described the incident as “tragic” and said investigators were focusing on identifying the victims and locating their families.
“Our priority at this time is identifying these three women and locating their families, who at this point remain unaware they have lost loved ones,” he said.
Hays urged the public to avoid speculation while officers gather information and establish the circumstances surrounding the deaths. Anyone with information has been asked to contact police.
It is not yet clear how the women came to be in the sea.
Sightings and possible lines of inquiry
According to a report by the PA Media news agency, the women were believed to be aged between about 20 and 30. They were reportedly first spotted near Brighton Palace Pier before drifting toward Brighton Marina.
Investigators are exploring several possible scenarios, including the possibility that the women entered the sea from the beach near where they were discovered and later got into difficulty.
A large cordon was initially put in place around the beach at Black Rock while emergency crews responded to the incident. The area has since reopened.
By Wednesday afternoon most emergency services had left the scene, with police departing later that evening.
Community reaction
News of the discovery prompted shock among residents and visitors in the seaside city.
Local sea swimmer Jilly Francis said the conditions on Wednesday were rough and not typical for recreational swimming.
“I live very close by and this is the worst I think I’ve heard of anything happening,” she said, adding that she would normally avoid swimming in such conditions.
Another resident, Pam Hinchliffe, described the incident as tragic and said people were struggling to understand how it had happened so early in the morning.
Several local political figures also expressed condolences.
Chris Ward, the MP for Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven, said the incident was deeply concerning for the community.
Bella Sankey, leader of Brighton & Hove City Council, said she was “shocked and deeply saddened”, adding that her thoughts were with the women’s families and friends.
Sian Berry, MP for Brighton Pavilion, described the news as “unbearably sad”, while Peter Kyle, MP for Hove and Portslade, said his thoughts were with those affected by the tragedy.
Meanwhile, Katy Bourne, the Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner, called the incident “awful” and also urged the public to allow investigators time to establish the facts.
Ongoing inquiries
Police say the investigation remains ongoing and that establishing the identities of the women is a key priority.
Officers have appealed for patience while inquiries continue and have repeated calls for anyone with information to come forward.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 May 2026

• 5 comments
• 279 views

webfact

May 13May 13

London Police to Deploy 4,000 Officers for Rival Protests

UK

London Police to Deploy 4,000 Officers for Rival Protests

London’s Metropolitan Police says it will deploy more than 4,000 officers to manage two rival demonstrations in the capital this Saturday, warning of possible violence and hate speech offences.

Get today's headlines by email

The large operation, one of the biggest protest policing deployments in decades, comes amid concerns that far-right demonstrators could clash with pro-Palestinian marchers if the two groups are not kept apart.
Police will also be managing large crowds expected for the FA Cup Final at Wembley Stadium, with tens of thousands of football fans due to attend the match on the same day.
Extensive security measures planned
Scotland Yard said the scale of the events requires the “highest degree of control” and a range of security measures.
For the first time at a demonstration, officers will be authorised to use live facial recognition cameras. Drones will also be deployed to help identify suspects from the air, and all officers involved in the operation will carry riot gear.
The force said its armoured vehicles have been placed on standby as a precaution, describing their use as unlikely but necessary in case of extreme violence.
Tens of thousands of people are expected at both protests. One is a “Unite the Kingdom” event organised by anti-Islam activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, also known as Tommy Robinson. The other is an annual “Nakba Day” protest in support of Palestinians, which will take place in another part of central London.
Police say protests cannot be banned
Deputy Assistant Commissioner James Harman said the force had “significant cause for concern” ahead of the demonstrations but does not have grounds to request a ban.
Under UK law, police can only ask the home secretary to prohibit a march if they lack the resources to prevent serious disorder.
Harman said the Metropolitan Police believed it had the capacity to keep the two events separate using its “most assertive” powers.
The £4.5m policing plan includes strict conditions on the routes taken by both marches and rules making organisers responsible for the behaviour of speakers on stage. Officers will also have enhanced public order powers, allowing them to stop and search suspected troublemakers and disperse individuals from central London.
Of the officers deployed, many will be reassigned from routine duties, while 660 will be brought in from police forces outside London.
Heightened tensions ahead of weekend
Police said the demonstrations are taking place during heightened concern within both Jewish and Muslim communities, as well as after the UK’s national terrorism threat level was raised to its second-highest category.
“These factors give us significant cause for concern as we head into the weekend,” Harman said, adding that the policing strategy aims to tightly manage large crowds and reduce the risk of disorder or other criminal offences.
The first “Unite the Kingdom” event organised by Yaxley-Lennon in London last September drew at least 100,000 people. Although many participants attended peacefully, police reported clashes with officers and incidents of anti-Muslim hate speech.
Ahead of Saturday’s event, the Home Office has barred at least seven individuals from entering the UK to participate.
Specialist police teams working with prosecutors will also be on standby to make rapid decisions on arrests related to hate speech offences. Harman said this could include chants referencing “intifada” at the pro-Palestinian march if officers deem them hateful or intimidating.
“We have been clear since the outset that we would not accept routes or rally locations that would increase the risk of intimidation to any community, or allow the two protests to come together,” he said.
Harman added that significant police resources would be used to keep the opposing groups apart. The armoured vehicles, he said, were only a contingency measure and had not been used in London for a considerable time.
“We will not use them unless absolutely necessary,” he said, “but they are available to support officers if extreme violence occurs.”

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 May 2026

• Middle East

• 2 comments
• 261 views

webfact

May 13May 13

Starmer Warns MPs Leadership Battle Would Cause Chaos

UK-Politics

Starmer Warns MPs Leadership Battle Would Cause Chaos

Sir Keir Starmer has warned Labour ministers and MPs that a challenge to his leadership could “plunge us into chaos,” as he tries to shore up support within a divided party.

Get today's headlines by email

The prime minister made the appeal during meetings with colleagues in Parliament on Wednesday, urging them to unite behind what he described as a programme of “radical” reforms designed to transform public services and improve the lives of working people.
His intervention comes amid growing pressure on his leadership, with several ministers resigning and dozens of Labour MPs calling on him to step down.
Leadership pressure mounts
Sir Keir is fighting to retain his position after four ministers resigned and more than 80 Labour MPs demanded he either resign immediately or set out a timetable for his departure.
Attention has focused on Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who is widely believed to be considering a challenge for the party leadership. Supporters told the BBC they expected him to launch a bid as early as Thursday.
Under Labour Party rules, Streeting would need the backing of 81 MPs to formally trigger a leadership contest.
Streeting met the prime minister at 10 Downing Street on Wednesday morning for talks lasting less than 20 minutes, following several days of intense speculation about his intentions.
A spokesperson for the prime minister said Sir Keir had “full confidence” in Streeting but declined to discuss the details of the meeting.
Later that evening, Sir Keir held a series of short meetings with Labour ministers and MPs in Parliament. During those discussions, he warned colleagues that a leadership contest would disrupt the government’s work.
“We cannot let a leadership contest plunge us into chaos,” he told them, adding that a challenge would “100%” have that effect.
A push for reform
The meetings took place shortly before the government outlined its legislative programme in the King’s Speech, marking the start of a new parliamentary session.
King Charles III announced a series of proposals in the House of Lords, including plans to abolish NHS England, introduce a digital identity system, restrict some trials by jury and end the leasehold system in England and Wales.
Other measures included plans to nationalise British Steel, accelerate green energy infrastructure projects, deepen trading ties with the European Union and invest in rail improvements across northern England.
Addressing MPs in the House of Commons, Sir Keir described the King’s Speech as setting out an “agenda of radical reform across our major public services”.
He said his government would act urgently to “tilt power back to workers, renters and the less fortunate” and give greater voice to people who felt ignored by the existing system.
The message echoed a speech earlier in the week in which he argued that incremental change was insufficient to tackle the country’s challenges.
Critics within and outside Labour
Despite the new policy programme, some Labour MPs remain unconvinced that the prime minister’s leadership matches the scale of change they believe voters expect.
Labour MP Jonathan Brash told the Commons that Sir Keir had not provided the “hope” many people were seeking.
“Some people will say this is about personality,” he said. “It is not. It’s about policy and whether we are prepared to meet the moment with the scale of change it demands.”
The government also faced criticism from the opposition. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch used her response to the King’s Speech to question Sir Keir’s authority.
She said the prime minister was “in office, but not in power,” and argued he would struggle to deliver the legislative programme outlined.
Badenoch also mocked Streeting’s reported leadership ambitions during her remarks in the Commons, prompting tense reactions from Labour MPs.
Potential contenders
While Streeting is seen as the most immediate potential challenger, other senior figures are also considered possible leadership contenders.
Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham is viewed by many Labour MPs as a strong candidate and polls suggest he remains one of the party’s most popular figures with voters.
However, Burnham is not currently a member of Parliament. Returning to the House of Commons would require winning a by-election, a process that could take time.
Several MPs, including Afzal Khan and Jeff Smith, have denied speculation that they might step down to allow Burnham to contest a seat.
Meanwhile, cabinet ministers have been working to persuade colleagues that a leadership contest would stall the government’s legislative agenda and hamper its ability to govern.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 May 2026

• 11 comments
• 269 views

webfact

May 13May 13

Saudi, UAE Launch Secret Strikes on Iran: Reports

Iranian Conflict

Saudi, UAE Launch Secret Strikes on Iran: Reports

Saudi Arabia carried out previously undisclosed airstrikes on Iran earlier this year in response to attacks on the kingdom during the widening Middle East conflict, according to Western and Iranian officials.

Get today's headlines by email

The strikes, reportedly conducted by the Saudi Air Force in late March, would mark the first known instance of Saudi Arabia directly launching military action on Iranian territory. Officials familiar with the matter described the attacks as retaliatory moves after Iran targeted Saudi Arabia with missiles and drones during the regional war.
Reuters said it could not independently verify the specific targets of the Saudi operations.
A senior Saudi foreign ministry official did not confirm whether the strikes took place when asked for comment, while Iran’s foreign ministry did not respond to requests for clarification.
Regional conflict widens
The reported Saudi strikes highlight the growing scope of the conflict that began when the United States and Israel launched airstrikes on Iran on 28 February. Since then, the confrontation has spread across the region, drawing in several Middle Eastern countries.
According to officials, Iran has launched missiles and drones at all six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council, targeting not only US military installations but also civilian locations, airports and oil infrastructure. Tehran has also closed the Strait of Hormuz, disrupting international trade.
The United Arab Emirates is also reported to have carried out strikes on Iranian territory. The Wall Street Journal reported that Emirati forces targeted an oil refinery on Iran’s Lavan Island early last month.
Those attacks were said to have taken place around the time US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire following a five-week air campaign against Iran.
The newspaper reported that US officials had privately welcomed Emirati participation and encouraged Gulf allies willing to confront Iran.
Different approaches from Gulf states
The Saudi and Emirati responses illustrate how Gulf states affected by Iranian strikes have begun responding militarily, although their strategies differ.
The UAE has taken a more confrontational approach, seeking to impose costs on Iran while maintaining limited diplomatic engagement.
Saudi Arabia, by contrast, has attempted to contain escalation while keeping open channels of communication with Tehran. Officials said contacts continued through Iran’s ambassador in Riyadh during the crisis.
A senior Saudi foreign ministry official reiterated the kingdom’s position in favour of reducing tensions, saying Riyadh supports “de-escalation, self-restraint and the reduction of tensions” to maintain regional stability.
Strikes followed by diplomatic engagement
Officials from Iran and Western governments said Saudi Arabia informed Tehran about the strikes, after which intensive diplomatic contacts took place.
Those talks, combined with Saudi warnings that further retaliation could follow, led both sides to reach an informal understanding to scale back hostilities.
Ali Vaez, Iran project director at the International Crisis Group, said such a sequence would suggest both countries recognised the risks of uncontrolled escalation.
He said retaliatory strikes followed by de-escalation would reflect “a shared interest in imposing limits on confrontation before it spiralled into a wider regional conflict”.
According to officials, the informal de-escalation began in the week before Washington and Tehran agreed to a broader ceasefire on 7 April.
An Iranian official confirmed the arrangement, saying the aim was to halt hostilities, protect shared interests and avoid further escalation.
Longstanding rivalry
Iran and Saudi Arabia, the region’s leading Shi’ite and Sunni powers, have long backed opposing factions in conflicts across the Middle East.
Relations began to improve after China brokered a rapprochement in 2023, restoring diplomatic ties and helping secure a ceasefire in Yemen between Saudi Arabia and the Iran-aligned Houthi movement.
During the current conflict, Saudi Arabia has managed to continue exporting oil through the Red Sea, avoiding some of the disruption faced by other Gulf states.
Former Saudi intelligence chief Prince Turki al-Faisal wrote in a weekend opinion article that the kingdom had sought to avoid being drawn deeper into the war, despite pressure from regional tensions.
Changing dynamics on the battlefield
Diplomatic contacts and the threat of stronger Saudi retaliation appear to have reduced the scale of Iranian attacks.
According to a Reuters review of Saudi defence ministry statements, more than 105 missile and drone strikes were recorded during the week of 25–31 March. That number dropped to just over 25 between 1–6 April.
Western officials said that in the days before the broader ceasefire many projectiles launched at Saudi Arabia appeared to originate from Iraq rather than Iran itself, suggesting Tehran had reduced direct attacks while allied groups remained active.
Saudi Arabia later summoned Iraq’s ambassador to protest strikes originating from Iraqi territory.
Tensions nevertheless continued around the start of the wider ceasefire, when Saudi authorities reported dozens of missiles and drones targeting the kingdom on 7 and 8 April.
The spike prompted Riyadh to consider further retaliation against Iran and Iraq, while Pakistan deployed fighter jets to reassure Saudi Arabia and urged restraint as diplomatic efforts intensified.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 May 2026

• 2 comments
• 236 views

webfact

May 13May 13

Trump Arrives in Beijing for High-Stakes Talks with Xi

China

Trump Arrives in Beijing for High-Stakes Talks with Xi

US President Donald Trump arrived in Beijing on Wednesday for a two-day visit that will focus on trade tensions, the war in Iran and the future of Taiwan, as he prepares for high-level talks with Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

Get today's headlines by email

Trump stepped off Air Force One to a formal reception in the Chinese capital, where he was welcomed by Vice-President Han Zheng and greeted with a red-carpet ceremony. The reception included a brass band and groups waving Chinese and American flags as the US president acknowledged the crowd.
The meeting comes at a time of strained relations between the world’s two largest economies and amid ongoing conflict in the Middle East that has unsettled global markets.
Trade tensions in focus
Trade is expected to dominate the discussions between Washington and Beijing.
Economic ties between the two countries have weakened in recent years following an escalating tariff dispute and other trade restrictions. Bilateral trade reached $414.7bn last year, down sharply from $690.4bn recorded in 2022.
The US is also seeking to reduce its trade deficit with China. In the most recent figures, the United States imported more than $200bn more in goods from China than it exported to the country.
Ahead of the trip, Trump said he would urge Xi to further open China’s economy to American companies. Writing on social media before landing in Beijing, he described Xi as a leader of “extraordinary distinction” and said expanding market access for US firms would be his first request.
Several senior business leaders travelled with the president, including Elon Musk of Tesla, Jensen Huang of Nvidia, Tim Cook of Apple, Larry Fink of BlackRock and Kelly Ortberg of Boeing.
Washington is expected to push for increased Chinese purchases of American agricultural products, while Beijing is likely to press the US to ease tariffs imposed on Chinese goods.
Technology competition will also feature prominently. China has expanded its ambitions in artificial intelligence and increased demand for advanced computing chips produced by US companies. At the same time, Washington has tightened export controls amid concerns that Chinese firms could gain access to sensitive technologies.
China may also use its control over rare earth metals—critical components in many high-tech products—as leverage in negotiations, a tactic it has previously employed in response to US tariffs.
Iran war adds pressure
The conflict involving Iran is another key issue expected to be discussed.
China relies heavily on Iranian oil, and shipments have been disrupted as the fighting has affected shipping through the strategically important Strait of Hormuz. The disruption has contributed to higher oil prices and added pressure on China’s economy.
The United States has urged Beijing to use its political and economic influence with Tehran. China and Iran have maintained close ties for decades.
Shortly before leaving Washington, Trump said he expected a lengthy discussion with Xi about the war but indicated the United States did not need assistance to resolve the conflict.
China has also signalled it wants the fighting to end, partly because of the impact of rising energy costs.
Taiwan tensions remain
Relations over Taiwan are also likely to cast a shadow over the meeting.
The Trump administration has taken a mixed approach toward the island, approving a large arms deal while appearing to soften commitments about defending Taiwan in the event of Chinese military action.
Last week, a bipartisan group of US senators wrote to Trump urging him to reaffirm Washington’s support for Taiwan. The letter also referenced a $14bn arms sale to Taipei approved by Congress last year.
The lawmakers said Trump should make clear that US backing for Taiwan is not negotiable as Washington pursues economic discussions with Beijing.
Packed diplomatic schedule
Trump’s schedule includes a formal welcome ceremony with Xi at the Great Hall of the People, followed by a state banquet and several bilateral meetings.
Events will also include a ceremonial “friendship photo” in Zhongnanhai, the leadership compound in the Chinese capital.
The US president is due to depart on Friday after further talks and a working lunch with Xi.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 May 2026

• Trump

• 20 comments
• 315 views

webfact

May 13May 13

UK to Deploy Jets, Drones, Warship to Hormuz Mission

UK-Politics

UK to Deploy Jets, Drones, Warship to Hormuz Mission

The UK has pledged fighter jets, drones and a warship to a multinational effort aimed at protecting commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important oil transit routes.

Get today's headlines by email

The announcement was made on Tuesday by defence minister John Healey during a virtual meeting of defence ministers from countries participating in the initiative. The mission, involving more than 40 nations, is intended to safeguard shipping in the narrow channel linking the Persian Gulf to global markets.
British officials said the operation would begin once conditions allow.
Tensions in the region have been high for months after Iran asserted control over the waterway in response to military strikes by the United States and Israel.
UK military contribution
The UK’s contribution will include autonomous systems designed to detect and clear naval mines, drone boats and Eurofighter Typhoon jets assigned to conduct air patrols over the shipping lanes.
Officials said the mission would be supported by £115m in new funding to expand the use of mine-hunting drones and counter-drone technologies.
A British destroyer, HMS Dragon, which is already travelling toward the Middle East, will be ready to take part in operations aimed at securing the waterway. Another vessel, RFA Lyme Bay, is currently being upgraded with additional equipment in case it is required for deployment.
The UK already has more than 1,000 personnel stationed in the region as part of existing defensive operations. These include counter-drone teams and fast-jet squadrons, according to the UK Ministry of Defence.
Healey said the multinational mission, first announced last month by the UK and France, is intended to reassure shipping companies and restore safe passage through the strait.
“With our allies, this multinational mission will be defensive, independent and credible,” he said in a statement.
Strategic waterway under strain
The Strait of Hormuz carries around 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas shipments. Disruptions there have already pushed global energy prices higher.
Iran has maintained control over the passage in retaliation for military pressure from Washington and its allies. At the same time, the United States has enforced a blockade of Iranian ports in an attempt to force Tehran to accept its terms, a move that has drawn strong criticism from Iran.
Although a ceasefire between the US and Iran has been in place since April, the situation remains fragile. US President Donald Trump recently described the truce as being on “massive life support”.
Both Tehran and Washington have accused each other of launching attacks in the strait during the standoff.
Political backdrop in London
The defence announcement comes as domestic political pressure builds on UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Dozens of Labour MPs have called on him to step down, prompting a show of support from Healey.
In a message posted on X, Healey said Starmer was guiding Britain through a period of international instability and warned that further political turmoil would not be in the country’s interests.
During a cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Starmer did not address calls for his resignation. Instead, discussions focused on the consequences of the Middle East conflict.
A spokesperson for Downing Street said ministers agreed that reopening the Strait of Hormuz to international shipping remained the government’s top priority.
Starmer has repeatedly said the UK should not be “dragged” into the conflict. He has also stated that Britain would not support the ongoing US blockade of Iranian ports.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 13 May 2026

• Iranian Conflict

• 47 comments
• 351 views

webfact

May 12May 12

Venezuela Dismisses Trump’s 51st State Comment

Venezuela

Venezuela Dismisses Trump’s 51st State Comment

Venezuela’s acting president has rejected remarks by Donald Trump suggesting the country could become the 51st US state, while reaffirming Venezuela’s sovereignty during international court hearings over a long-running territorial dispute with Guyana.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking to journalists on Monday, acting President Delcy Rodríguez dismissed the idea after Trump said he was “seriously considering” the possibility. The comment was reported by Fox News following an interview earlier in the day.
Rodríguez said Venezuela would continue to defend its independence and national integrity.
“We will continue to defend our integrity, our sovereignty, our independence, our history,” she said, adding that Venezuela was “not a colony, but a free country.”
Response to Trump’s Comment
The White House did not immediately respond to requests for clarification about Trump’s remarks, and the context in which they were made remains unclear.
Trump has previously made similar statements about Canada becoming part of the United States.
Later on Monday, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly declined to comment directly on the president’s suggestion during a Fox News interview. She said Trump was “famous for never accepting the status quo” and praised Rodríguez for working cooperatively with Washington.
Rodríguez said officials from Venezuela and the United States had been communicating and were seeking “cooperation and understanding.”
Dispute Over Essequibo
Rodríguez made the comments while attending hearings at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, where Venezuela and Guyana are contesting ownership of the resource-rich Essequibo region.
The territory covers about 62,000 square miles and makes up roughly two-thirds of Guyana. It contains large deposits of gold, diamonds and timber and lies close to major offshore oil fields that are currently producing about 900,000 barrels of crude oil per day.
That output is approaching Venezuela’s daily production of around one million barrels and has helped transform Guyana into a major energy producer despite being one of South America’s smallest countries.
Addressing the court, Rodríguez argued that the dispute should be resolved through political negotiations rather than a judicial ruling.
She said a 1966 agreement signed in Geneva created mechanisms for Venezuela and Guyana to settle the matter through dialogue, accusing Guyana of undermining that framework by seeking a legal decision.
According to Rodríguez, Guyana shifted the dispute to the court after a major offshore oil discovery in 2015.
Historical Background
Venezuela claims Essequibo dates back to the Spanish colonial era, when the area was considered part of its territory.
However, an 1899 arbitration decision by representatives from Britain, Russia, and the United States drew the border along the Essequibo River largely in Guyana’s favor.
Guyana asked the International Court of Justice in 2018 to confirm the validity of that ruling, shortly after a major oil discovery was announced off its coast by ExxonMobil.
Tensions intensified in 2023 when Venezuela’s former president Nicolás Maduro threatened to annex the region following a referendum on turning Essequibo into a Venezuelan state.
Court Decision Expected Later
Maduro was later detained during a US military operation in Caracas in January and transferred to New York, where he faces drug trafficking charges. He has pleaded not guilty.
Guyana’s foreign minister Hugh Hilton Todd told judges the dispute had cast a shadow over the country’s sovereignty since its earliest days, noting that about 70% of Guyana’s territory is involved.
The International Court of Justice is expected to take several months to issue a final ruling in the case.
Venezuela has warned that participating in the hearings does not mean it accepts the court’s authority to decide the dispute.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 13 May 2026

• Trump

• 6 comments
• 241 views

webfact

May 12May 12