Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.
ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

World News

Fresh news brought to you daily from around the world. Hot news, breaking stories as they happen.

UK Ramps Up Contingency Plans Over Iran War Impact

The UK government is intensifying contingency planning to guard against possible food and fuel shortages linked to the ongoing conflict involving Iran, as disruptions to global energy routes raise concerns about supply chains and economic stability.

Get today's headlines by email

Prime Minister Keir Starmer is set to chair another meeting of a Cabinet committee on Tuesday tasked with addressing potential shortages. A separate group of ministers is meeting twice weekly to monitor supply levels and assess any emerging risks to food, fuel and other essential goods.
The preparations follow the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital maritime route through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas normally travels. Since the conflict began, oil prices have surged, prompting governments and businesses to evaluate the potential economic fallout.
Government Planning for Supply Disruptions
Earlier this month, officials drafted a worst-case scenario outlining possible food shortages by the summer if the conflict continues. Among the items highlighted were poultry and pork, both of which rely heavily on stable supply chains and agricultural inputs.
Authorities have also moved to reassure the public. Drivers have been encouraged to continue refuelling as normal and avoid altering travel plans, amid concerns that panic buying or behavioural changes could worsen potential supply pressures.
The contingency planning group is being led by Darren Jones, the government’s Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister. He said the UK had taken the correct decision to stay out of the fighting while taking defensive measures to safeguard national interests.
Jones said ministers were working to prepare for and reduce any domestic consequences of the conflict, including effects on the economy and security.
Economic Risks and Energy Concerns
The potential impact of the conflict has already prompted warnings from international financial institutions. The International Monetary Fund said the energy shock linked to the war could hit the UK more severely than other advanced economies.
The IMF recently lowered its forecast for UK economic growth this year to 0.8%, down from an earlier prediction of 1.3%.
Officials have also been examining risks to the supply of carbon dioxide (CO2), a gas widely used in food production and preservation. CO2 is used in processes such as animal slaughter and packaging that helps keep food fresh.
To strengthen domestic supply, the government has provided funding to restart the Ensus Bioethanol Plant, which produces CO2 as a by-product during bioethanol manufacturing.
A spokesperson for the facility said the company was confident it could continue producing CO2 to meet national demand for the foreseeable future.
Jones said shipments of jet fuel were continuing to reach the UK and that supplies of CO2 had been secured, emphasising that motorists should continue using their vehicles as usual.
Industry and Political Response
Supermarkets have been working with ministers to prepare for possible supply disruptions if the conflict persists.
The National Farmers' Union has warned that some food prices could rise in the coming weeks. It said cucumber and tomato prices may increase within six weeks, while other agricultural products such as milk could see price pressures within three to six months.
Airlines have also sought to reassure travellers, saying they are not currently experiencing shortages of jet fuel because purchases are typically made in advance and airports maintain reserves.
Opposition politicians have called for broader measures to protect consumers. The Liberal Democrats urged the government to prioritise food security legislation in the next King’s Speech and proposed a reduction in fuel duty along with lower public transport costs.
Strait of Hormuz at Centre of Dispute
Tensions remain high around the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian negotiators have said reopening the waterway would be impossible while a US naval blockade of Iranian ports continues.
US President Donald Trump has sought to pressure Iran by targeting the country’s shipping tolls through the strait and its oil revenues. Tehran has described the blockade as piracy.
Delegations from Iran were in Islamabad, Pakistan on Saturday for talks aimed at ending the conflict.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 20
webfact
webfact

Netanyahu Orders Renewed Strikes on Hezbollah in Lebanon

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has instructed the military to intensify attacks on Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, just days after a ceasefire between the two sides was extended by three weeks. The directive was followed by fresh Israeli strikes in southern Lebanon on Saturday that Lebanese officials say killed at least six people.

Get today's headlines by email

The escalation comes amid growing strain on the fragile truce, which has reduced but not completely halted cross-border hostilities.
Deadly strikes in southern Lebanon
According to Lebanon’s health ministry, four people were killed when Israeli strikes hit a truck and a motorcycle in the town of Yohmor al-Shaqeef.
Another attack on the town of Safad al-Battikh left two people dead and injured 17 others, officials said.
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said it had killed three Hezbollah members travelling in what it described as a vehicle carrying weapons. The military added that another fighter riding a motorcycle was also killed.
The IDF said two additional armed Hezbollah members were killed in the Litani River area, where Israeli troops remain deployed inside a self-declared buffer zone. The army said the individuals posed a threat to Israeli soldiers operating in southern Lebanon.
Later, the Israeli military reported detecting what it called a “suspicious aerial target” near the Israeli border community of Malkia. It described the incident as another breach of the ceasefire agreement.
Hezbollah response and rising tensions
Hezbollah said it had fired on an Israeli army vehicle in southern Lebanon in retaliation for the strike in Yohmor al-Shaqeef.
Following Netanyahu’s order to step up military action, Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency reported several additional Israeli strikes in the region. These included two rapid attacks in towns in Bint Jbeil district, another strike in Tyre district, and further bombardments in Nabatieh district.
The Israeli military said it had targeted infrastructure used by Hezbollah for military purposes across southern Lebanon. It added that operations would continue against what it described as threats to Israeli civilians and soldiers, acting on instructions from the government.
Israel continues to maintain a presence in parts of southern Lebanon and has been carrying out large-scale demolitions in the area.
Concerns over attacks on journalists
Separately, an international press freedom group criticised recent violence affecting journalists covering the conflict.
The Media Freedom Coalition said attacks on journalists in Lebanon were unacceptable after a reporter was killed earlier in the week.
The group — co-chaired by the governments of the United Kingdom and Finland — urged all sides to ensure that media workers can operate safely.
A Lebanese journalist, Amal Khalil, was killed in an Israeli strike on Wednesday. Freelance photographer Zeinab Faraj was injured in the same attack.
Lebanese officials say the journalists had taken shelter inside a house after an initial air strike struck a vehicle nearby, killing two men. They accuse Israeli forces of deliberately targeting them.
The IDF has denied targeting journalists.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Suspected Gunshots Disrupt White House Correspondents' Dinner

Suspected gunshots briefly disrupted the White House Correspondents' Dinner in Washington, prompting security agents to rush guests to safety as authorities moved to secure the area. Early accounts from journalists inside the venue describe confusion in the ballroom after several loud bangs were heard, triggering an immediate security response.

Get today's headlines by email

Loud bangs trigger security response
A White House pool reporter said several loud bangs were heard inside the hotel ballroom during the event.
Moments later, members of the United States Secret Service rushed into action with guns drawn, shouting “shots fired” as they moved people away from the area.
Pool reporters said they were quickly pushed back and held by Secret Service personnel while agents worked to secure the scene.
While reporters were being held, some overheard agents saying that a suspected gunman had been taken into custody.
Guests crouch as chaos unfolds
Images taken inside the Washington Hilton, where the dinner is traditionally held, showed guests crouching or taking cover after the sounds were heard.
Security personnel were seen helping some attendees evacuate from the ballroom as the situation unfolded.
Several prominent figures were present at the event. The pool report said Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was seen limping as he moved through the area, while Jeanine Pirro was escorted past reporters by security.
FBI director shielded companion
Among those seated near the disturbance was Kash Patel, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
A journalist seated nearby said Patel reacted immediately when the sounds were heard. According to the account, he covered his girlfriend with his body and dropped to the ground as the situation unfolded.
After several minutes, one of Patel’s security agents signalled to other agents in the room that the FBI director was safe.
As guests began cautiously standing again, Patel was seen sending messages on his phone.
When reporters attempted to ask him what had happened, he was quickly escorted out of the room by security.
Investigation continues
Authorities have not yet publicly confirmed the source of the loud bangs or whether shots were actually fired.
However, agents at the scene indicated that a suspected shooter had been detained as security continued to manage the situation.
Officials are expected to provide further details once the incident has been fully assessed.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Compiled from various sources 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact

U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Trump Asylum Policy

A U.S. federal appeals court has blocked a directive by Donald Trump that sought to suspend access to asylum for migrants crossing the U.S.–Mexico border unlawfully, ruling that the policy conflicts with federal immigration law.

Get today's headlines by email

The decision, issued Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, found that the administration cannot bypass legal procedures governing deportation or prevent migrants already in the United States from applying for asylum.
Two judges supported the ruling, while a third agreed only in part.
Court finds policy conflicts with immigration law
Writing for the majority, Judge J. Michelle Childs said the administration’s proclamation and related guidance unlawfully attempted to sidestep the procedures laid out in the Immigration and Nationality Act.
She wrote that the law’s “text, structure, and history” show that Congress did not grant the executive branch the broad authority claimed by the administration to carry out summary removals or deny migrants the right to seek asylum.
Childs concluded that the policy improperly replaced existing removal procedures and disregarded statutory protections that allow individuals to apply for asylum or other forms of protection from deportation.
Judge Cornelia Pillard joined the majority opinion.
Partial dissent on asylum authority
Judge Justin Walker, who was appointed during Trump’s first presidency, agreed with the panel that migrants cannot be stripped of legal protections preventing them from being sent to countries where they could face persecution or torture.
However, he disagreed with the majority’s conclusion regarding the president’s ability to deny asylum applications entirely, arguing that the executive branch has broader discretion in that area.
Legal challenge from rights groups
The lawsuit challenging the policy was filed in February 2025 by immigrant advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union.
Lee Gelernt, an attorney with the organization, said the ruling could save the lives of people fleeing danger who had been denied the chance to present their cases.
The administration can request a review by the full appeals court or ask the Supreme Court of the United States to consider the case.
Policy introduced after Trump returned to office
The dispute stems from actions taken when Trump returned to the presidency in 2025.
On his first day back in office, he ordered officials to suspend the asylum process for migrants seeking protection in the United States, citing what he described as an “invasion” at the southern border.
Following the directive, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security instructed immigration authorities that migrants crossing between official entry points were not permitted to apply for asylum. The guidance also introduced new procedures allowing migrants to be removed quickly through “direct repatriation” or “expedited removal.”
Under those instructions, asylum officers were told not to ask migrants questions about whether they had a credible fear of persecution or torture.
Earlier ruling upheld
In July, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss ruled against the administration, concluding that neither the Immigration and Nationality Act nor the Constitution granted the president the sweeping authority claimed in the directive. He also certified a class action covering migrants affected by the policy.
The Justice Department appealed, but the appellate panel largely upheld the lower court’s decision.
Childs wrote that the law does not permit the president to create new summary removal procedures or suspend migrants’ statutory right to apply for asylum and related protections.
She added that if the government wishes to change the existing asylum system, it must seek action from Congress rather than act unilaterally.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump Faces War Powers Deadline Over Iran Conflict

A US law limiting unauthorized military action is approaching a critical deadline as the Trump administration continues its war with Iran without congressional approval. Under the War Powers Resolution, the president must obtain authorization from Congress within 60 days of deploying US forces into hostilities or end the military operation.

Get today's headlines by email

According to the statute’s timeline, the current conflict reaches that threshold on May 1, though lawmakers disagree about the exact date.
Timeline Set by War Powers Law
The law, enacted after the Vietnam War, establishes a sequence of steps when US troops enter combat without a formal declaration of war.
First, the president must notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing armed forces into hostilities. In his notification regarding the Iran conflict, Donald Trump said he had deployed troops using the president’s constitutional authority to conduct US foreign relations.
Second, Congress must approve the military action within 60 days of receiving that notice. If lawmakers do not grant authorization, the president is required to terminate the operation.
The law also allows a possible 30-day extension if the president argues additional time is needed to ensure the safe withdrawal of US forces.
Debate Over the Deadline
The exact timing of the 60-day limit remains disputed on Capitol Hill. Some lawmakers say the clock began when hostilities started, placing the deadline around April 29. Others point to the law’s wording and argue the countdown began when the White House formally notified Congress, which would make May 1 the key date.
The existence of a ceasefire has further complicated the debate. Some Republicans contend the pause in fighting should not count toward the 60-day total.
Republican Representative Brian Fitzpatrick said ceasefires should not be penalized and indicated he could push for a vote under the War Powers framework if the truce collapses.
Law Rarely Enforced in Practice
Although Congress can vote to revoke a president’s war powers at any time, attempts by Democrats to do so during the current conflict have so far failed.
Several presidents have also questioned the constitutionality of the War Powers Resolution. When the law was first passed, Richard Nixon vetoed it, arguing it restricted the president’s ability to defend the country. Congress later overrode that veto.
More recently, Vice President JD Vance has dismissed the law as unconstitutional and said it would not affect how the administration conducts foreign policy.
In practice, the law has never forced a president to end a military campaign. Courts have generally avoided ruling on disputes over its constitutionality despite lawsuits from members of Congress challenging presidential use of force.
Past Workarounds by Presidents
Previous administrations have used various legal arguments to continue military operations beyond the 60-day limit.
In 1983, Ronald Reagan reached a compromise with Congress allowing US Marines deployed in Lebanon to remain for an additional 18 months.
In 2011, Barack Obama allowed US involvement in a NATO bombing campaign in Libya to continue past the deadline. His administration argued that the operations did not amount to “hostilities” because American forces faced limited risk and allied nations carried out most of the combat.
Similarly, Bill Clinton maintained US troops in Kosovo for more than 60 days in 1999, saying Congress had effectively approved the mission by funding it.
Political Pressure Builds in Congress
The Trump administration has not publicly sought congressional backing for the Iran conflict or requested additional funding for the war.
Some Republican lawmakers have been reluctant to challenge the president, reflecting a broader pattern of Congress yielding authority on issues ranging from tariffs to federal spending.
However, the approaching 60-day deadline could test that unity. Some GOP lawmakers argue Congress has a responsibility to vote on whether to authorize a war that continues beyond the legal limit.
Even supporters of the military campaign may hesitate to hold such a vote, wary that the issue could become politically damaging ahead of midterm elections or signal division during wartime.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact

King Charles's US Visit Seen as Tough Test of His Reign

King Charles III’s upcoming state visit to the United States is being described by royal insiders as a moment of significant risk and opportunity, unfolding during one of the most strained periods in modern Anglo-American relations.

Get today's headlines by email

The four-day trip, which the King will undertake with Queen Camilla, comes amid geopolitical tensions, political disagreements between Washington and London, and renewed attention on controversies involving the royal family. Officials say the visit will require careful diplomacy as the monarch navigates complex political sensitivities while representing the United Kingdom abroad.
Strained political backdrop
The visit takes place against a turbulent international background that includes conflict in the Middle East and a fragile ceasefire involving Iran. Analysts say the broader geopolitical climate adds to the pressure surrounding the trip.
Andrew Lownie, author of a biography of Prince Andrew, said relations between the United States and the United Kingdom are facing their most serious difficulties in decades. He noted that dealing with President Donald Trump adds an unpredictable element to the diplomatic mission.
Despite those challenges, historians and officials say the King’s role could carry influence. Royal historian Ed Owens described the visit as a “huge global event” occurring during unusually tense political circumstances. He suggested the King may use the platform to promote longstanding Western values such as democracy, liberty and freedom.
Political disagreements between the two governments have recently intensified. President Trump has publicly criticised UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and questioned the strength of British military capabilities, while London has resisted joining the United States in military action related to the Iran conflict.
Officials are also mindful that the president’s unscripted remarks could create awkward moments during the visit, even though organisers have structured the itinerary to limit opportunities for off-the-cuff exchanges.
Diplomatic engagements
The visit will include several high-profile events in Washington and New York. The King is scheduled to address a joint session of the US Congress and attend a formal state dinner hosted by the White House.
Other engagements include a visit to the National September 11 Memorial and a reception in New York. The trip will conclude with an appearance in a national park in Virginia, highlighting natural heritage and environmental themes.
Royal sources say the visit must balance political sensitivities with the longer-term goal of maintaining the historic alliance between the two nations.
Officials have emphasised that state visits are conducted on behalf of the British government. While acknowledging present tensions, they say the trip aims to reaffirm the enduring relationship between the two countries.
Personal and public pressures
The King will also face personal and public scrutiny during the visit.
Campaigners connected to survivors of abuse linked to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein are expected to speak publicly during the trip, urging recognition of their concerns. Some have called for the King to meet victims, particularly given allegations previously made against his brother, Prince Andrew. Andrew has denied wrongdoing and settled a civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre in 2022 without admitting liability.
Queen Camilla’s schedule will include meetings with campaigners working to combat domestic abuse.
The visit also comes as the 77-year-old monarch continues cancer treatment. Despite his health challenges, he is expected to carry out a full programme of engagements.
Symbolism and historical echoes
A central moment of the trip will be the King’s speech to Congress, the first by a British monarch since Queen Elizabeth II addressed lawmakers in 1991.
Diplomats are expected to scrutinise the speech closely, as it could address issues such as NATO cooperation, support for Ukraine and future trade ties between the United Kingdom and the United States.
Observers say the speech will require a careful balance between reaffirming democratic principles and maintaining cordial relations with the current US administration.
Researchers studying past state visits note that such events can leave lasting impressions, from Queen Elizabeth II’s relationship with President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s to other high-profile diplomatic moments involving members of the royal family.
While the visit carries risks, some analysts believe the monarchy’s popularity in the United States could help soften political tensions.
A fragile alliance
Despite longstanding ties, analysts say the broader US-UK relationship has faced difficulties in recent months.
Some observers argue that Britain has attempted to act as a bridge between the United States and Europe, particularly on NATO issues, but with mixed success.
Others suggest the royal visit could help stabilise relations at a delicate moment. Advocates of the trip point to the monarchy’s ability to generate goodwill and influence public opinion in the United States.
Whether the visit ultimately strengthens the transatlantic partnership remains uncertain. But many agree it will represent one of the most consequential diplomatic moments of King Charles’s reign so far.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump Cancels US Envoys’ Pakistan Trip on Iran War

US President Donald Trump has cancelled a planned visit by American officials to Pakistan for talks related to the war involving Iran, shortly after an Iranian delegation departed Islamabad. The trip, which had been scheduled for Saturday, was intended to continue diplomatic contacts aimed at easing tensions. But Trump said the visit would waste “too much time”, adding that Tehran could initiate talks directly if it wished.

Get today's headlines by email

“If they want to talk, all they have to do is call,” he wrote on his Truth Social platform, also claiming that Iran’s leadership was divided and unclear about who was in charge.
The move came as diplomatic efforts remain stalled despite a temporary ceasefire extension designed to create space for negotiations.
Diplomatic efforts stall
Earlier in Islamabad, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi held discussions with Pakistani officials, who have been acting as intermediaries between Tehran and Washington.
After the meeting, Aragchi said he had outlined Iran’s position on how the conflict could be brought to an end. However, he said it remained uncertain whether the United States was genuinely prepared to pursue diplomacy.
Posting on social media, Aragchi described the talks in Pakistan as “fruitful” and said he had presented Iran’s proposal for a workable framework to permanently end the war. He added that it was still unclear whether Washington was serious about negotiations.
Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said the discussions involved a “warm, cordial exchange of views” on the regional situation.
The Iranian diplomat’s trip also includes visits to Oman and Russia, and Iranian state media reported he is expected to return to Islamabad later.
Ceasefire extended amid tensions
The cancelled visit followed Washington’s announcement on Friday that a US delegation led by special envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner would travel to Pakistan for talks.
The White House had suggested Iran was interested in negotiations. Tehran, however, said there were no plans for direct talks with the United States.
US Vice-President JD Vance had been on standby to join the delegation if discussions appeared promising. His absence from the initial team had already suggested that a major breakthrough was unlikely.
Trump recently extended a ceasefire that had been due to expire on 22 April, in the hope that diplomatic contacts could continue.
Asked whether cancelling the trip meant the war might resume, Trump said it did not necessarily signal renewed fighting.
Strait of Hormuz dispute
The conflict has centred on tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping route through which roughly one fifth of the world’s oil supply passes.
Iran restricted passage through the strait after the United States and Israel launched strikes in February. In response, Washington increased its naval presence in the area to block Iranian oil exports.
The confrontation has also been driven by long-standing concerns about Iran’s nuclear programme. Washington and Israel say they believe Tehran is seeking to develop nuclear weapons.
Iran denies the accusation, saying its nuclear activities are intended for civilian energy production, although it has enriched uranium to levels close to weapons grade.
Violence beyond the main conflict
Regional tensions have also continued elsewhere.
Lebanon’s state news agency reported that Israeli strikes in the country’s south killed at least four people on Saturday. Israel’s military said the attacks came after rockets were fired into Israel by Hezbollah.
Despite an existing ceasefire between Israel and the Iran-backed group, both sides have continued to exchange fire in recent weeks while accusing each other of violating the agreement.
A statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said the military had been ordered to “vigorously attack Hezbollah targets in Lebanon”.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump & Officials Clash Over Stability of Iran’s Leadership

Iran’s political leadership has become the subject of debate among U.S. officials and analysts, after President Donald Trump suggested the country’s ruling system is fractured and struggling to determine who is in charge. Speaking publicly over the past week, Trump said divisions between hardline and moderate factions were hampering decision-making in Tehran and slowing progress in negotiations with the United States.

Get today's headlines by email

However, several security and policy sources familiar with the situation dispute that characterization. They say the Iranian system remains functional, though decision-making has become less centralized following recent military developments.
Leadership after the Khamenei transition
According to officials cited by security sources, authority in Iran has shifted since the death of former supreme leader Ali Khamenei in U.S.–Israeli strikes on 28 February.
His son, Mojtaba Khamenei, is believed to have assumed the role of supreme leader. But sources say he remains in hiding and difficult to reach, complicating the government’s internal coordination.
Rather than a single dominant authority, decision-making now appears to involve a small group of senior figures closely linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the powerful military body founded in 1979 by revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.
Security officials describe the arrangement as resembling a “politburo-style” system, where several figures collectively shape policy.
Those cited as key participants include IRGC commander-in-chief Ahmad Vahidi, Supreme National Security Council chief Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, military adviser Yahya Rahim Safavi, and parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.
Despite differences in style or emphasis among officials, one regional policy source said there is “no clear evidence of fractures at the level of core decision-making.”
Questions over the supreme leader’s condition
Speculation has circulated about Mojtaba Khamenei’s health after reports he was seriously injured during bombing at the start of the war.
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said the leader suffered severe wounds and disfigurement. The The New York Times reported he is recovering from burns to his face and lips that may make speaking difficult.
Some officials believe he remains involved in strategic decisions even if not all matters are brought directly to him. Others say he is largely isolated, communicating only through intermediaries and avoiding phone calls or meetings.
One security source said the system appears strained but still operational. “They’re in disarray, but they’re still in control over the country,” the source said.
Military pressure and diplomatic stalemate
The debate over leadership comes as the United States and Israel continue to assess their strategy toward Iran.
Trump has sought to increase economic pressure through a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, while Israeli leaders argue military operations have significantly weakened Iran.
An Israeli official described the campaign as a major achievement, saying Iran is “weaker than it’s ever been.” However, the official added that further action may still be needed and could come through negotiations or other means.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has faced speculation that he urged Washington to pursue regime change in Tehran. An Israeli official rejected that claim, saying the objective was not to overthrow the government.
Analysts warn, however, that Iran remains heavily militarized and strongly influenced by the IRGC.
Iran retains significant capabilities
Despite battlefield losses, intelligence assessments suggest Iran still possesses substantial military resources.
The U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency said this week that Iran continues to hold thousands of missiles and attack drones. Israeli estimates suggest around 60% of missile launchers have been destroyed, though some could be repaired.
Iran is also believed to retain large stockpiles of ballistic missiles. During the recent conflict, more than 550 long-range missiles were fired toward Israel before a ceasefire was reached in early April.
Questions also remain over Iran’s nuclear programme. The International Atomic Energy Agency says it cannot fully verify the status of Iran’s centrifuges and nuclear materials.
Analysts warn that Iran still holds significant quantities of enriched uranium that could potentially be further refined.
While the war has weakened some of Iran’s capabilities, officials and analysts say the country’s leadership and military structure remain intact, leaving uncertainty over how the conflict and negotiations will develop.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Nato Says Members Cannot Be Expelled After US–Spain Report

Nato has said its founding treaty contains no mechanism to suspend or expel a member state, following reports that the United States had considered measures against Spain over its stance on the war with Iran. A Nato official said the alliance’s charter “does not foresee any provision for suspension of membership, or expulsion”, responding to a report that Washington had discussed possible retaliation against allies it believed had not supported its campaign.

Get today's headlines by email

The report, first published by Reuters, cited a US official who said an internal Pentagon email outlined potential steps to pressure partners seen as failing to assist.
Pentagon memo reportedly outlines possible retaliation
According to the report, the internal message suggested that Washington could review diplomatic support for certain European territories and consider limiting the influence of countries viewed as uncooperative within the alliance.
One proposal mentioned reassessing the US position on the UK’s sovereignty over the Falkland Islands, which are also claimed by Argentina.
The islands, known in Argentina as the Malvinas, lie roughly 8,000 miles from the United Kingdom and about 300 miles from the Argentine mainland. The two countries fought a conflict over the territory during the Falklands War after Argentine forces invaded the islands.
The email also reportedly suggested removing countries considered “difficult” from influential roles within the alliance.
The official cited by Reuters said the memo did not propose that the US leave the 32-member alliance or close military bases in Europe.
Spain rejects report
Pedro Sánchez dismissed the report, saying the Spanish government does not respond to unofficial communications.
“We do not work based on emails,” he told reporters, adding that Madrid deals only with formal policy statements from the US government.
Spain has refused to allow US forces to launch attacks on Iran from bases on its territory. The United States maintains two military installations in the country — Naval Station Rota and Morón Air Base.
Sánchez said Spain supports cooperation with allies but insisted such support must remain “within the framework of international law”.
Growing tensions within the alliance
The dispute comes amid tensions between Washington and some European allies after the US and Israel launched strikes against Iran on 28 February. Iran later restricted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil shipments.
Donald Trump has repeatedly criticised Nato partners for what he says is insufficient support in the conflict.
Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson said the US had done a great deal for its allies but claimed “they were not there for us”.
“The War Department will ensure the president has credible options to ensure that our allies are no longer a paper tiger and instead do their part,” she said, declining to comment further on internal deliberations.
At a separate news conference, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth criticised European governments for not contributing more to the conflict, saying they rely heavily on US protection.
“Europe and Asia have benefitted from our protection for decades, but the time for free riding is over,” he said.
European leaders urge unity
European leaders have moved to calm speculation about divisions within the alliance.
Giorgia Meloni called for unity among members, describing Nato as a “source of strength” and urging governments to reinforce Europe’s role within the alliance.
A spokesperson for the Germany government also rejected suggestions that Spain’s membership could be at risk, stating that Spain remains a full Nato member and that there was no reason for that to change.
Meanwhile, Keir Starmer said deeper British involvement in the war or the US blockade of Iranian ports would not be in the UK’s national interest.
Britain has nonetheless allowed the US to use its bases to launch strikes against Iranian targets and has deployed aircraft to intercept Iranian drones.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Kushner and Witkoff to Travel to Pakistan for Iran Talks

Senior envoys from the administration of Donald Trump are due to travel to Pakistan for discussions with Iranian officials as Washington explores a possible path toward renewed negotiations, the White House said on Friday. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that special envoy Steve Witkoff and presidential adviser Jared Kushner will depart for Islamabad on Saturday morning. The meeting is expected to involve representatives from Iran, with Pakistan acting as a mediator.

Get today's headlines by email

Leavitt said the administration had seen indications of progress from the Iranian side in recent days but did not provide further details.
“Steve and Jared will be heading to Pakistan tomorrow to hear the Iranians out,” she said during a briefing at the White House. “We hope progress will be made and we hope that positive developments will come from this meeting.”
Possible step toward renewed dialogue
The planned talks follow reports that Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araqchi, was expected to arrive in Islamabad on Friday. According to Reuters, Araqchi was due to discuss proposals aimed at restarting peace negotiations with the United States.
Pakistan has positioned itself as a potential intermediary as both sides explore options for returning to diplomatic discussions after earlier efforts stalled.
The visit by Witkoff and Kushner comes as the administration assesses whether recent contacts with Iranian officials could open the door to a broader negotiation process.
Vice president on standby
Leavitt also said JD Vance, who previously led a round of talks with Iranian representatives in Islamabad earlier this month, could travel to Pakistan if discussions begin to show signs of progress.
Those earlier negotiations, led by Vance, did not produce an agreement.
“The president, the vice president, the secretary of state will be waiting here in the United States for updates,” Leavitt said. She added that Vance was prepared to travel if officials determine his presence would help advance the discussions.
Ceasefire extended to allow negotiations
The diplomatic effort comes after Trump extended a temporary ceasefire with Iran earlier this week. The pause in hostilities was prolonged by two weeks shortly before it was due to expire.
Officials said the extension was intended to create additional time for negotiations aimed at ending the conflict.
The upcoming meeting in Islamabad could provide an opportunity for both sides to outline possible terms for restarting formal talks, though it remains unclear whether the discussions will produce concrete results.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Millions of Americans Eligible for Canada via New Citizen Rules

A change to Canada’s citizenship rules is prompting a surge of interest among Americans who may now qualify for dual nationality through their family heritage. Immigration lawyers in both countries say they have been inundated with inquiries since the revised law took effect on Dec. 15. The change expands eligibility for citizenship by descent, potentially allowing millions of people in the United States with Canadian ancestry to claim citizenship.

Get today's headlines by email

For some applicants, the discovery has come as a surprise.
Zack Loud of Farmington, Minnesota, said he learned that he and his siblings are already regarded as Canadian citizens under the new rules because their grandmother was born in Canada.
He said the recognition of citizenship has made the prospect of living or working north of the border more appealing. Loud added that he and his wife had already been considering employment opportunities abroad, but the new status has pushed Canada higher on their list.
Surge in legal inquiries
Immigration attorneys say the level of interest has risen sharply since the change was introduced.
Nicholas Berning, an immigration lawyer at Boundary Bay Law in Bellingham, Washington, said demand for assistance has surged.
He said his practice has been “pretty much flooded” with clients seeking help preparing applications and gathering documentation, forcing the firm to redirect resources away from other legal work.
Amandeep Hayer, an immigration lawyer based in the Vancouver area, said his firm previously handled around 200 citizenship cases annually. Since the new law came into effect, he said, the office has been conducting more than 20 consultations each day.
Expanded citizenship by descent
Canada has modified its citizenship legislation several times over the decades to address historical legal interpretations and discriminatory provisions.
Previously, citizenship passed automatically through only one generation born outside the country — typically from a Canadian parent to their child.
Under the revised framework, individuals born before Dec. 15 may qualify if they can demonstrate descent from a Canadian ancestor, which could include a grandparent, great-grandparent or earlier relative.
For those born on or after Dec. 15, the rules require proof that a Canadian parent lived in Canada for at least 1,095 days.
According to Hayer, individuals who meet the ancestry requirements are already legally considered citizens, but they must obtain a certificate to formally prove their status.
He said the application process effectively confirms a right that already exists. “You are Canadian, and you're considered to be one your whole life,” he explained.
Political and practical motivations
Applicants cite a range of reasons for pursuing citizenship, including family heritage, job prospects and political developments in the United States.
Michelle Cunha of Bedford, Massachusetts, said decades of political activism led her to reconsider her future in the United States. She decided to pursue Canadian citizenship and relocate after concluding that the country offered new opportunities.
Others say international travel or domestic policy debates have encouraged them to explore the option.
Troy Hicks of Pahrump, Nevada, said he began considering citizenship after a recent trip abroad highlighted how American politics shapes perceptions of U.S. travelers.
Maureen Sullivan of Naples, Florida, said she saw Canadian citizenship as a form of security for her family after immigration enforcement activity near her nephew’s school in Minnesota raised concerns.
Costs and processing times
The application fee for proof of citizenship is relatively modest — 75 Canadian dollars, about $55.
However, applicants may incur additional expenses if they hire lawyers or genealogists to track down records such as birth, marriage and death certificates needed to establish family lineage.
Cunha said she expects to spend about $6,500 after hiring legal assistance.
Others have completed applications independently using online guidance. Mary Mangan of Somerville, Massachusetts, said many applicants can likely manage the process without professional help.
Processing times are currently estimated at around 10 months, according to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, with more than 56,000 applications awaiting decisions.
Debate within Canada
The increase in interest from Americans has prompted mixed reactions in Canada.
Fen Hampson, a professor of international affairs at Carleton University in Ottawa, said Canadians generally view immigration positively.
However, he said some people worry that a surge in ancestry-based applications could slow processing for refugees and asylum seekers.
Others are skeptical about individuals with only distant family connections seeking passports without substantial ties to the country, a practice sometimes described as “citizenship of convenience.”

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact

India Condemns ‘Hellhole’ Comment Shared by Trump Amid Citizenship Debate

India has criticised remarks shared by U.S. President Donald Trump that described the country as a “hellhole”, calling the language uninformed and inappropriate as tensions briefly surfaced in the otherwise close relationship between the two nations. The comments originated from conservative radio host Michael Savage during an episode of The Savage Nation. Trump posted a transcript of the programme on his Truth Social platform on Thursday without adding any commentary.

Get today's headlines by email
Remarks linked to birthright citizenship debate
In the transcript, Savage criticised the U.S. policy of birthright citizenship and referenced immigration from several countries.
“A baby here becomes an instant citizen, and then they bring the entire family in from China or India or some other hellhole on the planet,” Savage said, according to the transcript shared by Trump.
Savage also claimed that newer immigrant communities had “almost no loyalty” to the United States, contrasting them with earlier waves of immigrants from Europe. Reuters said it could not immediately reach Savage for comment.
Trump has been pushing to restrict birthright citizenship in the United States, arguing that the policy encourages immigration abuses. The proposal has triggered legal challenges and is currently being considered by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Earlier this month, Trump attended a hearing on the issue in person, marking a rare visit by a sitting president to the court.
India calls comments inappropriate
India’s foreign ministry responded strongly to the remarks late on Thursday.
Foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said the comments were “obviously uninformed, inappropriate and in poor taste”.
“They certainly do not reflect the reality of the India-US relationship, which has long been based on mutual respect and shared interests,” he said in a statement.
The U.S. embassy in New Delhi sought to ease tensions, highlighting Trump’s previous remarks about India.
“The president has said ‘India is a great country with a very good friend of mine at the top’,” the embassy said.
China’s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Political reaction in India
India’s main opposition party, the Congress party, condemned the remarks and urged the government to respond more forcefully.
In a post on X, the party described the “hellhole” comment as “extremely insulting and anti-India” and said it offended people across the country.
The party also called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi to raise the matter directly with Trump and lodge a formal protest.
Government data shows nearly 5.5 million people of Indian origin live in the United States. Indian Americans, along with Chinese Americans, represent the largest groups of Asian origin in the country.
Relations between Washington and New Delhi
Trump and Modi maintained close ties during Trump’s first term in office. However, relations cooled after India faced some of the highest tariffs imposed by the United States last year.
Many of those tariffs were rolled back earlier this year, and the two countries are now working toward a trade agreement intended to prevent new tariff increases and expand bilateral commerce.
Despite occasional disputes, the United States and India have continued to cooperate closely on trade, security and strategic issues.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Epstein Housed Abuse Victims in London Flats After UK Police Declined Probe

Women who say they were abused by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were housed in several London flats paid for by the financier, according to evidence uncovered in a BBC investigation. Documents from the so-called Epstein files indicate that at least four apartments in the London borough of Kensington and Chelsea were rented for young women linked to Epstein. Receipts, emails and bank records show the properties were used in the years after British police chose not to pursue an investigation into trafficking allegations raised by Virginia Giuffre in 2015.

Get today's headlines by email

Six women who stayed in the flats have since come forward as victims of Epstein’s abuse, the BBC said. Many of the women were from Russia, eastern Europe and other countries. Some had been brought to the UK after Giuffre told police she had been trafficked to London and forced to have sex with Prince Andrew in 2001, an allegation he has repeatedly denied.
London properties linked to trafficking network
The BBC reviewed millions of pages of documents gathered by the United States Department of Justice as part of its investigation into Epstein.
The records suggest Epstein’s operation in the UK was more extensive than previously known. The flats provided accommodation for women who were sometimes pressured to recruit others into the trafficking network.

Emails in the files also show that some of the women were regularly transported between London and Paris on the Eurostar to visit Epstein.
According to the documents, Epstein purchased at least 53 train tickets for women travelling between France and England from 2011 to 2019. Thirty-three of those tickets were bought after Giuffre made her complaint to the Metropolitan Police.
In the final six months before his arrest in July 2019, women were transported between the two cities ten times, including one journey made just over two weeks before Epstein was detained by US authorities.
Ongoing contact with women in London
Messages found in the files indicate Epstein remained in contact with women living in the London flats shortly before his arrest. In one Skype exchange with a young Russian woman living in one of the properties, he described himself jokingly as her “landlord”, noting that unlike most landlords he paid the rent.
Financial records show Epstein sometimes covered everyday living costs. In one case, a woman living in an apartment had a credit card linked to Epstein’s account and a monthly allowance of $2,000.
Other records show payments for English-language courses and discussions about one of Epstein’s companies acting as a financial sponsor for a university art programme.
Despite the desirable locations, emails suggest the apartments were occasionally overcrowded, with some women sleeping on sofas. Correspondence also indicates that Epstein sometimes responded angrily when the women complained about conditions.
Questions over missed opportunities to investigate
Criticism has been directed at British authorities for failing to launch a criminal investigation into Epstein’s activities in the UK.
Human rights lawyer Tessa Gregory said she was surprised no inquiry had been opened, noting that credible allegations of trafficking place a legal obligation on the state to conduct an effective investigation.
Former Metropolitan Police Service detective Kevin Hyland said police had missed opportunities to pursue the case, arguing that travel and financial data could have been used to identify suspicious patterns involving groups of young women.
The Metropolitan Police said officers followed “reasonable lines of inquiry” after Giuffre’s complaint and interviewed her multiple times while cooperating with US investigators.
Information shared with US investigators
Emails in the files show other British agencies also passed information about Epstein to American authorities.
A 2020 memo from the National Crime Agency to the FBI referenced allegations connected to Clare Hazell, a socialite who had flown on Epstein’s private jet numerous times. Hazell, who denied wrongdoing during her lifetime, died last year.
The NCA also provided financial intelligence to the FBI, including payments linked to the rent of one of the London flats.
The Metropolitan Police said it is currently participating in a national policing group reviewing information released in the Epstein files, including material suggesting London airports may have been used as transit points for trafficking.
Survivors and campaigners are calling for a public inquiry to determine how Epstein’s activities continued for years without a full UK investigation.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump Photo Overshadows Women’s Tennis Champions

A photograph taken during a White House celebration for US collegiate champions has triggered criticism online after the women athletes being honoured were positioned behind a row of men, partially obscuring them in the image. The University of Georgia women’s tennis team visited the White House on Tuesday as part of an event recognising several National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) title-winning teams. The team secured the NCAA Division I women’s tennis championship in May last year.

Get today's headlines by email

In a photograph posted by a White House press aide, President Donald Trump stands at the front of a stage with five male members of the Georgia athletics staff. Behind them, the female players are arranged on risers in two rows.
Critics said the arrangement appeared to place the athletes being honoured out of view.
Photo arrangement sparks reaction
The men standing beside the president included Georgia deputy athletic director Ford Williams, athletic director Josh Brooks, head coach Drake Bernstein, associate head coach Jarryd Chaplin and assistant coach Will Reynolds.
The players positioned behind them were Anastasiia Lopata, Mai Nirundorn, Aysegul Mert, Sarah Branicki and Alexandra Vecic in the back row; Tatum Buffington, Guillermina Grant, Haley Gaudette and Sofia Rojas in the middle row; and Mell Reasco and Hayden Mulberry at the front.
Dasha Vidmanova, one of the team’s leading players, was not present. She was competing in qualifying matches at the Madrid Open at the time of the visit. Vidmanova is only the third women’s tennis player to win NCAA national titles in team, singles and doubles competition.
Former tennis champion Martina Navratilova was among those who criticised the image, posting on social media: “A photo is worth a thousand words.”
Online commenters also questioned why the athletes appeared behind staff members in the photograph.
Video shows greeting with staff members
A video shared by the same press aide showed Trump approaching the group and shaking hands with the five male staff members standing at the front. In the clip, he does not shake hands with the players positioned behind them.
Later the same day, the Georgia women’s tennis team posted the photograph on its official social media account, writing that it was “an honor” to represent the university at the White House and thanking the president for hosting the team.
The Georgia squad was one of seven championship teams invited to Washington this week to mark recent collegiate sporting victories.
White House sports visits sometimes contentious
Visits to the White House by championship teams are a long-standing tradition in American sport. However, such invitations have occasionally drawn political attention in recent years.
Before 2019, no women’s championship team had visited the White House on its own during Trump’s presidency, though some had attended events that included both men’s and women’s teams.
Four of the teams recognised at Tuesday’s event were women’s teams, alongside a mixed-gender rifle team.
Earlier this year, the US women’s ice hockey team declined an invitation to the White House after winning gold at the Milano Cortina Winter Olympics. Players cited scheduling conflicts and prior commitments.
The decision followed remarks Trump made during a phone call with the US men’s hockey team, in which he joked about needing to invite the women’s team as well. The men later attended a White House event and were guests at the State of the Union address.
Women’s team captain Hilary Knight later described the comment as a “distasteful joke” that overshadowed the team’s Olympic achievement.
Comparisons with earlier criticism
The tennis team photograph has also prompted comparisons with earlier moments during Trump’s presidency that drew criticism over representation.
In 2017, an image showing the president signing an anti-abortion measure in the Oval Office while surrounded by eight male advisers prompted backlash from critics who noted the absence of women in the room.
The latest reaction comes amid scrutiny of the administration after several recent cabinet departures involving female officials.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact

US Justice Department Ends Probe Into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell

The US Justice Department has ended its investigation into Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell over alleged cost overruns linked to renovation projects at the central bank’s headquarters, officials said on Friday. US Attorney Jeanine Pirro confirmed that the criminal inquiry would be dropped, with the matter instead handed to the Federal Reserve’s internal watchdog for further review.


Get today's headlines by email

The decision follows months of political tensions surrounding the central bank and criticism from US President Donald Trump over the cost of upgrading Federal Reserve buildings in Washington.
Internal review to continue
Although the Justice Department has stepped back from the investigation, scrutiny of the renovation project will continue through the Federal Reserve’s Office of Inspector General.
Pirro said in a message posted on social media that authorities would not hesitate to reopen a criminal probe if new evidence justified doing so.
A spokesperson for the White House said the administration believed an internal review would be better suited to determine whether public funds had been mismanaged.
“American taxpayers deserve answers about the Federal Reserve’s fiscal mismanagement,” said White House spokesman Kush Desai. He added that the inspector general’s investigative powers made it “best positioned to get to the bottom of the matter”.
The central bank declined to comment on the decision. The inspector general’s office said it was actively conducting its review and would release its findings to Congress and the public once the process was complete. No timeline was provided.
Political tensions around Powell’s leadership
The investigation emerged during a prolonged dispute between Trump and Powell over monetary policy.
Trump has repeatedly urged the Federal Reserve to reduce interest rates since returning to the White House last year. Powell and other policymakers have resisted those calls, arguing that rate decisions must be guided by economic data rather than political pressure.
During the dispute, Trump publicly criticised Powell, calling him a “knucklehead” and accusing him of doing “a lousy job” for refusing to cut borrowing costs.
Lower interest rates typically stimulate borrowing and economic activity, while higher rates are used by central banks to slow spending and contain inflation.
Trump has long advocated lower rates, reflecting his background as a property developer who frequently relied on borrowed financing.
Renovation costs spark controversy
The dispute intensified last summer after Trump criticised the cost of renovation works at Federal Reserve buildings in Washington.
The president claimed the project could reach $3.1bn (£2.3bn), significantly higher than the central bank’s estimate of roughly $2.5bn.
Federal Reserve officials have said the upgrades — covering the Eccles Building and offices at 1951 Constitution Avenue — are the first major renovation works since the structures were built in the 1930s. The project includes extensive modernisation and the removal of asbestos and lead contamination.
Earlier this year Powell revealed that the Justice Department had issued subpoenas related to testimony he gave to a Senate committee about the renovation programme.
Calling the investigation “unprecedented”, Powell suggested it was linked to political pressure following the Federal Reserve’s refusal to cut interest rates.
He warned at the time that the independence of the US central bank could be at risk if monetary policy became subject to political influence.
Succession battle in the Senate
The probe also became entangled in a political dispute over Powell’s potential successor.
Powell’s term as chair is set to expire on 15 May. Trump has nominated former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh to take over the role.
However, Republican senator Thom Tillis had withheld his support for Warsh’s nomination unless the administration abandoned the investigation into Powell.
Powell has indicated he plans to remain in the position until the Senate confirms a successor.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact

US Policy Shift Sparks New Row Over Falklands Sovereignty

The UK government has reiterated that sovereignty over the Falkland Islands rests with Britain after reports suggested the United States could reconsider its stance on the disputed territory. Downing Street issued the statement following a Reuters report about an internal Pentagon email that allegedly outlined potential diplomatic measures against NATO allies considered unsupportive of the US during its war with Iran.

Get today's headlines by email

Among the options discussed in the reported message was the possibility of reviewing Washington’s position on Britain’s claim to the Falkland Islands. The email also reportedly raised the idea of seeking Spain’s suspension from NATO due to its opposition to the conflict.
The British government responded by stressing that the status of the islands is not in question.
UK Emphasises Islanders’ Right to Decide
A spokesperson for the prime minister said the Falkland Islands had voted overwhelmingly to remain a British Overseas Territory and that the government continues to support the principle of self-determination.
“The Falkland Islands have hugely voted overwhelmingly in favour of remaining a UK overseas territory,” the spokesperson said. “We have always stood behind the islanders’ right to self-determination and the fact that sovereignty rests with the UK.”
The official added that the government’s position has been communicated clearly to successive US administrations.
“We could not be clearer about the UK’s position,” the spokesperson said. “Sovereignty rests with the UK and the islanders’ right to self-determination is paramount.”
BBC News said it has not seen the reported Pentagon email and has contacted the US Department of Defense for comment.
NATO Membership Question Raised
The internal communication cited by Reuters reportedly proposed several measures involving NATO partners. One suggestion included seeking Spain’s suspension from the alliance because of its stance against the US military campaign in Iran.
However, a NATO official indicated that the organisation’s founding treaty does not contain any provision allowing for the suspension or expulsion of member states.
Spain’s Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, also played down the significance of the report, saying his government responds only to formal positions issued by Washington.
“We do not work based on emails,” he said. “We work with official documents and official positions taken, in this case, by the government of the United States.”
Long-Running Dispute With Argentina
The Falkland Islands, located in the South Atlantic about 300 miles (480km) east of Argentina, have long been the subject of a sovereignty dispute between London and Buenos Aires.
Tensions over the territory escalated in 1982 when Argentina’s military ruler at the time, Leopoldo Galtieri, ordered forces to seize the islands. Britain responded by sending a naval task force to retake the territory.
After a 10-week conflict, Argentine forces surrendered. The war resulted in the deaths of 649 Argentine military personnel, 255 British service members and three Falkland Islanders.
Argentina continues to claim sovereignty over the territory, referring to it as the Malvinas.
Diplomatic Tensions With Washington
The report about the possible policy review comes amid strains between the US and the UK over the conflict involving Iran.
President Donald Trump has previously expressed dissatisfaction with the level of British support for the US campaign. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has repeatedly said Britain will not become involved in a broader regional war.
The development also surfaced just days before King Charles and Queen Camilla were scheduled to travel to Washington for a visit that includes a meeting with President Trump at the White House.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Prince Harry Visits Kyiv, Urges End to Russia-Ukraine War

Prince Harry made an unannounced visit to Ukraine this week, where he addressed a major security conference and urged an end to the ongoing war with Russia. The Duke of Sussex appeared at the Kyiv Security Forum on Thursday, delivering a keynote speech in which he appealed directly to Russian President Vladimir Putin to halt the conflict that began with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Get today's headlines by email

Harry, the younger son of King Charles III, has visited Ukraine three times since the war began. He now lives in California with his wife, Meghan, after stepping back from official royal duties.
Appeal for an End to the War
Speaking to delegates at the conference in Kyiv, Harry called for an immediate stop to the fighting and warned of the continued human cost of the conflict.
“President Putin, no nation benefits from the continued loss of life we are witnessing,” he said during his address. “There is still a moment — now — to stop this war, to prevent further suffering for Ukrainians and Russians alike, and to choose a different course.”
The war has led to significant casualties and widespread destruction across Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion more than two years ago. Kyiv has relied heavily on support from Western allies to sustain its defence.
Harry’s remarks focused on the humanitarian toll of the war and the urgent need for political action to end the violence.
Call for Continued US Support
During the speech, the Duke also emphasised the importance of continued American backing for Ukraine as the conflict continues.
He described the situation as a test of international commitments and urged Washington to maintain its leadership role in supporting Kyiv.
“This is a moment for American leadership, a moment for America to show that it can honour its international treaty obligations,” he said. He added that such support should be seen not as charity but as part of the United States’ longstanding role in maintaining global security and stability.
The United States has been one of Ukraine’s most significant supporters since the start of the war, providing military aid, financial assistance and diplomatic backing.
Meetings with Veterans and Demining Charity
In addition to attending the forum, Harry is expected to meet participants involved in the Invictus Games, the international sporting event he founded for wounded and injured military personnel.
He is also scheduled to visit the HALO Trust, a humanitarian organisation that works to remove landmines and unexploded ordnance left behind in conflict zones around the world.
Large areas of Ukraine have been contaminated with mines and unexploded explosives during the war, creating ongoing risks for civilians and hampering reconstruction efforts.
Harry has long been involved in initiatives supporting military veterans and humanitarian causes, and his visit is seen as part of those broader efforts.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 April 2026
webfact
webfact

US Reclassifies Medical Marijuana to Lower-Risk Category

The acting head of the US Justice Department has signed an order reclassifying state-licensed medical marijuana as a less dangerous drug under federal guidelines, marking a significant shift in the government’s treatment of cannabis. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche approved the change on Thursday, moving marijuana from the most restrictive Schedule I category to Schedule III of the federal drug classification system.

Get today's headlines by email

The adjustment places state-authorised medical marijuana in the same category as certain prescription medications including ketamine and testosterone.
Shift in Federal Drug Classification
Under the federal system administered by the Drug Enforcement Administration, Schedule I substances are defined as drugs with no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Schedule III drugs are considered to have a moderate to low risk of physical or psychological dependence.
Although the change aligns federal policy more closely with laws in many US states, marijuana remains illegal under federal law.
The order does not remove cannabis from the federal controlled substances list, legalise recreational marijuana nationwide or permit sales in the same way as alcohol or tobacco.
However, officials say the reclassification could ease some regulatory and tax burdens faced by the cannabis industry and make it easier for scientists to study the drug.
In a statement posted on X, Blanche said the decision would support more rigorous research and improve access to treatment options for patients.

Administration Plans Wider Review
US President Donald Trump announced last year that his administration intended to pursue reclassification of marijuana, though it would stop short of legalising the drug for medical or recreational use at the federal level.
Blanche said the Justice Department and the DEA will now begin evaluating whether marijuana more broadly should be reclassified to Schedule III.
The DEA plans to hold a hearing in late June as part of that review.
According to the Justice Department, the hearing will provide a legal framework to assess potential wider changes to marijuana’s federal status.
Process Began Under Previous Administration
Efforts to reconsider marijuana’s classification began during the presidency of Joe Biden.
In October 2022, Biden asked the Department of Health and Human Services to review the drug’s status under federal law.
At the time, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and Attorney General Merrick Garland were tasked with initiating the administrative process.
The Department of Health and Human Services recommended in August 2023 that marijuana be moved from Schedule I to Schedule III.
The Justice Department later issued a notice of proposed rule-making in May 2024 to begin implementing the change.
A formal hearing on the proposal had been scheduled for January 2025 but was postponed shortly before it was due to begin following a judicial decision.
Widespread Use and Health Concerns
Marijuana remains the most widely used federally illegal drug in the United States.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, around 52.5 million Americans — nearly one in five — reported using cannabis at least once in 2021.
Recreational marijuana has already been fully legalised in 24 states and the District of Columbia for adults aged 21 and over, allowing possession and limited cultivation.
Public health officials say cannabis may have medical benefits but also carries risks. Research cited by the CDC links cannabis use to potential mental health issues, impaired driving and respiratory or cardiovascular problems.
About three in ten users may develop cannabis use disorder, a condition in which individuals struggle to stop using the drug despite negative health or social effects.
Health authorities also warn that cannabis can affect brain areas linked to memory, learning and decision-making, and may harm brain development in younger people. Use during pregnancy has also been associated with lower birth weight and possible developmental effects.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 April 2026
webfact
webfact

US Navy Secretary John Phelan Departs Post With Immediate Effect

The United States has announced the immediate departure of Navy Secretary John Phelan, with the Pentagon confirming that the senior civilian leader of the service has stepped down from his role. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a social media post on Wednesday that Phelan’s exit would take effect immediately. Navy Undersecretary Hung Cao will temporarily assume the position in an acting capacity. No official reason has been provided for the sudden departure.

Get today's headlines by email
Leadership changes inside the Pentagon
Phelan becomes the latest senior military figure to leave the administration of US President Donald Trump in recent months.
The change in leadership follows several other high-level removals across the US military. Earlier this year, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth asked Army Chief of Staff Randy George to step down from his post.
Two additional Army officials — David Hodne and William Green — were also removed from their roles.
Since arriving at the Pentagon, Hegseth has dismissed more than a dozen senior officers, including the chief of naval operations and the Air Force’s vice chief of staff, according to US officials.
While the Pentagon has not explained Phelan’s exit, several US media outlets have reported that tensions had emerged between him and Hegseth, particularly over the implementation of a shipbuilding programme championed by Trump.
Civilian leader of the Navy
As secretary of the Navy, Phelan served as the top civilian authority overseeing the naval service. The position is largely administrative and involves setting policy, supervising recruitment and training, managing budgets and overseeing the construction and maintenance of naval ships and facilities.
Phelan, a businessman who had not previously served in the military, was sworn in as Navy secretary in March 2025 after being nominated by Trump the previous year.
He was also known as a major donor to Trump’s political campaign.
In December, Phelan appeared with the president at Trump’s Florida residence, Mar-a-Lago, when Trump announced plans for a new fleet of heavily armed naval vessels known as the “Golden Fleet”. The proposal included ships that Trump said would be named in his honour.
Acting replacement steps in
Phelan’s acting replacement, Cao, joined the Navy leadership in October 2025 after being confirmed as undersecretary.
A 25-year Navy veteran, he previously ran for the US Senate in Virginia in 2024 with Trump’s endorsement, challenging Democratic senator Tim Kaine. Cao ultimately lost the race.
During that campaign, he criticised diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives within the US military, arguing they distracted from combat readiness.
Former State Department official Andrew Peek said the change in leadership could partly reflect frustrations over progress on naval expansion.
“Eventually, somebody was going to take the fall for the lack of movement on that,” Peek said in comments to the BBC, suggesting disagreements over fleet expansion may have contributed to the decision.
Change comes amid regional tensions
The leadership shift comes during a period of heightened tensions in the Middle East.
The US has maintained a naval blockade of Iranian ports following the recent conflict involving Israel and Iran. Fighting around the Strait of Hormuz — a key corridor for global oil shipments — has continued despite a ceasefire.
Iranian officials said two ships had been seized in the strategic waterway, while the White House signalled that the blockade would remain in place.
US officials say the situation underscores the importance of naval operations in maintaining pressure on Tehran during ongoing regional tensions.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 April 2026S
webfact
webfact

Burj Khalifa Could Lose World’s Tallest Building Title as Saudi Mega-Towers Advance

Dubai’s Burj Khalifa, the world’s tallest building for more than a decade, may soon lose its record as new skyscraper projects in Saudi Arabia move forward. Standing at 828 metres, the landmark tower has dominated global height rankings since its completion in 2010. But two ambitious developments in Saudi Arabia — one already under construction and another in the planning stages — aim to surpass it.

Get today's headlines by email

The most advanced of the projects is Jeddah Economic Company Tower, also known as JEC Tower, which is planned to exceed 1,000 metres in height. If completed as intended, the structure would become the first building to cross the one-kilometre mark and take the title from Dubai’s flagship skyscraper.
A second proposal, known as Rise Tower, has been outlined as part of a broader development in Riyadh. The project envisions a structure reaching two kilometres in height, though it remains at the design stage.
Jeddah tower construction resumes
Construction of the Jeddah Economic Company Tower has faced several interruptions since the project was first announced more than a decade ago.
Work resumed in 2025 after Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal announced the restart on social media. Shortly afterwards, Kingdom Holding Company confirmed that construction activity had officially resumed.
By March 2026, the tower had reportedly risen above its 91st floor, reaching approximately 370 metres. Construction is progressing on a five-day cycle for each floor, supported by an estimated workforce of around 5,200 people.
The skyscraper is designed to include luxury residential apartments, office space and commercial areas. Plans also feature a Four Seasons hotel and an observation deck offering views across the city of Jeddah and the Red Sea.
Glass façade installation has already begun as the building continues to rise.
Developers say the tower will form part of the first phase of Jeddah Economic Company City, a wider urban development project covering around 5.3 million square metres. The initial phase spans about 1.3 million square metres and includes core infrastructure such as electricity, water supply, sewage systems, flood drainage and high-speed internet.
The remaining construction costs — estimated at about 6 billion dirhams — are expected to be funded through internal financing and bank facilities.
Completion of the tower is currently projected for 2028.
Riyadh’s proposed “Rise Tower”
Alongside the Jeddah project, Saudi Arabia is also considering a far larger structure in Riyadh known as Rise Tower.
Global architectural firm HKS revealed concept designs for the building in 2025. Backed by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, the proposal envisions a skyscraper reaching around two kilometres in height.
If realised, the structure would significantly surpass any existing building worldwide.
The planned tower would contain about 678 floors, with space allocated for luxury hotels, offices, restaurants and observation decks.
Rise Tower is intended to anchor a large master-planned development known as the North Pole project — a proposed “city of the future” covering roughly 306 square kilometres.
However, the project remains at the design stage and a construction timeline has not yet been confirmed.
Regional rivalry in supertall towers
Dubai may also be preparing a response to the challenge.
Reports in 2024 suggested that Emaar, the developer behind the Burj Khalifa, could be working on plans for another “super tower” in the city aimed at rivaling the existing record holder.
For now, the Burj Khalifa retains its position as the tallest structure ever built. But with construction advancing in Jeddah and ambitious plans emerging in Riyadh, the skyline record could soon shift to Saudi Arabia.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Cocaine, Cannabis and Pills Sold in UK High Street Mini-Marts, Filming Shows

Cocaine, cannabis, nitrous oxide and prescription medication are being openly offered for sale in convenience stores on high streets in parts of England’s West Midlands, an undercover investigation has found. Secret filming carried out by the BBC revealed that illegal drugs were readily available in several mini-marts across four neighbouring towns. Researchers were able to purchase substances including cannabis and nitrous oxide, while cocaine could be arranged and delivered to the shops.

Get today's headlines by email

Authorities say the findings highlight how organised criminal groups are increasingly using legitimate retail premises to distribute illegal goods.
Undercover purchases in local shops
In Cradley Heath, a shop worker at a mini-mart told an undercover researcher he could supply drugs immediately. During a visit, the researcher was taken to the back of the store and sold 3.5 grams of cannabis for £30.
On a later visit, the same worker arranged for a gram of cocaine to be delivered to the shop, which he then sold for £95.
During the encounter, the worker also displayed photographs of prescription medicines available for sale, including pregabalin — a drug prescribed for conditions such as epilepsy, nerve pain and anxiety. Misuse of the medication has been linked to a rise in deaths in recent years.
When confronted afterwards about the allegations, the shop worker denied any involvement in selling drugs.
The investigation forms part of a broader review of criminal activity on high streets across the UK. An analysis of dozens of local news reports identified more than 70 shops or related premises where drugs — including heroin and crystal meth — had been discovered.
Officials from the National Crime Agency and the Chartered Trading Standards Institute say organised crime networks are increasingly exploiting retail shops as a base for illegal trading.
Concerns across Dudley borough
A few miles away in the borough of Dudley, enforcement officers say similar activity has spread along several high streets.
Kuldeep Maan, a local trading standards lead, said the sale of illegal drugs alongside counterfeit cigarettes and unregulated vape products is the worst he has seen in two decades.
During visits to shops in the towns of Lye and Brierley Hill, undercover filming captured staff offering cannabis, cannabis vape products and nitrous oxide.
Nitrous oxide — often called laughing gas — has legitimate uses in industries such as catering, but supplying or possessing it for recreational inhalation is illegal. Inhaling the gas can cause serious health problems, including potential brain damage.
At one grocery store in Dudley town centre, a researcher asking for laughing gas was instructed to wait outside. Minutes later, a hooded man arrived, accepted £25 in cash and handed over a canister of nitrous oxide.
The shop later denied the allegations.
Local traders say the activity is damaging businesses and making the area feel unsafe. One shop owner described frequent fights and violent incidents on the high street, while another said her premises had been repeatedly targeted by vandals in what she believes is an attempt to force her out.
Calls for stronger action
Reacting to the findings, Liam Byrne, chair of the UK Parliament’s Business and Trade Committee, said the scale and ease of illegal drug sales were deeply concerning.
He called for tougher laws and greater enforcement to prevent organised crime groups operating through legitimate storefronts.
A spokesperson for the Home Office said the government was working with police, the National Crime Agency and trading standards authorities to tackle criminal businesses.
Meanwhile, the Chartered Trading Standards Institute has called for stronger powers to close offending shops. At present, premises can often only be shut for up to three months under anti-social behaviour legislation.
Local authorities say enforcement operations are ongoing. Dudley Council said 42 shops have been closed since launching its Operation Clearance campaign in 2024, although officials say some offenders simply reopen nearby.


oin the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump Says King Charles Visit Could Help Repair US–UK Relations

US President Donald Trump has said that the upcoming state visit by King Charles III and Queen Camilla could help improve relations between Washington and London, as tensions linger over foreign policy and domestic issues. Speaking in a phone interview with the BBC, Trump said the visit, scheduled to begin next week, would be a positive step for the relationship between the two countries.

Get today's headlines by email

“Absolutely,” he said when asked if the trip could help repair ties. “He’s fantastic. He’s a fantastic man. Absolutely the answer is yes.”
Trump added that he had known the British monarch for many years and described him as “a brave man” and “a great man”.
The King and Queen are due to arrive in the United States on Monday for a four-day visit that will include meetings with the US president and senior officials.
State visit schedule
During their stay in Washington, King Charles is expected to hold a private meeting with Trump at the White House and deliver an address to the US Congress.
After two days in the US capital, the royal couple will travel to New York, Virginia and Bermuda before returning to the UK.

According to the UK Foreign Office, the trip is intended to mark the 250th anniversary of American independence and highlight the long-standing partnership between the two countries. Officials say the visit will celebrate shared history as well as cooperation on security and economic ties.
Differences over policy
Trump also used the interview to comment on his relationship with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, suggesting the UK leader could improve his standing if he altered certain policies.
The US president said Starmer could “recover” politically if he changed his approach to immigration and allowed expanded oil and gas extraction in the North Sea.
The remarks followed criticism Trump posted earlier this week on his social media platform Truth Social, where he described the appointment of Peter Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to the United States as “a really bad pick”.
Trump has repeatedly urged Britain to increase drilling in the North Sea, arguing that it would strengthen energy security.
Starmer responded by saying he makes decisions based on what he believes is in Britain’s national interest.
Speaking to reporters on Thursday, the prime minister said the UK would not be drawn into policies or conflicts based on outside pressure.
Iran conflict tensions
Differences have also emerged between the two leaders over the conflict involving Iran.
Trump has criticised the level of support offered by some allies, including the UK, during the crisis. Starmer has maintained that Britain would not become involved in a wider war.
Asked why he wanted allies to participate, Trump said their involvement was not essential but that he wanted to see whether they would support the United States.
“I didn’t need them at all but they should’ve been there,” he said.
The president also claimed that Iran’s military had been severely weakened and said his warnings to Tehran were aimed at encouraging negotiations.
BBC lawsuit
Towards the end of the interview, Trump referenced a defamation lawsuit he has filed against the BBC over a Panorama documentary about the 6 January 2021 attack on the US Capitol.
The case centres on how a speech Trump delivered before the riot was edited in the programme. The broadcaster previously apologised for the edit but rejected calls for compensation and has said it will defend the case in court.
A BBC spokesperson said the organisation believes there is no basis for the claim.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 April 2026
webfact
webfact

ICC Confirms Trial of Philippine Ex-President Duterte Over Drug War

Former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte will face trial for crimes against humanity after judges at the International Criminal Court confirmed charges linked to his anti-drug campaign, the court said on Thursday. The 81-year-old is accused of overseeing widespread killings during a controversial “war on drugs” carried out between 2011 and 2019. Pre-trial judges unanimously determined there were substantial grounds to believe Duterte committed the alleged crimes, allowing the case to proceed to a full trial.

Get today's headlines by email

The decision follows multiple attempts by the former leader to secure his release after spending more than a year in detention.
Court rules it has jurisdiction
Duterte has rejected the legitimacy of the proceedings, arguing that the Philippines withdrew from the ICC’s founding treaty, the Rome Statute, during his presidency in 2019.
However, judges in the court’s Pre-Trial Chamber ruled that the tribunal retains jurisdiction because the alleged crimes occurred while the Philippines was still a member state.
The court also confirmed that more than 500 victims have been authorised to participate in the proceedings.
Focus on anti-drug crackdown
At the centre of the case is Duterte’s anti-drug campaign, which drew international condemnation from human rights groups.
Critics say the campaign led to the killing of thousands of suspected drug users and small-time dealers, often without trial, while failing to dismantle major trafficking networks. Police officials have long maintained that officers used lethal force only in self-defence during anti-drug operations.
Duterte has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and dismissed the allegations against him as false.
His legal team also argued that the former president was medically unfit to stand trial, citing claims of cognitive impairment. ICC judges rejected that argument, relying on medical assessments which concluded that he is capable of participating in the proceedings and exercising his legal rights.
Political tensions behind arrest
Duterte arrived in The Hague last year after being arrested at Manila’s airport. His transfer to the court followed political tensions between his daughter, Sara Duterte, and the current Philippine president, Ferdinand Marcos Jr..
The case marks one of the most significant international legal challenges faced by a former Philippine leader.
Mixed reactions in the Philippines
The ICC’s confirmation of charges has been welcomed by several critics of Duterte’s drug war.
Former justice secretary and now lawmaker Leila de Lima, a long-time opponent of the former president, described the decision as an important step toward accountability.
She said the ruling represented a milestone for those seeking justice for victims of the anti-drug campaign, though she acknowledged that the process had taken years to reach this stage.
Human rights group Karapatan also welcomed the development, describing it as recognition of efforts by campaigners to hold officials accountable for the killings.
However, the organisation said the moment was “bittersweet”, noting that the lives lost could not be restored and that families of victims continue to struggle.
The office of the Philippine president, known as Malacañang Palace, also said it welcomed the court’s decision.
Despite the charges, Duterte continues to enjoy strong support among a section of the Philippine public, with some of his backers staging protests against his detention and the ICC case.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump to Host Lebanon, Israel Envoys at White House for Ceasefire Talks

The administration of Donald Trump will host Lebanese and Israeli representatives at the White House on Thursday for a new round of discussions aimed at extending a fragile ceasefire between the two sides. Officials in Lebanon plan to request a one-month extension of the truce, which was brokered by the United States and is scheduled to expire on Sunday. The ceasefire followed weeks of hostilities between Israel and the Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah.
The talks come as Washington seeks to stabilise tensions on the Lebanese front while broader efforts to negotiate an end to the regional conflict with Iran remain stalled.

Get today's headlines by email
Talks Move to the White House
The meeting was initially expected to take place at the US State Department, following an earlier round of negotiations last week led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, the venue was moved to the White House, where Trump will personally greet the delegations.
According to a US official speaking on condition of anonymity, the president plans to welcome the envoys upon their arrival.
Both Israel and Lebanon will be represented by their ambassadors in Washington. In addition, the US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, will participate in the discussions — an addition to the negotiating team compared with the previous round.
Lebanon Seeks Ceasefire Extension
Lebanese officials say they will formally ask for the ceasefire to be prolonged for another month. The extension request includes maintaining a halt to attacks on civilian infrastructure and populated areas.
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said the extension should also ensure an end to the destruction of homes and strikes affecting civilians, places of worship, journalists and the medical and education sectors.
A Lebanese official confirmed that Beirut intends to propose a one-month continuation of the current truce.
Aoun also expressed hope of visiting Washington to meet Trump in person. However, he rejected suggestions that he planned to hold a telephone conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, contradicting an earlier statement by Trump.
Israel and Lebanon have technically remained in a state of war for decades and have rarely held direct talks. The current negotiations represent one of the most direct diplomatic contacts between the two sides since 1993.
Violence Continues Despite Truce
Hostilities have continued even as negotiations proceed. Israeli strikes killed five people in Lebanon on Wednesday, according to local authorities.
Lebanon’s state-run news agency reported that an Israeli drone strike on Thursday targeted a vehicle near Nabatieh, about 35 kilometres north of the Israeli border.
Under the terms of the ceasefire, Israel says it retains the right to strike against threats it considers imminent.
Hezbollah said it had carried out at least two attacks on Israeli troops in southern Lebanon and claimed it had targeted an Israeli reconnaissance drone. The group described the operations as retaliation for what it called Israeli violations of the ceasefire.
Among those killed in Wednesday’s strikes was Lebanese journalist Amal Khalil.
Israeli forces have also established a security zone extending roughly 10 kilometres inside southern Lebanon, taking control of several villages near the border.
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said Hezbollah remained the primary barrier to normal relations between the two countries.
Wider Regional Tensions
The ceasefire negotiations are taking place against the backdrop of wider regional tensions involving Iran and the United States.
Tehran had previously called for a truce in Lebanon as a condition for resuming negotiations with Washington over ending weeks of fighting in the region. However, Iran declined to attend a second round of talks with the United States this week, citing a continuing US naval blockade.
Despite the impasse, Trump has said the truce with Iran would be extended indefinitely.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 April 2026
webfact
webfact

EU Clears €90bn Ukraine Loan as Oil Pipeline Restart Breaks Deadlock

The European Union has moved forward with a €90bn ($97bn) loan package for Ukraine after oil deliveries through a key pipeline to Hungary and Slovakia resumed, ending a months-long dispute that had delayed the funding.
EU ambassadors meeting in Brussels gave preliminary approval to the financial package and a new round of sanctions against Russia on Wednesday. Final sign-off from EU governments is expected on Thursday.
The breakthrough came shortly after Ukraine confirmed it had restarted the flow of Russian oil through the Druzhba pipeline following repairs to infrastructure damaged earlier this year.
Pipeline restart breaks stalemate
The loan had originally been agreed by EU leaders last December. However, Hungary’s prime minister Viktor Orbán blocked the release of the funds in February after oil shipments through Ukraine to Hungary and Slovakia were disrupted by damage caused during Russian attacks. Budapest insisted that oil deliveries resume before it would allow the financial assistance to proceed.

Get today's headlines by email

Ukrainian officials said repairs were completed this week, allowing the pipeline to be pressurised again. Slovakia’s economy minister Denisa Sakova said energy operator Ukrtransnaft informed authorities that the process began on Wednesday morning and that crude oil would start reaching Slovakia on Thursday.
Hungarian energy company Mol said it also expected the first shipments to arrive by Thursday.
A Ukrainian government source said the transit of oil restarted at 12:35 local time (09:35 GMT), although the volume of crude being pumped was not immediately clear.
Political change in Hungary
Orbán, who remains in office in a caretaker role after losing Hungary’s election last weekend, had signalled that he would remove his veto once deliveries resumed.
His defeat has also eased tensions between Budapest and Brussels. Hungary’s incoming leader, Péter Magyar, has pledged to improve relations with the EU after years of disputes over policy and funding.
During the election campaign, Orbán accused Ukraine of imposing an “oil blockade” on Hungary and Slovakia and alleged that EU institutions were siding with Kyiv.
Satellite imagery taken in January indicated that a major oil tank facility in Brody, western Ukraine, had been damaged, contributing to the interruption in supplies. Ukrainian officials said repair work had been complicated by ongoing Russian attacks.
Funding seen as vital for Kyiv
EU officials have described the loan as a crucial financial lifeline for Ukraine as the war with Russia continues.
According to Ukrainian deputy prime minister Taras Kachka, about two-thirds of the funding will be used to strengthen Ukraine’s defence capabilities, with the remainder allocated to broader financial assistance.
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said the approval would demonstrate continued European support for Kyiv.
“Ukraine really needs this loan and it’s also a sign that Russia cannot outlast Ukraine,” she said ahead of the meeting of EU ambassadors.
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky said Kyiv had fulfilled its commitments to the EU and welcomed the expected release of the funds.
“It is important that the European support package becomes operational swiftly,” he said, although Ukrainian media reported that the money may still take several weeks to reach the country.
New uncertainty over German supplies
In a separate development, Russia said it plans to halt oil flows from Kazakhstan through another section of the Druzhba pipeline that supplies Germany from 1 May.
Germany stopped importing Russian crude following Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, replacing it with oil from Kazakhstan delivered through the same network.
The PCK refinery in Schwedt, which supplies fuel and heating oil to Berlin and surrounding regions, relies heavily on those shipments.
German economy minister Katherina Reiche said alternative supply routes through the ports of Gdansk and Rostock were available and expressed confidence that production could continue without disruption.
META: The EU has moved to approve a €90bn loan for Ukraine after oil deliveries through the Druzhba pipeline resumed, ending a dispute that had led Hungary to block the funding.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 23 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications
Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.