Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.
ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

World News

Fresh news brought to you daily from around the world. Hot news, breaking stories as they happen.

Foreign Nationals Among at Least 21 Killed in Delhi B&B Fire

At least 21 people have died and dozens more were injured after a fire swept through a multi-storey building in south Delhi, according to police in the Indian capital.

Get today's headlines by email

Several of those killed were foreign nationals, including people from South Asian, African and Central Asian countries who had travelled to India for medical treatment or were accompanying relatives receiving care, local media reported.
The blaze broke out at the Flourish Stay bed-and-breakfast in the Malviya Nagar area. The property is believed to have catered primarily to patients and family members visiting a nearby private hospital.
More than 40 people were rescued and taken to hospital. Authorities have not yet confirmed how many people were inside the building when the fire started, and the cause remains under investigation.
One of Delhi's Deadliest Fires
The incident is among the deadliest fires in the Indian capital in recent years.
Fire officer AK Malik said crews brought the blaze under control quickly before conducting a full search of the building.
"The fire was brought under control quite early on - it was contained very quickly. We have now cleared the building and opened it up for the police," he said.
Delhi minister Ashish Sood said officials were investigating whether the property had the required permissions to operate as a bed-and-breakfast facility. He added that anyone found responsible for violations would face criminal action.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed condolences to the victims' families and announced compensation of 200,000 rupees ($2,088) for the families of those killed and 50,000 rupees for those injured.
Witness Accounts
Videos shared on social media showed flames engulfing the building as crowds gathered outside. Television footage later showed the structure heavily damaged while emergency teams searched for victims.
Witnesses told BBC Hindi that many people were found unconscious inside the building. Some were discovered beneath beds in hotel rooms, while others were found collapsed in washrooms.
Wasim, a local resident who helped during the rescue effort, said he found the bodies of a couple embracing inside a washroom.
Another witness said several unconscious victims were given CPR, with some successfully revived.
A shopkeeper whose business faces the building said he laid quilts on the ground to help cushion people attempting to jump from upper floors. According to witnesses, several people survived after leaping from the building.
Victims Yet to Be Identified
Authorities have not released a complete list of those killed or formally identified the victims.
Local lawmaker Satish Upadhyay said a number of people from Bangladesh and other South Asian countries were staying in the building while seeking medical treatment in Delhi.
By early evening, search and rescue operations were nearing completion, although ambulances remained on standby as crews continued clearing debris.
Safety Concerns
Fires remain a recurring problem across India, where enforcement of building safety regulations is often criticised as inadequate.
Previous investigations into major fires have highlighted issues including poor inspections, faulty electrical systems and buildings operating beyond their approved use. Incidents at factories, hospitals, coaching centres and entertainment venues have repeatedly exposed gaps between safety regulations and their enforcement.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026
webfact
webfact

US House Approves Resolution Calling for End to Iran War

The House of Representatives has approved a resolution aimed at forcing President Donald Trump to end U.S. involvement in the conflict with Iran, delivering a political victory to Democrats and a small group of Republicans who argue the war lacks proper congressional authorization.

Get today's headlines by email

The measure passed on Wednesday by a vote of 215-208. Four Republicans — Thomas Massie, Brian Fitzpatrick, Tom Barrett and Warren Davidson — joined Democrats in supporting the resolution.
Bipartisan vote in House
Although the vote does not immediately alter U.S. military policy, it places the House formally on record against a conflict that has lasted for more than three months and has contributed to economic uncertainty worldwide.
Democrats described the outcome as a significant step in challenging the administration’s handling of the war. Representative Jared Huffman said Congress was moving closer to declaring the conflict unlawful without explicit approval from lawmakers.
Senate action still pending
The resolution now heads to the Senate, where lawmakers have been considering similar efforts to limit the administration’s war powers.
Previous attempts by critics of the conflict to advance war powers measures were blocked by Republican allies of the president. Momentum shifted last month when the Senate moved forward with its own proposal after Senator Bill Cassidy changed his position and voted in favor of advancing the measure. A final Senate vote has not yet been scheduled.
In the House, Wednesday’s vote marked the fourth attempt to pass legislation seeking an end to the conflict. Earlier efforts attracted some Republican backing but fell short because of opposition from party leaders.
Most Republicans, led by House Speaker Mike Johnson, have argued that the military action does not constitute a war requiring congressional approval. Party leaders have also maintained that restricting the president’s authority during the conflict could benefit Iran’s government and undermine U.S. security interests.
Economic concerns shape debate
Support for the administration’s position has weakened as public concerns about the conflict have grown.
While Republican voters largely continue to back the war, independent voters have become increasingly skeptical as fighting has continued. The shift comes as lawmakers prepare for November’s midterm elections.
Economic pressures have played a major role in that change. Disruptions to global trade linked to the conflict have contributed to higher prices for fuel and some consumer goods. Democrats have repeatedly argued that the war has undermined Trump’s campaign promises to avoid new overseas conflicts and reduce costs for American families.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said the conflict had increased costs for consumers and called for an immediate end to the military campaign.
Dispute over presidential authority
Several Republicans supporting the resolution have pointed to the 1973 War Powers Act, which allows presidents to conduct military operations without congressional approval for a limited period. Critics argue that the legal window for the current operation expired in early May and that Congress should now decide whether military action continues.
The House measure, introduced by Representative Greg Meeks, directs the president to withdraw U.S. forces from hostilities involving Iran unless Congress issues a declaration of war or specifically authorizes military action.
Because it is a concurrent resolution, the measure requires approval from both chambers of Congress but does not go to the White House for the president’s signature. The administration has dismissed the proposal as unconstitutional and argues that active hostilities ended after Trump ordered a ceasefire on April 7.
The White House has maintained that there are currently no hostilities requiring the withdrawal of U.S. forces and has opposed the resolution on both legal and practical grounds.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Murder Charge Filed in Death of California Trump Supporter

California prosecutors have filed a murder charge against a man accused of fatally beating a 69-year-old homeowner known locally for displaying American flags and pro-Trump memorabilia outside his residence.

Get today's headlines by email

The charge against Thomas Caleb Butler, 32, was upgraded after the victim, Kerry George Sheron, died from injuries sustained during an assault outside his home in Escondido on 20 May.
Butler, a former Navy information systems technician, had initially been charged with attempted murder and pleaded not guilty during a court appearance on 22 May. Following Sheron’s death on 24 May, the San Diego County District Attorney's Office amended the case to include a murder charge.
Victim Died Four Days After Assault
According to prosecutors, Butler allegedly punched Sheron, causing him to fall, and then struck him several more times while he was on the ground.
Sheron was taken to hospital in critical condition after the attack and died four days later. Family members described him as a strong supporter of Donald Trump and said the assault was “brutal and unprovoked.”
In announcing the upgraded charge, San Diego County District Attorney Summer Stephan said the attack had left Sheron’s family and community grieving and pledged to pursue justice in the case.
Investigation Continues
Authorities have not identified a motive for the assault. However, the Escondido Police Department said investigators are examining whether the incident may have had a political element.
The attack occurred at about 2:14 p.m. local time on 20 May, when officers responded to reports of an assault at Sheron’s home. Police said they found Sheron suffering from severe injuries. A bystander who intervened was also hurt.
Investigators said the suspect had fled before officers arrived. Police later located Butler in the neighborhood after witnesses provided a description.
Potential Life Sentence
Butler remains in custody at the San Diego County Jail without bail. He is scheduled to be arraigned on the murder charge on Friday after a previous court hearing was canceled.
Prosecutors said Butler faces a potential sentence of 28 years to life in prison if convicted.
Military records provided by the Navy show Butler enlisted in December 2011, served as an information systems technician, and was discharged in January 2023.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Starmer Accuses Farage of Exploiting Nowak Murder

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has accused Nigel Farage of exploiting the murder of Henry Nowak to fuel division, as the case sparked heated exchanges in Parliament.

Get today's headlines by email

The row follows comments by Farage, who urged the public to respond with “pure, cold rage” after police arrested the 18-year-old victim while he was dying. Officers initially detained Nowak after his attacker falsely claimed he had been the target of a racist assault.
During Prime Minister’s Questions, Farage repeated his argument that the case demonstrated “two-tier policing”, claiming anti-racism guidance had encouraged officers to treat ethnic groups differently. Starmer rejected the allegation, saying the appropriate response was “serious work, not rage”.
Murder and Investigation
Vickrum Digwa, 23, was sentenced on Monday to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 21 years for killing Nowak in Southampton in December.
Digwa stabbed the teenager with a large blade that he said he carried because of his Sikh faith. He then falsely told police he had been subjected to a racist attack, leading officers to initially arrest Nowak rather than his attacker.
Body-worn camera footage released this week showed officers handcuffing the teenager as he repeatedly said he could not breathe. The incident is under investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct.
Family Urges Unity
Starmer told MPs that Nowak’s family had specifically asked for the tragedy not to be used to deepen social divisions.
He said his own response had focused on identifying lessons and ensuring justice, while accusing Farage of appealing to public anger despite the wishes of the victim’s relatives. Starmer described attempts to use the case to create “grievance and division” as unforgivable.
Outside court on Monday, Henry’s father, Mark Nowak, said the family wanted his son’s death to lead to positive change. He urged people not to use the case to promote hatred, tension or division, and said they hoped it would help make streets safer.
Political and Policing Response
Kemi Badenoch also criticised Farage, saying she was disappointed by his intervention. In the Commons, she described the case as a warning to institutions across the country and said politicians should work to unite people rather than divide them.
Ed Davey said police forces should implement any recommendations arising from the watchdog’s investigation. He added that politicians should avoid turning the teenager’s death into a political issue.
Donna Jones said Nowak’s family were distressed by violent protests that broke out in Southampton on Tuesday. She said relatives had made clear they did not support demonstrations or the unrest seen on the streets.
Meanwhile, the National Police Chiefs' Council said it would review wording in its Police Anti-Racism Commitment. The document has faced scrutiny because it states police should not necessarily treat everyone “the same” if they are seeking equal policing outcomes across ethnic groups.
Earlier, Policing Minister Sarah Jones said the wording was wrong and could create a misleading impression. However, she stressed that the document was intended as a statement of values and did not form the basis of police training or operational decisions.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Ukraine Hits St Petersburg Ahead of Economic Forum

Ukraine launched drone attacks on the outskirts of St Petersburg early on Wednesday, hours before the opening of Russia’s flagship economic forum, an event aimed at showcasing the country to international investors.

Get today's headlines by email

As daybreak approached, large columns of smoke were seen rising over areas near Russia’s second-largest city. Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to address the forum on Friday, while organisers say thousands of participants from more than 130 countries will attend.
Air Defences Activated
Russian officials said air defence systems intercepted 59 drones overnight. Authorities reported that three districts in and around St Petersburg were affected by the attacks, although no fatalities were recorded.
The strikes disrupted daily activity in the region. Mobile internet services were affected, and operations at St Petersburg’s Pulkovo Airport were briefly suspended. Air raid alerts were also reported in parts of neighbouring Latvia and Estonia.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia would respond to the attacks, describing any future action as part of a broader and systematic approach.
Claims of Hits on Military and Energy Sites
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky later confirmed that Ukrainian drones had targeted several locations inside Russia, including an oil terminal and a naval facility in Kronstadt, a town near St Petersburg.
In a social media post, Zelensky said Ukraine’s campaign of long-range strikes was progressing as planned and aimed at bringing peace closer.
Kronstadt serves as the main base of Russia’s Baltic Fleet. Videos circulating online, which could not be independently verified, appeared to show drones flying toward military vessels docked in the area. The footage ended before any impact could be seen.
Robert Brovdi, commander of Ukraine’s unmanned systems forces, said on Telegram that the Russian corvette Boikiy had been hit during the operation.
Forum Draws International Guests
The attacks took place as St Petersburg prepared to host its annual economic forum, often referred to in the past as the “Russian Davos”.
Before Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the event regularly attracted senior Western political figures, business leaders and international investors.
This year’s gathering is expected to include a small US delegation for the first time in nearly ten years. The group is being led by Rodney Mims Cook Jr, head of the US Commission of Fine Arts, who has overseen President Donald Trump’s ballroom project at the White House.
Among other attendees expected at the forum are US commentator Candace Owens and actor Steven Seagal, who has publicly expressed support for Putin.
A Ukrainian defence industry figure, Denys Shtilierman of Fire Point, appeared to reference the timing of the strikes in a post on X, sharing footage of drones and smoke near the city.
War Continues on Multiple Fronts
Since the start of Russia’s invasion, Ukraine has significantly expanded its domestic defence industry and increased its ability to conduct long-range drone operations inside Russian territory. Kyiv has frequently targeted energy and oil facilities, arguing they support Russia’s military campaign.
Meanwhile, fighting continues to cause casualties on both sides.
A Moscow-backed official in the Russian-controlled Donetsk region said seven people were killed on Wednesday when a drone struck a passenger bus.
Russia has also continued its attacks across Ukraine. On Monday night, combined missile and drone strikes killed at least 22 people in various parts of the country.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Republicans Force Trump to Scrap $1.8bn DOJ Fund

The US Department of Justice has abandoned a controversial $1.8bn (£1.3bn) compensation fund after facing fierce opposition from Republican lawmakers, marking another instance of President Donald Trump encountering resistance from within his own party.

Get today's headlines by email

The so-called "anti-weaponisation" fund was unveiled as part of a settlement linked to a lawsuit Trump withdrew against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The programme was designed to compensate people whom the administration determined had been unfairly targeted by the Biden administration.
Republican Revolt Ends Controversial Fund
The proposal immediately sparked criticism across Washington. Lawmakers from both parties objected to provisions that shielded Trump, his family and his businesses from current IRS audits. Critics also raised concerns that people convicted over the 6 January 2021 attack on the US Capitol could potentially receive compensation, a possibility administration officials declined to rule out.
Pressure Builds in Congress
Republican opposition intensified rapidly after the plan was announced in May. During a private meeting with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, several Republican senators reportedly condemned the programme, arguing it appeared to benefit the president personally.
The backlash soon extended beyond criticism. Republicans began slowing progress on legislation intended to fund US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, signalling that the fund could jeopardise one of Trump's key immigration priorities.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune publicly urged the administration to withdraw the proposal, saying the administration should resolve the matter itself.
At the same time, Democrats vowed to oppose related legislation, while legal challenges were filed seeking to block the programme. A federal judge later ordered the Justice Department to suspend the fund while litigation proceeded.
A Pattern of Republican Resistance
The collapse of the fund reflects a broader trend during Trump's second term, with some Republicans showing a greater willingness to challenge the president when they believe he has overreached.
Recent examples include Republican support for efforts to limit the duration of US military involvement in Iran and votes compelling the Justice Department to release files connected to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Unlike previous controversies, many Republicans were quick to criticise the DOJ fund and few publicly defended it. Some viewed the initiative as a political liability at a time when Trump is dealing with a costly conflict involving Iran, rising fuel prices and weak approval ratings ahead of midterm elections.
A former Trump adviser described the proposal as a needless political mistake that risked harming Republicans electorally.
Fund Cancelled but Dispute Continues
After initially suspending the programme, Blanche confirmed on Tuesday that the administration would not proceed with the fund.
However, questions remain over whether the issue is fully resolved. Blanche declined to commit the decision to writing, prompting some critics to worry that a future administration could attempt to revive the concept.
Democratic and Republican lawmakers have already proposed legislation that would restrict presidents from using taxpayer funds to reward political allies. Republican Senator Thom Tillis argued that formally ending the programme was the only way to bring the controversy to a close.
Democrats, meanwhile, have pledged to continue pursuing legal and legislative action. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said the administration's verbal commitment was insufficient and called for permanent legal measures to prevent any similar fund from being created in the future.
Political Fallout Ahead
Although the programme lasted only two weeks, it has become a significant political flashpoint. Democrats are expected to use the controversy in campaign messaging ahead of the upcoming midterm elections, while Republicans continue to seek safeguards against similar initiatives.
The episode underscores the limits of Trump's influence within his party and highlights growing signs that some Republican lawmakers are prepared to oppose the president when they believe his actions could damage the party politically or raise concerns about the use of executive power.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026
webfact
webfact

US Strikes Iran After Drone Attack on Kuwait Airport

The United States and Iran exchanged new attacks overnight, as Kuwait said Iranian drones struck buildings, including its international airport, killing one person and injuring more than 60 others.

Get today's headlines by email

The US military said it carried out what it described as self-defence strikes on Iran's Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz and intercepted missiles and drones launched by Tehran towards Gulf countries and shipping in the region.
According to US Central Command (Centcom), the operation targeted an Iranian military ground control station after what it called attempted Iranian attacks across the Middle East. Centcom said Iran fired two missiles towards Kuwait and three towards Bahrain, but all either broke apart or were intercepted before reaching their targets.
Iran confirmed it had launched missiles and drones against US military assets in what it described as a regional country, saying the attacks were retaliation for recent American actions.
Kuwaiti officials said drones hit several sites, including Kuwait International Airport. The country's defence ministry spokesman, Brig Gen Saud Abdulaziz Al-Otaibi, condemned the incident as “criminal Iranian aggression”. Kuwait's foreign ministry later reported damage to infrastructure and diplomatic missions.
Strait of Hormuz Tensions
Centcom also said US forces shot down three Iranian attack drones that were heading towards civilian vessels navigating regional waters.
Earlier, the command announced that it had disabled an oil tanker travelling towards Iran as part of the US naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which began on 13 April.
The military said a US aircraft fired a Hellfire missile into the engine room of the Botswana-flagged vessel after its crew ignored repeated warnings. The tanker was reportedly not carrying cargo at the time.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps warned that any effort to disrupt security in the strategic waterway would come at a significant cost for US forces.
A separate statement from Iran's foreign ministry accused the leaders of Kuwait and Bahrain of bearing “direct and unmistakable responsibility” for what it called acts of aggression and also criticised the United States for its military strikes.
Ceasefire Talks Remain Stalled
The latest violence comes as efforts to negotiate a ceasefire between Washington and Tehran remain deadlocked.
US President Donald Trump has continued to express optimism about a potential agreement, saying this week that Iran wants a deal and that it would be beneficial for the United States.
Reports in US media suggested Trump recently sought changes to a proposed peace framework following discussions with senior advisers. The reported revisions involved the future of the Strait of Hormuz, the removal of highly enriched uranium from Iran, and a framework for renewed talks on Tehran's nuclear programme.
However, Iran's foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei rejected those reports, accusing Washington of repeatedly altering its positions and introducing contradictory demands.
Trump Signals Possible Meeting
In an interview broadcast on Wednesday, Trump said Iran had already agreed not to pursue a nuclear weapon and suggested discussions with Iranian leadership were progressing.
The president said Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei was involved in the talks and indicated that a meeting could take place in the future.
Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers that sanctions relief had not been offered in exchange for reopening the Strait of Hormuz. He said any easing of sanctions would depend on actions linked to Iran's nuclear programme.
Rubio also defended the administration's approach during a tense congressional hearing, insisting that the conflict had ended despite continuing military exchanges between the two sides.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 3 June 2026
webfact
webfact

US Targets 60 Trade Partners With New Forced-Labour Tariffs

The United States has announced plans to impose new tariffs on imports from 60 major trading partners, citing concerns that they have not done enough to prevent the importation of goods produced with forced labour.

Get today's headlines by email

The proposed duties, ranging from 10% to 12.5%, mark the second major tariff initiative by President Donald Trump’s administration since the US Supreme Court struck down many of its earlier import taxes in February.
According to the US Trade Department, the measures are aimed at countries that have failed to adequately prohibit or enforce restrictions on goods linked to forced labour. The 60 economies identified account for approximately 99.4% of US imports and include key trading partners such as the United Kingdom, the European Union, Canada, India, Japan and China.
Findings of US Investigation
The tariff proposal follows an investigation launched in March by US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer into whether major US trading partners had taken sufficient action against forced-labour imports.
The resulting report found that 54 countries had failed to establish and effectively enforce legal bans on the importation of goods produced wholly or partly through forced labour. It also concluded that six others — Canada, the European Union, Ecuador, Indonesia, Mexico and Pakistan — had not effectively enforced existing prohibitions.
Greer said the practice creates unfair competition for US workers.
“American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field,” he said.
The tariffs have not yet taken effect and must go through a formal implementation process before they can be enforced.
Countries Facing Proposed Duties
Under the proposal, imports from Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom, Indonesia, Mexico, Pakistan, Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Malaysia and Taiwan would face a 10% tariff.
The remaining 45 countries, including China and India, would be subject to a higher 12.5% duty.
International Pushback
Several governments quickly rejected Washington’s justification for the measures.
A UK government spokesperson said Britain was actively addressing forced labour risks both domestically and within international supply chains, adding that discussions with the US administration were continuing.
China denied allegations that goods produced with forced labour enter its export supply chains. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said Beijing opposed unilateral tariffs and rejected what she described as attempts to politicise the issue.
The European Commission also criticised the proposal, describing tariffs imposed on those grounds as unjustified while reaffirming its commitment to implementing trade commitments agreed with Washington last year.
India Questions Legal Basis
In India, trade analyst Ajay Srivastava of the Global Trade Research Initiative argued that New Delhi should challenge the legal foundation of the proposed tariffs.
He said the measures appeared to stretch the scope of Section 301, the US law used to investigate and respond to trade practices considered unfair. Srivastava characterised the move as part of broader US pressure tactics and said it should remain separate from ongoing trade negotiations.
Latest Move in Trump's Trade Agenda
The announcement comes months after the Supreme Court ruled that Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, introduced in April 2025, were unlawful.
Following that ruling, the administration introduced a temporary global tariff of 10%, though Trump and other officials have repeatedly said the rate could eventually rise to 15%.
The temporary measure is currently due to expire in July unless Congress acts to extend it.
The latest proposal signals the administration’s continued focus on using trade policy to address labour and supply-chain concerns while increasing pressure on major US trading partners.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 3 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Men Climb Out of New York Sewers in Mystery Incidents

New York City police are investigating a series of incidents after videos surfaced showing groups of men climbing into and out of the city's sewer network in Brooklyn and Queens.

Get today's headlines by email

Authorities believe the individuals may be searching for valuables beneath the streets, according to US media reports citing police sources. Investigators have not confirmed whether the same group is involved in all of the cases.
Surveillance Footage Raises Questions
Several videos recorded in recent weeks show men removing manhole covers before descending into the sewer system. In one clip, a group is seen entering through a manhole and emerging several hours later.
The unusual activity has prompted an ongoing police investigation as officials work to identify those involved and determine their motives.
Police Respond to Reports
Last week, officers received reports of unidentified individuals lifting manhole covers and entering the sewer system.
According to the New York Police Department, the suspects later left the area in an unidentified vehicle.
“The individuals then fled the location in an unknown vehicle to parts unknown,” the department told the BBC.
Police said no injuries were reported. No arrests have been made, and the investigation remains active.
Officials Warn of Serious Risks
City officials stressed that entering the sewer network is both unlawful and highly dangerous.
A spokesperson for New York City's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) warned that sewers contain a range of hazards, including toxic gases, unstable surfaces, flooding dangers and confined spaces that can quickly become life-threatening.
The department urged members of the public not to enter any sewer-related infrastructure, including pipes, drains, catch basins, manholes or outfalls.
‘Treasure Hunters’ Suspected
Police sources told CBS News that the men seen in the videos are believed to be urban explorers or self-described “treasure hunters” searching for valuables that may have ended up in the sewer system.
Authorities have not publicly confirmed that theory, and investigators are continuing to examine the incidents.
If identified and arrested, the individuals could face burglary-related charges.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 3 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Senior Iranian Commander Warns US Conflict Is ‘Inevitable’

A senior Iranian military official has said that renewed conflict between Iran and the United States is unavoidable unless Tehran accepts Washington’s demands, as diplomatic efforts between the two countries appear to have reached an impasse.

Get today's headlines by email

Mohammad Jafar Assadi, deputy head of Iran’s central military command, Khatam al-Anbiya, said the United States was seeking Iran’s complete capitulation and that such a demand would never be accepted by the Iranian people.
“The United States demands our total surrender, and the Iranian nation will never surrender,” Assadi said.
‘War Is Inevitable’
Assadi argued that if Iran refuses to yield to U.S. demands, armed conflict would be unavoidable.
“Without surrender, war is inevitable,” he said.
Rising Tensions
The remarks come as negotiations between Tehran and Washington appear to be losing momentum, raising concerns about a further deterioration in relations between the two longtime adversaries.
The comments are among the strongest public warnings from a senior Iranian military figure in recent months and underscore growing tensions as diplomatic efforts struggle to make progress.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Compiled from various sources. 3 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump Taps Bill Pulte as Acting Intelligence Chief

President Donald Trump has appointed Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director Bill Pulte as acting director of national intelligence, replacing Tulsi Gabbard, who is due to leave the position on June 30.

Get today's headlines by email

Trump announced the decision on Tuesday, saying Pulte would continue to lead the FHFA while also remaining chairman of mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The move places a housing finance official with no apparent intelligence background at the helm of the U.S. intelligence community, at least on an interim basis.
Dual Roles to Continue
In announcing the appointment, Trump highlighted Pulte's experience overseeing the U.S. housing finance system and managing the government-backed mortgage giants.
Trump said Pulte had handled some of the country's most sensitive financial responsibilities, pointing to his oversight of more than $10 trillion in assets tied to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The president also praised what he described as growth in the value of the two institutions during Pulte's tenure.
Pulte will continue serving in his existing positions while carrying out the duties of acting director of national intelligence.
Scrutiny Over Previous Investigations
Pulte is best known within the administration for initiating investigations into several figures viewed by Trump as political opponents. Those inquiries focused on allegations of mortgage fraud and potential misuse of authority.
Among those targeted were Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, New York Attorney General Letitia James, Democratic Senator Adam Schiff and former Representative Eric Swalwell. All have denied any wrongdoing.
At one point, the Department of Justice examined whether Pulte and members of his team had interfered with ongoing investigations. No allegations of wrongdoing were brought against Pulte.
Gabbard's Departure
Gabbard announced last month that she would step down from her role because of her husband's battle with bone cancer.
Following her resignation announcement, Trump praised her performance as director of national intelligence, describing her work as "incredible" and saying the administration would miss her.
The president had previously indicated that Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence Aaron Lukas would take over as acting DNI after Gabbard's departure.
However, Tuesday's announcement confirmed that Pulte would instead assume the position on an interim basis.
Senate Approval Needed for Permanent Role
Pulte's appointment is temporary. Should Trump decide to nominate him to serve as director of national intelligence on a permanent basis, the nomination would require confirmation by the U.S. Senate.
The appointment marks an unexpected shift in leadership for the intelligence community as the administration prepares for Gabbard's departure at the end of the month.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 3 June 2026
webfact
webfact

UN Warns World to Brace for El Niño's Return

The United Nations has warned countries to prepare for the likely return of El Niño, a climate phenomenon that can intensify extreme weather and push global temperatures higher.

Get today's headlines by email

According to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), there is an 80% chance that El Niño conditions will develop before September and a 90% probability they will emerge before November. Most forecasting models indicate the event will be at least moderate in strength, with some suggesting it could become strong.
While some scientists have previously suggested the coming event could be among the strongest of the century, the WMO said uncertainty remains and stopped short of endorsing those projections.
WMO Secretary-General Celeste Saulo said forecast models continue to show a wide range of possible outcomes, with some indicating a strong event and others not.
UN Chief Issues Warning
UN Secretary-General António Guterres described the development as an urgent climate warning, saying El Niño would amplify the effects of an already warming planet.
The previous El Niño episode, which occurred during 2023-24, ranked among the five strongest on record and contributed to exceptionally high global temperatures in 2024, when worldwide heat records were broken.
The WMO said above-average temperatures are expected across most regions of the world during the next three months. It also warned that the phenomenon increases the likelihood of severe rainfall and drought in different parts of the globe.
Regional Weather Impacts
Although every El Niño event differs, the pattern is typically associated with heavier rainfall in parts of South America, the southern United States, the Horn of Africa and Central Asia.
At the same time, drier-than-normal conditions often affect Central America, northern areas of South America, the Caribbean, Australia, Indonesia and parts of South Asia.
El Niño can also influence tropical storms by increasing hurricane activity in the central and eastern Pacific Ocean while suppressing storm formation in the Atlantic.
The warning comes after western Europe experienced unusually high temperatures in May, with monthly heat records broken in both the UK and Ireland. Earlier forecasts from the WMO and the UK Met Office suggested a new global temperature record is highly likely before the end of the decade, with El Niño potentially helping to drive that outcome as early as 2027.
Concerns Over Food Security
Gareth Redmond-King of the Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit said the prospect of another El Niño raises concerns for global food production, which is already facing pressure from climate-related disruptions and constraints on fertilizer supplies.
Scientists say El Niño develops when the trade winds that normally push warm surface waters westward across the Pacific weaken or reverse direction. This allows warmer waters to spread eastward, altering weather patterns worldwide.
The WMO reported that Pacific Ocean temperatures were approaching El Niño thresholds between late April and mid-May and that atmospheric conditions were also becoming consistent with the phenomenon's development.
The agency rejected the term “super El Niño,” saying it is not part of the official classification system.
Officials also stressed the importance of early-warning systems, which help communities prepare for disasters and have reduced loss of life in many regions. However, the WMO noted that some major donors, including the UK and the US, have recently reduced aid budgets that help fund such programs.
Guterres said the long-term response must include faster action to reduce fossil fuel use, expand renewable energy, protect vulnerable populations and ensure universal access to early-warning systems.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 3 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Henry Nowak Arrest Footage Sparks Fury Across Britain

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said there are “serious questions” for police after the release of bodycam footage showing officers’ response to the fatal stabbing of university student Henry Nowak in Southampton.

Get today's headlines by email

The footage emerged a day after Vickrum Digwa, 23, was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 21 years for murdering the 18-year-old with a 21cm blade. Digwa falsely told officers at the scene that he had been the victim of a racist attack.
The video shows Nowak, who had suffered fatal stab wounds, being handcuffed and repeatedly telling officers that he could not breathe.
Questions Over Police Response
Speaking to broadcasters, Starmer described the footage as “really harrowing” and said watching it had made him feel sick.
He said there were important questions about how allegations of racism may have influenced decisions made by officers at the scene.
An investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is continuing. Starmer said he would not rule out a wider inquiry but stressed that the watchdog should first complete its work.


Henry Nowak

Nowak’s family have strongly criticised the officers’ actions. His father, Mark Nowak, said his son repeatedly told police he had been stabbed and could not breathe, but was nevertheless handcuffed and treated as a suspect.
He described the difference in treatment between his son and Digwa as “unbearable” and said Henry should not have died on a Southampton street while in police custody.
Judge William Mousley KC later stated during sentencing that the severity of Nowak’s injuries meant he would not have survived, regardless of how quickly first aid or medical treatment was provided.
Political Row Intensifies
The case has triggered sharp political debate.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood warned against threats and misinformation linked to public reaction to the case. She revealed that one police officer had been forced to relocate after being wrongly identified online as being involved.
Mahmood also criticised attempts to politicise the murder, insisting that police must act without fear or favour and that everyone is equal before the law.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage argued that the case reflected what he called a “two-tier Britain”, claiming officers appeared to place greater weight on a false allegation of racism than on the condition of a dying victim.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp similarly questioned whether police focused too heavily on the racism allegation rather than helping Nowak.
The prime minister’s spokesman rejected claims of “two-tier policing”.
Meanwhile, Labour MP Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi accused some political figures of unfairly blaming the Sikh community for the actions of a single offender.
Protests and Further Legal Proceedings
Tensions spilled onto the streets of Southampton on Tuesday evening, when several hundred people gathered near the scene of the killing. Riot police clashed with some protesters after objects including bricks, bins and an e-scooter were thrown at officers.
The demonstration had been promoted by far-right activist Tommy Robinson.


Vickrum Digwa. Police handout

Separately, the Attorney General’s Office is considering whether Digwa’s sentence should be reviewed under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme following multiple requests.
Although practising Sikhs are legally permitted to carry a small ceremonial kirpan for religious reasons, prosecutors said the weapon used in the attack was significantly larger and worn openly outside Digwa’s clothing.
Digwa’s family apologised to the Nowak family and said they were deeply saddened by the killing.
His mother, Kiran Kaur, was convicted of assisting an offender after attempting to hide the murder weapon and will be sentenced in July. His father, Moga Singh, and brother, Gurpreet Digwa, appeared in court on separate weapons-related charges and were released on unconditional bail.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 3 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Hegseth Blocks Several Navy 1-Star Promotions

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has blocked the promotion of several senior Navy officers to the rank of one-star admiral, according to sources familiar with the decision, marking another unusual intervention in the military promotion process.

Get today's headlines by email

The move follows Hegseth's earlier involvement in recent Army promotion decisions and highlights his growing influence over senior military appointments since taking office.
Officers Removed From Promotion List
The officers had already been selected for promotion by a board of senior Navy admirals before being removed from the final list. The Pentagon publicly released the promotion list on May 22.
According to sources, those removed included African American officers, women and white male officers. The reasons varied, but some were linked to participation in or association with military Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs.
Defense secretaries have the authority to alter promotion lists for cause, but such interventions are relatively uncommon, particularly when they involve multiple officers who have already been recommended by a promotion board.
Effort to Advance Senior Aide
Sources also said Hegseth sought to have one of his senior military aides included on the promotion list or otherwise promoted.
The officer, William Francis Jr.>, is a Navy SEAL captain serving as Hegseth's assistant. However, Francis was not considered by the promotion board because he did not meet certain eligibility requirements, including experience leading a major command, according to sources.
The promotion block and Hegseth's efforts regarding Francis were first reported by The New York Times.
Focus on DEI Policies
Hegseth has repeatedly argued that policies introduced under previous administrations contributed to what he describes as a "woke" military. Since becoming defense secretary, he has pledged to remove initiatives and programs that he believes place excessive emphasis on diversity and inclusion.
His criticism comes as minority groups account for a growing share of military personnel and as women continue to gain representation in senior leadership positions across the armed forces.
The latest promotion dispute is likely to draw further scrutiny of the Pentagon's personnel policies and the extent of political influence over military advancement decisions.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 3 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Trump to Netanyahu on Lebanon: ‘What the F— Are You Doing?’

President Donald Trump reportedly confronted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a phone call on Monday, expressing anger over Israel's military actions in Lebanon and urging restraint, according to a report citing U.S. officials and a source familiar with the conversation.

Get today's headlines by email

Axios reported that Trump criticized Netanyahu's handling of the situation, describing him as acting recklessly and expressing frustration over what he viewed as a lack of appreciation for U.S. support. According to the report, Trump at one point reportedly yelled at Netanyahu, “What the f— are you doing?”.
Tensions Over Beirut Operations
The reported exchange came after Netanyahu ordered the Israeli military to strike Hezbollah targets in Beirut's Dahiyeh district earlier on Monday.
Israel and Hezbollah have continued to exchange fire since October 2023. Although a ceasefire took effect in November 2024, hostilities have not fully ceased, with both sides accusing the other of violations.
Iranian officials condemned the latest Israeli strikes, arguing they breached a broader ceasefire arrangement reached on April 7. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the agreement covered all fronts, including Lebanon, and warned that violations could have wider consequences.
Trump Claims Israeli Raid Was Averted
Following the call, Trump characterized his discussion with Netanyahu as productive and claimed he had persuaded the Israeli leader not to carry out a major operation in Beirut.
In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said he asked Netanyahu to avoid a large-scale raid on the Lebanese capital and asserted that Israeli forces had been pulled back.
Trump also said he had spoken with representatives linked to Hezbollah and claimed both sides had agreed to halt attacks against one another. He expressed hope that any renewed cessation of hostilities would endure.
Netanyahu Maintains Military Pressure
Netanyahu later offered a different emphasis in remarks posted on X. He said he informed Trump that Israel would continue to strike targets in Beirut if Hezbollah failed to stop attacks on Israeli civilians and communities.
The Israeli leader also stated that the Israel Defense Forces would continue planned operations in southern Lebanon, signaling that military pressure on Hezbollah would remain in place despite Trump's reported intervention.
Ceasefire Under Strain
The differing public statements highlighted continuing tensions over the fragile ceasefire and the broader regional security situation.
While Trump presented the conversation as having helped prevent a major escalation in Beirut, Netanyahu reiterated Israel's readiness to conduct further military action if Hezbollah attacks persist.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Russian Missile and Drone Attacks Kill 16 Across Ukraine

Russia launched a large-scale missile and drone attack across Ukraine overnight, killing at least 16 people, including two children, in one of the most extensive assaults carried out by Moscow in recent months.

Get today's headlines by email

Ukrainian officials said 11 people died in the southeastern city of Dnipro after an apartment building was struck, while another five people were killed in the capital, Kyiv. Dozens more were injured as attacks hit multiple regions across the country.
Heavy Casualties in Dnipro and Kyiv
Among those killed in Dnipro were an eight-year-old boy and a woman whose body was recovered from the rubble of a damaged apartment block. Regional authorities said another child also died in the strike.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said part of the residential building had been “essentially demolished” by the attack.
More than 70 people were reported injured in Dnipro and Kyiv. In the northeastern city of Kharkiv, authorities said 10 people were wounded, including a child.
Hundreds of Drones and Missiles Fired
According to Zelensky, Russia launched 656 strike drones and 73 missiles of various types during the overnight assault, including ballistic, cruise and anti-ship missiles.
The president said civilian infrastructure and energy facilities were targeted nationwide, with the main focus on Kyiv. He reported damage to dozens of residential buildings and other civilian sites in the capital.
Large plumes of smoke rose over Kyiv on Tuesday morning as air raid sirens sounded. City officials warned residents of incoming ballistic missiles and urged them to remain in shelters.
Mayor Vitali Klitschko said fires broke out near a petrol station, a construction site, several apartment blocks and private homes. Power outages were also reported in parts of the city.
Russia Says Strikes Were Retaliation
Russia's defence ministry said the attacks were carried out in response to previous Ukrainian operations and claimed all intended targets had been successfully hit.
The assault followed warnings from Moscow last week that it would conduct “systematic strikes” after accusing Ukraine of carrying out a deadly attack on a student dormitory in Russian-occupied eastern Ukraine. Kyiv has said its operation targeted a Russian military unit.
On Monday evening, Zelensky warned that a major Russian attack could be imminent and urged Ukrainians to pay close attention to air raid alerts.
Calls for More Air Defence Support
Following the strikes, Zelensky renewed calls for additional Western military assistance, particularly interceptor missiles for Patriot air defence systems.
He said Ukraine urgently needed further supplies from the United States to strengthen its ability to defend against missile attacks. Shortages of Patriot missiles have become a growing concern as demand for the systems has increased globally.
Since returning to office last year, Donald Trump has halted direct U.S. military supplies to Ukraine, leading European allies to purchase American equipment before transferring it to Kyiv.
Continuing Escalation
The latest barrage is part of a renewed cycle of attacks following the expiry of a brief ceasefire in May. Russia has since launched several major strikes on Kyiv, including an earlier attack on a residential block that killed 24 people, among them three children.
Ukraine has also conducted attacks inside Russia, including a recent strike in the Moscow region that Russian officials said killed three people. Zelensky described that operation as justified.
Ukraine's government accused Russia of using threats and military escalation as pressure tactics and called on international partners to increase support and pressure on Moscow as the war, which began with Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, continues.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026
webfact
webfact

U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Removal of Transgender Troops

A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that the Trump administration’s policy targeting transgender military personnel is likely unconstitutional, allowing transgender service members who brought the lawsuit to remain in the armed forces while the case proceeds through the courts.

Get today's headlines by email

In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld a lower court order preventing the Department of Defense from removing active-duty personnel because of gender dysphoria. However, the ruling does not stop the Pentagon from restricting transgender individuals from joining the military.
Judge Robert Wilkins, writing for the majority, said the policy introduced under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared arbitrary and motivated by hostility toward a politically unpopular group.
“At this preliminary stage,” Wilkins wrote, “the Hegseth Policy is both arbitrary and based upon animus,” concluding that it likely violates constitutional guarantees of equal protection.
Court Draws Distinction Between Recruits and Serving Personnel
The appeals court emphasized that active-duty personnel face more immediate and significant harm than prospective recruits.
According to the ruling, individuals seeking to join the military could pursue legal remedies later if the policy is ultimately struck down. By contrast, service members facing discharge could suffer irreparable damage to their military careers.
Wilkins noted that even if dismissed personnel were eventually reinstated, ending a military career would impose a far greater hardship than delaying the start of one.
As a result, the court allowed protections for the plaintiffs currently serving while leaving recruitment restrictions in place during the ongoing litigation.
LGBTQ Advocacy Groups Welcome Decision
Attorneys representing the transgender service members described the ruling as a major victory.
GLAD Law Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights Jennifer Levi said the decision confirmed there was no legitimate basis for discharging transgender personnel who had met military standards and demonstrated their ability to serve.
National Center for LGBTQ Rights Legal Director Shannon Minter called the ruling a “dramatic shift in the status quo,” noting that some service members had been preparing to face review boards and possible discharge despite years of service.
Dissent Warns Against Judicial Intervention
Judge Justin Walker, the lone dissenter on the panel, argued that courts should defer to military and political leaders on decisions regarding military personnel.
Walker acknowledged the rights at issue but said service members do not enjoy all the same protections as civilians. He argued that judges lack the expertise and constitutional authority to determine who may serve in the armed forces.
“The Constitution assigns that authority to Congress and the Commander in Chief,” he wrote.
The Department of Defense did not immediately comment on the ruling.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026

webfact
webfact

U.K. Bars U.S. Commentators From Entry Ahead of Events

Two prominent U.S. political commentators, Cenk Uygur and Hasan Piker, have been denied entry to the United Kingdom after British authorities concluded their presence would not be conducive to the public good.

Get today's headlines by email

The pair had been scheduled to take part in events linked to the London edition of SXSW and other speaking engagements. Uygur, co-founder of The Young Turks, and Piker, a popular Twitch streamer known online as HasanAbi, both said the decision was linked to their criticism of Israel.
Entry Clearance Revoked
Uygur announced on social media that he had been prevented from boarding a flight to London, where he was due to attend SXSW London and speak at Oxford. He claimed the move was retaliation for his views on Israel and questioned whether Western governments were suppressing political dissent.
Piker later said British authorities had also revoked his entry clearance. He similarly argued that the decision was connected to his criticism of Israel and accused Western governments of abandoning liberal values.
The U.K. Home Office confirmed that both men had been refused entry following an assessment of potential risks they might pose to British society. Officials said their presence in the country had been judged to be “not conducive to the public good.”
According to reports in The Times, the decision was linked to concerns that their appearances could contribute to antisemitism in Britain.
Criticism and Controversy
Piker has faced criticism in the past for remarks concerning Hamas and other controversial political statements. He was previously suspended by Twitch over content that violated platform standards and drew backlash in 2019 after saying that “America deserved 9/11,” a comment for which he later apologised.
He has also described himself as “anti-Israel” rather than antisemitic. Uygur, meanwhile, has repeatedly condemned Israel’s military actions in Gaza, describing them as “barbaric.”
Their planned participation at SXSW London had already attracted opposition from some groups. The Community Security Trust, a British Jewish charity focused on antisemitism and community security, urged organisers to reconsider hosting Piker and argued that the U.K. should not provide a platform to individuals who spread hatred or legitimise extremism.
Following the government’s decision, the organisation said there should be consequences for public figures who cross the line into hate speech.
Divided Political Reaction
The move has prompted sharply differing reactions.
British journalist and activist Ash Sarkar, who had been due to moderate a discussion involving Piker, criticised the government’s decision. She argued that ministers were motivated by concerns over accusations of antisemitism and criticism of their stance on the war in Gaza.
Others welcomed the decision. David Taylor, a member of Parliament, said there was no justification for admitting people who promote division or who have expressed support for a banned terrorist organisation.
Event May Proceed Remotely
Although Uygur and Piker have been blocked from entering the country under current arrangements, they remain eligible to apply for visas. Any applications would be considered individually by British authorities.
However, with SXSW London beginning this week, it is considered unlikely that any review process would be completed in time for them to attend in person.
Event organisers have indicated that remote participation remains a possibility.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Serena Williams Returns at Queen’s After Four-Year Absence

Serena Williams is set to make a surprise return to competitive tennis after nearly four years away from the sport, accepting a wildcard entry for the women’s doubles event at Queen’s Club later this month.

Get today's headlines by email

The 23-time Grand Slam singles champion will partner Canadian teenager Victoria Mboko at the WTA 500 tournament, which begins on 8 June in London. The appearance will mark Williams’ first competitive match since the 2022 US Open, ending an absence of 196 weeks from the tour.
Williams, now 44, stepped away from tennis in 2022, saying she had “evolved away” from the sport following one of the most successful careers in history. Speculation about a possible comeback emerged last year when her name appeared in the sport’s anti-doping testing pool. Those rumours intensified after she was listed among player reinstatements by the International Tennis Integrity Agency in February.
On Monday, Williams appeared to confirm the news through social media, posting a video of herself walking onto a tennis court alongside the message: “Guess everybody heard the news.” Another accompanying post read: “Good news travels fast.”
In a statement, Williams said Queen’s Club was the ideal venue for her return.
“Queen’s Club feels like the perfect place to begin this next chapter,” she said. “Grass has given me some of the most meaningful moments of my career and I'm excited to be back competing on one of the sport’s most iconic stages.”
Partnership with Rising Star
Williams will team up with 19-year-old Victoria Mboko, one of the brightest young talents in women’s tennis. Mboko, who has rapidly risen through the rankings, recently reached the third round of the French Open before losing to former Australian Open champion Madison Keys.
The Canadian has previously described Williams as her idol, making the partnership one of the most talked-about stories ahead of the tournament.
Wimbledon Questions Emerge
Williams’ return is likely to fuel speculation about a potential appearance at Wimbledon, which begins three weeks after Queen’s. The seven-time Wimbledon singles champion would require a wildcard to enter the tournament.
Her record on grass is among the strongest in the sport’s history, with seven singles and seven doubles titles at the All England Club.
Former world number one John McEnroe suggested a Wimbledon singles return could be the next step.
“If Serena Williams is the greatest of all time and is coming back, she's not coming back because she's happy to play,” McEnroe told TNT Sports. “She wants to win another major.”
One of Tennis’ Greatest Careers
Williams retired with 23 Grand Slam singles titles, the highest total in the Open era and second only to Margaret Court’s 24 major championships in women’s tennis history.
She spent 319 weeks ranked world number one and won 73 WTA singles titles. Alongside her sister Venus Williams, she captured 14 Grand Slam doubles crowns and three Olympic doubles gold medals, in addition to her singles gold medal at the London 2012 Olympics.
Williams also achieved a career Golden Slam in both singles and doubles, winning every Grand Slam title and Olympic gold during her career. Even after becoming a mother in 2017, she returned to reach four Grand Slam finals and re-enter the world’s top 10.
Her comeback at Queen’s will provide one of the most anticipated moments of the grass-court season and could signal a remarkable new chapter in an already historic career.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Compiled from various sources. 2 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Hungarian PM Moves to Remove President Sulyok

Hungary's new prime minister, Péter Magyar, has announced plans to amend the constitution to remove President Tamás Sulyok after the head of state refused to resign.

Get today's headlines by email

Magyar had pledged to replace Sulyok and other senior officials appointed during the rule of former prime minister Viktor Orbán. Following his landslide election victory in April, he renewed calls for the president to step down and set a deadline of 31 May for his resignation.
Sulyok, who became president in February 2024 with the backing of Orbán's Fidesz party, has repeatedly rejected those demands and insists he will complete his five-year term.
President Refuses to Resign
The dispute intensified on Monday after a meeting between the two men failed to produce a breakthrough.
Sulyok again refused to leave office, warning that the growing constitutional confrontation could deepen political divisions and damage Hungary's democratic reputation abroad.
Magyar has accused the president of acting in the interests of the previous government rather than serving as an impartial head of state. In a post on X, he criticised Sulyok for failing to defend vulnerable people, the rule of law and those facing political attacks.
Fidesz has condemned Magyar's efforts, describing his demand for the president's resignation as an "unlawful ultimatum".
Parliament Holds the Key
Magyar's Tisza party secured a two-thirds majority in parliament in April's election, giving it the power to amend Hungary's constitution.
The government is expected to use that authority to dismantle parts of the political system established during Orbán's 16 years in power. Magyar said the process of removing Sulyok could take about a month.
Although Hungary's presidency is largely ceremonial, the office retains several important powers, including approving public appointments and referring legislation back to parliament or to the constitutional court, potentially delaying government reforms.
On Monday, Sulyok continued to carry out presidential duties, announcing a number of military appointments on Facebook.
EU Funding and Future Reforms
The president warned that the political standoff could jeopardise efforts to unlock billions of euros in European Union funding that had been withheld over concerns about democratic standards under the Orbán government.
However, the EU indicated last week that reforms proposed by the new administration could clear the way for Hungary to receive €16.4 billion in funding.
Sulyok assumed office following the resignation of former president Katalin Novák, who stepped down amid controversy over the government's handling of a child sex abuse scandal.
Meanwhile, Magyar's government has proposed another constitutional amendment that would limit any future prime minister to a maximum of eight years in office, a move aimed at preventing a return to lengthy periods of rule such as Orbán's.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026

webfact
webfact

Football Great Kevin Keegan Discloses Cancer Battle

Former England captain and manager Kevin Keegan has disclosed that he has been diagnosed with stage four cancer, the most advanced stage of the disease, during an emotional appearance in Newcastle.

Get today's headlines by email

The 75-year-old said the illness was discovered after he underwent scans following a car accident that required surgery. Speaking at a live event at the Tyne Theatre and Opera House, Keegan explained that doctors identified the cancer while carrying out examinations ahead of the operation.
He told the audience that he was referred to a specialist, joking that he felt reassured when he learned the doctor supported Liverpool, one of his former clubs. Keegan recalled being surprised when the doctor described a treatment with a 33% success rate, saying he had expected a much higher figure. He added: “I'm still here at the moment.”
Keegan's family first revealed in January that he was receiving treatment after further investigations into ongoing abdominal symptoms.
Football Career
Keegan enjoyed a distinguished playing career with clubs including Liverpool F.C., Hamburger SV, Southampton F.C. and Newcastle United F.C.. He won the European Footballer of the Year award twice and was widely regarded as one of the leading players of his era.
After retiring, he managed Newcastle, Fulham F.C., the England national football team and Manchester City F.C..
Beyond football, Keegan became a prominent public figure through television appearances, advertising campaigns and even a brief music career, with his 1979 single Head Over Heels in Love reaching the UK charts.
Newcastle Legacy
Keegan remains one of the most influential figures in Newcastle's history. He oversaw the entertaining Newcastle side known as “The Entertainers”, which challenged for the Premier League title during the 1995-96 season.
Current Newcastle head coach Eddie Howe previously revealed that he sought advice from Keegan after taking charge of the club in 2021.
Despite Newcastle's disappointing league campaign this season, Keegan voiced strong support for Howe, praising him for delivering the club's first major domestic trophy in decades with last season's League Cup triumph.
Club Sends Support
Keegan also spoke about a possible return to St James’ Park, saying he would like the opportunity to say goodbye properly after feeling he never had the chance following his departure from the club in 2009.
Asked about the possibility of a statue in his honour, he said public recognition was less important than the reception he receives from supporters.
In a statement, Newcastle United F.C. expressed its support for Keegan and his family, describing him as a cherished figure whose passion, leadership and bond with the city helped create some of the club’s most memorable moments.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Mandelson Messages Reveal Concerns Over Starmer's Leadership

Documents released by the UK government have revealed private messages in which Lord Mandelson and senior ministers expressed concerns about Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Downing Street and Labour MPs.

Get today's headlines by email

The 1,500 pages of correspondence relate to Lord Mandelson’s appointment as the UK’s ambassador to the United States, a post he later lost because of his connections to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Among the messages, Lord Mandelson described No 10 as “beleaguered and bereft” and said it required a “complete revamp”. The exchanges also show discussions about Labour’s internal divisions, policy-making and Starmer’s authority during a major rebellion over welfare reforms.
Welfare Revolt Raises Leadership Fears
In June 2025, Lord Mandelson and then-Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden discussed government plans to reduce welfare spending by £5 billion by 2030. The proposals faced strong opposition from Labour MPs and were later significantly weakened.
As tensions mounted ahead of a parliamentary vote, McFadden wrote that MPs were “not moving”. Mandelson responded that the government could lose the vote and added: “I am not sure that Keir survives that.”
McFadden replied that Starmer was meeting the rebellion’s leaders and warned that defeat, withdrawal of the bill or major concessions would damage the prime minister’s authority. Mandelson agreed with the assessment.
Criticism of No 10
The documents also reveal concerns about the operation of Downing Street.
In July 2025, Mandelson and McFadden discussed Morgan McSweeney, who was serving as Starmer’s chief of staff. Mandelson said McSweeney appeared to have little confidence in the prime minister’s ability to reform No 10 and believed the priority should be maintaining support within the Parliamentary Labour Party.
Mandelson later wrote that he was “slightly losing faith in all this”.
In another exchange, he asked McFadden for his assessment of Downing Street. McFadden replied that the situation was “not good” and suggested advisers lacked clear direction.
Mandelson criticised the operation further, arguing that staff were not functioning effectively as a team and lacked leadership. He said many officials were uncertain about Starmer’s priorities and direction, later describing No 10 as “beleaguered and bereft”.
Debate Over Labour Priorities
Another message from McFadden appeared to criticise Labour backbench MPs, saying discussions often focused on identifying new sources of tax revenue to fund benefits rather than addressing broader policy questions.
A spokesperson for McFadden said his public position has consistently been that government should focus on improving people’s lives through work and opportunity, particularly for younger people.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch seized on the disclosures, arguing they showed a gap between Labour’s private discussions and public statements.
Policy Concerns and Ambassador Appointment
The papers also contain messages between Mandelson and minister Torsten Bell discussing government policy development. Bell argued that too many people assumed policy-making was someone else’s responsibility, while Mandelson suggested weak policy inevitably led to poor outcomes.
The correspondence includes a handwritten note sent by Mandelson to then Foreign Secretary David Lammy in November 2024, before his appointment as ambassador. In it, Mandelson pledged that Lammy would not regret selecting him for the role.
The government published the documents after MPs voted earlier this year to require their release. Speaking in the House of Commons, Cabinet Office minister Darren Jones said the disclosure was among the largest government publications ever produced and had cost more than £1 million.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Court Rejects Rwanda’s £100m Claim Over UK Asylum Deal

The UK will not be required to pay Rwanda more than £100 million linked to the abandoned migrant deportation scheme launched under former prime minister Boris Johnson, after an international arbitration tribunal ruled in Britain’s favour.

Get today's headlines by email

The case arose after Rwanda accused the UK government of breaching a bilateral agreement following the cancellation of the asylum partnership in 2024. Rwanda sought two outstanding annual payments of £50 million each, along with compensation and interest.
Tribunal Sides With UK
The ruling followed a three-day hearing at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague. Judges found that the UK was not liable for the disputed payments after the scheme was terminated.
The tribunal rejected one £50 million claim by majority decision and unanimously dismissed the second £50 million claim. As a result, Rwanda’s demand for compensation was also unsuccessful.
A UK government spokesperson said the government had “robustly defended” its position and welcomed the ruling, noting that the tribunal had decided in Britain’s favour on all issues.
Scheme Ended After Change of Government
The asylum agreement was signed in 2022 between the UK and Rwanda. Under the arrangement, asylum seekers who reached Britain through irregular routes, including small-boat crossings and lorry journeys, could be relocated to Rwanda for processing.
The policy faced legal and political challenges from the outset. It was eventually declared unlawful by the UK Supreme Court.
After Keir Starmer and the Labour Party won the 2024 general election, the new government scrapped the programme. On his first full day in office, Starmer described the plan as “dead and buried” and dismissed it as a gimmick.
UK lawyers argued during the arbitration proceedings that it was entirely foreseeable the scheme would be abandoned following a change of government and that no further payments were owed.
Rwanda Cited Costs and Lack of Notice
Rwanda maintained that it had invested heavily in preparing for the partnership and claimed Britain had failed to meet its contractual obligations.
Rwandan Justice Minister and Attorney General Emmanuel Ugirashebuja told the court that the country had incurred significant costs and had not been given advance notice of the UK’s decision to end the arrangement. He said Rwandan officials learned of the move through media reports.
In legal submissions, Rwanda requested around £100 million in unpaid instalments, plus approximately £6 million in compensation and interest. Alternatively, it said it would accept a formal apology from the UK.
Costs and Wider Tensions
According to the UK government, only four people were relocated to Rwanda under the scheme, all on a voluntary basis. Britain had already paid Rwanda about £290 million before the policy was terminated.
The previous Conservative government had spent around £700 million on the programme before it was abandoned.
The ruling comes as relations between the two countries remain strained. The UK has reduced aid to Rwanda, alleging that Kigali supports the M23 rebel group operating in the neighbouring Democratic Republic of the Congo.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026
webfact
webfact

Iran Suspends US Talks Over Lebanon Ceasefire Dispute

Iran has suspended negotiations with the United States, blaming Israel's military operations in Lebanon for violating a broader ceasefire arrangement and raising fears that months of diplomacy could unravel.

Get today's headlines by email

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran viewed the ceasefire as applying across all fronts, including Lebanon. He warned that any breach in Lebanon amounted to a breach of the entire agreement and held both Israel and the US responsible for the consequences.
An Iranian news agency linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps reported that Tehran had halted participation in talks aimed at ending the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil shipping route.
Trump Signals Little Concern Over Pause
US President Donald Trump said Washington had not been formally notified of Iran's decision but suggested a pause in negotiations would not necessarily be unwelcome.
Speaking to NBC News, Trump said the two sides may have been talking too much and that a period of silence could be beneficial. He added that the US would maintain its blockade of Iranian ports if talks collapsed but indicated there were no immediate plans for further military escalation.
The diplomatic setback follows US strikes on Iranian radar and drone facilities over the weekend. Tehran responded by claiming it had targeted a military base in Kuwait that it said was involved in the American operation.
Lebanon Tensions Threaten Wider Conflict
Iran's move reflects growing anger over Israel's offensive in Lebanon. The situation appeared to worsen after Israel issued evacuation orders for residents in Beirut's southern suburbs.
Iran's military command warned residents in northern Israel to leave should Israel launch attacks on Beirut or the Dahieh district. Kuwait also advised citizens to remain indoors amid fears of an imminent escalation.
Iranian military officials warned that strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs would trigger retaliatory attacks against northern Israel and other military targets inside the country.
Trump said he had spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and, through intermediaries, with Hezbollah representatives in an effort to secure a renewed ceasefire. He later claimed Netanyahu had agreed not to send troops into Beirut and that Hezbollah had agreed to halt attacks.
There was initially no confirmation from either Israel or Hezbollah. However, Lebanon's embassy in Washington later said both sides had accepted a reciprocal halt to attacks, including Israeli strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs.
Oil Market Concerns Grow
Iran's semi-official Tasnim news agency reported that Tehran would seek support from Yemen's Houthi movement to impose a second maritime blockade at the Bab al-Mandab Strait, another critical shipping route. The renewed tensions pushed oil prices close to $100 a barrel.
Iranian parliament speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf accused Washington of failing to uphold the ceasefire through both its blockade and support for Israeli operations.
Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron held discussions with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, Trump and several Arab leaders, urging efforts to preserve the Lebanon ceasefire and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Nuclear Talks Remain Frozen
Iranian officials said discussions on the country's nuclear programme would remain on hold until issues surrounding the Strait of Hormuz were addressed.
Foreign ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said no detailed nuclear negotiations were currently taking place and insisted Tehran's immediate priority was ending the conflict. He also confirmed that Iran was seeking reparations from the United States and that any future agreement would require approval from the UN Security Council.
A proposed 14-point memorandum would establish a 60-day ceasefire while negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme continue.
Despite diplomatic efforts, major disagreements remain over sanctions relief, frozen Iranian assets and broader regional security arrangements. The latest exchanges highlighted the fragility of the ceasefire and the challenges facing attempts to secure a lasting settlement.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 June 2026

webfact
webfact

Iran accuses Trump of stalling nuclear talks

Iran has accused US President Donald Trump of delaying negotiations over a possible nuclear-related agreement, saying Washington is imposing “excessive demands”, as expectations of a breakthrough continue to shift in global markets.

Get today's headlines by email

Oil prices have eased this week as reports persist that Washington and Tehran are edging towards a potential agreement after more than a month of negotiations without resolution.
President Donald Trump has not yet taken a final decision on the deal, which could extend the current ceasefire with Iran. A Situation Room meeting on Friday ended without any announcement, despite expectations that a “final determination” would be made.
Demands and disputed terms
US officials and regional counterparts have suggested a deal is close, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently predicting “good news” within hours, though Trump later said he would not “rush into” an agreement. Washington has outlined conditions including Iran never obtaining a nuclear weapon, reopening the Strait of Hormuz for unrestricted two-way shipping, and the removal of any mines in the waterway.
The agreement under discussion would extend a fragile ceasefire in place since early April, although both sides have accused each other of violations through continued strikes. US officials said a draft proposal would launch 60 days of further talks on Iran’s nuclear programme, but neither side has signed off.
Diplomatic tension and military warning
Iranian officials have rejected the US description of the deal. Mohsen Rezaei, a senior figure and former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, said Washington was “betraying diplomacy” and acting through “excessive demands”, according to Iranian media reports.
A senior Arab mediator told NBC News that negotiators had already agreed terms of a truce days earlier in Doha, but both sides have delayed final approval, describing the situation as a “game of chicken and egg”.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Trump remained patient and sought a strong agreement preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, adding that any deal would be a good outcome. He also said the US was prepared to resume strikes if no agreement was reached, insisting the country was capable of acting globally if required.
Some changes have reportedly been made to draft text, though it remains unfinalised, according to Iranian media. Iranian officials say no final understanding has been reached and discussions are still focused on ending the war rather than detailed nuclear issues.
Oil market reaction
Oil prices fell as hopes of a deal increased. Brent crude traded about 1.8% lower at around $92 a barrel, with prices down almost 20% in May. The war and closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20% of global oil previously flowed, has driven energy prices higher over the past three months.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 1 June 2
webfact
webfact

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications
Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.