Maestro

I have seen no exception of this kind mentioned anywhere.

It's not quite like that. When a tenant makes the TM.30 notification, he does not do so on behalf of the owner (whom you refer to as the landlord). He does it on his own behalf as the "householder", so defined by Section 4 of the Immigration Act. The immigration office may ask the foreigner to submit with the notification copies of some documents which he has to obtain from the owner, but this does not mean that he makes the notification on behalf of the owner. This is how Section 4 defines the householder (in some translations called the house-master or house master) in the case of a rented dwelling (highlighting in bold is mine): The rental agreement makes the tenant the chief possessor of the dwelling and thus the householder.

Correct, but handing down punishment under Section 77 of the Immigration Act can only be done by a court of law, not by an immigration official. Please take a look at Section 84 for clarification.

That's the information posted on the the website but it is not legally correct.

Removed some posts and the replies to them.

Removed an off-topic post (crossing to Malaysia)

Is it really technically the same when using a Cambodian crossing? Isn't it Cambodia that says you must stay in Cambodia at least one day?

It is not in the Ministerial announcement published in the Royal Gazette. Someone from the Consular Department of the Ministry of the Interior may have mentioned it in an interview.

How exactly does this work? Does the border immigration official say "don't come back earlier than in two days" (Chiang Khong) or "come back tomorrow" (Chiang Saen) without putting a stamp refusing entry into the passport?

Removed an off-topic post and the replies to it.

Thank you. Therefore, this new topic is not required. Discussion continued in this earlier topic: https://aseannow.com/topic/1336345-lao-borders-some-at-least-now-requiring-overnight-stay/page/2/#comment-19179539

That's interesting. So if you turn around the same day, what will Thai immigration do?

Thank you for your clarification. I'm sure not only I but also other readers will appreciate it if the names of immigration offices are written in full, not in two-letter acronyms or abbreviations.

Thank you for your guess.

That's very interesting. I wonder if the consular department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs whipped the visa section of the embassy in London into shape generally or just for the DTV.

What is KC?

Never too late to learn. In my lifetime, the ambassadors of all countries, not only of Kingdoms, have always had the title "Excellency"

Is this 15-year-old TM.6 card from your latest arrival in Thailand?

I remember that another member posted that ม.17 is a reference to section 17 of the Immigration Act, under the authority of which the new 60-day visa-exempt entry (VE-60) has been announced. ผ is the first letter of the Thai word that has been translated as "special" in section 17 of the Immigration Act ม is the first letter of the Thai word that has been translated as "section" in the Immigration Act.

Removed an off-topic post.

When entering Thailand with a new visa, the fist 90-day report is due 90 days after the date of arrival.

I've looked at the excerpt of the screenshot of the page on the website of the Thai embassy in London you posted and see that it has the date stamp of 28 August 2019 with an update on 16 October regarding the temporary change of the vis-exempt permission to stay from 30 days to 45 days. The text about the limitation of maximum three visa-exempt entries for 30 days (VE-30) by air and two by land is shown to apply to the VE-30, which is understandable because this outdated webpage does not take into account the new 60-day visa-exempt entry (VE-60) available now. Therefore, I would say that it is incorrect to refer to this text as a currently valid rule, regulation or law applicable to the VE-60. For information about the VE-60, we must refer to the Announcement of the Ministry of Interior, issued under the authority of the Immigration Act. This makes reference neither to unlimited entries nor to a limited number of entries. It is tacitly understood, however, that all entries into Thailand are subject to Section 12 of the Immigration Act. Sources: Immigration Act, English translation: https://aseannow.com/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=991237&key=afcda8a9154676f45da42331902f33c8 60-day visa-exemption, original Thai text https://ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/documents/37563.pdf 60-day visa-exemption, English translation https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LsZZ2J7z5jI1S2HEKAcljhbyn34L--VM/view?usp=drive_link

This news article of 27 February 2024 mentions Piccolo's law suit against Raglan Road Irish Pub, but not its outcome: https://www.allergicliving.com/2024/02/27/disney-and-pub-sued-after-doctor-dies-of-severe-allergic-reaction/

That's interesting additional information. Thank you for posting it.

Removed a troll post mentioning "ChinkPox"