Jump to content

placeholder

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    28,044
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    33

Everything posted by placeholder

  1. But somehow their shared DNA will promote a harmonious relationship with China?
  2. Thanks for providing so much reasoning to back up your characterization. Oh wait a minute.. I'm afraid you've still got nothing.
  3. I feel so ashamed of the way I've treated the polite, respectful, and low key points raised by right wingers. I kind of feel like I've been stomping on hobbits.
  4. So you weren't writing about history?
  5. Their DNA is Asian? Really? Is their language related to Chinese? Do they share a religion? Eat the same foods? What you'rr positing is just mystical argle bargle of a type that has historically been used as an excuse for bad behavior on the part of the more powerful.
  6. Why is it only my post that you object to on is the subject and not that a strong supporter of Israel. Why are you posting about the history?
  7. The Constitution of the United States that an official will be removed from office w"if impeached for and convicted of". If there's no conviction, there's no finding of death. That's the legal tradition the founding fathers were drawing on. Presumption of innocence is a crucial part of that tradition.
  8. Odd how you were incited by my comment, but the comment I was replying tot made the original assertion that Palestinians aren't originally from Israel excited no ire on your part. Why is that?
  9. I started to read it, but as usual for right wingers, he misstated the Russian collusion issue. Then he went on to assert the innocence of Mike Flynn That was enough.
  10. I went there and I got his warning: https://amgreatness.com/2025/01/06/conspiracies-too-awful-to-imagine/ Is Norton in on the conspiracy to undermine Trump?
  11. A claim that somehow what some posters post implies that they are brighter than everything else, may have more to do with an inferiority complex in some members. At any rate, claiming that posts imply something looks more like mindreading to me.
  12. Not only is it the right of private websites to enforce civility, but it also serves to foster a rational exchange of views.
  13. Blood Brothers: Palestinians and Jews Share Genetic Roots Jews break down into three genetic groups, all of which have Middle Eastern origins – which are shared with the Palestinians and Druze. https://www.haaretz.com/science-and-health/2015-10-20/ty-article/palestinians-and-jews-share-genetic-roots/0000017f-dc0e-df9c-a17f-fe1e57730000 Archaeologic and genetic data support that both Jews and Palestinians came from the ancient Canaanites, who extensively mixed with Egyptians, Mesopotamian, and Anatolian peoples in ancient times. Thus, Palestinian-Jewish rivalry is based in cultural and religious, but not in genetic, differences. The relatively close relatedness of both Jews and Palestinians to western Mediterranean populations reflects the continuous circum-Mediterranean cultural and gene flow that have occurred in prehistoric and historic times. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11543891/
  14. Well maybe you believe making personal insults and unproven allegations about people who post is somehow civil. But in the bluesky world, that stuff is prohibited. In the discussion I followed there was none of that.
  15. Thanks for the correction. You forget to mention this part: Critically, that report also shot down unsubstantiated speculation that the bureau had agents stoking some of the mayhem that day, “We found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6,” the report said. https://nypost.com/2024/12/12/us-news/doj-watchdog-says-fbi-had-26-confidential-sources-in-dc-for-jan-6-riot-but-no-evidence-of-undercover-agents/?utm_source=nypost&utm_campaign=android_nyp&utm_medium=social I am sure you will honorably acknowledge the error in your allegations as well. I'm sure you wouldn't indulge in cherry-picking. I look forward to seeing it in this thread.
  16. No. This rate of change is way outside the norm. Temperatures have been quite stable for the about 2000 years. And suddenly , in line with climatologists predictions, temperatures begin to soar. What an amazing coincidence. To be more accurate, we are in a post glacial period. Whether the glaciers extend themselves once again is not a certainty. But even if they eventually do, what's your point? As for the Little Ice Age: The Little Ice Age Wasn’t Global, but Current Climate Change Is None of the cold and warm epochs from the past 2,000 years were global events, but the current period of climate change is more intense and is happening simultaneously across the entire planet... “Statistically, the spatial coherence of the warming in the last century is totally different from the spatial coherence of any other period in the past,” says study coauthor Juan José Gómez-Navarro, an environmental physicist at the University of Murcia in Spain. https://eos.org/articles/the-little-ice-age-wasnt-global-but-current-climate-change-is#:~:text=Change Is - Eos-,The Little Ice Age Wasn't Global%2C but Current Climate,simultaneously across the entire planet.
  17. One of the ways that people who have nothing to offer in the way of rebuttal is to claim fake news and offer no credible fact in rebuttal.. I will say this for you: you didn't even bother to offer facts. You have nothing
  18. An accurate answer? What does that mean? The problem with your question is that it rests on the assumption that someone is Biden's Whisperer? In that it's similar to a when did you stop beating your wife question because it assume that someone is Biden's whisperer without offering evidence. I did offer evidence in the case of Trump. He did pretty much a 180 degree turn on the issue.
  19. Is your point that they are really Chinese?
  20. I remember when there was a Congresswoman who said not to worry about the extinction of one species because another will come along to replace it. Yours is that kind of thinkiing. Why would it "naturally" come down just as fast as it went up. You think this situation is analagous to shooting an arrow straight up into the air? This is pre-scientific thinking. The laws of physics probably will see the temperature eventually come down after the level of greenhouse gasses comes down. As for brainwashing people...you mean people who won't engage with the science and instead offer conspiracy theories?
  21. Call me a cockeyed optimist but I live in hope of their redemption.
  22. "It must have made her squirm"? More mind reading or body language reading. Your comment is ridiculous. By all accounts she acquitted herself honorably in the performance of her duties on this day. As did Mike Pence when he was in the same position. You've got nothing.
  23. 4 informants incited that crowd? Ridiculous. It was a crowd that was chanting Hang Mike Pence. Do you have a source that can identify these 4 alleged informants? Another ridiculous conspiracy theory.
  24. All those lying videos? More conspiracy nonsense.
×
×
  • Create New...