GroveHillWanderer

You're the one who seems confused about dates. All of the 60-plus lawsuits that were filed by Republicans contesting the results of the 2020 election had already been decided by January 2021. For some reason, the particular link I posted, only talks about 50 plus but other links from the same time or earlier, mention the total of over 60. Here's one example: In more than 60 cases, judges “looked at the allegations that Trump was making and determined they were without any merit.” Your second claim is also completely untrue - none of the lawsuits related to the 2020 election went in favour of the Republicans claiming the elections were fraudulent. Again, from the same link posted above:

Anyone can file a lawsuit or an amicus brief. Just filing one doesn't make it true. In fact, that lawsuit and over 60 others were adjudicated by the courts and in none of the court cases was any evidence found that any of the results were fraudulent. So it's not a question of just some random poster on here saying there was no evidence, it's literally dozens of judges (many of whom were appointed by Trump) who, having looked carefully into the matter and considered everything that was put before them, have issued official, judicial findings that there was no evidence. Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Please provide your evidence of Trump telling the Russians not to invade Ukraine. I'm pretty confident that you won't find any, since in fact, he stated while he was in office that Ukraine should be part of Russia, and when the invasion looked like it was about to happen, he described Putin's actions as 'genius.' Hardly observations indicative of someone opposed to, or who was ever likely to try to prevent, the Russian invasion. Trump Believed Ukraine ‘Must Be Part Of Russia’ As Putin eyes Ukraine invasion, Trump praises his actions as 'genius'

No they didn't. This was not a criminal trial, it was a civil suit. A jury in a civil suit does not find a person guilty or innocent, they decide whether a person is liable or not liable for damages. Also, even though the jury in the case did not find Trump liable for damages related to rape, based on New York's narrow legal definition of the term, the judge who presided over the case wrote in August 2023 that Carroll's accusation of rape was "substantially true". Judge tosses Trump's counterclaim against E. Jean Carroll, finding rape claim is 'substantially true'

The requirement for the amount of money in the bank is clearly stated on the official announcement of the DTV. It is no less than 500K Thai baht (or presumably, the equivalent). There are many reports on this thread of people successfully getting a DTV but (unless I've missed something) none I've read where people are being asked for evidence of more than that amount. For instance, there are people who have shown evidence of being granted the visa with a dentist's appointment and just over 500K in the bank (525K as it happens) with no requirement to prove any income. Do you have any evidence saying people are being, or will be asked for more than the 500K?

You don't need to use the app if you don't want to. So if you don't have a suitable device, it really doesn't matter.

Seems even the German Foreign Office is fact-checking (and trolling) Trump now. After Trump claimed in the debate that Germany is going back to fossil fuels, the German government pointed out that's not true, as follows. They then finished off with a taunt at his claims about immigrants eating pets. Germany taunts Trump in scathing fact-check

Really? So you haven't heard the absolute nonsense Trump regularly comes out with, in response to almost any question? For example, here's his recent response to a question about how he would make child care more affordable. “Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down, and I was, somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that, because, look, child care is child care is. It’s, couldn’t, you know, there’s something, you have to have it. In this country you have to have it.” "But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to — but they’ll get used to it very quickly – and it’s not gonna stop them from doing business with us, but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care." "We’re gonna have — I, I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country, because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just, that I just told you about." And you think Kamala Harris's responses are bad? Trump tried to explain how he plans to make childcare more affordable. It was a word salad

The abortion fact check was to say that there is no state in the US where it's legal to kill babies after they're born. How and where has it come to light that this is incorrect?

That proves only that there were allegations, nothing more. The police did do something about it - they investigated and could find no evidence of geese, or any other animals being snatched. In relation to the specific claims that geese had been snatched from parks: Fact Check: No evidence of Haitian immigrants stealing and eating pets in Ohio

There are no documented facts in this thread showing that Haitians (or anyone else) are snatching geese, dogs, cats or people's pets in Springfield. If you think there are, please point them out.

It takes the same amount of time to sign them, whether you do it beforehand or not.

Sorry your local IO treats your like that. All I can speak to is my personal experience in Hua Hin where there isn't any of that kind of unpleasantness. The IO's there have always been unfailingly polite and pleasant when I've been processing my marriage extensions. They just go quickly and quietly through all the documentation, with barely a query about anything, in my experience. I always go up to the window on my own, my wife stays behind in the seating area and they only call her forward when they need to take the photo of the two of us together. It usually takes around 40 - 45 minutes and most of that is just waiting for your turn. Admittedly, the first time was a little more complicated, they needed a witness there with us to sign some kind of document and there was a home visit about an hour later, but that was only the first year and we haven't needed a witness or had a home visit since. The home visit was also very perfunctory - they said they would come about one hour after I handed in the paperwork if that was convenient (it was) and just sat outside chatting for about ten minutes with ourselves and the witness (our next door neighbour). They took a couple of photos of us and the IO together at the front gate and then by the front door of the house - and that was it. Based on some of the stories I'd read on here I was worried it would be a lot more tricky, but it was really straightforward.

Not in my experience, they're not. I've done at least 3 extensions (maybe 4, can't remember exactly) by reason of marriage in Hua Hin and they only visited the one time, when I first switched from retirement to marriage. I would agree with those who say that marriage extensions are really not that burdensome. The only thing that annoys me slightly is the time it takes to sign all the documents. Other than that, it's fine.

I have looked at at least half a dozen fact checking articles examining statements made by the participants in the debate. Not a single one of them mentions that Harris told a lie about police officers dying on Jan 6, or lying about when she left the Capitol that day. Do you have a link to a reliable source that supports those claims?

None of that is happening, nor will it happen, because the simple fact is that there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that any of these ridiculous cat-eating stories are true.

Or, you could just go for the option of getting the visa by booking a dentist's or doctor's appointment. And then another one if or when needed. Which doesn't cost anything (at least not for the appointment itself).

Do you have any evidence that she called him illegitimate "for years after" and "still does"? Based on everything I can find from several Google searches using different search terms, she only ever called him illegitimate three times. Twice, in interviews a couple of days apart in late 2019 and once in July 2020. As far as I can tell, she never called him illegitimate before or since. If you have evidence to the contrary, I'd be glad to see it. Also, unlike Trump she has never claimed the election was "stolen" and she's never called for the results to be overturned. Trump of course, has repeated his election lies hundreds if not thousands of times, as the AP article below, alludes to. Trump's drumbeat of lies about the 2020 election keeps getting louder

It's not just John Bolton, though is it? The article from The Independent below lists who they say are all the former Trump staffers who have spoken out against him to a greater or lesser degree. Admittedly two of them, Barr and Haley, have since said that they will vote for Trump but that still leaves a whole load of those who probably know Trump's capabilities (or lack thereof) better than any of us, who do not want to see this man in office again. All the ex-Trump officials who refuse to endorse him in 2024

According to Fortune magazine, the Russian economy is coming under serious strain. An economic catastrophe is lurking beneath Russia’s GDP growth as Putin ‘throws everything into the fireplace’

I disagree. Everything Geraghty writes is predicated on (and quotes extensively from) the findings of the House Oversight Committee. As Geraghty puts it, this is, "What the House Oversight Committee report reveals ..." However once again, James Comer himself has said that nothing the Committee uncovered is evidence of a crime being committed.

"The Washington Post" said no such thing. The link you gave is to an opinion piece by Jim Geraghty, who is National Review’s senior political correspondent. The National Review describes itself as a "Leading conservative magazine and website." And the so-called evidence? Jim Geraghty writes that, "James Comer contends" that there is proof but tellingly, Comer himself has admitted that there is no actual evidence of wrongdoing. House Oversight chair admits GOP can’t back up Biden bribery accusations

I see that in sharp contrast to Trump, the Republican Governor of Utah has apologized for a campaign photo of him taken with Trump at Arlington. Utah Governor Apologizes For Campaigning With Photo From Trump's Cemetery Visit

It seems there are a number of reports indicating the Russian offensive on Pokrovsk has come to a grinding halt. Here's just one example.