johnhw Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 5 hours ago, mentalcolonization said: When fools run the country Ooops, Orientation's off. Not talking U.S. here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjaak327 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 5555 what an original excuse. Will be swept under the carpet of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Weird Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 11 hours ago, JustAnotherFarang said: Liar liar Why? What has he claimed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Weird Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 8 hours ago, wvavin said: Please don't give us such stupid excuses, you are making yourself looking more stupid! He hasn't given any excuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Weird Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 6 hours ago, AGareth2 said: wonder how long it took him to make up this story What story has he made up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smutcakes Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, Just Weird said: He hasn't given any excuse. Ok okay, everyone can read. You are not being clever. Everyone knows he has not officially given his answers, and this is just rumour. Don't be overly serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Weird Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Hasn't anyone here noticed that Prawit has, so far, made no claims about the watch and ring? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smutcakes Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Just now, Just Weird said: Hasn't anyone here noticed that Prawit has, so far, made no claims about the watch and ring? Yes they have, its just a bit of speculation, so get off your high horse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Weird Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 1 minute ago, smutcakes said: Ok okay, everyone can read. You are not being clever. Everyone knows he has not officially given his answers, and this is just rumour. Don't be overly serious. Why not? Every other poster is being overly serious. That's not very clever either, is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Weird Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 1 minute ago, smutcakes said: Yes they have, its just a bit of speculation, so get off your high horse. Why, and leave you lot on your high horses? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smutcakes Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 1 minute ago, Just Weird said: Why not? Every other poster is being overly serious. That's not very clever either, is it? Okay, you must be bored.. have a good night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Swagman Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 He should just blame Jarred, seems the go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Dude Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 "borrowed" watch...does this privileged fool really think that that will suffice. Just shows how arrogant they really are and that they think they can dismiss stuff with some lame-arsed response such as this each time. The current piggies have been troughing long enough...becoming a farce. Sad that the Thais let it continually roll on...such a submissive culture and society. Shocker really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkidlad Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 1 hour ago, Just Weird said: Why, and leave you lot on your high horses? Were you 'Gdgbb' on here before? Anyhoo, I'm reading that his name is listed as a 'celebrity buyer'. I'm sure you can enlighten us on how much truth is in that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 11 hours ago, Dave67 said: Nothing compared to Prayut watch, got it from a boot sale for 15 quid Problem is, I believe it currently isn't working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibook Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Come on all you hackers, it should be difficult to extract a list of the names of all, or all Thais, who have purchased this brand of watch. They are guaranteed for life and the manufacturer is very keen to keep in touch with the customers. While you are at it you could also get lists of the buyers of various other luxury brands to see how many government employees are splashing out. Of course you may need to use Wkileaks or some other platform to publish as I doubt many Thai websites would be keen to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogmatix Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 It is simply astonishing that anyone should be sceptical about the pronouncement that DPM Prawit is in the habit of wearing borrowed luxury watches and large carat diamond knuckle dusters. Are these people Thai? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Man Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 He is a bloody liar...just from his looks depicts everything. Who the hell borrows watch from a friend. LIAR. LIAR, AND a blatant liar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallGuyJohninBKK Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 7 hours ago, bkkcanuck8 said: No, that is not the case - most here understand and are fully aware that many senior military officers are wealthy in real life. I was responding to this reference in the OP article, which is perhaps meant to reflect what the average Thai citizen's beliefs might be on the subject: Quote The photo of the 72-year-old retired general shielding his eyes with his hand, displaying what appeared to be extremely expensive accessories, quickly caught the public’s attention amid questions how a lifelong military officer could afford such luxuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sambum Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 3 hours ago, rkidlad said: Were you 'Gdgbb' on here before? Anyhoo, I'm reading that his name is listed as a 'celebrity buyer'. I'm sure you can enlighten us on how much truth is in that. His posts have a certain familiarity about them don't they? And more than 1000 posts since September 26 - someone's on a mission! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JGV Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Friend A to friend B Can I borrow your watch ? I want to wear it on the TV so everybody can see that I have expensive things? B Yes of course You can look after by 2 million baht watch OK tell me who does the above - Answer No one Another example of Thai b*** sh** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaorop Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 4 hours ago, Sir Dude said: "borrowed" watch...does this privileged fool really think that that will suffice. Just shows how arrogant they really are and that they think they can dismiss stuff with some lame-arsed response such as this each time. The current piggies have been troughing long enough...becoming a farce. Sad that the Thais let it continually roll on...such a submissive culture and society. Shocker really. Huh? Go out and speak to some normal working Thais..They are NOT happy, but other than taking up arms, what can they do.. Yes they accepted the initial intervention but have been duped..That you make such poorly formed opinions is the shocker..really.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkidlad Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 8 hours ago, sambum said: His posts have a certain familiarity about them don't they? And more than 1000 posts since September 26 - someone's on a mission! Have a look at this story in the paper we cannot mention. Gdggb posts there now. Their posts are eerily similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 8 hours ago, sambum said: His posts have a certain familiarity about them don't they? And more than 1000 posts since September 26 - someone's on a mission! Not forgetting the part that the tooth fairy or even Father Christmas could have played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolgeoff Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 original excuse.how long did it take to come up with that one.maybe from a note book takism wrote to explain things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikiea Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 On 12/11/2017 at 5:00 AM, isaanbanhou said: no crime in borrowing a watch... yes , and no crime in being dumb as a box of rocks ...... haha haha haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikiea Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 On 12/11/2017 at 5:05 AM, lemonjelly said: A gift from the Chinese perhaps? Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect what a corruption free government this is ........yes , yes , dat's da ticket ...corruption free ...yes , yes ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaorop Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 12 hours ago, JGV said: Friend A to friend B Can I borrow your watch ? I want to wear it on the TV so everybody can see that I have expensive things? B Yes of course You can look after by 2 million baht watch OK tell me who does the above - Answer No one Another example of Thai b*** sh** Dooowde..happens to me everyother day..... Now I has me a spare that Im willing to let go cheap..You in? ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonmarleesco Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Why would he see the need to borrow an expensive watch for a photo shoot, other than to either attract interest ... or to deflect it from the rest of him? '... Watcharapol Prasarnrajkit ... used to serve as a deputy secretary-general to the prime minister attached to Prawit.' The PM was attached to Prawit? Umbilically? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Weird Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 (edited) 22 hours ago, rkidlad said: Were you 'Gdgbb' on here before? Anyhoo, I'm reading that his name is listed as a 'celebrity buyer'. I'm sure you can enlighten us on how much truth is in that. I didn't say that there was no truth in it, I said that he had not made an explanation yet. No idea what your first sentence means, doesn't seem to make sense...gdgbb, what's that? Edited December 12, 2017 by Just Weird Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now