Jump to content

Fugitive Thaksin Shinawatra gets another arrest warrant in telecom excise tax case


webfact

Recommended Posts

Fugitive Thaksin Shinawatra gets another arrest warrant in telecom excise tax case

By Thai PBS

 

Thaksin-Shinawatra2016.jpg

 

The Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Persons Holding Political Positions today (Mar 6) issued another warrant for the arrest of ex-premier Thaksin Shinawatra after he failed to appear to defend himself in a corruption case involving a telecom concession.

 

In this case, Thaksin was indicted of corruption over the conversion of revenue-sharing telecom concession to excise tax that inflicted over 66 billion baht loss to the state in 2008.

 

The Supreme Court scheduled today as the first hearing of the case brought against Thaksin by the Office of the Attorney-General (OAG)  after it was discarded of by the court for a decade after the defendant failed to appear in the court.

 

Full story: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/fugitive-thaksin-shinawatra-gets-another-arrest-warrant-telecom-excise-tax-case/

 
thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2018-03-06
Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 minutes ago, Golden Triangle said:

Why are these morons even bothering themselves with this - No persecution then, or does it make them feel good.

 

Shakes head in disbelief and moves on to something more interesting.

Perhaps that should be: Shakes head in disbelief and moves on to something more interesting less boring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, darksidedog said:

You have to ask yourself why on earth would they bother issuing an arrest warrant that they have absolutely zero chance of ever serving?

And the fact this is day one in a ten year old case makes it even more stupid.

Why procedure.. so he won't get off on a technicality. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, robblok said:

Why because the guy was corrupt and not a little bit either. Now they are trying to move the big corruption cases of Thaksin forward so the world can see the guy is not as innocent as he pretends to be. Before he could say I am only convicted for a land deal and it was nothing.. now if a few of those bigger corruption cases are done he will be shown for the corrupt criminal he is.

 

The stupid thing was that before political criminals like Thaksin could wait out corruption scandals but now they can't anymore the cases will go on with or without them. 

 

I can only applaud this to show the world what this guy was just an other crook. 

So Rob, do you expect the Thai officials to ask for the issue of a Red Interpol notice for Thaksin?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, robblok said:

I don't know maybe after these cases are settled and a bit more weight is behind the charges. Could also be they leave him be. But it would be good for the world to know that the guy is a crook. Now he can still play like he is persecuted. That becomes a lot harder if he is linked and convicted for huge corruption cases. This can change the perception people have of him it would make it hard for reuters to keep being so favorable about him.

 

But if your asking if i think if Thaksin will ever do time for this.. I don't he will just stay out of reach, I am also not 100% sure they really want him back. But it would at least dent his image and make it harder for people to support him given his crimes then.


Even here on the site there are still those that deny that the guy was a corrupt crook. That gets a lot harder once its proven in court. It would also be nice to see the scope of his crime.. i mean here 66 billion makes the 34 billion in the rice program look small. I wonder how many more cases and how much more money we are talking about. 

The thing is Rob, the very people who are reviving these old cases are the same people who have always hated Thaksin.   The voters would have him back, as PM, at any free and fair election in Thailand, if he were allowed to stand and the parliament wasn't pre-loaded with army personnel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How have they calculated this?  The family each sold their shares individually, 

43 minutes ago, robblok said:

I don't know maybe after these cases are settled and a bit more weight is behind the charges. Could also be they leave him be. But it would be good for the world to know that the guy is a crook. Now he can still play like he is persecuted. That becomes a lot harder if he is linked and convicted for huge corruption cases. This can change the perception people have of him it would make it hard for reuters to keep being so favorable about him.

 

But if your asking if i think if Thaksin will ever do time for this.. I don't he will just stay out of reach, I am also not 100% sure they really want him back. But it would at least dent his image and make it harder for people to support him given his crimes then.


Even here on the site there are still those that deny that the guy was a corrupt crook. That gets a lot harder once its proven in court. It would also be nice to see the scope of his crime.. i mean here 66 billion makes the 34 billion in the rice program look small. I wonder how many more cases and how much more money we are talking about. 

 

You should ask just how they have calculated this 66 billion loss considering he only netted 71 billion out of the entire sale, it just doesn't add up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, The Old Bull said:

If you judge Thai politicians by western standards they are all crooks. What Taksin did and cannot be forgiven for is politicizing the poor.

 

Politicising people is not a crime it is a duty and the poor people in Thailan need to be politicised further, they are largely unrepresented pawns of the rich, the poor need to have a voice as much as anyone, I find your comments unforgivably mean.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kieran00001 said:

How have they calculated this?  The family each sold their shares individually, 

 

You should ask just how they have calculated this 66 billion loss considering he only netted 71 billion out of the entire sale, it just doesn't add up.

Loss to the state does not equal what he got, but your right interesting question. But even if it was half of that it is still on par with the rice scam corruption. So by all means its not peanuts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CGW said:

I can agree with your thought process, then reality kicks in - the people who are issuing the warrants are just as, if not more corrupt than Thacksin! It puts a small dint in the case you are pleading sir!

Just means there are more corrupt Thai officials to send to jail, does not mean that someone who was corrupt should get off free. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robblok said:

Why because the guy was corrupt and not a little bit either. Now they are trying to move the big corruption cases of Thaksin forward so the world can see the guy is not as innocent as he pretends to be. Before he could say I am only convicted for a land deal and it was nothing.. now if a few of those bigger corruption cases are done he will be shown for the corrupt criminal he is.

 

The stupid thing was that before political criminals like Thaksin could wait out corruption scandals but now they can't anymore the cases will go on with or without them. 

 

I can only applaud this to show the world what this guy was just an other crook. 

You gotta be joking, how could anyone in the world believe anything coming from a totally illegitimate government, of a country where independent justice is a thing of the past, if it ever existed. Laughable!

 

Edited by KiChakayan
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KiChakayan said:

You gotta be joking would anyone in the world believe anything coming from a totally illegitimate government, of a country where independent justice is a thing of the past, if it ever existed. Laughable!

 

True...but the poor chap does do his best to introduce (yet again and again and again) some elements of comedy to our chats.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, robblok said:

Loss to the state does not equal what he got, but your right interesting question. But even if it was half of that it is still on par with the rice scam corruption. So by all means its not peanuts. 

 

Certainly not peanuts.  They used a legal loophole when they sold their corporation, if they had sold it off as one corp then they had to pay capital gains but by each family member selling individually that tax was not applicable, they've been moaning about it for a long time but the fact is that was the law at the time.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...