Ads pulled from Laura Ingraham's Fox News show after she mocked Parkland survivor

[Thakkar]

2 minutes ago, NumbNut said:

Love that list of alternative tunes she could play, especially tune #1 'Horst Wessel', also know as 'Horst Wessel Lied'

 

Also known as the Official anthem of the  National Socialist German Workers Party, better known as the Nazi Party

 

Too funny!

 

They foresaw this before any of us:

 

 

 

[geriatrickid]

2 hours ago, daoyai said:

Hogg boy is rude and arrogant, he even insults his parents,  search youtube to get a real understanding of the nature of his rhetoric.  .... and by the way, his S.A.T. score (though very respectable) is below the average of students accepted at UCLA.

Reaching for anything to justify the wrongful acts of the grownups aren't you?

Yes, let's go and search for the ramblings of an adolescent boy when he was aged 15, 16 and see what we can find.  There is a big difference between a  kid  growing up and going through the teenage angst that all boys of that age go through and a near 50 year old religious zealot who condemns everyone, spews hate and encourages negativity.  Show me one normal well adjusted boy who didn't have disagreements with his parents. There's a big difference between that and the  venom Ingraham spits.  You are defending the indefensible .  The high priestess of hatred came up against someone who  said no.

Turning point. You will see that those who are decent and moral will not accept Ingraham's malicious and hurtful actions.

 

And by the way, my SAT score was below the UCLA  cut off as well. Oddly enough, I  attended 3 universities all ranked in the top 10 of my country and  highly ranked in the world. I also managed to graduate with a lot of fancy paper and get several well paying jobs. SAT scores just show if someone can write a test. My MCAT was below average, and yet 2 of my diplomas say I was academically successful in health sciences. I aced my GMAT, but  wasn't asked to be CEO of  Pfizer.  Gee. These  tests  didn't predict much with me, nor with my colleagues, nor with my classmates. They are  biased and serve only as a means of  managing the admissions process by providing  the necessary legal excuse for non admission.

Edited April 2, 2018 by geriatrickid

[Thakkar]

26 minutes ago, geriatrickid said:

Reaching for anything to justify the wrongful acts of the grownups aren't you?

Yes, let's go and search for the ramblings of an adolescent boy when he was aged 15, 16 and see what we can find.  There is a big difference between a  kid  growing up and going through the teenage angst that all boys of that age go through and a near 50 year old religious zealot who condemns everyone, spews hate and encourages negativity.  Show me one normal well adjusted boy who didn't have disagreements with his parents. There's a big difference between that and the  venom Ingraham spits.  You are defending the indefensible .  The high priestess of hatred came up against someone who  said no.

Turning point. You will see that those who are decent and moral will not accept Ingraham's malicious and hurtful actions.

 

And by the way, my SAT score was below the UCLA  cut off as well. Oddly enough, I  attended 3 universities all ranked in the top 10 of my country and  highly ranked in the world. I also managed to graduate with a lot of fancy paper and get several well paying jobs. SAT scores just show if someone can write a test. My MCAT was below average, and yet 2 of my diplomas say I was academically successful in health sciences. I aced my GMAT, but  wasn't asked to be CEO of  Pfizer.  Gee. These  tests  didn't predict much with me, nor with my colleagues, nor with my classmates. They are  biased and serve only as a means of  managing the admissions process by providing  the necessary legal excuse for non admission.

 

Defending Hogg is exactly the kind of rabbit hole NRA flunkies want you to go into, because that then replaces any debate on the merits of gun control—a debate they can’t win.

 

The only reason to indiscriminately fling poop at these kids is because they have no valid arguments against the teenagers’ proposals.

[utalkin2me]

Yeah, I too think what is clearly happening here is the right just has to lash out and counteract any leftist argument, if you can even call this one leftist. 

 

Its very hard to argue against things like banning bump stocks though. The demands from the kids aren’t unreasonable at all. Not knowing what else to do, these hosts freak out and attack kids on a personal level. In this case, the more objective advertisers see that’s its wrong, so it is very hard to argue that these personal attacks are justified in any way. It’s just a smokescreen to cover the fact that there are real issues here, and there are very viable solutions that don’t have good counter arguments. Who is against banning bump stocks for example? It seems Ingraham in this case is too busy to address that question, being so concerned with a teenager’s gpa. 

Edited April 2, 2018 by utalkin2me

[cabinfever]

Nor everyone is abandoning her:

Russian bots are rallying behind embattled Fox News host Laura Ingraham as advertisers dump her show

• Russia-linked Twitter accounts are rallying in support of Fox News host Laura Ingraham after she drew scorn for mocking Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg's grades on Twitter.
• According to one website that tracks Russian propaganda on Twitter in near-real time, the hashtag #istandwithlaura saw a 2800% jump in 48 hours.
• Another website that monitors Russia's disinformation campaign found that @ingrahamangle, @davidhogg111, and @foxnews were among the top six Twitter handles that Russia-linked accounts have tweeted at in the last 24 hours.

http://www.businessinsider.com/russian-bots-support-fox-news-host-laura-ingraham-amid-advertiser-exodus-2018-3

[jobwolf]

On ‎3‎/‎30‎/‎2018 at 9:08 AM, mok199 said:

I think her and Hannity make a perfect couple...

At Fox they are all so like each other, they must be from the same Back wood village

somewhere in L.........!

[jobwolf]

On ‎4‎/‎2‎/‎2018 at 10:03 AM, Thakkar said:

 

They foresaw this before any of us:

 

 

 

Oh Boy, she got the angle wrong!    

[jobwolf]

On ‎4‎/‎2‎/‎2018 at 10:29 AM, geriatrickid said:

Reaching for anything to justify the wrongful acts of the grownups aren't you?

Yes, let's go and search for the ramblings of an adolescent boy when he was aged 15, 16 and see what we can find.  There is a big difference between a  kid  growing up and going through the teenage angst that all boys of that age go through and a near 50 year old religious zealot who condemns everyone, spews hate and encourages negativity.  Show me one normal well adjusted boy who didn't have disagreements with his parents. There's a big difference between that and the  venom Ingraham spits.  You are defending the indefensible .  The high priestess of hatred came up against someone who  said no.

Turning point. You will see that those who are decent and moral will not accept Ingraham's malicious and hurtful actions.

 

And by the way, my SAT score was below the UCLA  cut off as well. Oddly enough, I  attended 3 universities all ranked in the top 10 of my country and  highly ranked in the world. I also managed to graduate with a lot of fancy paper and get several well paying jobs. SAT scores just show if someone can write a test. My MCAT was below average, and yet 2 of my diplomas say I was academically successful in health sciences. I aced my GMAT, but  wasn't asked to be CEO of  Pfizer.  Gee. These  tests  didn't predict much with me, nor with my colleagues, nor with my classmates. They are  biased and serve only as a means of  managing the admissions process by providing  the necessary legal excuse for non admission.

I hope this is not geriatrics wife on his profile. Her picture and his name would explain a lot.

Now we know what fancy Universities can do, if geriatric ever visited one, be it just on a sight seeing tour.

[Jingthing]

New sponsors are stepping up to the plate! 

 

Quote

 

Fox’s Laura Ingraham is hemorrhaging advertisers. SNL found some eager replacements.

• Carl’s Sr.: “Leftover Carl’s Jr. Food ground to mush for old people.”
• Lady Bump Stock: “The lightweight bump stocks for delicate hands.” ...
• Cream soda: “The soda for whites. You got the white one, baby.”

 

 

 

http://www.paywallnews.com/news/Fox’s-Laura-Ingraham-is-hemorrhaging-advertisers--SNL-found-some-eager-replacements-.BymsxIbbhf.html

[utalkin2me]

14 hours ago, Jingthing said:

New sponsors are stepping up to the plate! 

 

 

 

http://www.paywallnews.com/news/Fox’s-Laura-Ingraham-is-hemorrhaging-advertisers--SNL-found-some-eager-replacements-.BymsxIbbhf.html

lol 

Edited April 16, 2018 by utalkin2me

[scorecard]

3 hours ago, utalkin2me said:

lol 

Maybe new sponsors are stepping up to the plate but that doesn't mean they are moral and ethical and respect all others. 

[thaibeachlovers]

On ‎4‎/‎1‎/‎2018 at 6:35 PM, brewsterbudgen said:

She's on "holiday" for a week. Whether it's a permanent holiday like O'Reilly or she weathers the storm like Hannity and returns, remains to be seen.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Her holiday was planned before the present kerfuffle and she's back. Seems to have plenty of advertisers still.